Review of Implementation. 1. If, in its final report, a panel determines that there has been a persistent pattern of failure by the Party complained against to effectively enforce its environmental law, and:
(a) the disputing Parties have not agreed on an action plan under Article 33 within 60 days of the date of the final report, or
(b) the disputing Parties cannot agree on whether the Party complained against is fully implementing
(i) an action plan agreed under Article 33,
(ii) an action plan deemed to have been established by a panel under paragraph 2, or
(iii) an action plan approved or established by a panel under paragraph 4, any disputing Party may request that the panel be reconvened. The requesting Party shall deliver the request in writing to the other Parties and to the Secretariat. The Council shall reconvene the panel on delivery of the request to the Secretariat.
2. No Party may make a request under paragraph 1(a) earlier than 60 days, or later than 120 days, after the date of the final report. If the disputing Parties have not agreed to an action plan and if no request was made under paragraph l(a), the last action plan, if any, submitted by the Party complained against to the complaining Party or Parties within 60 days of the date of the final report, or such other period as the disputing Parties may agree, shall be deemed to have been established by the panel 120 days after the date of the final report.
3. A request under paragraph 1(b) may be made no earlier than 180 days after an action plan has been:
(a) agreed under Article 33;
(b) deemed to have been established by a panel under paragraph 2; or
(c) approved or established by a panel under paragraph 4; and only during the term of any such action plan.
4. Where a panel has been reconvened under paragraph 1(a), it:
(a) shall determine whether any action plan proposed by the Party complained against is sufficient to remedy the pattern of non-enforcement and
(i) if so, shall approve the plan, or
(ii) if not, shall establish such a plan consistent with the law of the Party complained against, and
(b) may, where warranted, impose a monetary enforcement assessment in accordance with Annex 34, within 90 days after the panel has been reconvened or such other period as the disputing Parties may agree.
5. Where a panel has been reconvened under paragraph 1(b), it shall determine either that:
(a) the Party complained against is fully implementing the action plan, in which case the panel may not impose a monetary enforceme...
Review of Implementation. 1. If, in its final report, a panel determines that there has been a persistent pattern of failure by the Party complained against to effectively enforce its occupational safety and health, child labor or minimum wage technical labor standards, and:
1. the disputing Parties have not agreed on an action plan under Article 38 within 60 days of the date of the final report, or
2. the disputing Parties cannot agree on whether the Party complained against is fully implementing 1. an action plan agreed under Article 38, 2. an action plan deemed to have been established by a panel under paragraph 2, or
3. an action plan approved or established by a panel under paragraph 4, any disputing Party may request that the panel be reconvened. The requesting Party shall deliver the request in writing to the other Parties and to the Secretariat. The Council shall reconvene the panel on delivery of the request to the Secretariat.
2. No Party may make a request under paragraph 1(a) earlier than 60 days, or later than 120 days, after the date of the final report. If the disputing Parties have not agreed to an action plan and if no request was made under paragraph 1(a), the last action plan, if any, submitted by the Party complained against to the complaining Party or Parties within 60 days of the date of the final report, or such other period as the disputing Parties may agree, shall be deemed to have been established by the panel 120 days after the date of the final report.
3. A request under paragraph 1(b) may be made no earlier than 180 days after an action plan has been: 1. agreed under Article 38,
Review of Implementation. The representatives of the Contracting Parties shall, whenever needed, hold meetings in order to review the implementation of this Agreement. These meetings shall be held on the proposal of one of the Contracting Parties at a place and at a time agreed upon through diplomatic channels.
Review of Implementation. 5.1 The SCM Committee shall hold a dedicated annual review of progress in the implementation of this Agreement. This review shall be supported by a WTO Secretariat report based on Members' notifications complemented by relevant information provided by Members and information from other international organizations.
Review of Implementation. If the process of this Agreement has not been initiated within three (3) years after execution of this PA, the parties to the Agreement shall review the Agreement to determine whether revisions are needed. If revisions are needed, the parties to this Agreement shall consult to make such revisions.
Review of Implementation. The City shall review the project annually to monitor progress of the implementation of the terms of this MOA. Upon completion of the each review, the City shall submit a memorandum summarizing the status of MOA implementation to the ACHP, FHWA, VDOT, and SHPO. The review should occur in January each year following implementation of the MOA until all stipulations have been executed.
Review of Implementation. 1. On the second anniversary of the publication of the final report of the Review Panel, the Party that made the request for the establishment of the panel may request that the panel be reconvened to review the implementation of the recommendations. If the original panel cannot be reconvened, the Party may request that another panel be convened in its place.
2. Where a panel has been reconvened or convened under paragraph 1, it shall determine whether the persistent pattern of failure to effectively enforce its labour law directly related to principles and rights set out in Annex 1 has been remedied.
3. The panel shall present to the Ministers responsible for labour affairs its follow-up report within 90 days of being convened.
4. The Parties shall make the follow-up report available to the public in the three official languages 120 days after it is transmitted to the Ministers.
5. If the panel determines that the Party that was the object of the request has not remedied its persistent pattern of failure to effectively enforce its labour law directly related to principles and rights set out in Annex 1, the Party that made the request may take reasonable and appropriate measures, exclusive of fines or any measure affecting trade, but including the modification of cooperative activities pursuant to Article 12, to encourage the other Party to remedy that persistent pattern, in keeping with the panel’s determinations and recommendations.
Review of Implementation. 1. If, in its final report, a panel determines that there has been a persistent pattern of failure by the Party complained against to effectively enforce its environmental law, and:
(a) the Parties have not agreed on an action plan under Article 32 within 60 days of the date of the final report, or
(b) the Parties cannot agree on whether the Party complained against is fully implementing
Review of Implementation. If the stipulations have not been initiated within five years after the FHWA’s execution of this MOA, the parties to this MOA shall review the MOA to determine whether revisions are needed. If revisions are needed, the parties to this MOA shall consult in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800 to make such revisions.
Review of Implementation. A review of the implementation of this Agreement shall be undertaken one year after its entry into force and thereafter whenever the Parties so agree.
