PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES Sample Clauses

PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New Zealand’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Product certification bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45011 or ISO Guides 28 and 40, and either: 1. The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Inspection bodies operating in accordance with the requirements of EN 45004 or ISO Guide 39, and either: — accredited by NATA, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. (b) Testing laboratories operating according to the requirements of EN 45001 or ISO Guide 25, and either: — accredited by NATA, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement. The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement: (a) Testing laboratories: — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Calibration and Testing, or — recognised within the IECE CB scheme, or — able to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme. (b) Certification bodies — accredited by accreditation bodies which are signatories to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Certification — membership of the IECEE CB scheme — accredited by an accreditation body with which XXX-ANZ has a mutual recognition agreement, or — able to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Union’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Union in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New Zealand’s requirements
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by New Zealand in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against New Zealand’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives, and are designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) For the purposes of Article 10(5) of Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility, Inspection Bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45004 or ISO Guide 39, and either: 1. The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II must meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: — Product certification bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45011 or ISO Guides 28 and 40. — Quality system certification bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45012 or ISO Guide 62. — Inspection bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45004 or ISO Guide 39. Conformity assessment bodies will be designated in accordance with the procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. Conformity assessment bodies which are Notified Bodies under Annex XI of Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices or Annex VIII of Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medicinal devices in conjunction with Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives shall be presumed competent to carry out conformity assessment to Australian requirements for those devices and procedures for which they have been correspondingly notified by their competent authorities in Europe.
Sample 1Sample 2
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements The conformity assessment bodies listed in Section II will meet the requirements of the Directives listed in Section I, taking into account Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation directives and be designated on the basis of the procedures defined in the Annex to the Agreement. This may be demonstrated through: (a) Product Certification Bodies operating according to the requirements of EN 45011 or ISO Guides 28 and 40, and either: The procedures for designating conformity assessment bodies will be consistent with the principles and procedures set out in the Annex to the Agreement. (a) Testing laboratories: The following procedures are deemed to be consistent with those set out in the Annex to the Agreement: — accreditation by an accreditation body which is a signatory to the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA) Multilateral Agreement on Calibration and Testing, or — accredited by XXX-ANZ, or — ability to demonstrate competence under an equivalent accreditation scheme. — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement.
Sample 1
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. SECTION V: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
Sample 1
PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES. The procedures to be followed by Australia in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against the European Community’s requirements The procedures to be followed by the European Community in designating conformity assessment bodies to assess products against Australia’s requirements (b) For competent bodies according to Article 10(2) of Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility, testing laboratories operating according to the requirements of EN 45001 or ISO Guide 25, and either: — accredited by NATA, or — able to demonstrate competence by other means in accordance with Sections A and B of the Annex to the Agreement.
Sample 1

Related to PROCEDURES FOR DESIGNATING CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Instructions for Operators This agreement is intended to be provided to an Operator from a LEA. The Operator should fully read the agreement and is requested to complete the below areas of the agreement. Once the Operator accepts the terms of the agreement, the Operator should wet sign the agreement and return it to the LEA. Once the LEA signs the agreement, the LEA should provide a signed copy of the agreement to the Operator. Cover Page Box # 3 Official Name of Operator Cover Page Box # 4 Date Signed by Operator Recitals Box #5 Contract Title for Service Agreement Recitals Box #6 Date of Service Agreement Article 7 Boxes #7-10 Operator’s designated representative Signature Page Boxes #15-19 Authorized Operator’s representative signature Exhibit A Box #25 Description of services provided Exhibit B All Applicable Boxes  Operator notates if data is collected to provide the described services.  Defines the schedule of data required for the Operator to provide the services outlined in Exhibit A Exhibit D All Applicable Boxes (Optional Exhibit): Defines deletion or return of data expectations by LEA Exhibit E All Applicable Boxes (Optional Exhibit): Operator may, by signing the Form of General Offer of Privacy Terms (General Offer, attached as Exhibit E), be bound by the terms of this DPA to any other Subscribing LEA who signs the acceptance in said Exhibit. Exhibit F Boxes # 25-29 A list of all Subprocessors used by the Operator to perform functions pursuant to the Service Agreement, list security programs and measures, list Operator’s security measures

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Procedures for Providing NP Through Full NXX Code Migration Where a Party has activated an entire NXX for a single Customer, or activated at least eighty percent (80%) of an NXX for a single Customer, with the remaining numbers in that NXX either reserved for future use by that Customer or otherwise unused, if such Customer chooses to receive Telephone Exchange Service from the other Party, the first Party shall cooperate with the second Party to have the entire NXX reassigned in the LERG (and associated industry databases, routing tables, etc.) to an End Office operated by the second Party. Such transfer will be accomplished with appropriate coordination between the Parties and subject to appropriate industry lead times for movements of NXXs from one switch to another. Neither Party shall charge the other in connection with this coordinated transfer.

  • OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB) AUDIT REQUIREMENTS The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in 2 CFR 200.

  • PROFESSIONAL GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE A. Any claim by the Association or a teacher that there has been a violation, misinterpretation, or misapplication of the terms of the Agreement or violation of any established policy shall be a grievance and shall be resolved through the procedure set forth herein. B. In the event that a teacher, or the Association believes there is a basis for a grievance, the teacher or representative of the Association within thirty (30) working days of the time the teacher knew of the circumstances giving rise to the grievance, shall first discuss the alleged grievance with the building principal either personally or accompanied by the Association Representative. The grievance process may begin at the Superintendent’s level when the building principal is not involved with an alleged incident. C. If, as a result of the informal discussion with the building principal, a grievance still exists, the teacher or representative of the Association may, within ten (10) working days, invoke the formal grievance procedure through the Association on the grievance report form, signed by the grievant and a representative of the Association. Said form shall be available from the Association Representative in each building. A copy of the grievance form shall be delivered to the building principal, it may be filed with the Superintendent or a representative designated by him. D. Within five (5) working days of receipt of the grievance the principal shall meet with the Association in an effort to resolve the grievance. The principal shall indicate his/her disposition of the grievance in writing within five (5) working days of such meeting and shall furnish a copy thereof to the Association. If the Association desires to proceed to the next step, it shall do so within fifteen (15) calendar days of the principal’s disposition. E. If the Association is not satisfied with the disposition of the grievance, or if no disposition has been made within five (5) working days of such meeting (or ten [10] working days from the date of filing, whichever shall be later) the grievance shall be transmitted to the Superintendent. Within seven (7) working days the Superintendent or his/her designee, shall meet with the Association concerning the grievance and shall indicate his/her disposition of the grievance in writing within five (5) working days of such meeting, and shall furnish a copy thereof to the Association. F. If the Association is not satisfied with the disposition of the superintendent, or if no disposition has been received within five (5) working days of such meeting the Association may proceed to a Board Level Hearing. This grievance hearing shall be heard in closed session, so long as it does not violate the open meetings act. If the grievance is not settled at the preceding step, it may be submitted to binding arbitration. Within fifteen (15) working days of the receipt of the Superintendent’s answer, the party choosing to arbitrate must give written notice to the other party, setting forth specifically the nature of the dispute to be arbitrated. The charging party shall file a Demand for Arbitration with the American Arbitration Association within fifteen (15) days from the notification date that arbitration will be pursued. The arbitrator shall be selected by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its rules, which shall likewise govern the arbitration proceedings. G. The arbitrator shall have no power to rule on any of the following: 1. The termination of services of or failure to re-employ any probationary teacher. 2. Any claim or complaint for which there is another remedial procedure or forum established by law or by regulation having the force of law, including any matter subject to the procedures specified in the Teacher’s Tenure Act (Act IV Public Acts, Extra Session of 1937 of Michigan, as amended). 3. Any matter involving the content of a teacher evaluation. H. The Board and the Association shall not be permitted to assert in such arbitration proceedings any ground or to rely on any evidence not previously disclosed to the other party. The arbitrator shall have no power to alter, add to, or subtract from the terms of this Agreement. Both parties agree to be bound by the decision of the arbitrator and agree that judgment thereon may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. I. The fees and expense of the arbitrator shall be shared equally by both parties. J. The time limits provided in this Article shall be strictly observed but may be extended by written agreement of the parties. In the event a grievance is filed after May 15 of any year and strict adherence to the time limits may result in hardship to any party, the Board shall use its best efforts to process such grievance prior to the end of the school term or as soon thereafter as possible.

  • Auction Schedule; Method of Submission of Orders (a) The Funds and the Auction Agent shall conduct Auctions for each series of Preferred Shares in accordance with the schedule set forth below. Such schedule may be changed at any time by the Auction Agent with the consent of the Fund, which consent shall not be withheld unreasonably. The Auction Agent shall give notice of any such change to BD. Such notice shall be received prior to the first Auction Date on which any such change shall be effective. Time Event ---- ----- By 9:30 A.M. Auction Agent advises the Funds and the Broker-Dealers of the Maximum Rate as set forth in Section 3.2(a) hereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!