Consistency and predictability Sample Clauses

Consistency and predictability. Rules and procedures relating to trade to be applied in a consistent, predictable and uniform manner so as to minimise uncertainty to the trade and trade related parties. Rules and procedures relating to trade to provide clear and precise procedural guidance to the appropriate authorities with standard policies and operating procedures and be applied in a non-discretionary manner;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consistency and predictability. The parties agree to take steps to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their own administrative processes to the greatest extent possible. This will include, but is not limited to the use of: greater up-front guidance to industry; common streamlined generic terms of reference for assessments; standard outcome-focused conditions; increased data sharing across governments and provision of industry data from assessment documentation to the public; and project control and monitoring mechanisms. Draft Assessment Report Tasmania will provide to the Commonwealth Minister for comment a draft Assessment Report (or relevant part which addresses impacts on Matters of NES) before finalising it for the purposes of the relevant assessment process and both parties will endeavour, to the greatest extent possible, for officials to agree on a proposed set of common conditions. After receiving a copy of the draft Assessment Report, the Commonwealth Minister will provide advice within an agreed timeframe as to whether it provides the required Information for the Commonwealth Minister to make a decision on whether or not to approve the action under Part 9 of the EPBC Act. If the Commonwealth Minister does not respond within the agreed timeframes it is taken that the Commonwealth has no additional requirements. If the Commonwealth Minister decides that further Information is required, Tasmania will either: provide the Information; or proceed to finalise the Assessment Report notwithstanding the advice.
Consistency and predictability. The parties agree to take steps to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their own administrative processes to the greatest extent possible. This will include, but is not limited to the use of: greater up-front guidance to industry; streamlined generic terms of reference for assessments; standard outcome-focused conditions; and increased information sharing across governments and provision of industry information from assessment documentation to the public Draft Assessment Report To ensure requirements of the EPBC Act are met, wherever practicable Victoria will consult with the Commonwealth prior to finalising the Assessment Report with respect to: elements of the Assessment Report which address impacts on Matters of NES; and proposed conditions to address impacts on Matters of NES in sufficient time for the Commonwealth to advise whether further information is required.
Consistency and predictability. The parties will continue to take steps to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their own administrative processes to the greatest extent possible. Consultation on assessment To ensure statutory requirements are met, WA will consult with the Commonwealth during the assessment to ensure that relevant impacts on Matters of NES are adequately addressed. Notification of final Assessment Report WA will notify the Commonwealth that the assessment is complete on the date the Assessment Report is finalised and made public and ensure that all relevant material is available to the Commonwealth.
Consistency and predictability. The parties agree to take steps to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of administrative processes to the greatest extent possible. This will include, but is not limited to the use of: greater up-front guidance to industry; common streamlined generic terms of reference for assessments; standard outcome-focused conditions; increased data sharing across governments and provision of industry data from assessment documentation to the public; and project control and monitoring mechanisms.
Consistency and predictability. The parties agree to take steps wherever possible, to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their own administrative processes to the greatest extent possible. This will include, but is not limited to the use of: greater up-front guidance to industry; common streamlined generic terms of reference for assessments; standard outcome-focused conditions; and increased data sharing across governments and provision of industry data from assessment documentation to the public. Draft Assessment Report SA will provide to the Commonwealth Minister for comment a draft Assessment Report (or relevant part which addresses impacts on Matters of NES) before finalising it for the purposes of the relevant assessment process, and both parties will endeavour, to the greatest extent possible, to agree on a proposed set of common conditions. After receiving a copy of the draft Assessment Report, the Commonwealth Minister will provide advice within an agreed timeframe as to whether it provides the required Information for the Commonwealth Minister to make a decision on whether or not to approve the action under Part 9 of the EPBC Act. The process for the timeframe to be agreed will be set out in the Administrative Arrangements. If the Commonwealth Minister does not respond within the agreed timeframes it is taken that the Commonwealth has no additional requirements. If the Commonwealth Minister decides that further Information is required, SA will either: provide the Information; or proceed to finalise the Assessment Report notwithstanding the advice.

