Structural Performance Criteria for Pre-Cast MUTA Vaults Sample Clauses

Structural Performance Criteria for Pre-Cast MUTA Vaults. If it is determined that pre-cast MUTA Vaults are preferred over cast-in- place vaults, the Design Professional will provide structural performance criteria for the precast MUTA Vaults to be included in the project specifications to ensure that the precast vaults meet structural requirements. Design Professional will also provide bid and construction support associated with the pre-cast MUTA vaults, which will include the following: Bid Support will include the following: • Respond to structural design related technical questions and RFIs • Preparation of necessary addenda to contract document and revise the drawings as necessary for the addenda. Construction Support will include the following: • Attendance at up to two (2) construction meetings as requested by the City or Resident Engineer • Review of Contractor submittals related to the pre-cast MUTA Vaults for conformance to the Contract DocumentsReview of the Structural Performance Criteria for conformance to the Contract Documents • Provide written approval or disapproval for a substitution request • Review of RFI/RFC related to the pre-cast MUTA Vaults from the contractor and prepare written responses • Assist the Resident Engineer in preparing, reviewing, and recommending solutions to proposed construction change orders Deliverable: Structural performance Criteria Specifications for pre-cast MUTA Vaults
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Structural Performance Criteria for Pre-Cast MUTA Vaults

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Criteria for Performance Assessment A. A teacher’s performance shall be assessed based on the criteria set forth in the evaluation instrument, Appendix D.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.