Weighting Factors Sample Clauses

Weighting Factors. (a) Weighting Factors for Print Production Services. (i) For changes to the Weighting Factors for Print Production Services of more than five (5) percentage points, RCSI, in its sole discretion once during a calendar year upon sixty (60) days notice to First Data, *** the allocation of the Weighting Factor for Print Production Services for any one or more Critical Service Levels; provided, however, that the sum of the Weighting Factors for Print Production Services for all Critical Service Levels shall not exceed the Pool Percentage Available for Allocation for Print Production Services. Schedule B B - 20 RCSI / First Data Confidential (ii) For changes to the Weighting Factors for Print Production Services of five (5) percentage points or less during a calendar year: (A) RCSI in its sole discretion once a quarter shall provide reasonable notice to First Data of such changes and *** the allocation of the Weighting Factors for Print Production Services for any one or more Critical Print Service Levels within five (5) percentage points of the existing allocation (adjusting larger or smaller for a total range of ten (10) percentage points); provided, however, that the sum of the Weighting Factors for Print Production Services for all Critical Print Service Levels shall not exceed the Pool Percentage Available for Allocation for Print Production Services. (B) At no time during a calendar year may *** adjust the Weighting Factors for Print Production Services so that the revised allocation per Service Level exceeds five points (either lesser or greater) of the original allocation per Service Level for that calendar year.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Weighting Factors. Symetra shall have the right to: [***] and (iii) for any new Critical Milestones that will be applicable during the upcoming Contract Year, establish Weighting Factors for each such Critical Milestone.
Sample 1Sample 2
Weighting Factors. The Weighting Factors shall not exceed: (a) [***] percent ([***]%) in the aggregate for SLA (including Priority SLA) Weighting Factors; (b) [***] percent ([***]%) in the aggregate for Critical Milestone Weighting Factors; (c) [***] percent ([***]%) for any individual Priority SLA; (d) [***] percent ([***]%) for any individual SLA other than a Priority SLA; or (e) [***] percent ([***]%) for any individual Critical Milestone.
Sample 1Sample 2
Weighting Factors. (i) and (ii) the sum of the Weighting Factors for all Critical Service Levels shall not exceed the Pool Percentage Available for Allocation.
Sample 1
Weighting Factors. LS&Co. shall assign a number of percentage points to each Critical Service Level (“Weighting Factor”), except that the maximum Weighting Factor allocated among all the Critical Service Levels shall not exceed, in the aggregate, [****]* percentage points. The Weighting Factors in effect as of the Effective Date are identified in the applicable Service Level Definitions Document, and LS&Co. may reallocate such Weighting Factors by providing Supplier with 60 days’ prior notice.
Sample 1
Weighting Factors. Amounts at Risk (a) BPaaS (i) BPaaS Weighting Factor limit. In no event shall any single Weighting Factor for a Critical Service Level (excluding Non-BPaaS IT Service Levels) exceed ***(***) points. (ii) BPaaS Weighting Factor comprehensive limit. In no event shall the sum of the Weighting Factors for all Critical Service Levels (excluding Non-BPaaS IT Service Levels) exceed the BPaaS Pool Percentage Available for Allocation. (iii) BPaaS Amount at Risk limit. The total amount of Performance Payments payable by Supplier (excluding Service Level Credits payable with respect to Non-BPaaS IT Service Levels and excluding Performance Guarantee Group Payment Amounts as described in Sections 4.6(g) and 4.8(c)(ii)) relating to a calendar month shall not exceed the BPaaS Amount at Risk for such calendar month.
Sample 1
Weighting Factors. Health Net may from time to time during the Term change, in its sole discretion, the Weighting Factor for any one or more Critical Service Levels upon written notice to Supplier; provided, however, that: (i) Health Net may provide only one such notice during any calendar *** (which notice may contain multiple changes); (ii) the sum of the Weighting Factors for all Critical Service Levels shall not exceed the Pool Percentage Available for Allocation; and (iii) the Weighting Factor for any single Service Level may not be less than *** or exceed *** percentage points.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Weighting Factors. Beginning in 2016-2017, compensation for all co-curricular coaches, directors, and advisors will be determined based on the following weighting formula:
Sample 1
Weighting Factors 
Sample 1

Related to Weighting Factors

  • Performance Factors (a) Each party will notify the other party of the existence of a Performance Factor, as soon as reasonably possible after the party becomes aware of the Performance Factor. The Notice will: describe the Performance Factor and its actual or anticipated impact; include a description of any action the party is undertaking, or plans to undertake, to remedy or mitigate the Performance Factor; indicate whether the party is requesting a meeting to discuss the Performance Factor; and address any other issue or matter the party wishes to raise with the other party. (b) The recipient party will provide a written acknowledgment of receipt of the Notice within 7 Days of the date on which the Notice was received (“Date of the Notice”). (c) Where a meeting has been requested under paragraph 7.2(a)(3), the parties agree to meet and discuss the Performance Factors within 14 Days of the Date of the Notice, in accordance with the provisions of section 7.3.

  • ADJUSTMENT FACTORS The Contractor will perform any or all Tasks in the Construction Task Catalog for the Unit Price appearing therein multiplied by the following Adjustment Factors. See the General Terms and Conditions for additional information.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • SECONDARY FACTORS The extent of control which, by agreement, COUNTY may exercise over the details of the work is slight rather than substantial; (b) CONTRACTOR is engaged in a distinct occupation or business; (c) In the locality, the work to be done by CONTRACTOR is usually done by a specialist without supervision, rather than under the direction of an employer; (d) The skill required in the particular occupation is substantial rather than slight; (e) The CONTRACTOR rather than the COUNTY supplies the instrumentalities, tools and work place; The length of time for which CONTRACTOR is engaged is of limited duration rather than indefinite; (g) The method of payment of CONTRACTOR is by the job rather than by the time; (h) The work is part of a special or permissive activity, program, or project, rather than part of the regular business of COUNTY; (i) CONTRACTOR and COUNTY believe they are creating an independent contractor relationship rather than an employee relationship; and The COUNTY conducts public business. It is recognized that it is not necessary that all secondary factors support creation of an independent contractor relationship, but rather that overall there are significant secondary factors which indicate that CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor. By their signatures to this Agreement, each of the undersigned certifies that it is his or her considered judgment that the CONTRACTOR engaged under this Agreement is in fact an independent contractor.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!