RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION Sample Clauses

RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION. FOR POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE IMPLEMENTATION • Poor, partial or late implementation of the Project may be established by the NA on the basis of: - The final report submitted by the coordinator; - The products and outputs produced by the project; • The NA may consider also information received from any other relevant source, proving that the Project is not implemented in accordance with the contractual provisions. Other sources of information may include monitoring visits, desk checks or on the spot checks undertaken by the NA. • The final report will be evaluated on the basis of quality criteria and scored on a total of maximum 100 points. If the final report scores below 50 points in total, the NA may reduce the final grant amount on the basis of poor, partial or late implementation of the Project even if all activities reported were eligible and actually took place. • In the case of accredited organisations, if the NA considers that the implementation of the Project does not respect the quality commitment undertaken by the beneficiaries, the NA may in addition or alternatively impose the implementation of an action plan to ensure respect of the applicable quality and compliance requirements by the beneficiaries concerned within a given timeframe. If the beneficiaries do not implement the action plan satisfactorily by the due date, the NA may withdraw the accreditation of the beneficiaries concerned. • The final report, products and outputs will be assessed by the NA, using a common set of quality criteria focusing on: - The extent to which the project was implemented in line with the approved grant application - The quality of activities undertaken and their consistency with the project objectives - The quality of the products and outputs produced - The learning outcomes and impact on participants - The extent to which the project proved to be innovative/complementary to other initiatives - The extent to which the project proved to add value at EU level - The extent to which the project implemented effective quality measures as well as measures for evaluating the project's outcomes - The impact on the participating organisations - In case of learning, teaching and training activities: the quality of the practical arrangements provided in support of the mobility, in terms of preparation, monitoring and support to participants during their mobility activity, the quality arrangements for the recognition/validation of the learning outcomes of participants - The ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION. FOR POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE IMPLEMENTATION
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION. FOR POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE IMPLEMENTATION Poor, partial or late implementation of the Project may be established by the NA on the basis of the final report submitted by the beneficiary (including reports from individual participants taking part in the mobility activities). The NA may consider also information received from any other relevant source, proving that the Project is not implemented in accordance with the contractual provisions. Other sources of information may include monitoring visits, desk checks or on the spot checks undertaken by the NA. The final report will be assessed on the basis of quality criteria and scored on a total of maximum 100 points. If the final report scores below 50 points in total, the NA may reduce the final grant amount for organisational support on the basis of poor, partial or late implementation of the action even if all activities reported were eligible and actually took place. The final report will be assessed in conjunction with the reports from the mobility participants, using a common set of quality criteria focusing on: The extent to which the action was implemented in line with the approved grant application The quality of the learning outcomes and impact on participants The impact on the participating organisations The quality of the practical arrangements provided in support of the mobility, in terms of preparation, monitoring and support to participants during their mobility activity The quality arrangements for the recognition/validation of the learning outcomes of participants A grant reduction based on poor, partial or late implementation may be applied to the final amount of eligible expenses for organisational support and may be of: 25% if the final report scores at least 40 points and below 50 points; 50% if the final report scores at least 25 points and below 40 points; 75% if the final report scores below 25 points.
Sample 1

Related to RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • WILEY OPEN ACCESS TERMS AND CONDITIONS Wiley Publishes Open Access Articles in fully Open Access Journals and in Subscription journals offering Online Open. Although most of the fully Open Access journals publish open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License only, the subscription journals and a few of the Open Access Journals offer a choice of Creative Commons Licenses. The license type is clearly identified on the article.

  • Conditions for Award of Contract 7. The Borrower shall not award any Works contract which involves environmental impacts until:

  • Standard Terms and Conditions Executive expressly understands and acknowledges that the Standard Terms and Conditions attached hereto are incorporated herein by reference, deemed a part of this Agreement and are binding and enforceable provisions of this Agreement. References to “this Agreement” or the use of the term “hereof” shall refer to this Agreement and the Standard Terms and Conditions attached hereto, taken as a whole.

  • Previous Terms and Conditions In the event of any conflict between these Terms and Conditions and any prior versions thereof, the provisions of these Terms and Conditions shall prevail unless it is expressly stated otherwise.

  • SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS To the extent that Contractor has received an award for Lot 4, Implementation Services, the following terms and conditions apply to Lot 4 Implementation Services. All Services covered under Lot 4 – Implementation Services must be performed within CONUS. REQUEST FOR QUOTATION (RFQ) TRANSACTION PROCESS An RFQ for this Lot will be awarded based on, and result in, a deliverable-based Statement of Work (SOW) which will be incorporated into an Authorized User Agreement. The RFQ will include but is not limited to: Authorized User timeframes; system integration requirements; and other risks that may affect the cost to the Authorized User. All responses to RFQs must include detailed price information, including but not limited to: hours required per title, cost per hour, etc. Travel, lodging and per diem costs must be itemized in the total quote and may not exceed the rates in the NYS OSC Travel Policy. More information can be found at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/agencies/travel/travel.htm. All costs must be itemized and included in the Contractor’s quote. PARTICIPATION OPPORTUNITIES FOR NEW YORK STATE CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN OWNED BUSINESSES Article 17-B of the New York State Executive Law provides for more meaningful participation in public procurement by certified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Businesses (“SDVOB”), thereby further integrating such businesses into New York State’s economy. OGS recognizes the need to promote the employment of service-disabled veterans and to ensure that certified service-disabled veteran-owned businesses have opportunities for maximum feasible participation in the performance of OGS contracts. In recognition of the service and sacrifices made by service-disabled veterans and in recognition of their economic activity in doing business in New York State, Bidders are expected to consider SDVOBs in the fulfillment of the requirements of the Contract. Such participation may be as subcontractors or suppliers, as protégés, or in other partnering or supporting roles.

  • Elsevier Open Access Terms and Conditions You can publish open access with Elsevier in hundreds of open access journals or in nearly 2000 established subscription journals that support open access publishing. Permitted third party re-use of these open access articles is defined by the author's choice of Creative Commons user license. See our open access license policy for more information. Terms & Conditions applicable to all Open Access articles published with Elsevier: Any reuse of the article must not represent the author as endorsing the adaptation of the article nor should the article be modified in such a way as to damage the author's honour or reputation. If any changes have been made, such changes must be clearly indicated. The author(s) must be appropriately credited and we ask that you include the end user license and a DOI link to the formal publication on ScienceDirect. If any part of the material to be used (for example, figures) has appeared in our publication with credit or acknowledgement to another source it is the responsibility of the user to ensure their reuse complies with the terms and conditions determined by the rights holder. Additional Terms & Conditions applicable to each Creative Commons user license:

  • Payment Terms and Conditions 67.6.1 CLEC shall pay a Transit Service Charge as set forth in Table 1 for any Transit Traffic routed to CenturyLink by CLEC.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!