INTEGRATED BENEFITS PACKAGE REVISED AGREEMENT BETWEEN LIHIR GOLD LIMITED AND THE PEOPLE OF LIHIR REPRESENTED BY: THE LIHIR MINING AREA LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. AND THE NIMAMAR RURAL LOCAL-LEVEL GOVERNMENT Nimamar Rural Local-Level Government P O...
P O Box 81
Lihir
Lihir Island
New Ireland Province
Phone No. 0000000 Fax No. 0000000
1
BETWEEN: | LIHIR GOLD LIMITED hereinafter referred to as LGL of the one part. |
AND: | The NIMAMAR RURAL LOCAL-LEVEL GOVERNMENT (NRLLG) on behalf of the LIHIRIANS and the LIHIR MINING AREA LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. (LMALA) on behalf of the LANDOWNERS, of the other part. |
A. | On 26 April 1995 pursuant to the Mining Xxx 0000, the Landowners, the Lihirians and LGL through its agent Lihir Management Company Limited (as it was then) entered into the IBP which formed the all encompassing compensation package for the Landowners and the Lihirians. | ||
B. | All of the agreements, undertakings, commitments and the spirit of the original IBP are valid and remain in force until and unless amended by the Revised IBP or any other subsequent agreement. | ||
C. | The IBP became due for review on 26 April 2000 Negotiations between the Parties with LMALA and the NRLLG represented by the Joint Negotiating Committee or JNC) began on 20 June 2001. The Revised IBP embodies the consensus reached by the Parties on each of the issues discussed. All of the issues discussed are captured in the five chapters of the Revised IBP. | ||
D. | It was recognised and acknowledged by the parties at the beginning of the review process that the opportunity should be taken to re-orient the commitments under the IBP so as to bring them into line with the circumstances now prevailing on Lihir, in particular insofar as impacts on the community are concerned. Accordingly the Revised IBP describes the changes to the provisions of the IBP and new commitments required to address long term community development and sustainability on Lihir. | ||
E. | During the course of the review the JNC developed a policy document titled the Lihir Sustainable Development Plan (LSDP). The NRLLG and LMALA have proposed and LGL has accepted and agreed that the LSDP should form the basis for the revised IBP and provide the framework pursuant to which all future development initiatives are to be aligned and focused over the life of the project. | ||
F. | The parties and all other stakeholders agree that the LSDP must be implemented through the legitimate agency of government, (the NRLLG). Under the decision by the Tumbawinlam Assembly dated 30th September 2004, (Resolution Number 37/2004, attached to this Agreement as Appendix A), NRLLG has assumed ownership and responsibility for the implementation of the LSDP. |
2
G. | The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement is a starting point and as such signifies a commitment to a process and a series of Programmes, each of which still requires considerable detailed planning and budgeting work to attain the development objectives set out in the LSDP. | ||
H. | The Parties acknowledge that one of the core elements of sustainability in Lihir is the development of the capacity of the institutions required to implement the LSDP, in particular the NRLLG and the Nimamar Special Purposes Authority (NSPA) and the Parties have accordingly agreed that a capacity building Programme shall be a major initiative under the LSDP. | ||
I. | The JNC has expressed a desire to investigate alternative financial structures that will provide for more Lihirian control of their own affairs and that will utilise funds provided under existing agreements from LGL to generate investment returns as well as meet the annual budget needs of the Lihirians. LGL has agreed to work with the Lihirians to identify various options and possibilities, subject always to the requirements of the laws of PNG, good governance and commercial viability for all parties. | ||
J. | The IBP provides for a review each five years from the date of the original agreement. The parties hereby acknowledge that the next review will take place five years from the date of this agreement. |
IT IS HEREBY AGREED between the Parties as follows: |
In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires: | |||
“Affected Areas”-means the communities that are most exposed to the impact of the Lihir Project and are defined in Clause 22(a) and (e) of this Agreement. | |||
“Agreed Expended Sum”- means the aggregate of the amount already expended to pay certain outstanding legal fees incurred by the JNC and the cost of the trip to Kairiru undertaken upon the request and direction of JNC to attend the Entrepreneurial Business Development course and the Personal Viability course in Kairuru in 2004, totalling K965,000. | |||
“Carbon Credit”-means tradable units of Certified Emission Reductions (CER’s) that accrue to a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project. | |||
“Mine Closure Plan or MCP”- means Appendix I, the mine closure plan envisaged under Chapter 4 of the IBP and clause 37 of this Agreement to be prepared by LGL in conjunction with the Mine Closure Committee and to be regularly reviewed by the Mine Closure Committee and to be developed and revised by the Parties.. | |||
“CPI”- means the Consumer Price Index normally issued quarterly by the Bank of Papua New Guinea in its Quarterly Bulletin. | |||
“DEC”- means the Department of Environment and Conservation. |
3
“Deed of Settlement-Lihirians Equity Trust” -means the Deed dated 14 August 1997 between Xxxxx Moaina as Settlor and MRL as Trustee establishing the Lihirians Equity Trust. | |||
“DLE”- means the Department of Labour and Employment. | |||
“DOM”- means the Department of Mining | |||
“EIB Loan”- means the financial facility of USD21m that was on-lent by MRDC to MRL to finance the acquisition of the Lihirian Equity by MRL on behalf of the beneficiaries under the Deed of Settlement – Lihirians Equity Trust. | |||
“Execution Date” — means the date on which this Agreement is signed by all of the signatories to it. | |||
“FEC”- means the Finance Executive Committee which is the executive arm of the NRLLG. | |||
“Heads of Agreement” means the non-legally binding undertakings relating primarily to the Lihirian Equity dated 28 March, 2003. | |||
“IBP”- means the Integrated Benefits Package (including the Putput and Ladolam Relocation Agreement, the Putput Community Agreement, the Londolovit Community Agreement, the Land, Crops Air and Water Compensation Agreement, and a series of memoranda of understanding between the National Government, New Ireland Provincial Government, NRLLG and LMALA) signed on 26 April 1995 which was an all encompassing compensation package, the signing of which was a key step in enabling the construction and subsequent operation of the Lihir Gold Project. | |||
“IBP Trust Account”-means the Lihir Integrated Benefits Package Trust Account established pursuant to the Trust Instrument (created under the Public Finances (Management) Act 1995) approved by the Minister for Finance Mr Xxxx Xxxxxx on 27 October 2006 to hold and manage the funds described in Clause 3 for purposes of funding prioritized and budgeted projects and programs under each Chapter of the Revised IBP during the term of this Agreement. | |||
“IBP Trust Account Procedures” — means the procedures for administering the IBP Trust Account as set out in the Appendix C or as named by agreement of the parties from time to time. | |||
“JNC” — means the Joint Negotiating Committee which refers to the body commissioned by the NRLLG and LMALA to represent the Landowners and the Lihirians in the IBP Review negotiations. | |||
“Lihir Gold Project” means the gold exploration, mining and production operations carried out on the Lihir Group of islands by Lihir Gold Limited. | |||
“LMC”- means the company formerly engaged by LGL to manage the operation of the Lihir Gold project under a management agreement which authorised LMC to act for and on behalf of LGL in all matters pertaining to the operation of the Lihir Gold mine, until the 10th day of October 2005 when the management agreement |
4
was terminated and LGL assumed full management control of the Lihir Gold Project; | |||
“LGL” — means Lihir Gold Limited, a company duly incorporated under the laws of Papua New Guinea and duly authorised to conduct gold exploration, mining and production operations at Lihir. | |||
“LMALA” — means the association registered under the Associations Incorporation Act (Chapter 142) whose membership comprises the Landowners; | |||
“Landowners” — means members of any land owning clan which has its origin in the Lihir group of islands and owns land within the Special Mining Lease and Mining Leases, Lease for Mining Purposes and Mining Easements and any other tenements related to the project that have been granted; | |||
“Lihirians”- means all citizens who belong to a clan or sub clan within the Lihir group of islands and who have land rights according to Lihirian custom; | |||
“Lihirian Equity” — has the same meaning as “Lihirians Shares” defined in the MOA and refers to the equity held by MRL on behalf of Lihirians under the Lihirians Equity Trust; | |||
“LSDC” — means the Lihir Strategic Development Concept and refers to the document (LSDP in its first draft) first tabled in August 2003 by the JNC and which first expressed the long-term strategy by which the people of Lihir aim to achieve their destiny of financial independence and self reliance. The LSDC has been superseded and replaced by the LSDP; | |||
“LSDP” — means the NRLLG 20 Year Plan, the Executive Summary of which is contained in Appendix F and includes the five-chapter spreadsheet detailing the Programmes and projects for the first five years, and indicative budget allocations to each chapter, and associated descriptive attachments contained in Appendix E. | |||
“LSDP Custodian” – means a body established by agreement of the Parties to hold, manage and administer the LSDP Growth Account for the time being pending the establishment of the alternative financial system envisaged in Clause 35 of this Agreement which (when established) shall supercede the LSDP Growth Account arrangement. | |||
“LSDP Growth Account”-means the account establish by the Parties and controlled by the LSDP Custodian into which LGL shall release the LSDP funding as described in Clause 4(a) to be held and invested as envisaged in Clause 4(b) before such funding is released each month into the IBP Trust Account managed by the District Treasury Office to fund the budgeted prioritized projects and programs. | |||
“LSDP Planning and Monitoring Committee” –means the permanent parliamentary Committee to be established by NRLLG to act as the clearing and monitoring agent of NRLLG to screen and check all project documentation (and progress against approved budgets) to ensure their compliance with the LSDP and NRLLG Annual Budget and then make recommendations to FEC for approval for funding from the IBP Trust Account. |
5
“Mediation Report”-means mediation report of Xxxxx Tsiamalili OBE, dated 1May 1997 on the dispute in relation to “Participation by Lihirians in Mining on Lihir” which was envisaged in the IBP. The Mediation Report contains the findings and recommendations of Mr Xxxxx Tsiamalili (as Mediator) and formed the resolution of the dispute which in turn formed part of the IBP. | |||
“Mine Closure Committee”- means the committee established under clause 38 of this Agreement. | |||
“Mining Contract”-means the contract to mine and extract the gold bearing ore from either the ore body or stockpiled ore bodies as feed for the gold processing plant for processing and also includes mining the low grade ore stockpile after the mining phase of the project is completed. | |||
“MMC/MRO Equity Purchase Proposal”-means the proposal by the Minister for Mining where the SML Affected Landowners and people in the Affected Areas were to acquire a 50% shareholding in MMC and thereby become one of the major shareholder (through MMC) of MRO which is actively involved in the business of down stream processing of precious metals especially gold and silver from a number of major resource projects and small scale alluvial gold sellers in PNG. | |||
“MMC”-means Melanesian Metals Corporation Limited which is a major shareholder of MRO. | |||
“MRO”-means Metals Refining Operations Limited which is majority owned by MMC. | |||
“MOA”– means the single Memorandum of Agreement between the National Government, Provincial Government, NRLLG and LMALA dated 1 May 2007 (forming part of the Revised IBP). | |||
“MOU”- means the respective Memorandum of Understanding between NRLLG for one part and DEC, DOM, DLE, NIPG and the Police Department separately for the other part regarding the level of assistance that the NRLLG and LMALA require to adequately carry out their functions in Lihir as annexed to the MOA. | |||
