Security Review Tasks Sample Clauses

Security Review Tasks. 3.2.1 Plan a multi-day initial site visit to document the existing security measures and posture on-site and begin the vulnerability assessment. 3.2.2 Conduct an in-person Kick-Off Meeting concurrent with the initial site visit to review plan of action, timelines, and approach. 3.2.3 Conduct a comprehensive Threat and Vulnerability Assessment of the Proving Grounds in the areas of physical security measures (fencing, landscaping, barriers, locks, signage, etc.), operational security (policies and procedures, staffing, protocols, etc.), and technical measures (access control, video surveillance, detection and alarms, emergency notifications, etc.). The Assessment will include threat and hazard assessment, critical asset and area identification/consequence assessment, vulnerability assessment, and risk assessment. 3.2.4 Conduct a Progress Presentation to present results of vulnerability analysis prior to mitigation development. 3.2.5 Create a Security Mitigation Plan that describes the security recommendation measures, with priority levels. Included in the Plan will be a list of references to all nationally recognized standards applied to the recommendations (e.g. NICP CPTED, FEMA, ASIS, etc.). 3.2.6 Submit the Draft Written Report to include PROVIDERS assessment and recommendations which identify the areas investigated, the findings associated with each area investigated, the potential level of risk and the physical, operational, and technical measures to mitigate or reduce risk. Where possible, recommendations will identify anticipated costs and a list of known organizations with the necessary skillsets to execute mitigation measures. 3.2.7 Conduct an in-person Final Presentation to A&M System and relevant stakeholders to discuss PROVIDER’s assessment findings, comments, and recommendations. 3.2.8 Submit the Final Written Report in narrative format including pictures, diagrams, and other documentation supporting findings and recommendations. The Final Written Report will incorporate comments and decisions from A&M System. The Final Written Report will include an executive summary of the recommendations. Final Written Report will be provided electronically.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Security Review Tasks

  • System Security Review All systems processing and/or storing County PHI or PI must have at least an annual system risk assessment/security review which provides assurance that administrative, physical, and technical controls are functioning effectively and providing adequate levels of protection. Reviews should include vulnerability scanning tools.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • Seniority Verification Process i. The new school district shall provide the employee with the necessary verification form at the time the employee achieves continuing contract status. ii. The employee must initiate the seniority verification process and forward the necessary verification forms to the previous school district(s) within ninety (90) days of receiving a continuing appointment in the new school district. iii. The previous school district(s) shall make every reasonable effort to retrieve and verify the seniority credits which the employee seeks to port.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!