Principles of decision making (TWP 1 Sample Clauses

Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) An Industry Specification Group shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an Industry Specification Group meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG Member, one vote. ISG Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG Budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG QSC Agreement, (ii) Additional Costs under Article 3.1(c) of the ISG QSC Agreement, and (iii) the allocation of costs among members of the ISG QSC under Article 3.2 of the ISG QSC Agreement, require unanimous support of the ISG QSC Members. For all other decisions, except for the appointment of officials of the ISG QSC, a proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast. For interpreting the result of an election for an official of the Industry Specification Group, a simple majority of the votes cast shall be used (see 1.3 below).
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 1) An Industry Specification Group shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI deliverables and the adoption of Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an Industry Specification Group meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman using the individual weighting of each ETSI full or associate member as described in Article 11 of the Rules of Procedure. A proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast. If a proposal fails to achieve 71 %, the result shall be re-calculated using the votes of ETSI full members only. If the re-calculated result achieves 71 %, the proposal shall be deemed to be approved For interpreting the result of an election for an official of the Industry Specification Group, a simple majority of the votes cast shall be used (see 3.6.3.1.3 below).
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG NGP shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG NGP meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG NGP Member, one vote. ISG NGP Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG NGP budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG NGP Member Agreement, (ii) Additional Costs under Article 3.1(c) of the ISG NGP Member Agreement, and (iii) the allocation of costs among ISG NGP Members under Article 3.2 of the ISG NGP Member Agreement, require unanimous support. For all other decisions, except for the appointment of officials of the ISG NGP, a proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast by the ISG NGP Members are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast.
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG MBC shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Reports. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG MBC meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG MBC Member, one vote. ISG MBC Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG MBC budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG MBC Member Agreement, (ii) Additional Costs under Article 3.1(c) of the ISG MBC Member Agreement, and (iii) the allocation of costs among ISG MBC Members under Article 3.2 of the ISG MBC Member Agreement, require unanimous support. For all other decisions, except for the appointment of officials of the ISG MBC, a proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast by the ISG MBC Members are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast.
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. .7.1) The ISG SMT shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI deliverables and the adoption of Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG SMT meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG SMT member, one vote. ISG SMT participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG SMT budget under Article Error! Reference source not found. of the ISG SMT Member Agreement, (ii) Additional Costs under Article Error! Reference source not found. of the ISG SMT Member Agreement, and (iii) the allocation of costs among members of the ISG SMT under Article Error! Reference source not found. of the ISG SMT Member Agreement, require unanimous support. Otherwise, a proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast.
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG CCM shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG CCM meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG CCM Member, one vote. ISG CCM Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG CCM budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG CCM Member Agreement,
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG MBC shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Reports. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG MBC meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG MBC Member, one vote. ISG MBC Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG MBC budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG MBC Member Agreement,
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG NGP shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG NGP meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG NGP Member, one vote. ISG NGP Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG NGP budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG NGP Member Agreement,
Sample 1

Related to Principles of decision making (TWP 1

  • Resolution of Conflicts; Arbitration (i) In case the Shareholder Representative shall object in writing to any claim or claims made in any Officer's Certificate within thirty (30) days after delivery of such Officer's Certificate, the Shareholder Representative and Parent shall attempt in good faith to agree upon the rights of the respective parties with respect to each of such claims. If the Shareholder Representative and Parent should so agree, a memorandum setting forth such agreement shall be prepared and signed by both parties. If any claim against the Escrow Fund was sought, such memorandum shall be furnished to the Escrow Agent and the Escrow Agent shall be entitled to rely on any such memorandum and make payment out of the Escrow Fund in accordance with the terms thereof. (ii) If no such agreement can be reached after good faith negotiation (or in any event after 60 days from the date of the Officer's Certificate), either Parent or the Shareholder Representative may demand arbitration of the matter unless the amount of the damage or loss is at issue in pending litigation with a third party, in which event arbitration shall not be commenced until such amount is ascertained or both parties agree to arbitration; and in either such event the matter shall be settled by arbitration conducted by three arbitrators. Parent and the Shareholder Representative shall each select one arbitrator, and the two arbitrators so selected shall select a third arbitrator. The arbitrators shall set a limited time period and establish procedures designed to reduce the cost and time for discovery while allowing the parties an opportunity, adequate in the sole judgment of the arbitrators, to discover relevant information from the opposing parties about the subject matter of the dispute. The arbitrators shall rule upon motions to compel or limit discovery and shall have the authority to impose sanctions, including attorneys' fees and costs, to the same extent as a court of law or equity, should the arbitrators determine that discovery was sought without substantial justification or that discovery was refused or objected to without substantial justification. The decision of a majority of the three arbitrators as to the validity and amount of any claim in such Officer's Certificate shall be binding and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in Section 7.2(e) hereof, the Escrow Agent shall be entitled to act in accordance with such decision and make or withhold payments out of the Escrow Fund in accordance therewith. Such decision shall be written and shall be supported by written findings of fact and conclusions which shall set forth the award, judgment, decree or order awarded by the arbitrators. (iii) Judgment upon any award rendered by the arbitrators may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. Any such arbitration shall be held in Santa Xxxxx County, California under the rules then in effect of the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrators shall determine how all expenses relating to the arbitration shall be paid, including without limitation, the respective expenses of each party, the fees of each arbitrator and the administrative fee of the American Arbitration Association.

