Xxxxxx and Bumping. 12 (1) The Basic Layoff Rule Reductions in force are to be identified by 13 classification. Employees holding positions shall be subject to transfer, demotion, or layoff 14 options in inverse order of seniority.
Xxxxxx and Bumping Sample Clauses
Related to Xxxxxx and Bumping
Anti-dumping 1. The rights and obligations of the Parties in respect of the application of anti- dumping measures shall be governed by Article VI of the GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994.
Bumping i) Displaced employees can elect to bump to a position in line with seniority (subject to (c) (ii) below), provided the displaced employee has the capabilities and qualifications to perform the duties of the selected position.
Xxxxxx and Recall An employee in receipt of notice of layoff pursuant to 9.08(A)(a)(ii) may:
Dumping 1. If one of the Parties finds that dumping is taking place in trade with the other Party within the meaning of Article VI of the GATT 1994, it may take appropriate measures against this practice in accordance with the Agreement on implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994 and its own related internal legislation.
Xxxxxxxx and X X. Xxxxx. 1930. Checklist of the fishes and fishlike vertebrates of North and Middle America north of the northern boundary of Venezuela and Columbia. Rept. U.S. Fish Comm. 1928(2):1-670. Jordan, D.S. and X.X. Xxxxxxxx. 1896. The fishes of North and Middle America. Part 1. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bul. 47:1-1240. Xxxxx, S. and X. Xxxxxx. 2005..Hydrogeologic setting of the snake valley hydrologic basin, Xxxxxxx County, Utah, and White Pine and Lincoln Counties, Nevada – implications for possible effects of proposed water xxxxx. Report of investigation 254, Utah Geological Survey. Xxxxxxx, M.C. 1982. Status report of three Bonneville basin endemic fishes. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 27 pp. May, B. E. and X. X. Xxxxx. 1981. Comparative effects of sheep and cattle grazing on the Xxxxx Creek drainage. Transactions of the Bonneville Chapter American Fisheries Society. 1981:48-62. Xxxxx, X.X. 1985. Predation and species replacement in American Southwestern fishes: a case study. Southwestern Naturalist. 30:173-187. Xxxxxx, X. X. and X. X. Xxxxxx. 1985. Two New Intergeneric Cyprinid Hybrids from the Bonneville Basin, Utah. Copeia, 1985(2):509-515. Xxxxxx, X.X. 1972. Threatened freshwater fishes of the United States. Trans. Amer, Fish. Soc. 101(2):239-252.
Xxxxxxx and X Xxxx¨cker. A detailed account of Xxxxx Xxxxxx’ version of the standard model. IV. Rev. Math. Phys. 8 (1996) 205–228.
Xxxxxxxxx and X Xxxxxxx. A
Felling and Bucking Felling shall be done to minimize breakage of Included Timber and dam- age to residual timber. Unless agreed otherwise, felling shall be done by saws or shears. Bucking shall be done to permit removal of all minimum pieces set forth in A2. Purchaser may buck out cull material when necessary to produce pieces meeting Utilization Standards. Such bucked out material shall contain a minimum amount of sound wood, not in excess of the net scale in percentage of gross scale, or based on the merchantability factor, whichever is stated in A2. If necessary to assess extent of defect, Purchaser shall make sample saw cuts or wedges. B6.411 Felling in Clearings. Insofar as ground conditions, tree lean, and shape of clearings per- mit, trees shall be felled so that their tops do not extend outside Clearcutting Units, construction clearings, and ar- eas of regeneration cutting. B6.000 Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. Stumps shall not exceed, on the side adjacent to the highest ground, the maximum heights set forth in A6, except that occasional stumps of greater heights are acceptable when Purchaser determines that they are necessary for safe and efficient conduct of logging. Unless otherwise agreed, Purchaser shall re-cut high stumps so they will not exceed heights specified in A6 and shall dispose of severed portions in the same manner as other logging debris. The xxxxx heights shown in A6 were selected with the objective of maximum reasonable utilization of the timber, unless Sale Area Map shows special areas where xxxxx heights are lower for aesthetic, land treatment, or silvicultural rea- sons.
Xxxxxx and X Xxxxxxxxx. Key-agreement in ad-hoc networks. In Nordsec’99, 1999. [4] X. Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxx. Authenticated Group Key Agreement and Friends. In 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 17–26. ACM, November 1998. [5] X. Xxxxxx and X. Xxxxx. Communication complexity of group key distribution. In 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, November 1998. [6] X. Xxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx. Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In 1st ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1993. [7] Xxx Xxxxx. The Decision Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx problem. In Third Algorithmic Number Theory Symposium, number 1423 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 48–63. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1998. [8] Xxx Xxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. Applications of multilinear forms to cryptography. To appear in Contemporary Mathematics, American Mathematical Society. [9] Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx. Provably authenticated group Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx key exchange — the dynamic case. In Xxxxx Xxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT ’2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Gold Coast, Australia, 2001. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany. [10] Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, and Xxxx-Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. Provably authenticated group xxxxxx-xxxxxxx key exchange. In Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, editor, 8th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Philadelphia, PA, USA, November 2001. ACM Press. [11] Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx and Xxx Xxxxxxx. A secure and efficient conference key distribution system. In X. Xx Xxxxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’94, number 950 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1995. final version of proceedings. [12] X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxxx, X. Xxx, X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxxx. The VersaKey framework: Versatile group key management. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17(9), September 1999. [13] Xxxxx Xxxxx. Zero-knowledge undeniable signatures. In X.X. Xxxxxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’90, number 473 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 458–464. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, May 1991.
Anti-dumping and Countervailing Measures 1. Each Party retains its rights and obligations under Article VI of GATT 1994, the AD Agreement, and the SCM Agreement regarding the application of anti-dumping and countervailing measures. 2. During any anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigation involving the Parties, the Parties agree to exchange all notifications, exporter/producer questionnaires, and information requirements2 in English. 3. Should a Party decide to impose an anti-dumping or countervailing duty, the amount of such duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping or subsidies, and the investigating Party shall endeavor to apply a duty which is less than the margin of dumping or subsidies, if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry. 4. Upon receipt by a Party's competent investigating authority of a properly documented countervailing duty application with respect to imports from the other Party, and before initiating an investigation, the Party shall provide written notification to the other Party of its receipt of the application and afford the other Party a meeting to consult with its competent investigating authority regarding the application, as provided for in Article 13 of the SCM Agreement. 5. Where a Party's competent investigating authority conducts an anti-dumping or countervailing duty investigation with respect to imports from the other Party, in addition to the notifications in accordance with the relevant provisions of the AD Agreement and the SCM Agreement, and independently of the notifications provided directly to the producers or exporters, it shall provide to the other Party written notification of the initiation of such investigation procedure, together with a copy of the exporter/producer questionnaire and the list of the known main exporters or producers. 6. The Party that received the notification in accordance with paragraph 5: (a) shall endeavor to send the list of producers and exporters of the good under investigation to the competent investigating authority of the other Party, together with their addresses, within 30 days; 2 The parties concerned shall provide all documents and information required by the competent investigating authority through the exporter/producer questionnaires and information requirements in the competent investigating authority's official national language. The competent investigating authority shall accept translations of such documents and information, as long as the translator's identification and signature are included. (b) shall endeavor to inform the exporters or producers, or the relevant trade or industrial associations of the good under investigation, of the information received from the competent investigating authority of the other Party; and (c) may collect responses of the exporters or producers to the questionnaire and send the collected responses to the competent investigating authority of the other Party by the due date specified in the questionnaire.