“MRDC” — means Mineral Resources Development Company Limited. | |||
“MRL” — means Mineral Resources Lihir Limited, a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act of Papua New Guinea which holds the Lihirian Equity for the Lihirian beneficiaries under the Deed of Settlement – Lihirians Equity Trust. | |||
“National Government”- means the Independent State of Papua New Guinea. | |||
“NRLLG”- means the Nimamar Rural Local-Level Government established under the Organic Law on Provincial and Local Level Governments (1995). | |||
“NSPA” – means a body established by the NRLLG under the Organic Law on Provincial and Local Level Governments (1995) and the Local Level Government Administration Xxx 0000. | |||
“Parties”- means the parties to this Agreement. |
6
“Physical Environment”- means the natural environment including the marine life, flora and fauna, land, biomass and ecosystems that existed prior to commencement of construction and operation of the Lihir Project. | |||
“PNG Sustainable Development Programme Limited”- means a Singapore incorporated company incorporated to act as the corporate vehicle to hold the 52% shareholdings (formerly owned and held by BHP in the Ok Tedi Project) for the benefit of Papua New Guinea and the people of Western Province. | |||
“Provincial Government” — means the New Ireland Provincial Government. | |||
“Revised IBP”- means this Agreement and is used interchangeably with the term “Agreement”. | |||
“SML”- means the Special Mining Lease between LGL and the Independent state of Papua New Guinea dated 17 March 1995. | |||
“SML Affected Landowners”- means the Landowners who own customary land located in the Special Mining Lease. | |||
“Social Environment”- means the cultural, political, economic and social systems at Lihir. | |||
“Specific Issues Agreements”- means the agreements pursuant to which the Project Matrix described in Appendix L was agreed to. | |||
“Sustainable Energy Limited”- means a subsidiary of the PNG Sustainable Development Programme Limited whose focus is sustainable energy development. | |||
“Stakeholders”- means the Parties and signatories to this Agreement. | |||
“Status Statement“- means Appendix “B” which was signed by the parties on 9 November 2005 and encapsulating the then status of negotiations towards this Revised IBP. | |||
“Training and Localisation Plan”- means the Training and Localisation Plan that LGL is required to develop pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement (between the National, NRLLG, and LMALA), the Mining Development Contract (between LGL and the National Government) and Clause 7(b) of this Agreement. |
In this agreement, unless the context otherwise requires: |
(1) | The headings herein do not affect the interpretation or construction of this Agreement; | ||
(2) | Reference to any legislation or an Act includes the amendments to that legislation for the time being in force and also to any legislation passed in substitution therefore and any regulations for the time being in force thereunder; |
7
(3) | Words importing the singular include the plural and vice-versa; | ||
(4) | Words importing any gender include the other gender; and | ||
(5) | The recitals form part of this agreement. |
3. | The Revised IBP | |
The aggregate financial commitment of LGL under the Revised IBP for a period of five years commencing on 1 January 2006 as acknowledged in the Status Statement shall consist of a total of: |
(a) | One hundred million kina (K100 million) less the Agreed Expended Sum but subject to indexation in accordance with Clause 11 to be directed towards the implementation of the LSDP; and | ||
(b) | Up to seven million Kina (K7 million) funding for equity participation in a sustainable income generating business that specifically involves the downstream refining and processing of precious metals including gold and silver for the SML Affected Landowners and the Lihirians in the Affected Areas, subject to: |
(1) | them establishing an effective and transparent corporate governance structure for the management of the same in the business venture entered into to utilize this funding for the abovementioned purpose, and | ||
(2) | the respective due diligence to be undertaken by a reputable accounting firm, the costs of which is to be funded by LGL, to determine its merits as an investment. |
(c) | To ensure that the purpose in Clause 3(b) is achieved the Parties agree: |
(1) | that the MMC/MRO Equity Purchase Proposal by the Minister for Mining shall be pursued as an investment opportunity for the investment of the K7 million agreed to in Clause 3(b) as it is consistent with the original intention of the Landowners, |
8
(2) | to work together to jointly explore available options to ensure that the K7 million is invested in a well managed and profitable business that is involve in the downstream refining and processing of precious metals including gold and silver in Papua New Guinea or elsewhere, and | ||
(3) | that where the due diligence exercise proves that the MMC/MRO Equity Purchase Proposal is not economically viable, the Parties shall jointly explore options to make the MMC/MRO Equity Purchase Proposal become viable or secure a similar meritorious investment that shall always be consistent with the purpose in Clause 3 (b). |
(d) | The Status Statement is annexed hereto as a source document as Appendix B. |
4. | Payments |
(a) | Acknowledging that the funding of the LSDP must be aligned to LGL’s cash flow, the Parties have agreed that the amount in Clause 3(a) shall be funded in the following manner: |
(1) | LGL shall pay to the LSDP Growth Account over the five year term of the Revised IBP the unspent moneys for the preceding year together with a monthly instalment of K1.67million at the beginning of each month until its cash flow is improved. | ||
(2) | Where LGL’s cash flow had improved it shall pay the amount in Clause 3(a) over five (5) years in equal annual instalments of Twenty Million Kina (K20 Million) paid on the first day of January of each year by electronic transfer to the LSDP Growth Account. | ||
(3) | The instalments shall be adjusted on an annual basis for CPI from 1 January 2007 in accordance with Clause 11). |
(b) | Whilst the money is in the LSDP Growth Account it shall be invested in safe, passive and growth driven investments endorsed by the LSDP Custodian based on the recommendation of a professional financial and investment advisor. Proceeds of the investments shall continue to be rolled over and shall form part of the money held in the LSDP Growth Account that shall be electronically transferred into the IBP Trust Account in accordance with the IBP Trust Account Procedures. | ||
(c) | On the first(1st) day of each month money budgeted for the priority projects under each Chapter of the Revised IBP shall be electronically transferred into the IBP Trust Account and then disbursed to finance the respective projects and programs scheduled for funding in that month. | ||
(d) | Priority projects and programs funded from the IBP Trust Account in each month shall be those projects and programs whose project documentations have been cleared by the LSDP Planning and Monitoring Committee and approved by the FEC through the IBP Trust Account Procedures. |
9
(e) | All transactions involving the debiting of the IBP Trust Account shall be allowed only in accordance with the IBP Trust Account Procedures. Any transaction that does not comply with the IBP Trust Account Procedures shall be deemed to be null and void. | ||
(f) | Notwithstanding Clause 4(1), the funding of the LSDP to the LSDP Growth Account shall be revised from time to time depending on the cash flow of LGL. | ||
(g) | The IBP Trust Account Procedures is annexed hereto as Appendix C. |
5. | Potential Commercial Ventures |
(a) | The Parties further acknowledge that in his letter to the President of the NRLLG, dated April 20, 2005 the Minister for Mining flagged two further proposals that he had made to LGL to help resolve the issues raised by the Lihirians. These two proposals were for; the acquisition, ownership and operation of geothermal energy generation through a possible joint venture with Sustainable Energy Limited, a subsidiary of the PNG Sustainable Development Programme Limited; and investment in all accommodation facilities in the mine township. The onus is on the Lihirians, to further explore these proposals with LGL on a commercial basis. | ||
(b) | In the event that the Lihirians determine that either of the potential projects represents desirable use of their funds and to explore these proposals with LGL, LGL undertakes to respond reasonably to any approach by Lihirians and LMALA and subject to (c) below to participate in the process of evaluation to ascertain the attractiveness of any such proposal or approach. | ||
(c) | The Parties acknowledge that these proposals can only proceed if they are clearly to the economic benefit of all parties and continue to allow LGL to meet its operating needs. |
6. | Lihirian Equity Issue |
(a) | The Parties acknowledge that the Lihirian Equity is of paramount importance as a means of the Lihirian community benefiting from the mining operations. The Lihirian community’s equity interest in LGL was negotiated as part of the Mining Development Contract in 1995 and financed by the EIB Loan to realize benefit flows for Lihirians from dividends. However, in the last 10 years the anticipated dividend flows have not been forthcoming. | ||
(b) | By February 2006, MRL (on behalf of the beneficiaries of the Lihirian Trust Deed) had repaid the EIB Loan in full realizing a debt free equity of 5.09% (on the basis of LGL’s issued share capital as at 30 September 2006 after including certain shares LGL is to issue to MRL as a result of the LGL sell down process). |
10
(c) | By January 2007, MRL (on behalf of the Lihirian Trust Deed) had amended the Lihirian Trust Deed allowing it to sell down its shares in LGL to 3.7%. The Parties agree that the agreed increase of .11% (based on LGL’s issued capital as at 30 September 2006) initially agreed to apply to 5.09% (to increase it up to the agreed threshold of 5.2% as stated in the Heads of Agreement) shall apply to the current Lihirian Equity holding of 3.7%. | ||
(d) | Consistent with Clause 5 of the Heads of Agreement and the understanding reached between the Parties after the sell down process in September 2006, MRL and LGL shall work on terms and reach an agreement which would allow an increase in the 3.7% (or the relevant Lihirian Equity holding at the time the increase is effected by LGL) Lihirian Equity holding by a further .11% (based on LGL’s issued capital as at 30 September 2006). MRL and LGL agree that the target date to agree to such terms shall be six (6) months from the Execution Date. | ||
(e) | MRL (with the support of LGL, where required) shall: |
(i) | explore and develop proposals and investment strategies to convert the value of the equity holding and the proceeds of any sale of such Lihirian Equity holding (if any) to provide for long term growth driven investments for the benefit of the present and future generations at the same time creating a conducive economic environment for the Lihirian community consistent with the underlying principles of the LSDP. | ||
(ii) | in conducting the exercises described in clause (i) above, make such amendments to the Deed of Settlement- Lihirian Equity Trust dated 14 August 1997 as may be necessary to align it to the LSDP whilst ensuring that such amendments are in accordance with the law and good governance principles. | ||
(iii) | develop a protocol for the nomination of a Lihirian representative of the Lihirian Equity to the Board of Directors of LGL, such protocol to be subject to approval by the LGL Board and by LGL shareholders. | ||
(iv) | develop a consultative approval process or processes consistent with the principles of the LSDP, pursuant to which all possible future expansions of the Lihir Gold Project shall be undertaken. |
(f) | The Heads of Agreement as a source document is annexed herewith as Appendix D to this Agreement. |
7. | Participation in Mining on Lihir | |
LGL acknowledges the desire of the Lihirians to undertake contract mining in the pit and stockpile area of the SML as contemplated in the understandings reached in the Mediation Report on “Participation in Contract Mining in Lihir” dated 1 May 1997. To ensure that a Lihirian entity is awarded a Mining Contract as envisaged above, the Parties agree to do the following over the next five years: |
11
(a) | NRLLG and LMALA will liaise with Kuridala Limited and Lakaka Civil & Construction to restructure, merge, reorganize and/or reinvent Kuridala Limited and Lakaka Civil & Constructions Limited or to jointly explore other potential business arrangement including (amongst others) any possible joint venture arrangement between the Parties to enable such merged entity or potential joint venture arrangement to be eligible to competitively bid for the Contract Mining in 2011, | ||
