WARRANTY REVIEW Sample Clauses

WARRANTY REVIEW. Prior to the expiration of the warranties of any subcontractors and manufacturers, ESCO and Owner’s representative shall perform a warranty review, documenting defects or deficiencies in installation, materials, systems and equipment and preparing instructions to the sub-contractors and manufacturers for correction of noted defects. The ESCO shall then follow through to ensure that each defect or deficiency is appropriately addressed and verify that an appropriate remedy has been accomplished. ESCO shall copy Owner on the correspondence related to these warranty issues. 5.5. Construction Services/Construction Management Services. 5.5.1. ESCO shall have complete control over and charge of and shall be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, and for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work on the Project, so that, upon completion of the Work, the Project shall be structurally sound and shall be a complete, fully-functioning facility suitable for the purposes for which it is intended. These roles are solely ESCO's responsibility under this Design and Construction Contract. ESCO shall be fully responsible for maintaining construction schedules and for any failure to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. ESCO shall be deemed to have complete control over or charge of acts or omissions of all ESCO employees, agents, design professionals, and construction managers, as well as subcontractors, or their agents or employees, or of any other persons performing portions of the Work.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
WARRANTY REVIEW. 01 Review construction contractor(s) warranties for compliance with construction contract .02 Obtain construction contract compliant warranties from construction contractor(s) SAMPLE
Sample 1
WARRANTY REVIEW. Prior to the end of the warranty period, undertake a review for defects or deficiencies and notify the Constructor in writing of items requiring attention by the Constructor. F1
Sample 1
WARRANTY REVIEW. Prior to the expiration of the warranties of any sub- contractor(s) and manufacturer(s), the CONTRACTOR shall perform a warranty review, documenting defects or deficiencies in installation, materials, systems and equipment and preparing instructions to the sub- contractor(s) and manufacturer(s) for correction of noted defects. The CONTRACTOR shall then follow through to ensure that each defect or deficiency is appropriately addressed and verify that an appropriate remedy has been accomplished. The CONTRACTOR shall copy the Owner on the correspondence related to these warranty issues.
Sample 1
WARRANTY REVIEW. Prior to the expiration of the warranties of any subcontractors and manufacturers, ESCO and Owner’s representative shall perform a warranty review, documenting defects or deficiencies in installation, materials, systems and equipment and preparing instructions to the sub- contractors and manufacturers for correction of noted defects. The ESCO shall then follow through to ensure that each defect or deficiency is appropriately addressed and verify that an appropriate remedy has been accomplished.
Sample 1
WARRANTY REVIEW. Review project 11 months after Substantial Completion, and prepare a list of outstanding warranty items. PIVOT: Lead design team efforts in the warranty review process. MEP: Conduct 11-month review and provide list of incomplete and/or substandard items to PIVOT.
Sample 1
WARRANTY REVIEW. Prior to the expiration of the warranties of any subcontractors and manufacturers, ESCO and Owner’s representative shall perform a warranty review, documenting defects or deficiencies in installation, materials, systems and equipment and preparing instructions to the sub-contractors and manufacturers for correction of noted defects. The ESCO shall then follow through to ensure that each defect or deficiency is appropriately addressed and verify that an appropriate remedy has been accomplished. ESCO shall copy Owner on the correspondence related to these warranty issues. 5.5. Construction Services/Construction Management Services. 5.5.1. ESCO shall have complete control over and charge of and shall be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, and for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work on the Project, so that, upon completion of the Work, the Project shall be structurally sound and shall be a complete, fully-functioning facility suitable for the purposes for which it is intended. These roles are solely ESCO's responsibility under this Design and Construction Contract. ESCO shall be fully responsible for maintaining construction schedules and for any failure to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. ESCO shall be deemed to have complete control over or charge of acts or omissions of all ESCO employees, agents, design professionals, and construction managers, as well as subcontractors, or their agents or employees, or of any other persons performing portions of the Work. 5.5.2. ESCO's responsibility to provide the Work under this Design and Construction Contract commences with the execution of this Design and Construction Contract and terminates upon ESCO’s satisfaction of all obligations set forth in this Design and Construction Contract including those enumerated at Section K of the General Conditions. 5.5.3. ESCO shall provide, supervise and administer all Construction Work as set forth in this Design and Construction Contract and in the General Conditions unless otherwise provided in this Design and Construction Contract. 5.5.4. ESCO’s duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority shall not be modified or extended without the express written agreement of the Parties and any required Owner approvals. 5.5.5. Except as may otherwise be provided in the Contract Documents or when direct communications have otherwise been specifically authorized, Owner shall conduct a...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to WARRANTY REVIEW

