Students evaluation assessment Sample Clauses

Students evaluation assessment. To obtain the multiple diplomas, the student must succeed at each semester and pass all the courses. The evaluation rules depend on the rules of the hosting institution (see below). There is no compensation between the semesters. In addition, the summer school cannot compensate any failed academic course. The master thesis (semester 4) cannot compensate the academic semesters. The grading system of each institution is depicted below. GRADING SCHEMES Grading system at the University Paris-Saclay: Scale: 0-20 Grading system at the University of Genoa: Scale: 0-30 Grading system at the Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx University: Scale: 2 - 5 Grading system at the University of Porto: Scale: 0-20 COMMON SCORE CONVERSION TABLE Failed Sufficient Satisfactory Good Very good Excellent SERP+ F E D C B A Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx University <3 3 3+ 4 4+ 5 University of Paris-Saclay <10* 10 10.50 10.75 11 11.50 11.75 12 13 13.5 14 15 15.5 16 17 19 18 20 University of Porto <10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 University of Genoa <18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 30 e lode * Compensation with other(s) course(s) may be possible if all of the other grades are higher than 7/20 for the M1 students and 9/20 for the M2 students. In case of failing a subject, a second session of examination will be organized. If the student failed a subject during the second examination, he/she will have to abandon the SERP+ programme. In case the student receives a scholarship, the later will be stopped and the student will lose the rest of the scholarship. Every year, after the Summer school, the selection committee will assess the student’s overall performance and situation.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Students evaluation assessment. To obtain the multiple diplomas, the student must succeed at each semester and pass all the courses. The evaluation rules depend on the rules of the hosting institution (see below). There is no compensation between the semesters. The master thesis (semester 4) cannot compensate the academic semesters. The grading system of each institution is depicted below. GRADING SYSTEM Grading system at the University Paris-Saclay: Scale: 0 - 20 Grading system at the University of Rome La Sapienza: Scale: 0 - 30 Grading system at the University of Porto: Scale: 0 - 20 Grading system at the University of Toronto: Scale: F – A+ COMMON SCORE CONVERSION TABLE Xxxxx d Sufficient Satisfactory Good Very good Excellent ECTS Grades F E D C B A U of T F D- D D+ C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+ UPSaclay <10 10 10.50 10.75 11 11.50 11.75 12 13 13.5 14 15 15.5 16 17 19 18 20 U.Porto <10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 In case of failing a subject, a second session of examination will be organized. If the student failed a subject during the second examination, he/she will have to abandon the programme. In case the student receives a scholarship, the later will be stopped and the student will lose the rest of the scholarship.
Sample 1
Students evaluation assessment. To obtain the multiple diplomas, the student must succeed at each semester and pass all the courses. The evaluation rules depend on the rules of the hosting institution (see below). There is no compensation between the semesters. The master thesis (semester 4) cannot compensate the academic semesters. The grading system of each institution is depicted below. GRADING SYSTEM Grading system at the University Paris-Saclay: Scale: 0 - 20 Grading system at the University of Rome La Sapienza: Scale: 0 - 30 Grading system at the University of Szeged: Scale: 1 - 5 Grading system at the University of Xxxx: Scale: F - A COMMON SCORE CONVERSION TABLE (to be elaborated during the preparatory year) In case of failing a subject, a second session of examination will be organized. If the student failed a subject during the second examination, he/she will have to abandon the programme. In case the student receives a scholarship, the later will be stopped and the student will lose the rest of the scholarship.
Sample 1
Students evaluation assessment. To obtain the multiple diplomas, the student must succeed at each semester and pass all the examination. The evaluation rules depend on the rules of the hosting institution (see below). There is no compensation between the semesters. The master’s thesis (semester 4) cannot compensate the academic semesters. The grading system of each institution is depicted below. GRADING SYSTEM Grading system at the University Paris-Saclay: Scale: 0 - 20 Grading system at the University of Rome La Sapienza: Scale: 0 - 30 Grading system at the University of Porto: Scale: 0 - 20 Grading system at the University of Toronto: Scale: F – A In case of failing a subject, a second session of examination will be organized. If the student failed a subject during the second examination, she/he will have to abandon the programme. In case the student receives a scholarship, the later will be stopped and the student will lose the rest of the scholarship.
Sample 1

Related to Students evaluation assessment

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.