(b) | LGL with the assistance of LMALA and NRLLG shall review and adjust the LGL Training and Localization Plan to target the relevant training required to contribute towards the preparation of the Lihirian entity contemplated in (a) above , | ||
(c) | LGL with the assistance of NRLLG and LMALA shall revise the proposed four phase plan described in the LMC Submission of 24/25 April 1997 as set out in Item 5 of the Mediation Report dated 1 May 1997 to make it consistent with the corporate reorganization exercise stipulated in (a) above and the LGL Training and Localization Plan referred to in (b) above. | ||
(d) | LGL with the assistance of NRLLG and LMALA shall ensure that by 2011, the entity described in Clause 7(a) shall be invited to bid for the Contract Mining. |
8. | Fly-In/Fly-0ut Arrangement | |
Consistent with the original intent of the existing fly in/fly out arrangement, the Parties agreed to continue the existing arrangement subject to the following: |
(a) | that all the persons employed in positions consisting of the senior site management of LGL and all relevant National and Provincial Government agencies shall be accommodated at the Londolovit Mining Township where possible and subject to the issues of attraction and retention of senior management staff, | ||
(b) | that all other LGL and Contractor employees below the level described in Clause 8(a) shall continue to commute to work under the current fly-in fly- out arrangement for the duration of this Agreement, and | ||
(c) | that as consideration for the Lihirians’ consent to the continuation of the current fly-in fly-out arrangement, LGL shall support the social monitoring programs of the Social Monitoring and Movement Committee. |
9. | Entitlement to Carbon Credit | |
LGL acknowledge the Lihirians desire to achieve their aspirations set out in the LSDP and particularly their desire to participate in the ownership of the Geothermal Power Projects as set out in Clause 5. The Parties agree that they will jointly explore benefit sharing options to determine one that is best suited for carbon trading in relation to geothermal power emissions. | ||
10. | Chapter Allocations |
(a) | The Parties acknowledge the initial chapter allocations as endorsed |
12
by the FEC as the guide to how the K100 million total referred to in Clause 3 of this Agreement will be distributed amongst the five chapters of the Revised IBP and appropriated and budgeted for in the annual NRLLG budget. The five chapter five year allocations are attached as Appendix E. | |||
(b) | All allocations will be reviewed on an annual basis through the normal NRLLG budgetary processes. This review will be based on annual monitoring and reviews of performance by the LSDP Planning and Monitoring Committee. Allocations will always be within the total sum allowed under Clause 3(a) of this Agreement and must remain consistent with the relevant laws of Papua New Guinea and with the LSDP. | ||
(c) | The Parties agree that wherever there is a shortfall in the annual allocation of one Chapter, provided that the shortfall is genuine, the shortfall relates to a project or programme that has been approved by the NRLLG and is consistent with the LSDP, and alternative avenues for alternative funding have been exhausted, the relevant implementing agency of that Chapter may apply through a submission to the FEC for the amount required to be advanced to it from its total five year budget. LGL may, in its absolute discretion, determine whether such an advance should be made. Such advances will only be made in exceptional circumstances. |
11. | C.P.I. Adjustment |
12. | Adoption of the LSDP |
(a) | The Parties acknowledge that the LSDP and its component chapters will form the basis for the Revised IBP. The Executive Summary of the LSDP is annexed herewith as Appendix F to this Agreement. | ||
(b) | The 2006 and 2007 NRLLG budgets have incorporate the principles and programme and project components of the LSDP and further acknowledges that all funding that is available to the NRLLG should be directed into a single budget, based on the principles of the LSDP. | ||
(c) | This commitment and all others under this Revised IBP, in no way infringe upon the constitutional rights and responsibilities of the NRLLG to make regulations, policies and budgetary decisions for the benefit of the people of Lihir. To the extent of any inconsistency, the NRLLG’s constitutional duties and responsibilities shall prevail over the LSDP. |
13. | Lihir Destiny |
13
14. | MOA |
15. | MOU |
16. | Capacity Building |
(a) | Given that a core element of sustainability is the development of the capacity of the respective institutions, particularly the NRLLG and NSPA, the Parties have agreed they will support the capacity building programme that will be carried out in both the NRLLG and NSPA including all government related institutions and all government owned corporate entities. In the case of LGL, such support will not consist of financial assistance. | |
(b) | NRLLG undertake that it will take ownership of and promptly implement the capacity building programme within its structures and institution to align itself with the LSDP and to have the capacity to implement the LSDP and that it will allocate the necessary financial and human resources to ensure that this programme is implemented. | |
(c) | Institutions related to or established by the NRLLG and New Ireland Provincial Government shall be covered under the capacity building programme. These institutions include but are not limited to the following: |
(I) | NSPA; | ||
(ii) | Lihir Sub-District Office; |
14
(iii) | Namatanai District Management structure; | ||
(iv) | Nimamar Investments Limited; | ||
(v) | Lihir Mining Area Landowners Association Inc.; | ||
(vi) | Lihir Sustainable Development Limited; and the | ||
(viii) | Lihir Sub-District Treasury Office. |
(d) | As a component of the capacity building Programme, NRLLG shall fund the: |
(i) | Integrated Agriculture Training Programme through the sixteen Xxxx Development Budgets in consultation with the Department of Primary Industry, the Lihir Sub-District Administration and Lihir Sustainable Development Limited; and | ||
(ii) | the Holistic Human Development Programme through the sixteen Xxxx development budgets and managed by Lihir Sustainable Development Limited under Chapter 4. |
17. | Incomplete Projects & Programmes |
LGL undertakes that it will fund and implement all outstanding and incomplete projects and programmes that remain incomplete under the IBP as at the Execution date, being; |
(a) | Sealing the Putput relocation area access road; | ||
(b) | Sealing the ring road from Zuen to Palie via the SML area (but excluding those road sections within the SML); | ||
(c) | Putput water supply; | ||
(d) | Putput cemetery monument; and | ||
(e) | Alaia preservation project. |
18. | Continuing IBP Projects/Programmes | |
(a) | The parties acknowledge that there are a number of programmes and projects established under the old IBP that are ongoing in nature, and that will have to be maintained in the transition to the new LSDP structure. While the longer term aim is to hand over the implementation of these programmes to the NRLLG and its agencies, it is acknowledged that this will take some time to achieve and that the NRLLG and its agencies need to implement the various capacity building programmes before they can take over all of the functions currently being implemented by LGL. | |
(b) | The LSDP spreadsheets in Appendix E identifies the programmes and projects to be carried over, and LGL undertake that it will continue to implement all such continuing projects and programmes as projects carried over in the Revised IBP, until such time as the parties agree to a mutually convenient hand over. LGL will |
15
fund these activities directly out of the K100 million total funding provided under this Revised IBP and referred to in Clause 3(a). LGL will follow the process established for accessing funds from the IBP and will account for its spending on these continuing projects to the FEC as part of the quarterly review process. | ||
19. | Chapter 1 Budget | |
(a) | The Chapter 1 LSDP spreadsheet in Appendix E(1) identifies the programmes and projects to be budgeted for implementation under Chapter 1. | |
(b) | NRLLG undertakes that it will under its capacity building programme referred to in Clause 16 of this Agreement, provide for Xxxx budget coordination so as to assist Xxxx members to formulate and implement their respective Xxxx budgets. | |
20. | NRLLG Undertakings | |
(a) | Subject to Clause 12(c) of this Agreement, NRLLG agrees that it shall do all things necessary to ensure that the LSDP is successfully implemented. | |
(b) | Consistent with (a) above, NRLLG undertakes that before the end of 2007 and for each of the financial years to and including the year ended 31 December 2010, it shall consolidate its budget and the LSDP budget into a single budget that will be implemented through the Lihir Sub-District Treasury Office, or any other alternative accounting system which is consistent with the Public (Finances) Management Act and which is agreed to by all the Parties, where the establishment of the Lihir District Treasury Office is delayed. | |
(c) | NRLLG undertakes that where it does not have the expertise to implement any part of the LSDP it shall request non-financial assistance from the parties to this Agreement and the Parties agree that where a request for assistance is requested by NRLLG they shall use reasonable endeavours to assist NRLLG, provided always that such assistance does not include financial assistance. | |
(d) | The Parties all acknowledge that the Parliamentary Committee structure of the NRLLG needs to be activated to take charge of sectoral policy development and that all external assistance, whether from LGL, the national government or any other source, must be directed into programmes and projects through this committee structure. Accordingly, all projects and programmes of social monitoring, as referred to in Chapter Two of the IBP under the sub- heading Human Development’ will be directed through the appropriate parliamentary committee as determined by the NRLLG. The proposed Office of Social Monitoring will also be a sub committee of that body and will report to it. | |
(e) | NRLLG undertakes, and the parties all agree, that the annual expenditures of the NRLLG must be audited by a privately commissioned audit firm independently of any audit which may be carried out by the national government or the Auditor General’s office. Any such audit report is to be made available publicly, including to the other parties to this Agreement, as part of the NRLLG commitment to transparency and accountability to the people of Lihir. |
16
21. | LMALA-Implementing Agency |
22. | Affected Areas | |
(a) | The IBP identified the following as areas of Lihir that would be subject to more significant impacts from mining operations. |
(I) | Xxxxxx 0 xxx 0 | ||
(xx) | Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx | ||
(xxx) | Kunaye Village | ||
(iv) | Zuen Village | ||
(v) | Lipuko Village (by virtue of the Putput Community Agreement) |
(b) | It was agreed that these areas should receive additional benefits in the form of the following infrastructure development: | |
Reticulated water Garbage collection and septic tank emptying facilities Assistance with preparation of village layout planning Housing assistance Electricity reticulation |
||
(c) | Initial housing assistance was provided to the identified communities in the form of a lump sum payment under the IBP. Thereafter, an annual payment was to be made into trusts established for this purpose, based on the area of lease land contributed by each of the following communities to the project. The annual payment is based on the Damaged Land rate of land use by the area of leases: |
(I) | Putput 1 and 2 as covered in the Putput Community Agreement | ||
(ii) | Londolovit K75, 000.00 | ||
(iii) | Kunaye K75, 000.00 | ||
(iv) | Zuen K50, 000.00 |
These payments were activated at the time the project impacted on the relevant communities. In the case of Zuen this would only be triggered by commencement of a limestone quarry project which has not yet eventuated and may not eventuate. No specific provision was made for the Kapit community which is covered by a separate but related agreement, the Kapit Relocation Agreement. | ||
(d) | The Parties acknowledge that the Malie Community was accorded “Affected Area” status by virtue of the Memorandum of Understanding between LMC and the Malie Community dated 3rd May 2001. | |
