Common use of Student Growth Impact Rating Clause in Contracts

Student Growth Impact Rating. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the teacher is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below: Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s student growth impact rating. The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact rating. 5-12 13-17 18-20 Low Average High

Student Growth Impact Rating. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the teacher employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below: . Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s student growth impact rating. The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact rating. 5-5 – 12 13-13 – 17 18-18 – 20 Low Average High

Student Growth Impact Rating. 20 21 Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as 22 student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1XX 0.0, SG 3.200 XX 0.0, SG XX 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these 24 components and the teacher employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the 25 scores below: . 27 Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will 28 combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s 29 student growth impact rating. 30 31 The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact 32 rating. 5-33 5 – 12 13-13 – 17 18-18 – 20 Low Average HighHigh 34

Student Growth Impact Rating. 16 17 Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as 18 student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1XX 0.0, SG 3.200 XX 0.0, SG XX 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these 20 components and the teacher employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the 21 scores below: . 23 Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will 24 combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s 25 student growth impact rating. 26 27 The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact rating. 5-5 – 12 13-13 – 17 18-18 – 20 Low Average HighHigh 28 rating. 29 30 31 32 33 34