Xxxxxx and Xxxxx. 123 under the original partnership arose in 1930 and was, therefore, barred by prescription and that there was no evidence to- establish a fresh partnership. The only question that requires decision is whether the retirem ent of FoPEeka from the partnership operated in law as a dissolution of the partnership or whether the partnership continued under the agreem ent o f M arch 5, 1927, as betw een the plaintiff and the defendant ? In 1929, Fonseka com m enced proceedings against the defendant claim ing his share o f the profits under the agreement. Xxxxxxx did not ask for a dissolution o f the partnership. This case, according to the plaintiff’s evidence, 'w as settled on the footing that the plaintiff and defendant bought up Xxxxxxx’ s rights for B s. 3,000. The plaintiff apparently with difficulty liquidated his share o f this sum b y driblets. The m atter is o f course governed b y the Partnership A ct (1890) (53 and 54 V iet, o- 39) w hich is in force in Ceylon by virtue o f section 3 o f the Civil L a w Ordinance (Cap. 66). Sections 32 and 33 o f the A ct prescribe in w hat m anner a partnership is dissolved. E etirem ent o f a partner is not form ulated as operating in law to produce a dissolution. On the other hand, section 4 6 o f the A ct is worded as fo llo w s: — “ The rules o f equity and o f com m on law applicable to partnership, shall continue in force except so far as they are inconsistent with the express provisions o f this A ct. ” I t would seem that prior to the enactm ent of the Partnership A ct, 1890, a partnership at com m on law w ould be dissolved b y the retirem ent o f a partner. Can it be said that the rule o f com m on law is inconsist e n t w ith the provisions of Sections 32 & 33 o f the A ct ? M x. Xxxxxx in support o f his contention that the partnership was dissolved relies on the
Xxxxxx and Xxxxx own beneficially and of record the shares of True Fiction free and clear of any liens and encumbrances.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxx. X AFFILIATES ARE NOT LIABLE IN CONTRACT, TORT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR BY STATUTE OR OTHERWISE, FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER WITH RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE USE OF THE CLIENT DATA OR DELIVERABLES, WHETHER DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, CONSEQUENTIAL, COLLATERAL, OR INCIDENTAL, FOR DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF OR CORRUPTION OF DATA OR INFORMATION, LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF OR INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS OR LOSS OF ANTICIPATED SAVINGS. THE FOREGOING LIMITATION OF LIABILITY DOES NOT LIMIT XXXXX’X AND XXXXX’X AFFILIATES LIABILITY FOR ANY CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DEATH, BODILY INJURY, OR TANGIBLE DAMAGE TO PROPERTY.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxx. Let P be a static group key agreement protocol for n parties allowing broadcasts.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxx. Xxxx (2006). The Front End of Innovation in an Era of Industry Convergence: Evidence from Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods, R&D Management 36, 5, pp. 487-498. Xxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxxx, X. & Xxxxxx, R. (1995) Sociology and health promotion. Health, risk and consumption under late modernism. In The Sociology of Health Promotion (ed. by X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxxx & X.Xxxxxxx), pp. 1–9. Routledge, London. Xxxx, Xxxx X, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx X. and Xxxxxx, Xxx (2006). Canadian Health and Food: The Links between Policy, Consumers, and Industry Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 54, pp. 605–629 Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx X, and Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx (1992). Toward a More Comprehensive Theory of food Labels, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, May 1992, pp. 460-468. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx X. and Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx X. (1996). Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78, pp. 1248-1253. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx X., and Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx (1991) Firm Strategic Response to Food Safety and Nutrition Regulation, Economics of Food Safety, print in ed. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx 99. 273-297, New York, Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx (2008). Market, and Regulatory Factors Influencing Innovation and Commercialization in Canada’s Functional Food and Nutraceutical Sector, Agribusiness, Vol. 24 (2) 207–230 Xxxxx Xxxxxx B., Xxxxx Xxxxx X. and Xxxxx Xxxxx (2002). Xxxxxxxx i masni xxxxxx xxx funkcionalna hrana”, Uljarstvo, vol. 33, br. 3-4, str. 3-8. Xxxxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx X., Baras Xxxxx X. and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (2002). Značaj i mogućnosti proizvodnje funkcionalne hrane, Hemijska industrija, vol. 56, br. 3, str. 113-122. Xxxxxxx, A.T., Xxxxx, X.X., Xxxxxxx, M., Xxxxxx, F., Xxxx, X.X. &Roberfroid, M.B. (1999) Scientific concepts of functional foods in Europe: consensus document. British Journal of Nutrition, 81, S1–S27.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxx acknowledge that neither of them have relied upon any statement, representation, omission made or documentation provided by the other party or the Broker(s), its
Xxxxxx and Xxxxx. Executive also specifically acknowledges that his service as a director beyond the expiration of his current term in 2004 is subject to Executive's re-nomination as a director candidate by the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Company's Board of Directors and the election by shareholders, neither of which events are guaranteed by this Separation Agreement.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxx a ‘milestone in blasphemy prosecution’ in England,480 Justice Xxxxxxxxx ‘overturned the straightjacketed statute that had been created by Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx in the 1670s’481 and decided that ‘even the fundamentals of religion may be attacked’ as long as ‘the decencies of controversy’ are observed.482 Xxxxxxxxx distinguished between the matter and manner of an utterance.483 As long as one is decent, timid, or inoffensive in style, one may question, or criticize religion. By doing so, the focus of the law’s protection shifted from Christianity as such, to the protection of Christian believers.484 477 Quoted in: X. Xxxxxxxx, ‘The Invention of Criminal Blasphemy: Xxx x. Xxxxxx (1676),’ Representations, 2008, p. 31. 478 X. Xxxx, ‘The English Law of Blasphemy: The “Melancholy, Xxxx, Withdrawing Roar”’, in: X. Xxxxxxx & X. Xxxxxxxxxx (eds.), The Fall and Rise of Blasphemy Law, Leiden: Leiden University Press 2016, p. 58-60.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxx. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the rights of the Participant upon a Change of Control (as defined in the Plan) shall be as set forth in section 9 of the Plan on the date hereof., in lieu of the vesting schedule set forth in Schedule 1. If as a result of the Change of Control, the Common Stock is exchanged for or converted into a different form of equity security and/or the right to receive other property (including cash), the Option may be exercised, to the maximum extent practicable, in the same form.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxx. [15] gave a detailed study of the commu- nication complexities of the hypercube based protocol. They also discussed a protocol named octopus, in which members are divided into four disjoint subgroups, and each subgroup has a member as the header. Let A, B, C, D be such four group head- ers. Member A rst builds a secure communication channel with each of its subgroup member Ai. Then Ai generates a random ki and sends it to A. A calculates SA = QA 2G(A) ki, where G(A) is the subgroup headed by A. Headers B, C, and D also gen- erate SB , SC , and SD . Then A, B, C, D perform a hypercube key agreement protocol described above to get a common key K = SAB SCD . Then A sends each of its subgroup members Ai [3], they de xxx k(l;v) = b