(e) | The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the list of “Affected Area” communities shall be redefined as |
17
Putput 1 and 2 | - | Most Affected community | ||||
Kapit village | - | Most Affected community | ||||
Londolovit village | - | Affected Area community | ||||
Kunaye 1 and 2 | - | Affected Area community | ||||
Malie Island | - | Affected Area community | ||||
Zuen | - | Lesser Affected Area community | ||||
Lipuko | - | Lesser Affected Area community |
(f) | These areas shall therefore continue to receive extra benefit in the form of infrastructure development through the VDS Grants scheme with particular, but not exclusive, emphasis on: |
(a) | Reticulated water | ||
(b) | Garbage collection and septic tank emptying facilities | ||
(c) | Assistance with preparation of village layout planning | ||
(d) | Housing assistance | ||
(e) | Electricity reticulation |
23. | General Compensation |
24. | Alignment with the LSDP |
(a) | acknowledged that the beneficiaries of the projects and programs under Chapter 2 now totally depends on goods and services provided by LGL which in the long term is not sustainable and therefore inconsistent with the principles of the LSDP; | ||
(b) | acknowledged and agree that the projects and programs under Chapter 2 shall be approached in a manner that will cause a shift from the dependency and reliance mind set currently being encouraged by LGL to a self help mind set based on the principles of the LSDP; | ||
(c) | agree and accept that to enable the change of mind set described in paragraph (a) and (b) above LMALA shall focus its resources at implementing the following programs and projects: |
i. | Capacity Building Project- particularly geared towards reorganizing and/or restructuring LMALA to ensure the shift envisaged in paragraph (b) happens; |
18
ii. | Awareness Project- to ensure every individuals in the affected Areas are made aware of the requirements they need to satisfy to ensure that they are part of the shift; | ||
iii. | Self Reliance Project- to ensure that individuals and families in the Affected Areas achieve holistic development (Mental, Spiritual, Emotional, Physical and Financial development) thereby contribute to the creation of a happy, healthy, wise and wealthy society in the Affected Areas and overtime throughout Lihir; and | ||
iv. | Financial Independence Project- to ensure that each individual in the Affected Areas is assisted (by following a definitive financial plan tailor- made for his needs) to convert from being a liability to an asset to himself, his family and to his community; |
(d) | agree and accept that they will jointly work together to ensure that: |
i. | the required details, resources and requirements necessary and required to successfully implement the four programs described in paragraph (c) above are completed; | ||
ii. | these four projects are progressively and constantly improved in line with the objective of achieving the Lihir Destiny; and | ||
iii. | more projects and programs (in addition to these four projects) shall be developed to ensure that the shift envisaged in paragraph (b) is realised and the attainment of the Lihir Destiny is achieved; |
(e) | Subject to paragraph (c)(i) above: |
i. | The Parties acknowledge that there is a need for LMALA to re-organise and re-orient itself in order for it to be in a position to deliver the outcomes it has set itself for the period of the LSDP. This process will be conducted as part of the capacity building exercise referred to in chapter one of the LSDP. | ||
ii. | LMALA agrees that it needs to duly gain a mandate from its stakeholders according to its constitution to endorse the revised structure and its operational role. |
25. | Financial Support for LMALA |
26. | The Chapter Two Budget |
19
27. | NSPA as Implementing Agency | |
(a) | The NSPA, shall be the lead implementation agency for Chapter Three. | |
(b) | It is acknowledged however that the NSPA needs considerable technical support before it will have the capacity and capability it needs to fully manage all projects and programmes and that this will be addressed through the capacity building programme under Chapter One. | |
(c) | LGL commits to providing necessary technical support and guidance in the interim to ensure that projects are implemented as directed by the FEC. | |
28. | The Chapter Three Budget |
29. | Role of NSPA |
(a) | For implementing all infrastructure-related projects under all chapters of the Revised IBP. | |
(b) | For tendering of all infrastructure-related projects that are budgeted for under all the chapters of the Revised IBP. | |
(c) | For supervising and managing the implementation of all projects whose implementation is outsourced to private contractors. | |
(d) | For providing technical guidance and advice to the 16 Xxxx planning committees of the NRLLG, in particular providing design and scoping advice, as well as costing for xxxx planning purposes. | |
(e) | For providing quarterly reports on the progress (fiscal and technical) of all projects implemented by it to the NRLLG. | |
30. | NRLLG Undertaking |
20
31. | Lihir Sustainable Development Limited | |
(a) | A corporate entity to be known as Lihir Sustainable Development Limited is proposed as the implementing agency for Chapter Four. This company has yet to be registered and its ownership structure and operational mandate will be developed for submission to the NRLLG for approval. | |
(b) | LMALA and NRLLG have determined that LSDL will be responsible for the development and delivery of the Holistic Human Development Programme for Lihir and in particular the delivery of the Personal Viability training Programmes as developed by the EDTC to the community as a whole as the first stage of development in Lihir. | |
32. | The LSDP- Long Term Economic Development Plan |
33. | Holistic Human Development | |
(a) | LMALA and the NRLLG have determined that the focus of this Chapter will be on Holistic Human Development particularly on getting as many Lihirians as possible to attend the PV Courses and PV Home School Courses Programme for each xxxx in Lihir for the period from 2006 t0 2010. | |
(b) | These courses will be funded under the respective Xxxx Budgets of each of the sixteen wards in Lihir. | |
(c) | Lihir Sustainable Development Limited will be responsible for managing and conducting these courses in the Affected Areas and in all wards in Lihir. |
34. | Economic Development for Communities |
35. | Alternative Financial System |
(a) | acknowledge that, LGL, NRLLG and LMALA are committed to jointly exploring ways of using and leveraging the amount set out in Clause 3(a) so that it can be used to fund projects and programmes set out in the Five Chapters of the Revised IBP and simultaneously begin to create and grow alternative sources of income that over the life of the Lihir Project will grow to eventually replace LGL as the |
21
provider of all financial resources required to successfully implement and sustain the LSDP; and | |||
(b) | undertake that they will work together to develop and implement a viable alternative financial arrangement that LGL, NRLLG and LMALA finally approve as the financial system that will facilitate the implementation of the LSDP. | ||
36. | Chapter 4 Budget |
37. | Mine Closure | |
(a) | Mine closure must be designed to rehabilitate Physical Environment and assist social development given that both the Physical Environment and the Social Environment have been and will continue to be affected by the operation of the Lihir Project. Mine closure must be growth and sustainability driven, consistent with the principles of the LSDP. | |
(b) | The Parties acknowledge that the LSDP will address the growth and development of the Social Environment while the rehabilitation of the Physical Environment will be addressed by the Mine Closure Plan or MCP. The MCP has been developed by LGL and will continue to be reviewed regularly by the Mine Closure Committee and by the parties after every five years. The MCP is required to deal with (amongst other things) the following fundamental issues: |
(I) | the scope and extend of the land reclamation/rehabilitation in the Affected Areas; | ||
(ii) | the clean up costs of the land reclamation/rehabilitation; | ||
(iii) | the financial assurance for the land reclamation/rehabilitation; | ||
(iv) | the future use of the final void of the pit; | ||
(v) | the ownership and use of the public utilities including the Xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx, Xxxxxx xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx water supply and xxxx, geothermal power station, Lihir Medical Centre, offices, communication towers, LGL residential accommodation and townsite infrastructure; and | ||
(vi) | other issues consistent with the principles of the LSDP. |
(c) | LGL in conjunction with the Mine Closure Committee will be the main agency for the implementation of Chapter 5, especially the provision of funding for; the seven IBP trust funds; the preparation of the Mine Closure Plan; the anticipated costs of closure; and annual, ongoing costs of rehabilitation. |
22
(d) | The Mine Closure Plan is in its second draft and a copy of the current draft is annexed herewith as Appendix I to this Agreement. This Plan is subject to regular review by the Mine Closure Committee and formal review by the Parties and by the State after every five years. | |
38. | Mine Closure Committee | |
(a) | The Mine Closure Committee shall be the implementing agency of the Mine Closure planning process. | |
(b) | The Mine Closure Committee shall be comprised of the Departmental Heads of the DEC, DOM, and representatives from LGL, NRLLG and LMALA. | |
(c) | The procedures for the conduct of meetings of the Mine Closure Committee shall be decided by the Mine Closure Committee. | |
(d) | The Parties undertake that they will do all things necessary and required by the Mine Closure Committee to facilitate the designing, preparation and implementation of the Mine Closure Plan including ensuring that the MCP is consistent with the growth and sustainability principles of the LSDP. | |
39. | Trust Funds | |
(a) | The Parties acknowledge that the respective trust funds established under the IBP shall be managed by their respective trustees. The Parties further acknowledge that LGL shall oversee the general management of the seven major IBP Trust Funds until the individual Boards of trustees are able and willing to assume responsibility for the management of these trust funds from LGL. | |
(b) | Annual payments into the trust funds will continue to be made as provided in the IBP, with the difference that the rates are now increased in line with the revision to these rates as recorded in Clause 22 of this Agreement and in Appendix G under each specific issue and Appendix H (where applicable) to this Agreement. | |
(c) | It is further acknowledged that as from 2006, an annual payment will be made into each of the Putput and Ladolam Relocation Trust Fund, the Putput Plantsite Trust Fund and the Kapit Relocation Trust Fund. This annual payment will be based on the land area covered by SML 6 multiplied by the Social Inconvenience rate as established in clause 22, Appendix G. | |
(d) | The Parties acknowledge and agree to establish a new fund to be called the Mine Closure Investment Fund where LGL has agreed to pay Three Hundred Thousand Kina (K300, 000.00) per annum into the Fund for the duration of this Agreement. This new fund shall supersede the Long Term Investment Fund provision in the IBP, and the funds presently held by LGL under the Long Term Investment Fund provision shall be amalgamated with the annual commitment to the Mine Closure Investment Fund. | |
(e) | An Investment and Management Board representing all Stakeholders shall oversee and manage the Mine Closure Investment Trust Fund. Membership of this board shall be as follows (each of the nominees may appoint a delegate as appropriate): |
23
Lihir Gold Limited | GM EA&SD | |||
LMALA | Chairman | |||
NRLLG | President | |||
DoM | Secretary |
(f) | The investment board will be responsible for appointing a fund manager and for providing that fund manager with investment guidelines. The board will also determine whether a formal trust arrangement is appropriate, and if so how it should be established and structured. | |
(g) | The investment and management board will be required to provide an annual report to the NRLLG and the community on the status of the fund. | |
40. | Chapter 5 Budget |
41. | Law Applicable | |
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Papua New Guinea. | ||
42. | Force Majeure |
(a) | Any failure on the part of a Party to comply with any of the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall not be grounds for termination or give the other Party any claim for damages if such failure arises from a force majeure event, and if the first-mentioned Party has; |
