Principles of decision making (TWP 1 Sample Clauses

Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) An Industry Specification Group shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI deliverables and the adoption of Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an Industry Specification Group meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman using the individual weighting of each ETSI full or associate member as described in Article 11 of the Rules of Procedure. A proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast. If a proposal fails to achieve 71 %, the result shall be re-calculated using the votes of ETSI full members only. If the re-calculated result achieves 71 %, the proposal shall be deemed to be approved For interpreting the result of an election for an official of the Industry Specification Group, a simple majority of the votes cast shall be used (see 3.6.3.1.3 below).
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) An Industry Specification Group shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an Industry Specification Group meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG Member, one vote. ISG Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning
Sample 1Sample 2
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG NGP shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG NGP meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG NGP Member, one vote. ISG NGP Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG NGP budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG NGP Member Agreement, (ii) Additional Costs under Article 3.1(c) of the ISG NGP Member Agreement, and (iii) the allocation of costs among ISG NGP Members under Article 3.2 of the ISG NGP Member Agreement, require unanimous support. For all other decisions, except for the appointment of officials of the ISG NGP, a proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast by the ISG NGP Members are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast.
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG CCM shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG CCM meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG CCM Member, one vote. ISG CCM Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG CCM budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG CCM Member Agreement,
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG MBC shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Reports. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG MBC meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG MBC Member, one vote. ISG MBC Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG MBC budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG MBC Member Agreement,
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG NGP shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG NGP meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG NGP Member, one vote. ISG NGP Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG NGP budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG NGP Member Agreement,
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG CCM shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG CCM meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG CCM Member, one vote. ISG CCM Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG CCM budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG CCM Member Agreement, (ii) Additional Costs under Article 3.1(c) of the ISG CCM Member Agreement, and (iii) the allocation of costs among ISG CCM Members under Article 3.2 of the ISG CCM Member Agreement, require unanimous support. For all other decisions, except for the appointment of officials of the ISG CCM, a proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast by the ISG CCM Members are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. 7.1) The ISG MBC shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI Group Reports. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG MBC meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG MBC Member, one vote. ISG MBC Participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG MBC budget under Article 3.1(b) of the ISG MBC Member Agreement, (ii) Additional Costs under Article 3.1(c) of the ISG MBC Member Agreement, and (iii) the allocation of costs among ISG MBC Members under Article 3.2 of the ISG MBC Member Agreement, require unanimous support. For all other decisions, except for the appointment of officials of the ISG MBC, a proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast by the ISG MBC Members are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast.
Sample 1
Principles of decision making (TWP 1. .7.1) The ISG SMT shall endeavour to reach Consensus on all issues, including the approval of draft ETSI deliverables and the adoption of Group Specifications. If Consensus cannot be achieved, the Chairman can decide to take a vote which may be performed by a secret ballot. A vote may be conducted during an ISG SMT meeting or by correspondence. Where voting is used, vote results shall be evaluated by the Chairman on the basis of one ISG SMT member, one vote. ISG SMT participants do not have the right to vote. Decisions concerning (i) the ISG SMT budget under Article Error! Reference source not found. of the ISG SMT Member Agreement, (ii) Additional Costs under Article Error! Reference source not found. of the ISG SMT Member Agreement, and (iii) the allocation of costs among members of the ISG SMT under Article Error! Reference source not found. of the ISG SMT Member Agreement, require unanimous support. Otherwise, a proposal shall be deemed to be approved if 71 % of the votes cast are in favour. Abstentions or failure to submit a vote shall not be included in determining the number of votes cast.
Sample 1

Related to Principles of decision making (TWP 1

  • Principles of cooperation The Parties shall apply the following principles to cooperation activities covered by this Agreement:

  • Shared Decision Making 33-1 Purpose The purpose of a shared decision making program is to create an atmosphere in which decision making is a collegial, shared, process that fosters an exchange of ideas and information necessary for effective professional practice and for improved student performance. The Association and District agree to continue pursuing jointly the implementation of legitimately recognized school councils as a foundation of a shared decision-making program. All provisions of this Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect throughout the process.

  • PRINCIPLES OF COLLABORATION The parties agree to adopt the following principles when carrying out the Project (Principles):

  • Resolution of Disputes Choice of Law (a) This Transition Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.

  • Principles of Interpretation and Definitions (1) The singular includes the plural and the plural the singular. The pronouns “it” and “its” include the masculine and feminine. References to statutes or regulations include all statutory or regulatory provisions consolidating, amending, or replacing the statute or regulation. References to contracts and agreements shall be deemed to include all amendments to them. The words “include,” “including,” etc. mean include, including, etc. without limitation. (2) References to a “Section” or “section” shall mean a section of this contract. (3) “Contract” and “Agreement,” whether or not capitalized, refer to this instrument.

  • GOVERNING LAW, JURISDICTION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION The rights and obligations of the Parties under the Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of India. The TDSAT, to the exclusion of all other courts, shall have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of any dispute between the Parties arising out of or in connection with or as a result of this Agreement.

  • Principles of Interpretation The following principles of interpretation apply to this Settlement Agreement:

  • Dispute Resolution; Governing Law Any litigation or other dispute resolution between You and Apple arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the Apple Software, or Your relationship with Apple will take place in the Northern District of California, and You and Apple hereby consent to the personal jurisdiction of and exclusive venue in the state and federal courts within that District with respect any such litigation or dispute resolution. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the United States and the State of California, except that body of California law concerning conflicts of law. Notwithstanding the foregoing:

  • Dispute Resolution, Governing Law and Jurisdiction The parties will make good faith efforts to first resolve internally within 30 days any dispute, including over an invoice, relating to the Agreement by escalating it to higher levels of management. If Client withholds an amount more than sixty days Accenture will be permitted to suspend performance until such time as the matter in dispute is resolved. The governing law and jurisdiction are set forth in the Order Form.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.