Testing Determination Sample Clauses

Testing Determination. Upon determining that an employee must submit to testing (whether urinalysis for drugs or breath for alcohol) because of reasonable suspicion or a work-related accident or safety violation, the supervisor shall give the employee a reasonable opportunity, prior to the test, to request the presence of or to seek the advice from a Union representative. The employee and the Union representative, if available, shall be given an opportunity to communicate any information or other explanation relevant to the circumstances to the supervisor. The supervisor shall then determine, after considering all of the circumstances, whether the test shall be administered. If the supervisor determines that a test shall be given, testing shall take place immediately after discussion with the employee and the Union representative, if available, but in no case longer than one hundred and twenty (120) minutes after the reasonable suspicion or the work-related accident or safety violation determination has been made.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Testing Determination. Upon determining that a member must submit to testing (whether urinalysis for drugs or breath for alcohol) because reasonable belief has been established, the supervisor shall give the Member an opportunity, prior to the test, to request the presence of or to seek the advice from a Lodge representative. The member and the Lodge representative, if available, shall be given an opportunity to communicate any information or other explanation relevant to the circumstances to the supervisor. The supervisor shall then determine, after considering all of the circumstances, whether the test shall be administered. If the supervisor determines that a test shall be given, testing shall take place immediately after discussion with the member and the Lodge representative, if available, but no more than one hundred and twenty (120) minutes after the reasonable belief determination has been made, whichever is sooner. Should a Lodge representative not be readily available and the supervisor believes time is critical in determining whether or not the member is impaired, the supervisor may direct the member to submit to testing immediately. The Lodge representative, if available, may accompany the member to and be present with the member at the collection/testing site.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Testing Determination. Upon determining that a member must submit to a reasonable belief test or an unannounced test under Section 34.12(E) for alcohol or illegal drug usage, the supervisor shall give the member an opportunity, prior to the test, to request the presence of, or to seek the advice from a Lodge Representative. The member and the Lodge Representative, if available, shall be given an opportunity to communicate any information or other explanation relevant to the circumstances to the supervisor. The supervisor shall then determine, after considering all of the circumstances, whether the test shall be administered. If the supervisor determines that a test shall be given, testing shall be made immediately after discussion with the member and the Lodge Representative, if available, but no more than one hundred and twenty (120) minutes after the reasonable belief determination has been made, whichever is sooner. The Lodge Representative, if available, may accompany the member to and be present with the member at the collection site. The fact that a member may have been taking a legal drug shall not preclude the administration of a drug test if the supervisor has reasonable belief to believe that the member's satisfactory work performance has been adversely affected by the presence of such a legal drug; provided, however, that the ultimate disposition of the matter shall take such fact into consideration.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Testing Determination. Upon determining that a member must submit to a reasonable belief test for alcohol or illegal drug usage, the supervisor shall give the member an opportunity, prior to the test, to request the presence of, or to seek the advice from a Lodge Representative. The member and the Lodge Representative, if available, shall be given an opportunity to communicate any information or other explanation relevant to the circumstances to the supervisor. The supervisor shall then determine, after considering all of the circumstances, whether the test shall be administered. If the supervisor determines that a test shall be given, testing shall be made immediately after discussion with the member and the Lodge Representative, if available, but no more than one hundred and twenty (120) minutes after the reasonable belief determination has been made, whichever is sooner. The Lodge Representative, if available, may accompany the member to and be present with the member at the collection site. The fact that a member may have been taking a legal drug shall not preclude the administration of a drug test if the supervisor has reasonable belief to believe that the member's satisfactory work performance has been adversely affected by the presence of such a legal drug; provided, however, that the ultimate disposition of the matter shall take such fact into consideration.
Sample 1Sample 2
Testing Determination. Upon determining that a Member must submit to a reasonable suspicion test for alcohol or illegal drug usage, the City shall give the Member the opportunity, prior to the test, to request the presence of, or to seek the advice from a Local representative. The Member and the Local representative, if available, shall be given an opportunity to communicate any information or other explanation relevant to the circumstances. The City Manager or designee shall then determine, after considering all of the circumstances, whether the test shall be administered. If the City Manager or designee determines that a test shall be given, testing shall be made immediately after discussion with the Member and the Local representative, if available, but no more than one hundred and twenty (120) minutes after the reasonable suspicion determination has been made, whichever is sooner. The Local representative, if available, may accompany the Member to and be present with the Member at the collection site. A Member who is subject to testing shall be placed on paid administrative leave pending completion of the testing process.
Sample 1
Testing Determination. Upon determining that a Employee must submit to a breath and/or urinalysis test for alcohol or drug usage either through random testing, the supervisor shall give the Employee an opportunity, prior to the test, to request the presence of, or to seek the advice from an Union representative. The Employee and the Union representative, if available, shall be given an opportunity to communicate any information or other explanation relevant to the circumstances to the supervisor. The supervisor shall then determine, after considering all of the circumstances, whether the test shall be administered. If a union representative is requested by the Employee but is unable to be present ninety (90) minutes after the Employee is informed of the testing, the supervisor may proceed with the testing without the union representative. The union representative, if available, may accompany the Employee to and be present with the Employee at the collection site. The City may place the Employee subject to testing on paid administrative leave pending receipt of the test results.
Sample 1

Related to Testing Determination

  • Salary Determination 12.5.1 A unit member shall receive a salary not less than the minimum salary nor more than the maximum salary (Articles 12.3 and 12.4) for the rank to which appointed, except as provided in Articles 4.15, 5.6, 10.6.1 or Article 10.6.1.1. The effective dates for salaries shall be the appropriate dates specified in Article 12.2.2.