(I) | Taken all appropriate precautions, due care and reasonable alternative measures either with the objective of avoiding such failure and/or of carrying out its obligations under this Agreement; and | ||
(ii) | Given notice to the other Party of the occurrence of the force majeure event upon becoming aware of same. |
(b) | The first-mentioned party shall take all reasonable measures to overcome the force majeure and to fulfil the terms and conditions of this Agreement with the minimum of delay (provided that no Party has an obligation to settle a labour dispute or to test the constitutional validity of or otherwise challenge any legislation or laws) and shall give notice to the other Party upon the restoration of normal conditions. | ||
(c) | For the purposes of this Agreement force majeure events shall include war, insurrection, civil disturbance, blockades, riot, embargoes, strikes lock-out and other labour conflicts and disputes, epidemics, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, cyclones, floods, tidal waves, explosions, fires, lightning, governmental restrictions or unavailability of material or equipment and any other event which the party claiming force majeure could not reasonably be expected to prevent or control. |
24
43. | Termination/Review |
(a) | This Agreement shall terminate on the expiration of the Special Mining Lease or upon its earlier revocation or surrender. | ||
(b) | This Agreement shall be reviewed by the Parties within five (5) years from the date of the execution of the Agreement. However, nothing herein shall preclude any party to request renegotiation of any provision herein. |
44. | Resolution of Disputes | |
Where a dispute arises between the parties as to interpretation or implementation of this Agreement, a meeting shall be held within fourteen (14) days of the request made by a party, with a view to resolve same. | ||
45. | Arbitration | |
Where a dispute referred to in Clause 41 is not resolved within sixty (60) days after the request for a meeting, the Parties may submit the dispute to a single arbitrator agreed to by the Parties for resolution of disputes in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration Act (Chapter 46). | ||
46. | Waiver | |
The failure of any Party to enforce, at any time of the provisions of this Agreement shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of the provision in no way be thereof of this Agreement or the right of any Party thereafter to enforce each and every part of the provision in respect of any subsequent default or breach. | ||
47. | Severability | |
The provision of this Agreement shall be separate and severable each from the other to the extent that if any portion or any one provision or portion is deemed to be inoperative then the remainder of the Agreement shall remain binding upon and enforceable by the Parties hereto. | ||
48. | Further Acts | |
The Parties shall execute such documents and do and perform such acts that lie within their power and are necessary to give full effect to this Agreement. | ||
49. | Implementation | |
Each party undertakes to reasonably use legal and administrative powers it has at its disposal from time to time to ensure that the provisions of this Agreement are effectively and expeditiously implemented. | ||
50. | Communications |
(a) | Any formal communication by the Parties concerning this Agreement shall be deemed to have been made: |
25
(I) | In the case of the LGL, if signed by the Chief Executive Officer, the Executive General Manager or the General Manager for External Affairs and Sustainable Development ; and | ||
(ii) | In the case of the Nimamar Rural Local-Level Government if signed by the President of the Nimamar Rural Local-Level Government; and | ||
(iii) | In the case of the Lihir Mining Area Landowners Association Inc. if signed by the Chairman of the Lihir Mining Area Landowners Association Inc. |
(b) | Any formal communication shall be in writing and may be delivered either personally, or transmitted by mail or by facsimile to the person, or persons referred to herein at its address given below: |
(I) | Notice to LGL: | ||
Executive General Manager Lihir Gold Limited LIHIR ISLAND New Ireland Province |
|||
Fax No. (000) 000 0000 | |||
(ii) | Notice to the Nimamar Rural Local Level Government | ||
The President Nimamar Rural Local Level Government P.X. Xxx 00 XXXXX XXXXXX Xxx Xxxxxxx Xrovince |
|||
Fax No. (000) 000 0000 | |||
(iii) | Notice to Lihir Mining Area Landowners Association Inc | ||
The Chairman Lihir Mining Area Landowners Association Inc. P.X. Xxx 000 XXXXX XXXXXX, Xxx Xxxxxxx Xrovince |
|||
Fax No. (000) 000 0000 |
(c) | Any formal communication shall be deemed to have reached the other Party: |
(I) | in the case of personal delivery, when received by the relevant person referred to in Clause 42 (b); and | ||
(ii) | in the case of telex or facsimile, as soon as the transmission is confirmed. |
26
51. | Execution |
(a) | This Agreement is legally binding on the Parties to it upon its execution by the duly authorized representatives for each Party. | ||
(b) | This Agreement shall not be invalidated or affected by any future dispute as to the authority of the person appointed to execute the Agreement for and on behalf of any of the Parties to this Agreement. | ||
(c) | All of the agreements, undertakings, commitments and the spirit of the original IBP are valid and remain in force unless amended by the Revised IBP or any other subsequent agreement. Express provision in this revised IBP Agreement shall supersede any prior existing agreement relating to the same, including prior agreement in the original IBP. |
LIHIR GOLD LIMITED by:
Managing Director
|
Witness | |
Name: Xxxxxx Xxxx
|
Name: |
LIHIR MINING AREA LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION by:
Chairman
|
Witness | |
Name: XXXX SOIPANG
|
Name: |
27
NIMAMAR RURAL LOCAL-LEVEL
GOVERNMENT by:
President
|
Witness | |
Name: XXXXXXX XXXXXX
|
Name: |
28
Appendix A |
NRLLG Resolution No.37/2004 | |
Appendix B |
Status Statement | |
Appendix C |
IBP Trust Account Procedures | |
Annexure D |
Heads of Agreement | |
Appendix E |
Five Chapter Spread Sheets | |
1. Appendix E(1) |
Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 1 | |
2. Appendix E(2) |
Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 2 | |
3. Appendix E(3) |
Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 3 | |
4. Appendix E(4) |
Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 4 | |
5. Appendix E(5) |
Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 5 | |
Appendix F |
Executive Summary of the LSDP | |
Appendix G |
Project Matrix for Specific Issues | |
1. Specific Issues Agreements |
||
(a) Appendix G(1) |
Putput Ladolam Relocation Agreement | |
(b) Appendix G(2) |
Putput Community Agreement | |
(c) Appendix G(3) |
Pit and Stockpile | |
(d) Appendix G(4) |
Kapit Relocation Agreement | |
(e) Appendix G(5) |
Londolovit Community River Agreement | |
(f) Appendix G(6) |
Londolovit Township Agreement | |
(g) Appendix G(7) |
Kunaye Airport Settlement Agreement | |
2. Land, Crop, Water and Air Compensation Agreement |
||
(a) Appendix H(1) |
Revised Land Use Rates Table | |
(b) Appendix H(2) |
Revised Economic Trees Rates Table | |
Appendix I |
Mine Closure Plan |
29
30
Resolution No: 37/2004 | ||
That the Tumbawinlam Assembly, endorsed and approved the Lihir Sustainable Development Plan (LSDP). | ||
Moved: Member Suar | ||
Seconded: Member Seksalan | ||
All in favour. | ||
7. | REPORTS | |
Nimamar Special Purposes Authority annual report 2003, the report was presented by the Manager Mr. Bualia. He than briefly went through the report for the members noting. | ||
Resolution No: 38/2004 | ||
That the Tumbawinlam Assembly endorsed and approved the Nimamar Special Purposes Authority 2003 Annual Report. | ||
Moved: Member Kolzik | ||
Seconded: Member Butmakil | ||
All in favour. | ||
8. | AOB |
8.1 | Member Kolzik, requested the administration to write to the management NSPA to fast tract the construction of the members kit house. | ||
8.2 | Member Xxxxxx some officers are not performing to their expectations, and, the administration should ensure these officers must attend to duties. He also raised, the probation period of three (3) months is over, and their performance should be reviewed. | ||
8.3 | Member Xxxxxx, refer to his conversation with Mr. Kondiak on the equity payout. He said, Mr. Kondiak will be requesting a second listing from members. | ||
8.4 | Member Seksalan, raised can the administration brief the members of the operation of NIL. | ||
8.5 | Member Kare, asked what criteria was used to appoint board members to government establishment institutions. | ||
8.6 | In reply to both questions, Chairman Silul informed members the following. |
31
STATUS STATEMENT
A. | On or around 26 April 1995, Lihir Management Company (LMC) acting for and on behalf of Lihir Gold Limited (LGL), Nimamar Development Authority (predecessor to NRLLG) and LMALA entered into an agreement known and referred to as the Integrated Benefits Package (IBP). The IBP contained all of Lihir’s agreements with, and commitments to, the Lihirian community, as well as a series of Memorandum of Agreement between the landowners, the local and provincial level governments and the State. | ||
B. | The IBP provided for review by the parties of the commitments in the IBP after a period of five years had elapsed. | ||
C. | The review process has been undertaken involving the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) representing NRLLG and LMALA on behalf of the Lihirian community, LMC for and on behalf of Lihir and representatives from the National Government and from the NIPG. The first formal meeting of all stakeholders took place at the Lihir Hotel in June 2001 . | ||
D. | Discussions have proceeded on a regular basis since that date and as of the end of 2004 had reached a point where significant unresolved issues had prevented further progress. | ||
E. | On 20th April 2005, the Minister for Mining sent a letter to the President of the NRLLG setting out proposals for the JNC, SML landowners and Lihir to consider to progress conclusion of the IBP review (“the proposals”). A copy of this letter is attached as Schedule A. | ||
F. | On 24 April 2005, the Chairman of Lihir sent a letter to the Independent Chairman of the IBP Review process, Xx Xxxxx Bai, setting out the terms of Lihir’s final offer made to NRLLG and LMALA in a meeting conducted on Lihir on 23 April, 2005 (“the offer”). A copy of the offer is attached as Schedule B. | ||
G. | On 26th August 2005, the JNC presented its response at Kokopo, ENBP to the proposals and this JNC response was confirmed by letter dated the same day, a copy of which is attached as Schedule C. | ||
H. | On 8th September 2005, Lihir sent a letter to the Independent Chairman of the IBP Review process, setting out its response to the JNC. This was |
Page 1
accompanied by a draft Status Statement which was modified on 13th September 2005. A copy of this letter and the modified Status Statement is attached as Schedule D. | |||
I. | On 23rd September 2005, the National Government sent a letter to the President of the NRLLG and the Chairman of the JNC setting out it’s response to the JNC Kokopo presentation. A copy of this letter is attached as Schedule E. | ||
J. | By this document therefore the parties wish to confirm their understanding of the status of the various proposals, offers and responses and establish the steps to be undertaken to finalize the review process and enter into a final, detailed revised IBP agreement to allow for the implementation of commitments. |
1. | The total financial commitment of Lihir under the IBP, for the period of five years from execution of formal agreements by Lihir and the JNC, shall consist of a total of: |
(a) | K100 million, less agreed sums already expended in relation to the review process. These funds are to be directed to the implementation of the Lihir Sustainable Development Plan [LSDP] as developed through the IBP Review process and as may be endorsed by the parties thereto; | ||
(b) | The amounts to be deducted, having already been incurred by the JNC as part of the review process and paid are; |
(i) | K 715,000 for legal fees; and | ||
(ii) | K 250,000 for travel costs (Kairiru trip). |
(c) | Up to K7 million funding for equity participation in a sustainable, income generating business for Special Mining Lease (SML) affected landowners, together with certain due diligence costs set out more fully in the offer. This offeris conditional upon the SML landowners establishing an effective and transparent governance structure for the management of the SML landowners’ equity in whichever business venture is entered into using the K7 million funds. |
