Review of Arrangements. 9.1 The parties will undertake, pursuant to Section 111 of the LDEDCA 2009, a joint review of the matters set out in Clause 9.2 to be commenced, whichever is the earlier of –
(a) the fifth anniversary of the date of this Agreement; or
(b) immediately after notice is given by a Constituent Council requesting a joint review, provided that such notice is not given before the third anniversary of the date of this Agreement.
9.2 The matters are –
(a) a matter in respect of which an order may be made under any of sections 104 to 107 of the LDEDCA 2009
(b) a matter concerning the Authority which the authority has power to determine
(c) any other matter contained in this Agreement
9.3 The provisions of this Clause are without prejudice to statutory rights of one or more of the Parties to undertake their own review at any time.
Review of Arrangements. Licensee shall not enter into any agreement referred to in this Article 2 with any Redistributor or Customer until each such agreement has been submitted to and approved by Licensor. Within five (5) business days after its receipt of any such agreement, Licensor shall notify Licensee whether it approves or disapproves of the agreement and, if it disapproves of the agreement, Licensor shall provide written notice of the reasons therefor, including any changes that would require to approve of the agreement. If Licensor fails to notify Licensee of its approval or disapproval of any such agreement within such period of time, the agreement shall be deemed to be approved by Licensor.
Review of Arrangements. 10.1 The Parties will undertake, pursuant to Section 111 of the LDEDCA 2009, a joint review of the matters set out in Clause 10.2 to be commenced, whichever is the earlier of –
(a) the fifth anniversary of the date of this Agreement, or
(b) immediately after notice is given by a Constituent Council requesting a joint review, provided that such notice is not given before the third anniversary of the date of this Agreement.
10.2 The matters are –
(a) a matter in respect of which an order may be made under any of sections 104 to 107 of the LDEDCA 2009
(b) a matter concerning GMCA that GMCA has power to determine
(c) any other matter contained in this Agreement
10.3 The provisions of this Clause are without prejudice to statutory rights of one or more of the Parties to undertake their own review at any time.
10.4 The Parties endorse the draft Agreement reached between the Constituent Councils pursuant to the resolution of the Executive Board on th 26 February 2010, the terms of which are set out in Schedule 4.
Review of Arrangements. The Integrated Commissioning Board shall review operational arrangements in March each year and, where necessary, make recommendations for amendments to the parent organisation
Review of Arrangements. (a) From time to time, the Company may review its arrangements with the insurance provider in order to ensure they remain competitive and continue to offer a satisfactory level of benefit to employees covered by this Agreement.
(b) No changes to the insurance arrangements will be made without consultation with employees and the Unions, recognising that employees have a fundamental interest in the value for money offered by the insurance product because the value of the benefit provided under this clause is part of the consideration, in exchange for which, employees have entered into this Agreement.
(c) In addition, the Company commits that the outcome of any review of income protection insurance arrangements will not result in a reduction of benefits to employees covered by this Agreement.
Review of Arrangements. If during the Term the employment agreements or compensation arrangements of the Company’s executive officers are reviewed generally for material improvements, this Agreement and the Executive’s compensation arrangements, as applicable, will be subject to the same review.
Review of Arrangements. Licensee shall not enter into any agreement referred to in this Article 2 with any Customer until each such agreement has been submitted to and approved by Licensor. Within ten (10) business days after its receipt of any such agreement, Licensor shall notify Licensee whether it approves or disapproves of the agreement and, if it disapproves of the agreement, Licensor shall provide written notice of the reasons therefor, including any changes that it would require to approve of the agreement. If Licensor fails to notify Licensee of its approval or disapproval of any such agreement within such period of time, the agreement shall be deemed to be approved by Licensor. Licensor's review and approval of any agreement pursuant to this Section 2.5 shall not relieve Licensee of any of its obligations under this Agreement, including but not limited to, Sections 2.6, 7.1 and 7.3 hereof.
Review of Arrangements. The HSE and the MHRA will meet at agreed intervals to review this agreement, to ensure its currency and usefulness.
1. You must ensure that all exhibits are kept safely and that there is a clear, identifiable audit trail from the moment that exhibits are seized to the moment they are presented in evidence. This is because the prosecution may have to prove that the exhibit before the court is the same exhibit that was referred to by the witness in his or her statement, or that the exhibit has not been tampered with illicitly while being retained for court proceedings. See OM 2001/128.
2. In establishing this chain of evidence, each person handling an exhibit must write a brief statement identifying the exhibit and its whereabouts, stating when they received it and who they received it from, and saying to whom they passed it and when.
3. So, for example, in respect of a sample which is seized and taken to a laboratory for testing, a statement is required covering all the stages from the taking of the sample or the taking into possession of an article, through submission to the laboratory, testing etc, and to its production in court. A statement is required from the officer carrying out the analysis to be able to say how the sealed sample came into the possession of that officer and how it was identified.