  • Penalty Determination H&SC section 39619.7 requires CARB to provide information on the basis for the penalties it seeks. This Agreement includes this information, which is also summarized here. The provision of law the penalty is being assessed under and why that provision is most appropriate for that violation. The penalty provision being applied in this case is H&SC section 42402 et seq. because IIT sold, supplied, offered for sale, consumer products for commerce in California in violation of the Consumer Products Regulations (17 CCR section 94507 et seq.). The penalty provisions of H&SC section 42402 et seq. apply to violations of the Consumer Products Regulations because the regulations were adopted under authority of H&SC section 41712, which is in Part 4 of Division 26. The manner in which the penalty amount was determined, including aggravating and mitigating factors and per unit or per vehicle basis for the penalty. H&SC section 42402 et seq. provides strict liability penalties of up to $10,000 per day for violations of the Consumer Product Regulations with each day being a separate violation. In cases like this, involving unintentional violations of the Consumer Products Regulations where the violator cooperates with the investigation, CARB has obtained penalties for selling uncertified charcoal lighter material in California. In this case, the total penalty is $7,500 for selling uncertified charcoal lighter material in California. The penalty in this case was reduced because this was a strict liability first-time violation and IIT made diligent efforts to cooperate with the investigation. To come into compliance, IIT no longer offers Safegel BBQ & Fireplace Lighting Gel Fire Starter for commerce in California. Final penalties were determined based on the unique circumstances of this matter, considered together with the need to remove any economic benefit from noncompliance, the goal of deterring future violations and obtaining swift compliance, the consideration of past penalties in similar negotiated cases, and the potential cost and risk associated with litigating these particular violations. The penalty reflects violations extending over a number of days resulting in quantifiable harm to the environment considered together with the complete circumstances of this case. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger on a per ton basis. The final penalty in this case was based in part on confidential financial information or confidential business information provided by IIT that is not retained by CARB in the ordinary course of business. The penalty in this case was also based on confidential settlement communications between CARB and IIT that CARB does not retain in the ordinary course of business. The penalty also reflects CARB’s assessment of the relative strength of its case against IIT, the desire to avoid the uncertainty, burden and expense of litigation, obtain swift compliance with the law and remove any unfair advantage that IIT may have secured from its actions. Is the penalty being assessed under a provision of law that prohibits the emission of pollution at a specified level, and, if so a quantification of excess emissions, if it is practicable to do so. The Consumer Product Regulations do not prohibit emissions above a specified level, but they do limit the concentration of VOCs in regulated products. In this case, a quantification of the excess emissions attributable to the violations was not practicable.

  • Expert Determination If a Dispute relates to any aspect of the technology underlying the provision of the Goods and/or Services or otherwise relates to a financial technical or other aspect of a technical nature (as the Parties may agree) and the Dispute has not been resolved by discussion or mediation, then either Party may request (which request will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) by written notice to the other that the Dispute is referred to an Expert for determination. The Expert shall be appointed by agreement in writing between the Parties, but in the event of a failure to agree within ten (10) Working Days, or if the person appointed is unable or unwilling to act, the Expert shall be appointed on the instructions of the relevant professional body. The Expert shall act on the following basis: he/she shall act as an expert and not as an arbitrator and shall act fairly and impartially; the Expert's determination shall (in the absence of a material failure to follow the agreed procedures) be final and binding on the Parties; the Expert shall decide the procedure to be followed in the determination and shall be requested to make his/her determination within thirty (30) Working Days of his appointment or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter and the Parties shall assist and provide the documentation that the Expert requires for the purpose of the determination; any amount payable by one Party to another as a result of the Expert's determination shall be due and payable within twenty (20) Working Days of the Expert's determination being notified to the Parties; the process shall be conducted in private and shall be confidential; and the Expert shall determine how and by whom the costs of the determination, including his/her fees and expenses, are to be paid.

  • INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION 6.1 By signing and submitting this bid, the Bidder certifies that the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication or agreement, for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other Bidder or with any competitor; unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid have not been knowingly disclosed by the Bidder prior to bid opening directly or indirectly to any other Bidder or to any competitor; no attempt has been made, or will be made, by the Bidder to induce any person or firm to submit, or not to submit, a bid for the purpose of restricting competition.

  • Eligibility Determination The State or its designee will make eligibility determinations for each of the HHSC HMO Programs.

  • Adverse Benefit Determination An adverse benefit determination is any of the following:  Denial of a benefit (in whole or part),  Reduction of a benefit,  Termination of a benefit,  Failure to provide or make a payment (in whole or in part) for a benefit, and  Rescission of coverage, even if there is no adverse effect on any benefit. An appeal of an adverse benefit determination can be made either as an administrative appeal or as a medical appeal, as defined further in this section. Our Customer Service Department phone number is (000) 000-0000 or 0-000-000-0000.

  • FINAL DETERMINATION BY BOARD The Board shall have the right and power to adjust and determine finally all questions as to the proper and timely performance of the work and the amounts earned under this Contract, all as provided in General Conditions.

  • Interest determination (a) Where Screen Rate Determination is specified in the applicable Final Terms as the manner in which the Rate of Interest is to be determined, the Rate of Interest for each Interest Period will, subject as provided below, be either:

  • Final Determination His/her determination is final unless, within ten (10) days after notification, a recognized employee organization requests in writing to meet and confer thereon.

  • Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that CHSI has materially breached this CIA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!