2. | The MMC / MRO proposal as identified by the Minister for Mining and referred to in the LGL Chairman’s offer, shall be subject to a due diligence by a reputable accounting firm to determine the commercial viability of this proposal. Should the proposal prove to be not commercially viable, then another project will be identified and tested using the same process. |
2
a) | JNC (assisted by Lihir) will reallocate the K100million to cater for the five chapters of the Revised IBP inline with the prioritized projects under the LSDP during the implementation planning process described below. | ||
b) | The K20million annual allocations for the five year term of the Revised IBP from which drawdowns will be made to fund the projects prioritized for that year will be channeled and managed through a transparent and accountable mechanism that will be agreed to by the parties during the implementation planning process referred to below. |
3. | Matters concerning the Memoranda of Agreement (MoA) between the State, NIPG, NRLLG and the LMALA signed in 1995 along with the rest of the IBP agreements will be negotiated by a complementary process consistent with the IBP Review progress. | ||
4. | Matters concerning the outstanding Special Support Grant (SSG) payments due under the terms of the MoA between the State, NIPG, NRLLG and the LMALA will be negotiated by a complementary process consistent with the IBP Review progress. | ||
5. | The procedure for release of the SSG funds will be negotiated between the State, NIPG, NRLLG and LMALA by a complementary process consistent with the IBP Review progress. |
6. | Matters concerning the reallocation of NIPG Royalties to implement the LSDP in New Ireland Province (NIP) will be negotiated between the NIPG and the NRLLG by a complementary process consistent with the IBP Review progress. | ||
7. | Matters concerning the reallocation of NIPG royalties to the Namatanai District in the NIP will be negotiated between the NIPG and the NRLLG by a complementary process consistent with the IBP Review progress. |
3
8. | The Geothermal Energy proposal as referred to by the Minister for Mining in his letter of April 20, 2005 whereby the minister proposed that Lihir allow a private company to buy and operate the geothermal energy generation plant, and facilitate land owner involvement in a joint venture arrangement. | ||
9. | The Accommodation Lease proposal as referred to by the Minister for Mining in his letter of April 20, 2005 whereby the minister proposed that Lihir enter into long term contracts with the Lihirian land owners on all accommodation facilities in the mine township. |
10. | All amounts agreed to in the Revised IBP will be subject to C.P.I adjustment. | ||
11. | Lihir to allocate and legally sub-lease land for accommodation and commercial purposes to Lakaka, small businesses, NSPA and LGPMKL in the Londolovit township. | ||
12. | Capacity building program to be designed and implemented (consistent with the Lihir Sustainable Development Plan) by the JNC (assisted by Lihir, State, relevant State Agencies and where applicable by relevant professional consultants) for the Lihirian institutions. | ||
13. | Consistent with the terms of the Londolovit Township Agreement Lihir will legally sub-lease land blocks in the plantation to the six main clans of Lihir. | ||
14. | LBDAC be re-organised to include persons appointed by the six clans from their clan members and Chairman of the Pit & Stockpile and Plant Site committees. | ||
15. | The Londolovit Plantation to be given back to the Londolovit Plantation landowners through the NRLLG. | ||
16. | Lihir must commit to funding uncompleted commitments in the current IBP. | ||
17. | Lihir to give the Supply and Procurement to Lakaka Hardware Limited. |
4
18. | Kuridala to increase its existing 6 haul trucks to 12 haul trucks, ail of which will be managed by Lakaka Civil and Construction Limited in line with its original intention as per the existing IBP. |
19. | The parties acknowledge that this statement represents: |
(a) | a conclusion to consultations in relation to the amount of direct LGL financial commitments resulting from the IBP review process; | ||
(b) | and creates a contractual relationship between Lihir, LMALA and NRLLG only in relation to the Offer described and accepted in 1 and 2 above; and | ||
(c) | a non contractual relationship between the parties and in respect of issues other than that referred to in 19(b), as these issues will be further addressed in the implementation planning process described in 1 and 2 above. |
20. | The parties acknowledge that the Lihir Sustainable Development Plan and its components, in particular the Lihir Destiny Concept, will form the basis for the revised IBP as endorsed and adopted by the NRLLG through its assembly Resolution 38/2004 and the acceptance in principle contained in the letter from Lihir to the Chairman JNC dated October 7th 2004. Copy attached as schedule G to this document. | ||
21. | The parties also acknowledge the necessity of incorporating the proposals and programmes proposed under the LSDP into the 2006 budget process of the NRLLG, the NSPA and for LGL. This will require the endorsement of the NRLLG of the programmes and projects in the final LSDP draft. The parties therefore commit to working together to achieve this to ensure that there is consistency between the projects that will be implemented under the LSDP and that there are no delays in the implementation of projects and programmes, subject to the requirements of the planning and budget process. | ||
22. | It is acknowledged that some programs may require the commitment of start up funding in the current calendar year and this may be agreed by the parties by mutual consent during the budget preparation process referred to in clause 21 above. | ||
23. | Subsequent to finalization of the IBP Review referred to in clause 20 above, and prior to its execution by the relevant parties, the resultant Memoranda of Agreement must be: |
(a) | Accepted and agreed to by the Mining Warden. |
5
(b) | Endorsed by the full assembly of the NRLLG. | ||
(c) | Accepted and agreed by LMALA executives. | ||
(d) | The subject of an agreed community awareness programme, involving representatives from LMALA, NRLLG and Lihir and aimed at ensuring comprehensive understanding of the nature and substance of the agreement throughout the Lihirian community. |
24. | Each of the parties to this statement shall pay their own expenses incidental to the review, the IBP and all activities referred to in this statement, including all fees of legal, financial or other advisers, unless the contrary is specifically referred to in this statement or otherwise agreed to in writing. The parties acknowledge that as recorded in the Minute of the IBP Review Meeting of 26-28 September 2005, Lihir will pay the travel and accommodation costs of parties attending the review of the MoA and IBP Review. | ||
25. | The terms of this statement are not to be the subject of any announcement by the parties because they have been reached on a “commercial in confidence” basis and will remain so until all of the implementation issues described above have been carried out. |
Lihir Gold Limited
|
/s/Xxxxxx Xxxx | |||
Xxxxxx Xxxx | ||||
Managing Director | ||||
Nimamar Rural Local Level Government
|
/s/ Xxx Xxxxxxx Silul MPA | |||
Xxx Xxxxxxx Silul MPA | ||||
President | ||||
Lihir Mining Area Landowners Association
|
/s/ Marc Soipang | |||
Marc Soipang | ||||
Chairman |
6
National Government
|
/s/ Stevie T. S. Nion | |||
Stevie T. S. Nion | ||||
A / Secretary for Mining | ||||
New Ireland Provincial Government
|
||||
Xxxxxxxx Sirambat | ||||
Provincial Administrator | ||||
Witnessed by
|
/s/ Xxxxx Xxx CBE | |||
Xxxxx Xxx CBE | ||||
Independent Chairman to | ||||
IBP Review |
7
32
1
2
3
File: LSDP Trust Flow Chart vers 1 January 12, 2007 |
LSDP Project Approval and Funding Flowchart |
A. | MRL holds 77,169,431 ordinary shares in LGL (representing 6.76% of the issued share capital) which are held on trust for the beneficiaries under the Lihirian Equity Trust, who are Lihirian landowners. | |
B. | MRL financed its acquisition of shares in LGL during 1995 using funds borrowed by MRDC from European Investment Bank (“EIB”), which were on-lent by MRDC to MRL , details of which are included in an On-lending Agreement dated 12 July 1996. | |
C. | In the absence of dividend income MRL has not made repayments of principal or interest of its loan from MRDC. |
D. | MRL has not met its management fees and associated administrative costs accrued to MRDC. | |
E. | Notwithstanding the non-payment referred to in paragraph C, MRDC has (with the approval of and assistance from the State) made repayments of principal and interest due to EIB. | |
F. | A Joint Negotiating Committee was established, consisting of representatives of LMALA and NRLLG as representatives of the Lihirian Community, for the purpose of negotiating with the State and LGL the review of the Integrated Benefits Package Agreements (“IBP”). | |
G. | During the review of the IBP, the issue of Lihirian equity and the settlement of the EIB loan became a significant issue which was beyond the scope of the State/LGL IBP Review Team to resolve. A special LGL Board subcommittee, the Secretary of the Department of Mining and representatives from MRDC and the Department of Treasury have been involved in discussions towards a resolution of the equity issue since March 2002. | |
H. | At a meeting in Kokopo on 14 January 2003, the JNC discussed a proposal to sell down MRL equity to a minimum 5.2% conditional upon 6 conditions being met. | |
I. | A Special Working Group (“SWG”) was established to address the implementation of the 6 conditions of the JNC’s acceptance of the equity sell down as described in the letter from the State and LGL to the JNC of 28 January 2003. The SWG comprises representation from the JNC, LMC, Department of Mining, Department of Treasury, MRDC, and an independent Chairman. | |
J. | The JNC responded to the Minister for Finance & Treasury, the Minister for Mining and the Chairman of LGL on 3 February 2003 outlining the JNC’s understanding of the State and LGL position on acceptance of the 6 conditions. | |
K. | Funding will be made available to establish an investment fund out of which future instalments of principal and interest shall be made directly to the EIB, subject to agreed modification or removal of the on-lending agreements and charge over the remaining MRL equity. |
1. | OWNERSHIP, ESTABLISHMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF INVESTMENT ACCOUNT | |
Subject to any requisite regulatory approvals by the Bank of PNG, a Euro denominated bank account will be established in the name “MRL-Lihirian Investment Account” for the proceeds of sale referred to in clause 2 (“Investment Account”). This bank account will be managed by an investment account committee (“Investment Account Committee”) which comprises one representative from each of: |
• | MRL; | ||
• | MRDC; and | ||
• | LGL. |
2.
2. | SELLDOWN OF MRL EQUITY | |
On the basis of satisfactory exchange rates and share price, MRL will sell down its equity in LGL to a level no less than 5.2% of the total equity and: |
• | the sale price and arrangements for doing so will be co-ordinated by MRL and MRDC; | ||
• | MET, will seek to obtain the best price obtainable to sell the relevant shares; | ||
• | the net proceeds of sale will be converted into Euros and paid to the credit of the Investment Account; and | ||
• | The Investment Account Committee can only use funds to service the loan and when the loan is discharged any residual funds must go to an account managed by MRL on behalf of the Lihirian community in accordance with the trust deed as amended. |
3. | STATE/ MRDC GRANT | |
The State and MRDC agree to write-off and release MRL: |
• | from 100% of liability in respect of interest payments made by MRDC to EIB prior to 15 December 2001; | ||
• | from 100% of liability in respect of the principal and interest repayment made to EIB in December 2001; | ||
• | from 50% of liability in respect of the principal and interest repayment made to EIB in December 2002; and | ||
• | from 100% of liability in respect of management fees and associated administrative costs incurred to MRDC prior to the establishment of the Investment Account, |
totalling PGK19,151,518.00. | ||
It is acknowledged that the State and MRDC will meet to address the internal accounting issues with respect to the December 15, 2002 principal and interest payment and associated costs. | ||
4. | LGL COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT | |
LGL will give MRL amounts of money to be applied as follows: |
• | PGK3,532,759.00, (which MRL directs be paid to MRDC), representing 50% of the debt incurred by MRL to MRDC resulting from the repayment made to EIB in December 2002; and | ||
• | US$2,635,000 to be paid into the Investment Account, |
(“Community Support Grant”) |
3.
