Section M--Evaluation Factors for Award Sample Clauses

Section M--Evaluation Factors for Award. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Section M--Evaluation Factors for Award. The Government will issue an award to the responsible offeror on a sole source basis based upon an analysis of the following:
Sample 1
Section M--Evaluation Factors for Award. The Government may award a contract without discussions, based solely on initial offers received. Therefore, each initial offer received should be submitted on the most favorable terms.
Sample 1
Section M--Evaluation Factors for Award. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and issue a contract and the Program Management Task Order based on the proposal submitted. The Offeror’s proposal should contain the best terms from a cost and technical standpoint. The Government intends to award without discussions, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions including negotiations and, if necessary, ongoing discussions. The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the public interest; accept an offer other than the lowest cost proposal; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received. The evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the FAR Part 15 competitive procedures using a best value trade-off evaluation. The Government intends to award an IDIQ a hybrid FFP and cost-based Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract and a firm-fixed price Program Managemetn Task Order (with cost-based CLINs for Travel and Secure Facility Rental) from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal conforming to this solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, cost and other factors considered. I n order to receive consideration for award a rating of no less than “acceptable” must be achieved for Factors 1, 2 and 3. The Government reserves the right to evalute offerors in any order it chooses, such that (for example) a vendor could receive an unacceptable rating on Factor 3 – Personnel, be deemed ineligible for award, and would not be evaluated on any of the other factors.
Sample 1
Section M--Evaluation Factors for Award. Contract Award
Sample 1
Section M--Evaluation Factors for Award. 1. The Government may award more than one contract resulting from this Request for Offer (RFO) to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer submitted in response to, and conforming with this RFO terms and conditions, is fully responsive in providing submissions required by Section L, is technically acceptable and is determined to represent the BEST VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT price and other factors listed below. Award shall not be based on price alone. 2. An offeror may be determined to be technically acceptable by receiving a rating of at least satisfactory in all technical key discriminators and factors. An unacceptable rating received in any key discriminator or factor will determine the offeror to be unacceptable for further consideration for award. 3. The Government may: (a) reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; (b) accept other than the lowest offer; (c) waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received; (d) make award without written or oral discussion with offerors; (e) have discussions with any one offeror, all offerors, or without any discussions. EVALUATION CRITERIA/RATING SCHEME: NOTE: Offerors must demonstrate compliance, as described in Section L of this RFO, with the applicable accessibility standards under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 identified in Section C of this RFO and attached at Section J. Offerors that fail to demonstrate compliance with the applicable accessibility standards identified in Section C of this solicitation shall be eliminated from further consideration for award. For this acquisition, Price and Technical factors will be evaluated as described herein. Technical factors shall be given more weight than price in the overall evaluation of offers to determine the best value to the Government in terms of quality, performance, cost, and other factors.
Sample 1
Section M--Evaluation Factors for Award 
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Section M--Evaluation Factors for Award

  • Performance Adjustment One-twelfth of the annual Performance Adjustment Rate will be applied to the average of the net assets of the Portfolio (computed in the manner set forth in the Fund's Declaration of Trust or other organizational document) determined as of the close of business on each business day throughout the month and the performance period.

  • Adjustments to Number of Shares The number of shares of Common Stock subject to this Option shall be adjusted to take into account any stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalization of the Common Stock as provided in the Stock Option Plan.

  • Adjustments to Option The Option shall be subject to the adjustment provisions of Sections 8 and 9 of the Plan, provided, however, that in the event of the payment of an extraordinary dividend by the Company to its shareholders: the Exercise Price of the Option shall be reduced by the amount of the dividend paid, but only to the extent the Committee determines it to be permitted under applicable tax laws and to not have adverse tax consequences to the Optionee under Section 409A of the Code; and, if such reduction cannot be fully effected due to such tax laws and it will not have adverse tax consequences to the Optionee, then the Company shall pay to the Optionee a cash payment, on a per Share basis, equal to the balance of the amount of the dividend not permitted to be applied to reduce the Exercise Price of the applicable Option as follows: (a) for each Share subject to a vested Option, immediately upon the date of such dividend payment; and (b) for each Share subject to an unvested Option, on the date on which such Option becomes vested and exercisable with respect to such Share.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Evaluations The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Annual Adjustments Base Rent shall be increased on each annual anniversary of the first day of the first full month during the Term of this Lease (each an “Adjustment Date”) by multiplying the Base Rent payable immediately before such Adjustment Date by the Rent Adjustment Percentage and adding the resulting amount to the Base Rent payable immediately before such Adjustment Date. Base Rent, as so adjusted, shall thereafter be due as provided herein. Base Rent adjustments for any fractional calendar month shall be prorated.

  • Performance Adjustment Rate Except as otherwise provided in sub-paragraph (e) of this paragraph 3, the Performance Adjustment Rate is 0.02% for each percentage point (the performance of the Portfolio and the Index each being calculated to the nearest .01%) that the Portfolio's investment performance for the performance period was better or worse than the record of the Index as then constituted. The maximum performance adjustment rate is 0.20%. For purposes of calculating the performance adjustment of the portfolio, the portfolio's investment performance will be based on the performance of the retail class. The performance period will commence with the first day of the first full month following the retail class's commencement of operations. During the first eleven months of the performance period for the retail class, there will be no performance adjustment. Starting with the twelfth month of the performance period, the performance adjustment will take effect. Following the twelfth month a new month will be added to the performance period until the performance period equals 36 months. Thereafter the performance period will consist of the current month plus the previous 35 months. The Portfolio's investment performance will be measured by comparing (i) the opening net asset value of one share of the retail class of the Portfolio on the first business day of the performance period with (ii) the closing net asset value of one share of the retail class of the Portfolio as of the last business day of such period. In computing the investment performance of the retail class of the Portfolio and the investment record of the Index, distributions of realized capital gains, the value of capital gains taxes per share paid or payable on undistributed realized long-term capital gains accumulated to the end of such period and dividends paid out of investment income on the part of the Portfolio, and all cash distributions of the securities included in the Index, will be treated as reinvested in accordance with Rule 205-1 or any other applicable rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as the same from time to time may be amended.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!