Quality Assessment and Peer Review Sample Clauses

Quality Assessment and Peer Review. Resident shall be subject to and, to the extent requested by Baptist, participate in quality assessment, utilization management, and peer review procedures established by Baptist.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quality Assessment and Peer Review. 9.1 The MoJ has a policy requirement to improve the quality of medical reporting. MedCo is required by the MoJ to keep the quality of medical reports under review. Quality Assessment and/or Peer Review will be arranged through the expert audit and peer review (EAPR) sub- committee in order that MedCo may meet that requirement. 9.2 EAPR may carry out reviews of Case Data at any time and for any reason. Where EAPR, in its sole discretion, considers that issues arise from review, the IME will be contacted by EAPR and should co-operate with EAPR’s requests. 9.3 During the term of this User Agreement, MedCo may keep the quality of medical reports under review by way of: (a) Quality Assessment – in which the quality of the IME's reports is kept under review. Such review will include, but is not limited to, issues of the IME’s conduct where such issues have been raised with EAPR or are apparent from a review of the Case Data. Quality Assessment will include examination of the Case Data provided by the IME and, where appropriate, consideration of Anonymised copies of medical reports; (b) Peer Review – to be carried out by a panel of medical professionals experienced in conducting relevant medical legal work who report their findings to EAPR. The peer review will involve a review of the IME’s Anonymised medical reports to establish and ensure that the quality of the medical reports produced is of the highest standard. The identity of the IME will not be notified to the panel, and the identity of the members of the panel will not be notified to the IME; 9.4 Quality Assessment or Peer Review may result in the IME’s access to the Service being suspended in accordance with Clause 13 if EAPR considers this appropriate. The IME may also be required, at its own expense, to complete further training or other steps as assessed and advised by EAPR. 9.5 If MedCo concludes that the findings of the Quality Assessment or Peer Review are such that the IME should no longer be Accredited: (a) that will constitute a material breach of the XXXx obligations under this User Agreement; (b) MedCo will withdraw the IME’s Accredited status; and (c) MedCo will terminate this User Agreement forthwith in accordance with the termination procedure set out in Clause 14 of this Agreement.
Quality Assessment and Peer Review. 9.1 During the term of this Agreement MedCo may: (a) keep the quality of the IME's reports under review, such review will include issues of conduct, via assessment ("Quality Assessment") of the Case Data provided by the IME and where appropriate by considering Anonymised copies of medical reports; or (b) conduct Peer Reviews in order to establish and ensure that the quality of the medical reports produced is of the highest standard. 9.2 Peer Review and Quality Assessment will be arranged through the expert audit and peer review (EAPR) sub-committee and IME will, where appropriate and practicable as decided at MedCo's discretion, be provided with 14 days' notice of such review. A Quality Assessment or Peer Review may result in IME being required to complete further training or other steps as assessed and advised by the MedCo EAPR committee. 9.3 Should, following Quality Assessment or Peer Review, MedCo conclude that the IME's reports are not of an appropriate quality, such that IME should no longer be Accredited then that will constitute a material breach of the XXXx obligations under this Agreement and the Accreditation status will be withdrawn and the Agreement will be terminated forthwith in accordance with the termination procedure set out in clause 14 of this Agreement.

Related to Quality Assessment and Peer Review

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment and Prior Consultation Processor shall provide reasonable assistance to the Company with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with Supervising Authorities or other competent data privacy authorities, which Company reasonably considers to be required by article 35 or 36 of the GDPR or equivalent provisions of any other Data Protection Law, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Company Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, the Contracted Processors.

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum. b. The intending bidder or the Purchaser is responsible at own costs and expenses to make and shall be deemed to have carried out own search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification on all liabilities and encumbrances affecting the Property, the title particulars as well as the accuracy and correctness of the particulars and information provided. c. The Purchaser shall be deemed to purchase the Property in all respects subject thereto and shall also be deemed to have full knowledge of the state and condition of the Property regardless of whether or not the said search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification have been conducted. d. The Purchaser shall be deemed to have read, understood and accepted these Conditions of Sale prior to the auction and to have knowledge of all matters which would have been disclosed thereby and the Purchaser expressly warrants to the Assignee that the Purchaser has sought independent legal advice on all matters pertaining to this sale and has been advised by his/her/its independent legal advisor of the effect of all the Conditions of Sale. e. Neither the Assignee nor the Auctioneer shall be required or bound to inform the Purchaser of any such matters whether known to them or not and the Purchaser shall raise no enquiry, requisition or objection thereon or thereto.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • Rent Review 3.1 If the reference base used to compile the Index shall change after today’s date the figure taken to be shown in the Index after the change shall be the figure which would have been shown in the Index if the reference base current at today’s date had been retained 3.2 If it becomes impossible by reason of any change after today’s date in the methods used to compile the Index or for any other reason whatever to calculate the revised Rent by reference to the Index or if any dispute or question whatever shall arise between the parties with respect to the amount of the revised Rent or the determination of the revised Rent such matter shall at the option of the Landlord be determined by an independent valuer to be appointed either by agreement between the parties or in the absence of agreement by the President for the time being of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (or his duly appointed deputy or any person authorised by him to make appointments on his behalf) on the application of either party who shall have full power to determine on such dates as he shall deem apposite what would have been the increase in the Index had it continued on the same basis and in view of the information assumed to be available for the operation of this rent review or (if that determination shall also be impossible) shall determine a reasonable revised Rent for the Property on such dates having regard to the purposes and intent of the provisions in this Lease for the review of the Rent 4 The Landlord shall give written notice to the Tenant of the amount of the revised Rent and thereafter memoranda (in such form as the Landlord shall reasonably require) recording the amount of the revised Rent shall be signed by or on behalf of the Landlord and the Tenant and annexed to this Lease and the Counterpart thereof and the parties shall bear their own costs of this procedure 5 If the new Rent payable on and from any Review Date has not been agreed by that Review Date Rent shall thereafter be payable at the rate in force immediately before the Review Date and forthwith upon the revised Rent being ascertained the Tenant shall pay to the Landlord an amount representing the difference (“the Shortfall”) between:- 5.1 the amount of the yearly Rent which would have been payable for the period from that Review Date until the next payment date following the date of ascertainment if the revised Rent had been ascertained at that Review Date and 5.2 together with interest at the rate of 2% below the Interest Rate on the Shortfall calculated on a day to day basis upon those parts of the Shortfall which would have been payable if the revised Rent had been ascertained at that Review Date

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!