The purpose of the Community Support Grant is to assist MRL and the Lihirian Equity Trust to be financially self sufficient in respect of the repayment of its loan from MRDC, and is given in recognition of the importance of the Lihirian Community in the success of the Lihir mine. Payment of the Community Support Grant in to the Investment Account will be made as soon as practicably possible after the sale of the MRL shares and transfer of the proceeds in to the Investment Account. | ||
Interest will begin to accrue on all amounts (sale proceeds and Community Support Grant) from the time they are deposited in to the Investment Account. | ||
In the event that MRL sell down its equity in a number of tranches, payment of the Community Support Grant will be made in to the Investment Account at a percentage equal to the percentage of MRL shares sold and the proceeds of which are paid in to the investment account. At the time that MRL has sold sufficient shares to meet the needs of repayment of the loan, LMC will make payment into the Investment Account any residual amount remaining of the Community Support Grant. | ||
In addition, LMC will pay the amount of interest in to the Investment Account to a level that would exist if the entire Community Support Grant was paid in to the Investment Account at the time the first MRL shares were paid in to the Investment Account. The interest rate used by LMC will be that rate applied by the bank to the Investment Account. | ||
The amount of interest must be calculated on the sum of the total Community Support Grant and the proceeds of the sale from MRL’s shares in to the Investment Account. | ||
For completeness, the amount of additional interest LMC will contribute to the Investment Account is calculated as follows (on the date of each sale of shares): |
(US$ 2.635 million — LP) x IADIR x NDSLS | ||||||
where: | ||||||
LP | = | LMC payments already made into Investment Account; | ||||
IADIR | = | Investment Account daily interest rate; | ||||
NDSLS | = | Number of days since last share sale. |
5. | NO DILUTION OF MRL EQUITY | |
LGL and the State agree that MRL’s equity proportion of no less than 5.2% will not be diluted to a level less than 5.2% due to any need by LGL to raise equity in the Lihir project after the selldown referred to in paragraph 2 subject to the following matters: |
• | this obligation only applies to any mining activity, whether land or sea based, on the Lihir Group of Islands; | ||
• | this obligation does not apply to any new project outside Lihir Island, for example where the Board of LGL acquire a new mine or exploration rights outside the Lihir Group of Islands; and |
4.
• | implementation will be subject to obtaining any necessary approvals including, if applicable, approval from other shareholders. |
6. | AMENDMENT TO EQUITY TRUST DEED OF SETTLEMENT | |
The State (with the support of LGL) agrees that the Deed of Settlement — Lihirian Equity Trust be amended and varied to be consistent with general principles of the Lihir Strategic Development Concept and the Long Term Investment Fund (“LTIF”) to the extent possible by relevant law. | ||
Since this request will take considerable time to evaluate and bring into effect, the issues associated with changing the Trust Deed are to be dealt with by the SWG. | ||
Both the State and LGL are of the opinion that several issues in particular need to be fully addressed within the SWG including, but not limited to: |
• | good governance of the highest standard of the Trust and LTIF; | ||
• | no payment or benefit to individuals or select groups, specifically from the LTIF; | ||
• | funding of administration and management of MRL; | ||
• | details on the value and mechanisms for investment and draw down of the LTIF; and | ||
• | at the request of the Lihirians in a manner consistent with the new Trust Deed, the Trustees to be given the ability and authority to sell shares. |
Given the need to jointly communicate with the community the SWG will also be charged with the task of coordination of the content and delivery of community information programs regarding equity resolution and associated matters. | ||
7. | LIHIRIAN REPRESENTATION ON LGL BOARD | |
Working on advice from the JNC Executive, the SWG will develop a protocol for the nomination of one Lihirian representative to the Board of Directors of LGL, acknowledging that: |
• | this protocol will be subject to approval by the LGL Board; | ||
• | the appointment of any director is subject to approval by the shareholders of LGL in annual general meeting; | ||
• | LGL will consider any necessary amendment to the constitution of LGL to reflect such changes, subject to approval by the necessary majority of shareholders; and | ||
• | all directors are subject to periodic re-election in accordance with the constitution of LGL. |
8. | LIHIR NON-MINING ACTION PLAN | |
LGL and NRLLG will each initially contribute K50,000 per quarter to the Lihir Non-Mining Action Plan, provided that the total support (across the operational office, |
5.
LMALA or any other representative organisation) does not exceed the current regular support payments and that the NRLLG are in agreement on the understanding that the operational, financial and other administrative arrangements will be detailed within the final IBP Review documents. | ||
9. | PROJECT EXPANSION | |
The Lihirian Community, LMALA, NRLLG and MRL support, in principle, possible expansion of the Lihir project, but only after all issues have been adequately considered, and relevant approval and consultative processes completed in a manner consistent with the principles of the Lihir Strategic Development Concept. |
/s/ Koiari
Tarata |
/s/ Kuma Aua, OBE |
|||||
/s/ Abrose
Silul |
/s/ Xxxx Xxxxx |
|||||
/s/ Xxxxxxx Xxxx |
/s/ Marc Soipang |
|||||
/s/ Xxxx Xxxx |
||||||
Company Limited as agent for and on behalf of Lihir Gold Limited |
6.
1.
|
Appendix E(1) | Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 1 | ||
2.
|
Appendix E(2) | Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 2 | ||
1.
|
Appendix E(3) | Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 3 | ||
2.
|
Appendix E(4) | Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 4 | ||
5.
|
Appendix E(5) | Five Year Spread Sheet for Chapter 5 |
Project | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | Prog/Project | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ID | Programmes and Projects Description | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
1) | Capacity Building Program |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Specific Projects |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a | ) | Capacity Building Consultants |
315,000 | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | 315,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
b | ) | Training Program |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | |||||||||||||||||||||
c | ) | Media -FM Lihir&Newspaper |
1,000,000 | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
d | ) | Treasury Office Upgrade |
150,000 | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | 150,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
e | ) | Policy,Planning & Monitoring |
NIL | 180,000 | 180,000 | 180,000 | 180,000 | 900,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
f | ) | Social Monitoring (sealanes,Airways&Movement) |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
h | ) | Integrated Agriculture Training Program |
600,000 | 150,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 1,500,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
I | ) | Xxxx Budgets(VDS inclusive) |
6,131,150 | 6,731,150 | 6,731,150 | 6,731,150 | 6,731,150 | 33,655,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||
j | ) | Marahun Housing Maintenance |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
I | ) | Land Acquisitions |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sub Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Institutional Support&Strengthening | (TO FULFILL THE MEANING OF MOUs) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a | ) | Nimamar Rural LLG Secretariat |
NIL | 107,850 | 107,850 | 107,850 | 107,850 | 539,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||
b | ) | Nimamar Special Purposes Authority |
100,000 | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | 100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
c | ) | Nimamar Rural LLG Administration(Lihir Sub Xxxx.Xxxxxx) |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
d | ) | Mining&Liaison |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
e | ) | Department of Environment |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
f | ) | Department of Labour&Employment |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
h | ) | Lihir District Court (Magisterial Services) |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
i | ) | Department of Police |
NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sub Total |
100,000 | 387,850 | 387,850 | 387,850 | 387,850 | 1,651,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2) | Community Development Funds |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health |
190,000 | 190,000 | 190, 000 | 190, 000 | 190, 000 | 950,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Lihir Ring Road |
190,000 | 190,000 | 190, 000 | 190, 000 | 190, 000 | 950,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Community Projects(Educ. Inclusive) |
380,000 | 380,000 | 380, 000 | 380, 000 | 380, 000 | 1,900,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub Total |
760,000 | 760,000 | 760, 000 | 760, 000 | 760, 000 | 3,800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL (PGK |
7, 879, 000 | 7, 879, 000 | 7, 879, 000 | 7, 879, 000 | 7, 879, 000 |
Chapt | Project | Programme | 2006 | Spent to | Unspent | Implementation Schedule - 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. | ID | Project Description | Estimate | Date | IBP Balance | September | October | November | December | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Social Infrastructure
|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a | ) | Power Electrification — F/Study
|
130,000 | 0 | 130,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b | ) | FM Lihir
|
1,000,000 | 34,050.00 | 965,950 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
c | ) | Other Infrastructure(Treas. U/grade)
|
150,000 | 51,361.00 | 98,639 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub Total
|
1,280,000 | 85,411.00 | 1,194,589 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | LSDP Projects & Programmes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a | ) | V/Dev.Sytm — LGL ongoing comt
|
1,200,000 | 276,419 | 923,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b | ) | Planing & Monitoring Office
|
180,000 | 180,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub Total
|
1,380,000 | 276,419 | 1,103,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | CDF Projects&Programmes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a | ) | Lihir Res.Centre
|
20,000 | 0 | 20,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b | ) | Lihir High School Grant
|
25,000 | 0 | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
c | ) | Education Subsidies
|
75,000 | 0 | 75,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
d | ) | Lihir Teachers’ Inservice
|
10,000 | 0 | 10,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
e | ) | Elementary Coordination Training
|
25,000 | 0 | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
f | ) | N/Ailan Save&Loans-Lihir Branch
|
9,000 | 0 | 9,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
g | ) | Primary School Inspection
|
11,000 | 0 | 11,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One(1) | h | ) | Primary T/Up Schools Admin-x3
|
15,000 | 0 | 15,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
i | ) | Lihir Ring Road
|
190,000 | 0 | 190,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
j | ) | Health Projects&Programmes
|
190,000 | 0 | 190,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub Total
|
570,000 | 0 | 570,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.4 | Capacity Building
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a | ) | Xxxx.Xxxxxxx&Strenghtening
|
230,000 | 0 | 230,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b | ) | Training
|
95,000 | 0 | 95,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
c | ) | Policies&Systems
|
90,000 | 0 | 90,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub Total
|
415,000 | 0 | 415,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.5 | Xxxx Projects&Programmes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xxxx 1 to Xxxx 16 | 6,731,150 | 184,427 | 6,386,723 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Total for Chapter One(1) | K9,669,893.00 |
Nimamar Rural Local-Level Government X.X.Xxx 81,LONDOLOVIT, Lihir Island,NIP |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ph:(000) 0000000 Fax:(675)864118 |
LMALA CHAPTER 2 - LMALA | Budget FORECAST 2006 -2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Description | Allocation | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.0.0 | ONE: CAPACITY BUILDING PROJECTS. |
22,550,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.0.1 | Administration |
0 | 800,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present Administration cost |
1,600,000 | 800,000 | 800,000 | 1,600,000 | 6,925,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Administration Cost after Capacity Building |
10,000,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 10,000,000 | 5,125,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Staff Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consultancy Fees(Mentors, Coaches, Consultants). |
1,200,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | 4,725,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operational Cost |
400,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Housing Package |
1,750,000 | 1,000,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 1,750,000 | 800,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 5,125,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Physical Capital Cost. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feasibility Study Fee. |
1,000,000 | 200,000 | 250,000 | 300,000 | 250,000 | 1,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Allocation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Preperation |
1,500,000 | 375,000 | 375,000 | 375,000 | 375,000 | 1,500,000 | 1,500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office Extension |
500,000 | 500,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 500,000 | 500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Housing |
1,000,000 | 400,000 | 400,000 | 200,000 | 0 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vehicles |
800,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 800,000 | 800,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office Equipments & Stationeries |
300,000 | 75,000 | 75,000 | 75,000 | 75,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
600,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contigency |
1,500,000 | 375,000 | 375,000 | 375,000 | 375,000 | 1,500,000 | 1,500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.0.4 | Capacity Building within the Specific Issues Communities. |
0 | 4,975,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.05 | Training |
400,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 400,000 | 4,725,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-Total |
22,550,000 | 800,000 | 6,925,000 | 5,125,000 | 4,975,000 | 4,725,000 | 22,550,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.0.0 | TWO: AWARENESS PROJECT. |
400,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.0.1 | Awareness to the Specific Issues landowners |
100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 400,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.0.2 | Awareness to the 8 Specific Issues committee members. |
0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.0.3 | Awareness to NRLLG |
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.0.4 | Awareness to LGL |
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-Total |
400,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 400,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.0.0 | Putput Ladolam Relocation Programs |
3,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.0 | THREE: SELF RELIANCE PROJECTS. |
1,890,000 | 0 | 3,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Projects. |
0 | 562,000 |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Description | Allocation | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.1 | Mental Development Programs |
130,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 130,000 | 1,062,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.2 | Physical Development Programs |
600,000 | 100,000 | 190,000 | 100,000 | 200,000 | 10,000 | 600,000 | 462,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.3 | Spiritual Development Programs |
30,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 30,000 | 552,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.4 | Emotional Development Programs |
30,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 30,000 | 362,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.5 | Financial Development Programs. |
1,100,000 | 300,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 1,100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Projects total. |
1,890,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.6 | Financial Independence Projects. |
