Procedures for the Imposition of Sanctions Sample Clauses

Procedures for the Imposition of Sanctions. (a) Definition of “
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Procedures for the Imposition of Sanctions. 48 (a) Sanction of Oral Reprimand. The sanction of oral reprimand may be imposed by the appropriate 49 administrative officer if the officer believes that there is just cause to warrant the sanction. The 1 sanction of oral reprimand must be imposed within sixty (60) working days of the appropriate 4 (b) Sanction of Oral Reprimand with Notation to File. The sanction of oral reprimand with notation to 5 file may be imposed by an administrative officer if there is just cause to warrant the sanction. The 6 sanction of oral reprimand with notation to file must be imposed within forty-five (45) working days of 7 the appropriate administrator’s knowledge of the act, failure to perform, or condition on which the
Sample 1
Procedures for the Imposition of Sanctions. Sanction of Oral Reprimand. The sanction of oral reprimand may be imposed by the appropriate administrative officer if he/she believes that there is cause to warrant the sanction. The sanction of oral reprimand shall be imposed within ninety (90) days of the appropriate administrator’s knowledge of the act, failure to perform, or condition on which the sanction is based. Sanction of Oral Reprimand with Notation to File. The sanction of oral reprimand with notation to file may be imposed by the appropriate administrative officer if he/she believes that there is cause to warrant the sanction. The sanction or oral reprimand with notation to file shall be imposed within (90) days of the appropriate administrator’s knowledge of the act, failure to perform, or condition on which the sanction is based. After twelve (12) calendar months from the date of an oral reprimand with notation to file, if no further sanction has been imposed against a faculty member regarding this specific sanction, the notation shall be removed from the member’s file. Sanctions More Severe than Oral Reprimand. Complaints alleging that a faculty member has engaged in conduct such as to warrant the imposition of sanctions more severe than oral reprimand shall be filed with the President of the University or a designee. Such complaints shall be in writing and shall state specifically the facts believed to constitute the grounds for the imposition of such sanctions. Upon receiving such written complaint, the President or designee shall promptly refer it to an appropriate administrative officer and shall also have a copy of the written complaint delivered in person to the faculty member or sent by certified mail to a last known address. If the administrator finds that there is no basis for a sanction, the administrator shall notify affected parties thereby terminating the process. The administrative officer shall fully explore the possibility of a settlement mutually acceptable to the faculty member and the officer. If no mutual settlement is effected, the following procedures shall apply: Written Reprimand. If in the judgment of the administrative officer to whom the complaint has been referred, the preponderance of the evidence supports the complaint against the faculty member, the officer may determine that the imposition of a sanction of written reprimand is warranted. After thirty-six (36) calendar months year from the date of a written reprimand, if no further sanction has been imposed a...
Sample 1
Procedures for the Imposition of Sanctions 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (18)

Related to Procedures for the Imposition of Sanctions

  • Compliance with Executive Orders Concerning Ethics The Contractor warrants that he and his firm have complied in all respects with the Governor’s Executive Orders concerning ethics matters, including, but not limited to, Executive Order dated January 13, 2003 (establishing Code of Ethics for Executive Branch Officers and Employees, including provisions governing former officers and employees); Executive Order dated October 1, 2003 (governing vendors to state agencies and disclosure and registration of lobbyists); and O.C.G.A. Sections 21-5-70(5), 21-5-71 and 21-5-73, all as amended effective January 9, 2006 (requiring registration and disclosure filings by state agency vendor lobbyists). In this regard, the Contractor certifies that any lobbyist employed or retained by the Contractor or his firm has both registered and made the required disclosures required by the Executive Orders, as amended.

  • RECIPROCITY AND SANCTIONS PROVISIONS Bidders are hereby notified that if their principal place of business is located in a country, nation, province, state or political subdivision that penalizes New York State vendors, and if the goods or services they offer will be substantially produced or performed outside New York State, the Omnibus Procurement Xxx 0000 and 2000 amendments (Chapter 684 and Chapter 383, respectively) require that they be denied contracts which they would otherwise obtain. NOTE: As of May 15, 2002, the list of discriminatory jurisdictions subject to this provision includes the states of South Carolina, Alaska, West Virginia, Wyoming, Louisiana and Hawaii. Contact NYS Department of Economic Development for a current list of jurisdictions subject to this provision.

  • Compliance with Federal Regulations (1) Any contract entered pursuant to this solicitation shall contain the following provisions: All USDOT-required contractual provisions, as set forth in FTA Circular 4220.1F, are incorporated by reference. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, FTA mandated terms shall control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this Agreement. Contractor shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any grantee request that would cause the recipient to be in violation of FTA terms and conditions. Contractor shall comply with all applicable FTA regulations, policies, procedures and directives, including, without limitation, those listed directly or incorporated by reference in the Master Agreement between the recipient and FTA, as may be amended or promulgated from time to time during the term of this contract. Contractor’s failure to so comply shall constitute a material breach of this contract.

  • Compliance with Federal Law, Regulations, and Executive Orders This is an acknowledgement that FEMA financial assistance will be used to fund the contract only. The contractor will comply will all applicable federal law, regulations, executive orders, FEMA policies, procedures, and directives.

  • Penalties and Sanctions 7.1 The Scheduling Coordinator shall be subject to all penalties made applicable to Scheduling Coordinators set forth in the CAISO Tariff.

  • COMPLIANCE WITH TAX LAW SECTION 5-a The following provisions apply to Contractors that have entered into agreements in an amount exceeding $100,000 for the purchase of goods and services:

  • BREACH SANCTIONS 24 Failure by CONTRACTOR to comply with any of the provisions, covenants, 25 or conditions of this Agreement shall be a material breach of this Agreement. 26 In such event, ADMINISTRATOR may, and in addition to immediate termination and 27 any other remedies available at law, in equity, or otherwise specified in this

  • STRIKES AND SANCTIONS 19.1 The Association and the Board subscribe to the principle that differences shall be resolved by peaceful and appropriate means without interruption of the school program. The Association, therefore, agrees that it will not sponsor nor support any strike, sanction, work stoppage, or other concerted refusal to perform work by the teachers covered by this Agreement, nor any instigation thereof, during the life of this Agreement, nor shall the Board engage in any form of lockout against teachers.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!