Results and outcomes Sample Clauses

Results and outcomes. The Kita CSP did extremely well in this component with only one out of eight indicators falling short of the project target. i.e the proportion of children 6-59 months who received Vitamin A twice in the past 12 months was noted at 50% at the final, as compared to the 60% target. Except for the above indicator, all others for Immunization and Vitamin A surpassed the objectives set by the project. The success in the area of coverage is particularly notable because of the challenges faced. For, percentage of children 12-23 months completely vaccinated by the first birthday, the project saw a change from 51% at the baseline to 77.2% at the final. The target was 71%. Likewise the project saw a great reduction in the drop out rate, with the proportion of children 12-23 months with DPT 1 minus those with DPT 3 going from 49% at baseline to 18.9% at the final, more than meeting the 20% objective. The proportion of children 12-23 months with measles vaccine also did very well, beginning with 51% at baseline and ending with 83.5% at final, surpassing the 80% target. Mothers of children 0-23 months who delivered at health facilities reporting that they received at least 2 doses of Vitamin A (200,000 IU) before leaving the center was 97.2% at the final compared to the target 60%. No baseline data is available. In terms of disease surveillance: the proportion of cases of measles, polio, neonatal tetanus reported to the health facilities was 100%, and the response by the health facility on reported data was 100%. Success in related indicators also monitored by the project but not in the DIP included: Children 0-23 months who have an immunization card (49% at baseline and 94.6% at the final – target was 80%); Mothers of children 0-23 months who delivered at the health facility reported receiving Vitamin A was 40.1% at the midterm LQAS, and 97.2% at the final KPC, more than achieving the 60% target; and Mothers of children 0-23 months with a prenatal card was 70% at the final, again bypassing the 60% target.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Results and outcomes. The results for the diarrhea component were mixed. When it came to the proportion of children 0-5 months who received only breast milk in the 24 hours before the survey (exclusive breastfeeding), there was a big improvement from the baseline 11.6% to 62.4% at the final, achieving the 60% target. Although there was no baseline data for the proportion of mothers able to site at least 2 methods of preventing diarrhea, the final was 67.6%, almost reaching the project target of 70. But the results for diarrhea treatment with ORS or home-based fluids seem to indicate that there has been no change (25.2% at baseline and 25.5% at final). FGD discussions with mothers seem to indicate that the above question was understood to mean use of ORS packets only because in all group interviews it was clear that the preparation of sugar, salt, solution at home was common knowledge. Mothers also spoke about giving other fluids such a liquid porridge and breast milk; all of the above they said, as substitutes for ORS packets when they can’t get them. The results for the proportion of HC staff, relais, and ASACOs trained for this component was 100%, 95.7% and 0% respectively. Thus with respect to the first two cadre, the project target was achieved, and close to being achieved. Tremendous success in related IMCI indicators that were monitored by the project, although not included in the DIP objectives, were the following: Mothers of children 0-23 months who know 2 signs indicating that a child needs care went from 35.3% at baseline to 87.8% at the final, above and beyond the 60% target; Children 0-23 months who were sick who received at least the same amount or more than usual to drink went from 26.6% at baseline to 85.8% at the final, again more than the 60% target; and Children 0-23 months who were sick who received at least the same amount, or more than usual to eat started at 21% at baseline and went to 86.3% at final, again surpassing the 60% target. Although the project also followed the indicator for immediate breastfeeding: percent of children who received breast milk within the first hour of birth, the results seem to indicate a difference in how the question was posed at the baseline and final (79.7% and 51.5% respectively) because the a big reduction in this indicator does not make sense. At the baseline, the enumerators probably focused on whether or not the child received colostrom (as this was emphasized to be the rationale behind the question). While at the final...
Results and outcomes. The project achieved two out of three objectives set for the pneumonia case management component. When it came to the proportion of children 0-23 months with fast/difficult breathing taken to a health facility, the project contributed to an enormous improvement, as it was 20% at the baseline and jumped to 60% at the final. This achievement was far beyond the 40% objective set. The proportion of fever cases referred to the health facility (overlapping symptom with malaria) was 59.1% at baseline and jumped to 83.7% at final (as mentioned under malaria results). This also surpassed the target of 75%. As has already been mentioned under the other components, the proportion of CSCom (health facility) staff trained was 95.7%, close to the 100% target. And lastly, although no precise objective was set for the following related capacity building indicator, the proportion of CSComs with 10 essential drugs in stock during the last six months (including antibiotics) went from none (zero) to a third (33.3%) in the sample of 12 CSComs surveyed.

