Chain of Evidence Sample Clauses

Chain of Evidence. Storage. Each step in the collecting and processing of the urine specimens shall be documented to establish procedural integrity and the chain of custody. Where a positive result is confirmed, urine specimens shall be maintained in a secured, refrigerated storage area. If a dispute arises, the specimens will be stored until all legal disputes are settled.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Chain of Evidence. The procedures to obtain, handle, and store test samples and to conduct laboratory tests shall be documented to establish procedural integrity and chain of evidence. Such procedures shall be administered with due regard for the employee’s privacy and the need to maintain the confidentiality of test results and to an extent which is not inconsistent with the needs of this policy.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Chain of Evidence. The procedures to obtain, handle, and store blood and 26 urine samples and to conduct laboratory tests shall be documented to establish 27 procedural integrity and chain of evidence as established by the reference laboratory 28 used by the Hospital for such testing. All tests and results will be identified in such a 29 way as to ensure employee confidentiality.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Chain of Evidence. The procedures to obtain, handle, and store test 11 samples and to conduct laboratory tests shall be documented to 12 establish procedural integrity and chain of evidence. Such procedures 13 shall be administered with due regard for the employee’s privacy and 14 the need to maintain the confidentiality of test results and to an extent 15 which is not inconsistent with the needs of this policy.
Sample 1
Chain of Evidence. In order to be used in rule of law criminal proceedings, the linking of circumstantial evidence and the conclusions drawn from it must be logical, consistent and compelling. Therefore, convictions and the establishment of a suspicion presuppose that the facts on which they are based have a certain quality and that it can be concluded with a certain probability from the facts that the suspect/accused is indeed the offender. The necessary quality of the facts and the necessary probability of committing the offence increase with the intensity of the investigation measures applied on the basis of the suspicion (e.g. search and seizure, detention on remand). For a conviction, the factual basis must be of the highest quality and the probability of perpetration must be highest. The degree of suspicion required for investigative measures and the standard of the court’s persuasion for a conviction vary widely between the different national criminal procedural systems. What the systems have in common, however, is that the various stages of suspicion are described with normative terms. The descriptions of the suspicion reflect a certain necessary quality of the facts and a necessary level of probability of the offence being committed that can be derived from the facts. Examples (from the German and US Codes of Criminal Procedure) include the "simple" suspicion to start an investigation, the reasonable suspicion for special investigation measures (e.g. seizure), sufficient suspicion to bring charges against the suspect, probable cause for arrests and warrants, and, last but not least, the "beyond all reasonable doubts" standard to convict the suspect. It is difficult to harmonize the normative standard of evidence in criminal proceedings with statistical results of data analysis procedures. The criminal lawyers involved in the proceedings must be enabled to subsume the results of technical investigations under the normative concepts. Therefore, the relevant information must be presented to the criminal lawyers in a form and language that they can understand. When using data analysis techniques such as address clustering, both the software tools used, and the investigating IT experts must therefore be able to provide exact information about which evidence is to be derived from the analysis and what conclusions can be drawn from it with what probability. In addition, possible sources of error must be identified, and alternative hypotheses must be presented and, if neces...
Sample 1
Chain of Evidence. Sources Related to State Level Education Reform Figure 2: Chain of Evidence: Sources Related to Local Level School Reform Table 1 provides an overview of the relationship of all data sources to the research questions. Table 1
Sample 1
Chain of Evidence. The procedures to obtain, handle, and store blood and urine samples and to conduct laboratory tests shall be documented to establish procedural integrity and chain of evidence as established by the reference laboratory used by the Hospital for such testing. All tests and results will be identified in such a way as to ensure employee confidentiality.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Chain of Evidence

  • Medical Evidence (a) While a medical certificate will not normally be required for leave taken in periods of less than five consecutive days, where it is considered warranted, an employer may require a principal to produce a medical certificate or other evidence of sickness or injury satisfactory to the employer. If so, the employer will agree to meet the employee’s reasonable expenses in obtaining the proof.

  • Categories of Evidence Multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement, judgments based on observations and artifacts of professional practice, including unannounced observations of practice of any duration; and additional evidence relevant to one or more Standards of Effective Teaching Practice (603 CMR 35.03).

  • Requirements Pertaining Only to Federal Grants and Subrecipient Agreements If this Agreement is a grant that is funded in whole or in part by Federal funds:

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • Evidence Used In Evaluation The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Educator:

  • Federal Immigration and Nationality Act The contractor shall comply with all federal, state and local immigration laws and regulations relating to the immigration status of their employees during the term of the contract. Further, the contractor shall flow down this requirement to all subcontractors utilized during the term of the contract. The State shall retain the right to perform random audits of contractor and subcontractor records or to inspect papers of any employee thereof to ensure compliance. Should the State determine that the contractor and/or any subcontractors be found noncompliant, the State may pursue all remedies allowed by law, including, but not limited to; suspension of work, termination of the contract for default and suspension and/or debarment of the contractor.

  • Compliance with Federal Law, Regulations, and Executive Orders This is an acknowledgement that FEMA financial assistance will be used to fund the contract only. The contractor will comply will all applicable federal law, regulations, executive orders, FEMA policies, procedures, and directives.

  • References to Statutes, Public Acts, Regulations, Codes and Executive Orders All references in this Contract to any statute, public act, regulation, code or executive order shall mean such statute, public act, regulation, code or executive order, respectively, as it has been amended, replaced or superseded at any time. Notwithstanding any language in this Contract that relates to such statute, public act, regulation, code or executive order, and notwithstanding a lack of a formal amendment to this Contract, this Contract shall always be read and interpreted as if it contained the most current and applicable wording and requirements of such statute, public act, regulation, code or executive order as if their most current language had been used in and requirements incorporated into this Contract at the time of its execution.

  • Children Under Age of 13 XxxxXxxXxXxxxx.xxx does not knowingly collect personal identifiable information from children under the age of thirteen (13) without verifiable parental consent. If it is determined that such information has been inadvertently collected on anyone under the age of thirteen (13), we shall immediately take the necessary steps to ensure that such information is deleted from our system's database. Anyone under the age of thirteen (13) must seek and obtain parent or guardian permission to use this website.

  • Supporting Evidence The Recipient shall furnish to the Administrator such documents and other evidence in support of the application as the Administrator shall reasonably request, whether before or after the Administrator shall have permitted any withdrawal requested in the application.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.