Scenario 4 ransomware attack
Scenario 4. Full consolidation of the current Secretariat team and establishment of a Compliance Programme + 47,32 % / Scenario 3
Scenario 4 de overheid biedt collectieve opties aan
Scenario 4. In general, this scenario is a special scenario for demonstration high data traffic wireless channel for broadcasting with separating broadcasting hub and event location can be facilitated using either direct connection or multi-hops depending on required data rate. The Scenario 4 is designed for the case of high data transportation between Olympic stadium and Berlin-Messe, where broadcasting centre is arranged in Berlin-Messe using exist glass fibre. In the meantime any cables are available at Olympic stadium even though events are held on the spot. Fig. 13 shows possible rays for connecting wireless channel between two sites, where red points are relay locations and green lines represent designed path for wireless channel, namely direct transmission with solid line, one hop with dashed line and two hops with dotted line. 3D map of Berlin Scenario 4 is also shown in Fig. 14.
Scenario 4 a < c < d < b, it is noted in the scenario that a + d < b + c. The combined domain is shown in Figure F. Figure F The combined domain of X1, X2 From the situation, (1 + 2 ≤ ), the distribution function of X1 + X2 can be derived based on five possible cases as follows: Case 1: ≤ + Case 2: + ≤ ≤ + Case 3: + ≤ ≤ + Case 4: + ≤ ≤ + Case 5: ≥ + Hence, the summary of the distribution of X is shown as follows: Probability density function (when a + d ≤ b + c): () = 0 , ≤ + ( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + ( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + − + ( + ) ( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + Cumulative distribution function (when a + d ≤ b + c): () = 2 − 2( + ) + ( + )2 2( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + 2( − ) + (2 − 2 − 2( − )) 2( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + −2 + 2( + ) − (2 + 2 + 2( + − )) 2( − )( − ) , + ≤ ≤ + { 1 , ≥ + Under this case, the expectation can be derived as follows: [] = [1 + 2] = [1] + [2] =
Scenario 4. Open Data lifecycle: maximizing OGD benefits
Scenario 4. TCCA has not completed the certification process for a Canadian applicant and EASA validation is in progress. The procedure for continued validation is:
a. The Canadian applicant will apply for a CAA validation pursuant to the TIP, and provide the CAA with the same documentation and data package provided to EASA; and
b. At the discretion of the Canadian applicant, validation may be completed under one of the following alternatives;
(i) If the current EASA validation activity for that application will result in an EASA validation design approval issued no later than December 31, 2022, the CAA will take into consideration the completion of the EASA validation activity and issuance of EASA design approval as a basis for the CAA to issue its own approval without further technical involvement by the CAA, Or
(ii) If the EASA validation will not be completed by December 31, 2022, the CAA and TCCA will mutually recognize and accept all EASA and TCCA validation decisions made to date and continue to follow or maintain the EASA/TCCA project validation plan to the greatest extent practicable. TCCA and the CAA will follow the validation procedures in the TIP that are applicable to the remaining parts of the project.