  • Resolution of Disputes Choice of Law (a) This Transition Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to the principles of conflicts of law. (b) All suits, actions or proceedings arising out of or relating to this Transition Agreement shall be brought in a state or federal court located in San Francisco County, California, which courts shall be the exclusive forum for all such suits, actions or proceedings. Executive and the Company hereby waive any objection which either of Executive may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue in any such court, including any claim based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens or any similar doctrine, for any such suit, action or proceeding. Executive and the Company each hereby irrevocably consent and submit to the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts located in San Francisco County, California for the purposes of any suit, action or proceeding arising out of relating to this Transition Agreement. If any action is necessary to enforce the terms of this Transition Agreement, the substantially prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses in addition to any other relief to which such prevailing party may be entitled (c) EXECUTIVE AND THE COMPANY EACH HEREBY WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING UNDER THIS TRANSITION AGREEMENT OR RELATED IN ANY WAY TO EXECUTIVE’S EMPLOYMENT AND/OR TO THE TERMINATION OF EXECUTIVE’S EMPLOYMENT AND AGREE THAT ANY SUCH SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE TRIED BEFORE A COURT AND NOT BEFORE A JURY.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Effect of Decision The decision or award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the University, the UFF, and the grievant, provided that either party may appeal to an appropriate court of law a decision that was rendered by the arbitrator acting outside of or beyond the arbitrator's jurisdiction, pursuant to Section 682.13, Florida Statutes.

  • Chief Executive Office; Change of Name; Jurisdiction of Organization (a) The exact legal name, type of organization, jurisdiction of organization, federal taxpayer identification number, organizational identification number and chief executive office of such Grantor is indicated next to its name in Sections I.A. and I.B. of the Perfection Certificate. Such Grantor shall furnish to the Collateral Agent prompt written notice of any change in (i) its corporate name, (ii) the location of its chief executive office, its principal place of business, any office in which it maintains books or records relating to Collateral owned by it or any office or facility at which Collateral owned by it is located (including the establishment of any such new office or facility), (iii) its identity or type of organization or corporate structure, (iv) its federal taxpayer identification number or organizational identification number or (v) its jurisdiction of organization (in each case, including, without limitation, by merging with or into any other entity, reorganizing, dissolving, liquidating, reincorporating or incorporating in any other jurisdiction). Such Grantor agrees (A) not to effect or permit any such change unless all filings have been made under the UCC or otherwise that are required in order for the Collateral Agent to continue at all times following such change to have a valid, legal and perfected first priority security interest in all the Collateral (subject to, with respect to priority, Permitted Encumbrances having priority by operation of law) and (B) to take all action reasonably satisfactory to the Collateral Agent to maintain the perfection and priority of the security interest of the Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Credit Parties in the Collateral intended to be granted hereunder. Each Grantor agrees to promptly provide the Collateral Agent with certified Organization Documents reflecting any of the changes described in the preceding sentence. (b) The Collateral Agent may rely on opinions of counsel as to whether any or all UCC financing statements of the Grantors need to be amended as a result of any of the changes described in SECTION 4.3(a). If any Grantor fails to provide information to the Collateral Agent about such changes on a timely basis, the Collateral Agent shall not be liable or responsible to any party for any failure to maintain a perfected security interest in such Grantor’s property constituting Collateral, for which the Collateral Agent needed to have information relating to such changes. The Collateral Agent shall have no duty to inquire about such changes if any Grantor does not inform the Collateral Agent of such changes, the parties acknowledging and agreeing that it would not be feasible or practical for the Collateral Agent to search for information on such changes if such information is not provided by any Grantor.

  • Negotiation; Alternative Dispute Resolution The Parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating to the performance of services under this Agreement. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute, then, pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code Section 21.36, Contractor may submit to the Contracting Officer a written request for administrative review and documentation of the Contractor's claim(s). Upon such request, the Contracting Officer shall promptly issue an administrative decision in writing, stating the reasons for the action taken and informing the Contractor of its right to judicial review. If agreed by both Parties in writing, disputes may be resolved by a mutually agreed-upon alternative dispute resolution process. If the parties do not mutually agree to an alternative dispute resolution process or such efforts do not resolve the dispute, then either Party may pursue any remedy available under California law. The status of any dispute or controversy notwithstanding, Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with the Agreement and the written directions of the City. Neither Party will be entitled to legal fees or costs for matters resolved under this section.

  • Dispute Resolution Mandatory Arbitration Class Action Waiver SAMPLE (a) Claims Subject to Arbitration. Except as expressly provided below, the parties agree that to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any dispute arising out of or relating in any way to this Agreement or a similar prior agreement, the Property or the relationship between Resident and Owner or Manager (including matters occurring prior to the date of this Agreement and disputes also involving third parties) (collectively, “Claims”) will, at the election of either party, be resolved by arbitration, including any dispute about arbitrability, such as scope and enforceability.

  • COURT'S DECISION 33.01 In the event of any articles or portions of this Agreement being held improper or invalid by any Court of Law or Labour Relations Board, such decision shall not invalidate any other portions of this Agreement than those directly specified by such decision to be invalid, improper or otherwise unenforceable.

  • Accounting Decisions All decisions as to accounting principles, except as specifically provided to the contrary herein, shall be made by the General Partner.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!