Quality Reporting System Sample Clauses

Quality Reporting System. (QRS-Plan Service); related to Attachment 7, Section 3.01. Specific measures noted in Appendix 1 to this Attachment 14. Quality and Network Management – (QRS); related to Attachment 7, Section 3.01 Expectation: Plan Service- CAHPS measure set summary (Product type reporting) 106.255% of total performance requirement expected. Performance Level: <50th PCT:105% penalty;51-75th PCT: no penalty; >75th PCT: 105% performance credit (vs. national HMO benchmark). Covered California – Final Health Plan Contract Attachments, May 620117, 2013 Attachment 14-8 3.65 eValue8 – specific to Attachment 7, Section 3.05 Expectation: Total Covered California eValue8 performance, 795.5 points total. 10% of total performance penalty at risk. Performance Level: < 40% of total points: 10% performance penalty. 40-74% of total points-no penalty. 75% or greater of total points: 10% performance credit. Covered California – Final Health Plan Contract Attachments, May 620117, 2013 Attachment 14-9 ATTACHMENTS TO COVERED CALIFORNIA QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN CONTRACT Covered California Performance Standards for Contractor Group 3 continued: Covered California Performance Standards Quality, Network Management and Delivery System Standards 0.0% of Performance Penalty or Credit for Measurement Year 2014 50% of Performance Penalty or Credit ThereafterQuality, Network Management and Delivery System Standards 50% of Performance Penalty or Credit
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quality Reporting System. (QRS)-) - Plan Service- CAHPS measure set summaryQuality and Network Management – QRS Expectation: Plan Service - CAHPS measure set summary (Product type reporting) - 10% of total performance requirement expected. Claims Processing Composite (CAHPS) Customer Service Composite (CAHPS) Plan Information on Costs Composite(CAHPS) Global Rating of Plan(CAHPS) *certain CAHPS measures may not be available for all Product Types
Quality Reporting System. (QRS) - Access to Care- HEDIS/CAHPS measure set summary
Quality Reporting System. (QRS-Plan Service); related to Attachment 7, Section 3.01. Specific measures noted in Appendix 1 to this Attachment 14. Quality and Network Management – (QRS); related to Attachment 7, Section 3.01 Expectation: Plan Service- CAHPS measure set summary (Product type reporting) 106.255% of total performance requirement expected. Performance Level: <50th PCT:105% penalty;51-75th PCT: no penalty; >75th PCT: 105% performance credit (vs. national HMO benchmark). 3.65 eValue8 – specific to Attachment 7, Section 3.05 Expectation: Total Covered California eValue8 performance, 795.5 points total. 10% of total performance penalty at risk. Performance Level: < 40% of total points: 10% performance penalty. 40-74% of total points-no penalty. 75% or greater of total points: 10% performance credit. Covered California Performance Standards for Contractor Group 3 continued: Covered California Performance Standards Quality, Network Management and Delivery System Standards 0.0% of Performance Penalty or Credit for Measurement Year 2014 50% of Performance Penalty or Credit ThereafterQuality, Network Management and Delivery System Standards 50% of Performance Penalty or Credit 3.75 6 Quality and Network Management- Health Status Assessment; Attachment 7, Section 3.06. Performance expectation to be determined in collaboration with QHPs based on 2014 measurement with Year 1- Track only; Year 2-3 performance measure based on Year 1 determined performance with preliminary target of exceeding QHP 50th percentile to avoid penalty NOTE: for 2014 measurement year/2015 penalty/credit assessment, track and report to QHPs only;5% penalty at risk thereafter (2015 measurement and beyond) 3.86 7 Quality and Network Management- Preventive Health and Wellness; Attachment 7, Section 4.01. Performance expectation to be determined in collaboration with QHPs based on 2014 measurement with preliminary target of exceeding QHP 50th percentile to avoid penalty NOTE: for 2014 measurement year/2015 penalty/credit assessment, track and report to QHPs only;5% penalty at risk thereafter (2015 measurement and beyond) Year 1- Track only; Year 2-3 performance measure based on Year 1 determined performance with preliminary target of exceeding QHP 50th percentile to avoid penalty 3.97 8 Quality and Network Management- New Care Models; Attachment 7, Section 5.02. Performance expectation to be determined in collaboration with QHPs based on 2014 measurement with preliminary target of exceeding QHP 50th percentile t...

Related to Quality Reporting System

  • Diversity Reporting Upon request, the Contractor will report to the Department its spend with business enterprises certified by the OSD. These reports must include the time period covered, the name and Federal Employer Identification Number of each business enterprise utilized during the period, commodities and contractual services provided by the business enterprise, and the amount paid to the business enterprise on behalf of each agency purchasing under the Contract.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will xxxx Xxxxxxx Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.

  • Diversity Report The Contractor shall report to each Customer, spend with certified and other minority business enterprises. These reports shall include the period covered, the name, minority code and Federal Employer Identification Number of each minority business utilized during the period, Commodities provided by the minority business enterprise, and the amount paid to each minority business on behalf of each purchasing agency ordering under the terms of this Contract.

  • Quality Standards Each Party agrees that the nature and quality of its products and services supplied in connection with the other Party's Marks will conform to quality standards set by the other Party. Each Party agrees to supply the other Party, upon request, with a reasonable number of samples of any Materials publicly disseminated by such Party which utilize the other Party's Marks. Each Party will comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and customs and obtain any required government approvals pertaining to use of the other Party's marks.

  • Monthly Reporting Within twenty (20) calendar days following the end of each calendar month, Registry Operator shall deliver to ICANN reports in the format set forth in Specification 3 attached hereto (“Specification 3”).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!