  • Due Diligence Review; Information The Company shall make available, during normal business hours, for inspection and review by the Investors, advisors to and representatives of the Investors (who may or may not be affiliated with the Investors and who are reasonably acceptable to the Company), all financial and other records, all SEC Filings (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) and other filings with the SEC, and all other corporate documents and properties of the Company as may be reasonably necessary for the purpose of such review, and cause the Company’s officers, directors and employees, within a reasonable time period, to supply all such information reasonably requested by the Investors or any such representative, advisor or underwriter in connection with such Registration Statement (including, without limitation, in response to all questions and other inquiries reasonably made or submitted by any of them), prior to and from time to time after the filing and effectiveness of the Registration Statement for the sole purpose of enabling the Investors and such representatives, advisors and underwriters and their respective accountants and attorneys to conduct initial and ongoing due diligence with respect to the Company and the accuracy of such Registration Statement. The Company shall not disclose material nonpublic information to the Investors, or to advisors to or representatives of the Investors, unless prior to disclosure of such information the Company identifies such information as being material nonpublic information and provides the Investors, such advisors and representatives with the opportunity to accept or refuse to accept such material nonpublic information for review and any Investor wishing to obtain such information enters into an appropriate confidentiality agreement with the Company with respect thereto.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • POST-REVIEW DISCOVERIES If, during the implementation of an undertaking, a previously unidentified property that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register is encountered, or a known historic property may be affected in an unanticipated manner, the Agency Official shall follow 36 C.F.R. § 800.13(b). A. In the event that previously unidentified archeological sites or human remains are discovered during project construction, that portion of the project shall stop immediately and the project manager shall take appropriate steps to immediately secure the site, and shall notify the Agency Official within 48 hours. The Agency Official shall immediately notify the SHPO/THPO, Tribes, and other relevant consulting parties including descendent communities. B. If human remains are discovered, they shall be respectfully covered over and protected. In addition, the project manager shall immediately notify local and/or state law enforcement authorities including medical examiner or coroner, pursuant to local and state law. C. The Agency Official shall consult with the SHPO/THPO and Tribes or other descendent community representatives to determine if the discovered site appears eligible for the National Register. If it does appear eligible, the Agency Official shall submit a treatment plan for the avoidance, protection, recovery of information, or destruction without data recovery to the SHPO for review and comment. The treatment plan shall be consistent with the ACHP’s handbook Treatment of Archaeological Properties and subsequent amendments and SHPO Human Remains Discovery Protocol. If human remains are discovered, the treatment plan shall follow the guidance in Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Policy Statement Regarding Treatment of Burial Sites, Human Remains and Funerary Objects, including appropriate consultation with descendent communities. Avoidance and preservation in place are the preferred options for treating human remains. D. The Agency Official shall notify relevant consulting parties of the unanticipated discovery and provide the proposed treatment plan for their comment. Construction work in the area of the discovery shall not continue until the plan has been accepted by SHPO/THPO and implemented. E. An undertaking that may affect a human burial site shall comply with provisions of New York State and local laws, the terms of this Agreement notwithstanding.

  • Due Diligence Investigation Pubco shall be reasonably satisfied with the results of its due diligence investigation of the Company in its sole and absolute discretion.

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum. b. The intending bidder or the Purchaser is responsible at own costs and expenses to make and shall be deemed to have carried out own search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification on all liabilities and encumbrances affecting the Property, the title particulars as well as the accuracy and correctness of the particulars and information provided. c. The Purchaser shall be deemed to purchase the Property in all respects subject thereto and shall also be deemed to have full knowledge of the state and condition of the Property regardless of whether or not the said search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification have been conducted. d. The Purchaser shall be deemed to have read, understood and accepted these Conditions of Sale prior to the auction and to have knowledge of all matters which would have been disclosed thereby and the Purchaser expressly warrants to the Assignee that the Purchaser has sought independent legal advice on all matters pertaining to this sale and has been advised by his/her/its independent legal advisor of the effect of all the Conditions of Sale. e. Neither the Assignee nor the Auctioneer shall be required or bound to inform the Purchaser of any such matters whether known to them or not and the Purchaser shall raise no enquiry, requisition or objection thereon or thereto.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Due Diligence Examination At any time during the Review Period, and thereafter through Closing of the Property, Buyer and/or its representatives and agents shall have the right to enter upon the Property at all reasonable times for the purposes of reviewing all Records and other data, documents and/or information relating to the Property and conducting such surveys, appraisals, engineering tests, soil tests (including, without limitation, Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments), inspections of construction and other inspections and other studies as Buyer deems reasonable and necessary or appropriate to evaluate the Property, subject to providing reasonable advance notice to Seller unless otherwise agreed to by Buyer and Seller (the “Due Diligence Examination”). Seller shall have the right to have its representative present during Buyer’s physical inspections of its Property, provided that failure of Seller to do so shall not prevent Buyer from exercising its due diligence, review and inspection rights hereunder. Buyer agrees to exercise reasonable care when visiting the Property, in a manner which shall not materially adversely affect the operation of the Property.

  • Inspection Checklist (Check one)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!