RECOGNITION OF ADDITIONAL TEST METHODS Sample Clauses

RECOGNITION OF ADDITIONAL TEST METHODS. In addition to the endorsed competency standards the following may be recognised for progression of employees under clause 4 or clause 7. The points shown are where the employee is competent and holds certification to the relevant Australian Standard where required: Radiography testing level 2 specific welds AS2177: 6 points B Band (Note only 9 points in total can be credited for specific welds and specific castings when taken together Radiography testing specific castings AS3507: 6 points B Band (Note only 9 points in total can be credited for specific welds and specific castings when taken together Ultrasonic testing specific welds AS2207: 6 points B Band (Note only 9 points in total can be credited for specific welds and specific castings when taken together Ultrasonic testing specific castings AS2574: 6 points B Band (Note only 9 points in total can be credited for specific welds and specific castings when taken together) Xxxx current testing specific AS2084: 6 points B Band Coatings inspector: 6 points B Band. MFL/Tank Inspection: 12 points B Band Heat treatment operator who is responsible for set up, completion, and recording of the job - points to be based on MSA advice. Australian In-service Certification for Inspection Personnel: 12 points B Band Welding Inspection: 12 points B Band Welding Supervision: 12 points B Band. â For the purposes of clause 7 12 points is regarded as one advanced method. â When competency standards have been endorsed in respect to any of the above then the competency standards points shall apply in lieu of the above.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RECOGNITION OF ADDITIONAL TEST METHODS. 6.1 Subject to clause 1.1(4) of this Appendix, the company will, by agreement with an individual employee, recognise required additional test methods and/or relevant experience and will ‘reclassify’ the employee accordingly.
Sample 1
RECOGNITION OF ADDITIONAL TEST METHODS 
Sample 1

Related to RECOGNITION OF ADDITIONAL TEST METHODS

  • Test method 3.3.1. The method used shall be that described in Annex 3, paragraph 3.1.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Sole Source as Grounds for Rejection of a Change Order If a Change Order is submitted to Contractor for the purposes of adding a Bulletin to this Contract and said Bulletin designates a Sole Source from which Contractor is required to procure goods or services necessary to perform the Work, which Sole Source has not been designated previously, Contractor shall be entitled to reject the proposed Change Order if the designated Sole Source refuses to provide to Contractor the warranties, bonds, terms or schedule required under the Contract Documents, including any warranty or terms or schedule required by Bulletins referenced in the proposed Change Order. In such event, Contractor shall give written notice to the Owner rejecting the proposed Change Order and, if possible, shall accompany said written notice with a proposal from Contractor for changes or modifications to the Bulletin so as to eliminate the Sole Source designation but to achieve goods or services equal in quality or function. The Owner may then require the Design Professional to revise the subject Bulletin so as to eliminate the designation of the Sole Source by incorporation of Contractor's proposal or otherwise. Upon revision of the Bulletin by the Design Professional and approval thereof by the Owner, the Owner shall again submit to the Contractor a proposed Change Order for the purpose of adding the revised Bulletin to this Contract. If the Owner decides to retain the Sole Source in the Change Order and Contractor cannot acquire the full contractually required warranties from the Sole Source, Contractor shall be held only to the warranty terms and schedule obtainable from the Sole Source.

  • Cost for Service and Charge Methodology – POS to The NWSA Service Area and Department (Acct if appropriate) Service Item (from list above) Method of Charges1 Basis for Charge Hourly Rate, Fixed Percentage or Formula 2021 Budgeted Amount2 Commission Office Dept #1200 3.a Fixed Based upon agreed amount of $250,000 per year. $250,000

  • ADDITIONAL TERMS OF SERVICE The following additional terms of service (hereinafter “Additional Terms of Service”) will apply in the event that You are purchasing or subscribing for one or more of the following Services in addition to the Terms and Conditions. To the extent that the Additional Terms of Services conflict with the Terms, the Additional Terms of Service, as may be applicable, will prevail.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services 1. Quality- and Cost-based Selection. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 2 below, consultants’ services shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality and Cost-based Selection.

  • Limitation of Administrative Costs Worksheet The worksheet is intended for use during the budgeting process to estimate the district's percent increase of FY2021 budgeted expenditures over FY2020 actual expenditures. Budget information is copied to this page. Insert the prior year estimated actual expenditures to compute the estimated percentage increase (decrease).

  • Payment of Additional Costs If termination of this contract is due to the failure of the Engineer to fulfill its contract obligations, the State may take over the project and prosecute the work to completion, and the Engineer shall be liable to the State for any additional cost to the State.

  • Service Eligibility Criteria 4.3.4.1 High capacity EELs must comply with the following service eligibility requirements:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.