Related to Consistency and predictability

  • Consistency The Corporate Taxpayer and the Members agree to report and cause to be reported for all purposes, including federal, state and local Tax purposes and financial reporting purposes, all Tax-related items (including the Basis Adjustments and each Tax Benefit Payment) in a manner consistent with that specified by the Corporate Taxpayer in any Schedule required to be provided by or on behalf of the Corporate Taxpayer under this Agreement unless otherwise required by law. Any dispute as to required Tax or financial reporting shall be subject to Section 7.09.

  • PROCEDURAL HISTORY On December 23, 2002, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech Illinois”) and Cook Inlet/Voicestream Operating Company, LLC, By Voicestream PCS BTA 1 Corporation, its agent, and Voicestream Wireless Corporation (collectively “Voicestream”), filed a joint Petition for approval of the Fourth Amendment to the Interconnection Agreement dated November 18, 2002 (the “Amendment”), under Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) (the “Act”). The Amendment was submitted with the Petition. A statement in support of the Petition was filed along with verifications sworn to by Xxxx Xxxxxx on behalf of Ameritech Illinois, and by Xxx Xxxxxx on behalf of Voicestream, stating that the facts contained in the Petition are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief. Illinois Commerce Commission Staff filed the Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 7, 2003. Counsel for Ameritech Illinois and Staff appeared at the hearing and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding. The Verified Statement of X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • Reliability Reliability targets (Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)) are defined in the technical specifications as set out in the Contract. Notwithstanding any possible application of penalties relating to reliability defined in the Contract, Goods shall remain covered by the warranty defined in this Article 16 as long as the reliability commitments have not been reached.

  • Constructability Program 5.2.1 Implement and conduct a constructability program to identify and document Project cost and schedule savings opportunities. The constructability program shall follow accepted industry practices and be reviewed by Owner at design milestones. Whenever the term “value engineering” is used in conjunction with this Agreement or the Project, it has its commonly accepted meaning within the construction industry and does not imply the practice of professional engineering without a license. If any value engineering activities constitute the professional practice of engineering, then such activities shall be performed by an engineer licensed in Texas.

  • Affordability (a) Throughout the term of this Agreement, each Low and Moderate Income Unit will be rented for no more than the rental rates set forth herein to an Eligible Tenant. An Eligible Tenant is a Family whose annual income does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the Area median income adjusted for family size as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). A “

  • Traceability 11.1 Under the terms of this Agreement, Supplier shall have and operate a process to ensure that all Products, sub-assemblies and the components contained therein supplied to the Buyer are completely Traceable back to manufacturer by batch or lot or date code.

  • Compatibility 1. Any unresolved issue arising from a mutual agreement procedure case otherwise within the scope of the arbitration process provided for in this Article and Articles 25A to 25G shall not be submitted to arbitration if the issue falls within the scope of a case with respect to which an arbitration panel or similar body has previously been set up in accordance with a bilateral or multilateral convention that provides for mandatory binding arbitration of unresolved issues arising from a mutual agreement procedure case.

  • Review of legality and data minimisation (a) The data importer agrees to review the legality of the request for disclosure, in particular whether it remains within the powers granted to the requesting public authority, and to challenge the request if, after careful assessment, it concludes that there are reasonable grounds to consider that the request is unlawful under the laws of the country of destination, applicable obligations under international law and principles of international comity. The data importer shall, under the same conditions, pursue possibilities of appeal. When challenging a request, the data importer shall seek interim measures with a view to suspending the effects of the request until the competent judicial authority has decided on its merits. It shall not disclose the personal data requested until required to do so under the applicable procedural rules. These requirements are without prejudice to the obligations of the data importer under Clause 14(e).

  • Geometric visibility The visibility of the illuminating surface, including its visibility in areas which do not appear to be illuminated in the direction of observation considered, shall be ensured within a divergent space defined by generating lines based on the perimeter of the illuminating surface and forming an angle of not less than 5° with the axis of reference of the headlamp. The origin of the angles of geometric visibility is the perimeter of the projection of the illuminating surface on a transverse plane tangent to the foremost part of the lens of the headlamp.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!