Related to Results and outcomes

  • Outcomes Secondary: Career pathway students will: have career goals designated on SEOP, earn concurrent college credit while in high school, achieve a state competency certificate and while completing high school graduation requirements.

  • Results The five values obtained shall be arranged in order and the median value taken as a result of the measurement. This value shall be expressed in Newtons per centimetre of width of the tape. Annex 7 Minimum requirements for sampling by an inspector

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • RECOGNITION OUTCOMES The receiving institution commits to provide the sending institution and the student with a Transcript of Records within a period stipulated in the inter-institutional agreement and normally not longer than five weeks after publication/proclamation of the student’s results at the receiving institution. The Transcript of Records from the receiving institution will contain at least the minimum information requested in this Learning Agreement template. Table E (or the representation that the institution makes of it) will include all the educational components agreed in table A and, if there were changes to the study programme abroad, in table C. In addition, grade distribution information should be included in the Transcript of Records or attached to it (a web link where this information can be found is enough). The actual start and end dates of the study period will be included according to the following definitions: The start date of the study period is the first day the student has been present at the receiving institution, for example, for the first course, for a welcoming event organised by the host institution or for language and intercultural courses. The end date of the study period is the last day the student has been present at the receiving institution and not his actual date of departure. This is, for example, the end of exams period, courses or mandatory sitting period. Following the receipt of the Transcript of Records from the receiving institution, the sending institution commits to provide to the student a Transcript of Records, without further requirements from the student, and normally within five weeks. The sending institution's Transcript of Records must include at least the information listed in table F (the recognition outcomes) and attach the receiving institution's Transcript of Record. In case of mobility windows, table F may be completed as follows: Component code (if any) Title of recognised component (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Number of ECTS credits Sending institution grade, if applicable Mobility window Total: 30 ….. Where applicable, the sending institution will translate the grades received by the student abroad, taking into account the grade distribution information from the receiving institution (see the methodology described in the ECTS Users' Guide). In addition, all the educational components will appear as well in the student's Diploma Supplement. The exact titles from the receiving institution will also be included in the Transcript of Records that is attached to the Diploma Supplement. Steps to fill in the Learning Agreement for Studies P Additional educational components above the number of ECTS credits required in his/her curriculum are listed in the LA and if the sending institution will not recognise them as counting towards their degree, this has to be agreed by all parties concerned and annexed to the LA

  • CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (1) Engage in any business activities substantially different than those in which Borrower is presently engaged, (2) cease operations, liquidate, merge, transfer, acquire or consolidate with any other entity, change its name, dissolve or transfer or sell Collateral out of the ordinary course of business, or (3) pay any dividends on Borrower's stock (other than dividends payable in its stock), provided, however that notwithstanding the foregoing, but only so long as no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing or would result from the payment of dividends, if Borrower is a "Subchapter S Corporation" (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended), Borrower may pay cash dividends on its stock to its shareholders from time to time in amounts necessary to enable the shareholders to pay income taxes and make estimated income tax payments to satisfy their liabilities under federal and state law which arise solely from their status as Shareholders of a Subchapter S Corporation because of their ownership of shares of Borrower's stock, or purchase or retire any of Borrower's outstanding shares or alter or amend Borrower's capital structure.

  • Financial Condition There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as determined by Bank, in the market value of any collateral required hereunder or a substantial or material portion of the assets of Borrower.

  • Operations As of the date hereof, the Company has not conducted, and prior to the IPO Closing the Company will not conduct, any operations other than organizational activities and activities in connection with offerings of its securities.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.