Specific Evaluation Procedures. Operational Effectiveness and Supportability. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s documented ability to meet or exceed the specifications listed in the P-Spec and the SOW. An offeror’s failure to meet any of the specifications in the RTM may render the proposal unacceptable for award. Past Performance. The Government will consider the past performance information submitted and, as deemed appropriate, consider the offeror’s record in CPARS and elsewhere. In the case of an offeror without a sufficient record of recent, relevant past performance, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably with regard to its past performance history. Only recent efforts of some relevance that are sufficiently substantiated will be considered in determining a performance confidence rating. To be recent, an effort must have 12 months of performance occurring during the 36 months preceding the proposal submission date. Relevancy will be determined based on the prior effort’s similarity to the solicited effort. For recent, relevant efforts, the government will consider how well the offeror performed on each contract, including the delivery schedule compliance, product quality, and overall customer satisfaction. Lastly, the quality of performance on each relevant effort will be considered to determine the Government’s overall level of confidence in the offeror’s ability to successfully perform the solicited effort.
Specific Evaluation Procedures
