Previous Cultural Resources Investigations Sample Clauses

Previous Cultural Resources Investigations. Numerous cultural resources investigations, including pedestrian survey, subsurface testing, and excavation, have occurred in the general Project area over the past four decades. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) conducted cultural resources investigations in 1979 to locate and map historic and cemetery sites eligible for selection by the Cook Inlet Region, Inc. (CIRI), under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) 14(h)(1) (Fall and Xxxxx 1980). Other BIA ANCSA surveys in the area were conducted by Xxxxx (1988) and Kent (1995a, 1995b). The United States Forest Service (Forest Service) and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) have conducted cultural resources investigations, including excavation, on lands under their respective jurisdictions (e.g., Matson 1988; Xxxxxx 1991; Xxxxxx 1996, 1998; Xxxxxxx 1998, 2000; Xxxxxx 2002a, 2002b; Forest Service 2002). The State of Alaska OHA first conducted cultural resources investigations for proposed realignments of the Sterling Highway in 1978 (Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx 1980) and 1979 (Xxxxxxxxx 1981). DOT&PF contracted subsequent cultural resources investigations in the Project area in 1983 (Xxxxxxxxxx 1983), and then again, by the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Survey (ADGGS) or the OHA, every year between 1984 and 1989 (Xxxxxx 1985; Xxxxxx 1985; Xxxx et al. 1987; XxXxxxx et al. 1991). Surveys specific to NEPA alternative alignments were commissioned as the environmental process continued to its present status. The Juneau Creek Alternative was surveyed by the OHA in 2000 (Xxxxxx 2000), and several DOT&PF-sponsored surveys have occurred within the Project area over the past decade (e.g., Xxxxx 2004a). The majority of the G South Alternative was surveyed by Cultural Resources Consultants, LLC (CRC), in 2005 and 2009 (Xxxxxxxxx et al. 2010). CRC also conducted determinations of eligibility (DOEs) for sites within the Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Mining Claims Historic District (SEW-01268; Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxx 2007), and for additions to the Sqilantnu Archaeological District (XXX-00156/SEW-00282; Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxx 2005b). HDR Alaska, Inc. (HDR) conducted a small survey of the approximately 20 acres of the G South Alignment in 2014 to explore avoidance options of the New Village Site (Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxx 2014). In 2016, HDR cultural resources specialists surveyed 74 acres of land within the G South Alternative that had not been previously investigated (Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxxx 2016). A summa...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Previous Cultural Resources Investigations

  • Cultural Resources If a cultural resource is discovered, the Purchaser shall immediately suspend all operations in the vicinity of the cultural resource and notify the Forest Officer. Operations may only resume if authorized by the Forest Officer. Cultural resources identified and protected elsewhere in this contract are exempted from this clause. Cultural resources, once discovered or identified, are not to be disturbed by the Purchaser, or his, her or its employees and/or sub- contractors.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Compensation Complaints All complaints involving or concerning the payment of compensation shall be initially filed in writing with the Human Resources Director. Only complaints which allege that employees are not being compensated in accordance with the provisions of this MOU shall be considered as grievances. Any other matters of compensation are to be resolved in the meeting and conferring process, if not detailed in the MOU which results from such meeting and conferring process shall be deemed withdrawn until the meeting and conferring process is next opened for such discussion. No adjustment shall be retroactive for more than two (2) years from the date upon which the complaint was filed.

  • Natural Resources Protecting America’s great outdoors and natural resources.

  • Quality Assurance Plan The contractor shall develop and submit to NMFS a contractor Quality Assurance Plan, as referenced in Section F.5.3, which details how the contractor will ensure effectiveness and efficiency of collection efforts as well as the quality of data collected by its At-Sea Monitors. The contractor shall further establish, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance Management program to ensure consistent quality of all work products and services performed under this contract.

  • Clinical Management for Behavioral Health Services (CMBHS) System The CMBHS is the official record of documentation by System Agency. Grantee shall:

  • Additional Resources The WLSC may establish workgroups that include other department representatives and/or subject matter experts. These subcommittees will conform with rules established by the WLSC.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Resourcing 5.1. NHS England may, at its discretion provide support or staff to the CCG. NHS England may, when exercising such discretion, take into account, any relevant factors (including without limitation the size of the CCG, the number of Primary Medical Services Contracts held and the need for the Local NHS England Team to continue to deliver the Reserved Functions).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.