The ICJ’s Non Sample Clauses

The ICJ’s Non examination in Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo in the Armed Activities case between the DRC and Uganda, the effectiveness of governmental control and the duty of vigilance similarly formed the basis of a dispute.134 One of Uganda’s counterclaims – specifically invoking the Corfu Channel case – alleged that the DRC had supported, or at least xxxxx- 131 Corfu Channel, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Xxxxxxxxx, 55; Dissenting Opinion of Judge Xxxxxxx, 93; Dissenting Opinion of Dr. Ečer, 1949 iCJ Reports 115, at 121. 132 Corfu Channel, Separate Opinion of Judge Xxxxxxx, 44 (emphasis added). 133 At the same time, though, Xxxxxxx also argued ibid. that ‘every State is considered as having known, or as having a duty to have known, of prejudicial acts committed in parts of its territory where local authorities are installed’ (emphasis in original), which was deemed too strict of a requirement by Xxxxxx in Aktionen Privater, 252-253. 134 This complex case arose out of the armed conflict in the Great Lakes region involving multiple states. The DRC submitted three claims against Uganda: violation of the prohi- bition on the use of force and related principles; failure to respect and ensure respect for international human rights law and international humanitarian law; and looting of the DRC’s natural resources. The Court also adjudicated upon two counter-claims by Uganda, concerning the duty of vigilance, and alleged violations of the Vienna Conven- tion on Diplomatic Relations. ated, anti-Ugandan rebel groups operating in Congolese territory.135 The iCJ examined the claim divided into three time-periods due to the different factual circumstances of each, and ultimately rejected the counterclaim for all three. Of these periods, the first one is of particular interest, where the Court examined the question of support and ‘tolerance’ separately, and held the following regarding the latter: The Court has noted that, according to Uganda, the rebel groups were able to operate “unimpeded” in the border region between the DRC and Uganda “because of its mountainous terrain, its remoteness from Kinshasa (more than 1,500 km), and the almost complete absence of central government presence or authority in the region during President Xxxxxx’s 32-year term in office”. During the period under consideration both anti-Ugandan and anti-Zairean reb- el groups operated in this area. Neither Zaire nor Uganda were in a position to put an end to their activities. However, in the ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to The ICJ’s Non

  • Termination of Agreement, Resignation, or Removal of Custodian Either party may terminate this agreement at any time by giving written notice to the other. We can resign as custodian at any time effective 30 days after we send written notice of our resignation to you. Upon receipt of that notice, you must make arrangements to transfer your Xxxx XXX to another financial organization. If you do not complete a transfer of your Xxxx XXX within 30 days from the date we send the notice to you, we have the right to transfer your Xxxx XXX assets to a successor Xxxx XXX trustee or custodian that we choose in our sole discretion, or we may pay your Xxxx XXX to you in a single sum. We will not be liable for any actions or failures to act on the part of any successor trustee or custodian, nor for any tax consequences you may incur that result from the transfer or distribution of your assets pursuant to this section. If this agreement is terminated, we may charge to your Xxxx XXX a reasonable amount of money that we believe is necessary to cover any associated costs, including but not limited to one or more of the following. • Any fees, expenses, or taxes chargeable against your Xxxx XXX • Any penalties or surrender charges associated with the early withdrawal of any savings instrument or other investment in your Xxxx XXX If we are a nonbank custodian required to comply with Regulations section 1.408-2(e) and we fail to do so or we are not keeping the records, making the returns, or sending the statements as are required by forms or regulations, the IRS may require us to substitute another trustee or custodian. We may establish a policy requiring distribution of the entire balance of your Xxxx XXX to you in cash or property if the balance of your Xxxx XXX drops below the minimum balance required under the applicable investment or policy established.

  • COMPLIANCE WITH TAX LAW SECTION 5-a The following provisions apply to Contractors that have entered into agreements in an amount exceeding $100,000 for the purchase of goods and services:

  • Disclosures; Prohibited Interests Independent of whether Consultant is required to file a Form 700, Consultant warrants and represents that it has disclosed to City any economic interests held by Consultant, or its employees or subcontractors who will be performing the Required Services, in any real property or project which is the subject of this Agreement. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that no officer or employee of City, has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds hereof, or in the business of Consultant or Consultant’s subcontractors. Consultant further agrees to notify City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. For breach or violation of any of these warranties, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.

  • Certification Regarding Prohibition of Boycotting Israel (Tex Gov. Code 2271) If (a) Vendor is not a sole proprietorship; (b) Vendor has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this Agreement or any agreement with a TIPS Member under this procurement has value of $100,000 or more, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Vendor certifies, where applicable, that neither the Vendor, nor any affiliate, subsidiary, or parent company of Vendor, if any, boycotts Israel, and Vendor agrees that Vendor and Vendor Companies will not boycott Israel during the term of this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “boycott” shall mean and include refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with Israel, or with a person or entity doing business in Israel or in an Israeli-controlled territory but does not include an action made for ordinary business purposes. When applicable, does Vendor certify? Yes

  • COMPLIANCE OF LAWS RELATING TO REMITTANCES 3.1 The Allottee, if resident outside India, shall be solely responsible for complying with the necessary formalities as laid down in Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder or any statutory amendment(s) modification(s) made thereof and all other applicable laws including that of remittance of payment acquisition/sale/transfer of immovable properties in India etc. and provide the Promoter with such permission, approvals which would enable the Promoter to fulfil its obligations under this Agreement. Any refund, transfer of security, if provided in terms of the Agreement shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 or the statutory enactments or amendments thereof and the Rules and Regulations of the Reserve Bank of India or any other applicable law. The Allottee understands and agrees that in the event of any failure on his/her part to comply with the applicable guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India; he/she may be liable for any action under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 or other laws as applicable, as amended from time to time.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.