Retribution. The NMT judgments reflect a single-minded, if not entirely successful, devotion to the idea that the principal goal of a criminal trial is to separate the guilty from the innocent and to impose sentences that reflect the moral culpability of the convicted.1 That devotion is evident in every aspect of the tribunals’ jurisprudence, from their rigorous application of the presumption of innocence to their desire – recalling Judge Xxxxxxx’ description – “not only to impose a sentence that would fit the guilt of the individual defendant but also bring about uniformity in the sentences.” Did the tribunals achieve retributive justice? A categorical answer to that question is not possible, because retributive justice is not a unitary phenomenon. On the contrary, it has at least four indices in the context of a criminal trial: (1) whether suspects selected for trial were more deserving of prosecution than suspects who were not selected2; (2) whether convicted defendants were, in fact guilty; (3) whether acquitted defendants were, in fact, innocent; and (4) whether the sentences imposed on guilty defendants reflected their culpability.3
Retribution. The position of Administrator is gratuitous. However, if any of the Administrators renders to the Company services for any professional work or any other kind of work, the consideration paid by the Company will be with respect to such services only according to the ordinary mercantile and labor existing legislation.
Retribution. The annual gross income granted to the Employee amounts to CHF 380'000.—, to be paid in twelve monthly installments latest on the penultimate day of the month. The income is subject to legal deductions for AVS, public unemployment insurance, and the Employee's contribution to the pension fund. The Employee accepts that the installments for the months between January 2009 and September 2009, as well as the corresponding charges due by the Employer, shall only be paid as of October 31st, 2009. Moreover, as of January 10th, 2010, the Employee may be entitled to receive an annual bonus to be determined according to the scheme of payment hereunder, of which the goals and factors shall be subject to annual review from the Board of Directors and notified in advance. Scheme of payment:
Retribution. The Tenant hereby declares that the sole real estate agent or broker, for this Offer to Lease is Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxx Ltd., it being understood that the retribution payable to Xxxxxxx & Wakefield Ltd. shall be paid by the Landlord.
Retribution. MANUFACTURER shall have the right, but not the obligation to prosecute, defend and conduct at its own expense all suits involving its trademarks and trade names including without limitation, actions involving suspected infringement and/or passing off.
Retribution. As retribution for the purchase of THE PRODUCT subject to this agreement, THE CLIENT will pay THE SUPPLIER the amounts indicated in Annex A.
Retribution. In retribution for the development of the Project, the Company shall pay a total amount of __________ Eur (________Eur (in letters)), payable according to the following: A first payment of Eur __ (in numbers), (________Eur (in letters)), equal to the ___% of the total amount, payable at the signing of this agreement. A second payment of Eur __ (in numbers), (________Eur (in letters)), equal to the ___% of the total amount, payable upon __________. A third and final payment of Eur __ (in numbers), (________Eur (in letters)), equal to the ___% of the total amount, payable upon the delivery of the final report of the Project. The above-mentioned amounts should be increased with VAT.
Retribution. The price of the services covered by this Agreement, which XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XX be billed to CLIENT, is equivalent to one month's rental income. The above-mentioned amount will be increased by the corresponding VAT, accrued mandatory, according to the statutory rate applicable at all times and automatically. The fees set will also be paid by the customer if:
