Submittals Review Sample Clauses

Submittals Review. Extend the scope of work for Submittals Review as per the amended agreement to address additional Submittals. Consultant shall continue to track in the Submittal Log and shall:  Review and respond up to an additional five (5) submittals material submittals by Otak and up to an additional two (2) each by Alta and DKS. (Assume a team average of approximately 3 hours per submittal).  Continue preparing and maintaining a submittal response log.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Submittals Review. The CONTRACTOR shall perform, at a minimum, the following submittals review tasks as part of the Construction Phase Services: - During the submittal review tasks, the CONTRACTOR shall make no change in design, and no changes requiring additional cost to the OWNER, without prior written approval from the OWNER. - During review and approval or disapproval of all “or equal” products, equipment and materials, CONTRACTOR shall not approve any “or equal” products, equipment and materials which decrease energy efficiency, increase maintenance costs or adversely affect the Project Schedule. - Review and approve the Construction Subcontractors’ List of Durations for all activities, for conformance to the approved Project Schedule. - Submit lists of shop drawings, samples, catalogue cuts and other documents on a submittal log form and update every two weeks or more frequently if directed by the OWNER including but not limited to, analyses in support of specified systems and components and/or modifications proposed by the CONTRACTOR or Construction Subcontractor. - For hot systems, perform stress analysis of Construction Subcontractors final pipe routing to verify loads are within acceptable tolerance for hangers and equipment. Such stress analysis shall be performed by a professional engineer.

Related to Submittals Review

  • Submittals Submittals required by the Contract Documents shall be prepared specifically for the Work by the Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work. Submittals are not Contract Documents.

  • Submittal Review 7.10.1 The A/E shall review Submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data, and Samples for conformity with design intent and conformity with the Contract Documents within 14 days of receiving Submittals or in accordance with the approved submittal schedule, or other period as mutually agreed by the A/E and Contractor.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • Readiness Review Includes all plans to be implemented in one or more Service Areas on the anticipated Operational Start Date. At a minimum, the HMO shall, for each HMO Program:

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.