Total U. S. Invoice Value multiplied by the lesser of: (i) 85%, (ii) the U.S. Content Percentage from the most recently delivered Exporter's Certificate and (iii) the Disbursement Percentage (if any) from such Exporter's Certificate. NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE ONE PAGE PER EXPORTER (OR ANCILLARY SERVICES PROVIDER) B(2a)-1 Annex B Exhibit 3 ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATE ________, 20_ Export-Import Bank of the United States 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, X.X. Washington, DC 20571 Attention: Operations Division Subject: Ex-Im Bank Guarantee No. AP080562XX-Singapore Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd (the "Borrower") Anti-Lobbying Certificate Ladies and Gentlemen: The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
Total U. S. Firm Shares:................ --------------- =============== SCHEDULE II NUMBER OF FIRM SHARES INTERNATIONAL UNDERWRITER TO BE PURCHASED ------------------------- --------------- Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx & Co. International Limited...... Xxxxxxx Xxxxx International.....................
Total U. S. Published List Price of the base and/or applicable Add-ons Minimum Royalty and options purchased for the Bundled --------------------------- X Product (as Bundled U.S. Published determined above) List Price for that product
Total U. S.$ Swingline Commitments means the aggregate for the time being of the U.S.$ Swingline Commitments, being U.S.$250,000,000 at the date of this Agreement.
Total U. S. Cross-Border Trade in Goods and Services Source: Analysis by CRS of U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis data. What are supporting views? Many in the business community support XxXX as an opportunity to increase consistency and predictability among trading partners, to eliminate trade barriers, and to strengthen and update multi- lateral rules on trade in services beyond the WTO GATS. What are opposing views? Opponents of trade in services liberalization, including some labor unions and civil society groups, are concerned about the potential impact of XxXX on the authority of national, state, and local governments to regulate services. What is the current status? 21 rounds of XxXX negotiations occurred 2013 through 2016. Parties cancelled the December 2016 ministerial meeting, and no negotiations have been scheduled for 2017. The Xxxxx Administration has not stated an official position on XxXX. In response to questions on XxXX from his Senate Finance confirmation hearing, U.S. Trade Representative Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx wrote, “Maintaining a vibrant U.S. services sector and expanding U.S. services exports is vital to a healthy economy and a key objective of X.X. xxxxx xxxxxx. If confirmed, I look forward to working with you to pursue our services trade priorities.” Issues for Congress As part of its oversight of trade negotiations, Congress may monitor progress on the XxXX negotiations. Congress could examine the economic implications of a potential XxXX; compare the XxXX provisions with the priorities established in TPA and with U.S. free trade agreements; or consider whether XxXX should include other parties with large, fast- growing service sectors, such as Brazil, China, and India. For more information see CRS Report R43291, U.S. Trade in Services: Trends and Policy Issues, by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, and CRS Report R44354, Trade in Services Agreement (XxXX) Negotiations: Overview and Issues for Congress, by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, Analyst in International Trade and Finance IF10311 Disclaimer
