WARRANTY REVIEW Sample Clauses

WARRANTY REVIEW. Prior to the expiration of the warranties of any subcontractors and manufacturers, ESCO and Owner’s representative shall perform a warranty review, documenting defects or deficiencies in installation, materials, systems and equipment and preparing instructions to the sub-contractors and manufacturers for correction of noted defects. The ESCO shall then follow through to ensure that each defect or deficiency is appropriately addressed and verify that an appropriate remedy has been accomplished. ESCO shall copy Owner on the correspondence related to these warranty issues. 5.5. Construction Services/Construction Management Services. 5.5.1. ESCO shall have complete control over and charge of and shall be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, and for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work on the Project, so that, upon completion of the Work, the Project shall be structurally sound and shall be a complete, fully-functioning facility suitable for the purposes for which it is intended. These roles are solely ESCO's responsibility under this Design and Construction Contract. ESCO shall be fully responsible for maintaining construction schedules and for any failure to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. ESCO shall be deemed to have complete control over or charge of acts or omissions of all ESCO employees, agents, design professionals, and construction managers, as well as subcontractors, or their agents or employees, or of any other persons performing portions of the Work.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
WARRANTY REVIEW. Prior to the expiration of the warranties of any subcontractors and manufacturers, ESCO and Owner’s representative shall perform a warranty review, documenting defects or deficiencies in installation, materials, systems and equipment and preparing instructions to the sub- contractors and manufacturers for correction of noted defects. The ESCO shall then follow through to ensure that each defect or deficiency is appropriately addressed and verify that an appropriate remedy has been accomplished. ESCO shall copy Owner on the correspondence related to these warranty issues.
WARRANTY REVIEW. Prior to the end of the warranty period, undertake a review for defects or deficiencies and notify the Constructor in writing of items requiring attention by the Constructor. F1
WARRANTY REVIEW. Prior to the expiration of the warranties of any sub- contractor(s) and manufacturer(s), the CONTRACTOR shall perform a warranty review, documenting defects or deficiencies in installation, materials, systems and equipment and preparing instructions to the sub- contractor(s) and manufacturer(s) for correction of noted defects. The CONTRACTOR shall then follow through to ensure that each defect or deficiency is appropriately addressed and verify that an appropriate remedy has been accomplished. The CONTRACTOR shall copy the Owner on the correspondence related to these warranty issues.
WARRANTY REVIEW. 01 Review construction contractor(s) warranties for compliance with construction contract .02 Obtain construction contract compliant warranties from construction contractor(s) SAMPLE

Related to WARRANTY REVIEW

  • WARRANTY/QUALITY Unless a longer warranty is called for elsewhere in the Contract, Contractor, manufacturer, or their assigned agents shall guarantee the workmanship, product or Services performed against defective workmanship, defects or failures of materials for a minimum period of one (1) year from District’s written approval of the Work. All workmanship and merchandise must be warranted to be in compliance with applicable California energy, conservation, environmental, and educational standards.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Independent Review and Inspection The Owner may undertake independent inspection of the installation of the Work. Such independent inspector shall operate on behalf of the Owner and shall act to protect the best interests of the Owner.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • POST-REVIEW DISCOVERIES If, during the implementation of an undertaking, a previously unidentified property that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register is encountered, or a known historic property may be affected in an unanticipated manner, the Agency Official shall follow 36 C.F.R. § 800.13(b).

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum.

  • SATISFACTION SURVEYS In order to assess the level of performance of the Supplier, the Customer may undertake satisfaction surveys in respect of the Supplier's provision of the Services. The Customer shall be entitled to notify the Supplier of any aspects of their performance of the provision of the Services which the responses to the Satisfaction Surveys reasonably suggest are not in accordance with this Call Off Contract. All other suggestions for improvements to the provision of Services shall be dealt with as part of the continuous improvement programme pursuant to Clause 17 of this Call Off Contract (Continuous Improvement). 12/08/2013 ANNEX 1 TO PART B: ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [ ]

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Inspection Checklist (check one) ☐ In order to avoid disagreements about the condition of the Premises, at the time of accepting possession of the Premises, Tenant will complete the Inspection Checklist incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit B and record any damage or deficiencies that exist at the commencement of the Term. Landlord will be liable for the cost of any cleaning or repair to correct damages found at the time of the inspection. Tenant will be liable for the cost of any cleaning and/or repair to correct damages found at the end of the Term if not recorded on the inspection checklist, normal wear and tear excepted. ☐ The Tenant is NOT required to complete an inspection checklist.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.