Selectivity. In order to constitute state aid a measure must favour certain undertakings or 36 the production of certain goods. A measure that is general in its application does not meet the selectivity condition. Individual measures that provide an advantage to one undertaking will be selective. Also general schemes are typ- ically set up in a way so as to exclude certain undertakings. They may be target- ed at a certain sector (rail transport and not road), or a certain type of activity (renewable but not non-renewable energy) and thereby be selective. The selectivity issue typically comes to the fore with tax or tax-like mea- 37 sures. In order to assess whether a measure such as a tax exemption provides an advantage that is selective, a three-step analysis is applied. First, the system of reference must be identified. Second, the position of the undertaking benefitting 37 Case C-280/00, 24.7.2003, Altmark, at para. 94.
Selectivity. The first two Employees on a job shall be the Xxxxxxx, selected by the Employer, and the Xxxxxxx, selected by the Business Manager, regardless of their positions on the out-of-work list. For a job under the terms of this Agreement, the Employer may select a maximum of five (5) additional Boilermaker Employees by name from among the top fifty percent of registrants on the appropriate out-of-work list of the Local Lodge having jurisdiction. These five (5) additional Boilermaker Employees may be selected from any one or combination of Boilermaker classifications under the terms of the appropriate local or area Articles of Agreement (i.e. Assistant Xxxxxxx, Journeyman, Apprentice, or other applicable classifications), except that the choice may not exceed one Apprentice and one other Sub-Journeyman classification, or two Apprentices where other Sub- Journeyman classifications are not provided for in the Agreement. Additional Employees required for the job will be obtained in accordance with the Referral Rules.
Selectivity. The first two 12 employees on a job shall be the xxxxxxx, 13 selected by the Employer, and the stew- 14 ard, selected by the business manager, 15 regardless of the positions on the out-of- 16 work list. For a job under the terms of 17 this Agreement, the Employer may 18 select a maximum of five (5) additional 19 boilermaker employees by name from 20 among the top fifty percent of regis- 21 trants on the appropriate out-of-work 22 list of the local lodge having jurisdic- 24 maker employees may be selected from 25 any one or combination of boilermaker 26 classifications under the terms of this 27 area’s Articles of Agreement (i.e., jour- 29 classifications), except that the choice 30 may not exceed one apprentice and one 31 other sub-journeyman classification, or 32 two apprentices. Additional employees 33 required for the job will be obtained in 34 accordance with the Referral Rules.
Selectivity. As Xxxx Xxxxxx has noted, the retributive function of international tribunals is often “hobbled by the fact that only some extreme evil gets punished, whereas much escapes its grasp, often for political reasons anathema to Kantian deontology.”4 The NMTs were no different, for all of the reasons discussed in Chapter 3. Most obviously, of the 2,500 “major war criminals” identified by the OCC, only 177 ever stood trial – a mere 7%. That retributive shortfall would have been troubling even if the 177 defendants had represented the most major of the “major war criminals.” But that seems unlikely, given how many important suspects were not prosecuted solely 1 R. v. M.(C.A.) [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500, quoted in Prosecutor x. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx, IT-95-14/2-A, Judgment, para. 1075 (17 Dec. 2004). 2 DRUMBL, 151. 3 See, e.g., XXXXXXX K.B. XXXXXX, GETTING EVEN: REVENGE AS A FORM OF JUSTICE 49-50 (1999). 4 DRUMBL, 151. for financial, temporal, or logistical reasons – Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, the head of the Xxxxx Central Office of Health Leadership, because he arrived in Nuremberg after the indictment in RuSHA had already been filed; Xxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx’x Chief of Staff, because Dulles has promised him immunity; Field Marshals xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, xxx Xxxxxxxx, and xxx Xxxxxxxxx, because Xxxx ordered Xxxxxx not to prosecute them; and so on.
Selectivity. VAT may be selectively applied to specific goods or business entities.
Selectivity. 3. For class of emission A1A, the overall radio frequency and intermediate frequency selectivity of the direction- finder should be as follows:
Selectivity. The first two employees on a 4 job shall be the xxxxxxx, selected by the Employer, 5 and the xxxxxxx, as designated by the Union. The 6 Employer may then select the first eight applicants 7 for employment from the Union out-of-work list, 8 regardless of their numerical position on that list.
Selectivity. The first two employ- 23 ees on a job shall be the xxxxxxx, selected by 24 the Employer, and the xxxxxxx, selected by 25 the business manager, regardless of their 26 positions on the out-of-work list. For a job 27 under the terms of this Agreement, the 28 Employer may select a maximum of five (5) 29 additional boilermaker employees by name 30 from among the top fifty percent of regis- 31 trants on the appropriate out-of-work list of 32 the local lodge having jurisdiction. These 33 five (5) additional boilermaker employees 34 may be selected from any one or combina- 1 tion of boilermaker classifications under the 2 terms of this Agreement (i.e., journeyman,