1,110,000 | 120,000 | 630,000 | 120,000 | 120,000 | 120,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEDIUM TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Purchase. |
500,000 | 0 | 500,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* LGL Component |
470,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 90,000 | 90,000 | 90,000 | 470,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Land Owners Component |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organise & Use of Tangible and intangible resources |
140,000 | 20,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 140,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LONG TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Vehicles.(Businesses, Real Estate, Stocks,
Bonds,Mutual Funds) |
0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,110,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
3,000,000 | 562,000 | 1,062,000 | 462,000 | 552,000 | 362,000 | 3,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.0 | Putput Plantsite Programs |
10,750,000 | 31,100,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Projects. |
9,600,000 | 3,042,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.1 | Mental Development Programs |
100,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 100,000 | 3,752,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.2 | Physical Development Programs |
1,090,000 | 200,000 | 300,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 190,000 | 1,090,000 | 3,142,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.3 | Spiritual Development Programs |
30,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 30,000 | 3,042,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.4 | Emotional Development Programs |
30,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 30,000 | 3,022,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.5 | Financial Development Programs. |
1,200,000 | 200,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 1,200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inconvenience Allowances |
7,250,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 7,250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Projects Total. |
9,700,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.6 | Financial Independence Projects. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEDIUM TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Purchase. |
500,000 | 0 | 500,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* LGL Component |
500,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Land Owners Component |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organise & Use of Tangible and intangible resources |
50,000 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 0 | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LONG TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Vehicles.(Businesses, Real Estate, Stocks,
Bonds,Mutual Funds) |
0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,050,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
10,750,000 | 3,042,000 | 3,752,000 | 3,142,000 | 3,042,000 | 3,022,000 | 10,750,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3.0 | PIT AND STOCKPILE |
11,450,000 | Pit K4,450,000 + . | MMC/MRO | K7,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Projects. |
22,900,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3.1 | Mental Development Programs |
120,000 | 20,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 120,000 | 600,000 |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Description | Allocation | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3.2 | Physical Development Programs |
1,000,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 1,000,000 | 8,225,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3.3 | Spiritual Development Programs |
60,000 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 60,000 | 1,215,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3.4 | Emotional Development Programs |
70,000 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 70,000 | 705,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3.5 | Financial Development Programs. |
1,000,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 1,000,000 | 705,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MMC/MRO Deal |
7,000,000 | 0 | 7,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Project Total |
9,250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3.6 | Financial Independence Projects. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEDIUM TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Purchase. |
1,000,000 | 0 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 0 | 0 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* LGL Component |
900,000 | 100,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 900,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Land Owners Component |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organise & Use of Tangible and intangible resources |
300,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LONG TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Vehicles.(Businesses, Real Estate, Stocks,
Bonds,Mutual Funds) |
0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-Total |
11,450,000 | 600,000 | 8,225,000 | 1,215,000 | 705,000 | 705,000 | 11,450,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.0 | Kapit Relocation |
2,900,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Projects. |
5,800,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.1 | Mental Development Programs |
120,000 | 24,000 | 24,000 | 24,000 | 24,000 | 24,000 | 120,000 | 512,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.2 | Physical Development Programs |
1,000,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 1,000,000 | 822,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.3 | Spiritual Development Programs |
20,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 20,000 | 522,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.4 | Emotional Development Programs |
20,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 20,000 | 522,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.5 | Financial Development Programs. |
1,000,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 1,000,000 | 522,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Total |
2,160,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.6 | Financial Independence Projects. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEDIUM TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Purchase. |
300,000 | 0 | 300,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* LGL Component |
300,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Land Owners Component |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organise & Use of Tangible and intangible resources |
140,000 | 20,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 140,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LONG TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Vehicles.(Businesses, Real Estate, Stocks,
Bonds,Mutual Funds). |
0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
2,900,000 | 512,000 | 822,000 | 522,000 | 522,000 | 522,000 | 2,900,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.5.0 | Londolovit Community River. |
3,100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Projects. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.5.1 | Mental Development Programs |
150,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 150,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.5.2 | Physical Development Programs |
1,000,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 1,000,000 | 6,200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.5.3 | Spiritual Development Programs |
25,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 25,000 | 500,000 |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Description | Allocation | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.5.4 | Emotional Development Programs |
25,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 25,000 | 800,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.5.5 | Financial Development Programs. |
1,400,000 | 200,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 1,400,000 | 600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Relaince Sub- total |
2,600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.5.6 | Financial Independence Projects. |
600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEDIUM TERM PROGRAMS. |
600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Purchase. |
200,000 | 0 | 200,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* LGL Component |
200,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Land Owners Component |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organise & Use of Tangible and intangible resources |
100,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LONG TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Vehicles.(Businesses, Real Estate, Stocks,
Bonds,Mutual Funds) |
0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-Total |
3,100,000 | 500,000 | 800,000 | 600,000 | 600,000 | 600,000 | 3,100,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.6.0 | Londolovit Plantation |
2,540,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Projects. |
, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.6.1 | Mental Development Programs |
80,000 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 10,000 | 80,000 | 5,080,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.6.2 | Physical Development Programs |
1,000,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 1,000,000 | 462,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.6.3 | Spiritual Development Programs |
30,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 30,000 | 692,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.6.4 | Emotional Development Programs |
30,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 30,000 | 492,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.6.5 | Financial Development Programs. |
900,000 | 180,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 160,000 | 160,000 | 900,000 | 452,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Sub- Total |
2,040,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.6.6 | Financial Independence Projects. |
442,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEDIUM TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Purchase. |
200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* LGL Component |
200,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Land Owners Component |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organise & Use of Tangible and intangible resources |
100,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LONG TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Vehicles.(Businesses, Real Estate, Stocks,
Bonds,Mutual Funds) |
0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-Total |
2,540,000 | 462,000 | 692,000 | 492,000 | 452,000 | 442,000 | 2,540,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.7.0 | Kunaye Airport. |
1,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self Reliance Projects. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.7.1 | Mental Development Programs |
50,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.7.2 | Physical Development Programs |
390,000 | 40,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 50,000 | 390,000 | 2,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.7.3 | Spiritual Development Programs |
20,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 20,000 | 158,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.7.4 | Emotional Development Programs |
20,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 4,000 | 20,000 | 248,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.7.5 | Financial Development Programs. |
250,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 250,000 | 218,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self
Reliance Projects Sub Total. |
730,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.7.6 | Financial Independence Projects. |
218,000 |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Description | Allocation | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEDIUM TERM PROGRAMS. |
158,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Purchase. |
20,000 | 0 | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* LGL Component |
200,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Land Owners Component |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organise & Use of Tangible and intangible resources |
50,000 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 0 | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LONG TERM PROGRAMS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Vehicles.(Businesses, Real Estate, Stocks,
Bonds,Mutual Funds) |
0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
270,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-Total |
1,000,000 | 158,000 | 248,000 | 218,000 | 218,000 | 158,000 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL KINA |
57,690,000 | 6,636,000 | 22,626,000 | 11,876,000 | 11,286,000 | 10,636,000 | 63,060,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NIMAMAR SPECIAL PURPOSE AUTHORITY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget Projection - 2007 -2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue Code | ESTIMATE REVENUE FORECAST - 2007 - 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIHIR - IBP | Allocation from the IBP Budget |
2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 12,500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance carried forward in 2006 |
2,500,000 | 12,500,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Estimated Revenue for 2007 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 |
ESTIMATE EXPENDITURE - 2007 - 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost Code | PARTICULARS | 2005 EST | 2006 EST | 2007 EST | 2008 EST | 2009 EST | 2010 EST | TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Finance & Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.1 | Administration Grant |
450,000 | 300,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 1,250,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.2 | Capacity Building |
80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.3 | Systems & Policies |
30,000 | 150,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.4 | Training |
80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.5 | Monitoring & Evaluation |
20,000 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.6 | Awareness |
20,000 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
680,000 | 300,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 1,600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projects Grants |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.1 | Temporary office Infrastructure |
250,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.2 | Staff Accommodation |
250,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.3 | Logistic support (Vehicle, Boat) |
200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.4 | Feasibility design (LRRd) |
200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.5 | Rural Electrification Extension |
110,000 | 110,000 | 110,000 | 110,000 | 440,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.6 | Feasibilty Design Const (Hurtol) |
250,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.7 | Feasibilty Design Const (Samo, Mazuz) |
100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 400,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.8 | Feasibilty Design Const Jetties (Islands) |
200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.9 | Survey Existing Infrastructure & Dev Program |
100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 400,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.10 | VDS Housing Scheme Implementation |
100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 400,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.11 | Feasibility design, Const (Water supply) |
60,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 240,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,820,000 | 1,360,000 | 1,360,000 | 1,360,000 | 5,900,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EST BUDGET | 7,500,000 | 1,660,000 | 1,610,000 | 1,610,000 | 12,500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIHIR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget Projection - 2007 -2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue Code | ESTIMATE REVENUE FORECAST - 2007 - 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIHIR - IBP | Allocation from the IBP Budget |
2,676,000 | 2,676,000 | 2,676,000 | 2,676,000 | 2,676,000 | 13,380,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance carried forward in 2006 |
383,163 | 13,380,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Estimated Revenue for 2007 | 452,163 |
ESTIMATE EXPENDITURE - 2007 - 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost Code | PARTICULARS | 2005 EST | 2006 EST | 2007 EST | 2008 EST | 2009 EST | 2010 EST | TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Finance & Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.1 | Administration Grant |
69,000 | 331,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.2 | Consultancy Fees |
5,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 405,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.3 | Personal Viability Courses (Lihir Training Scholarship) |
400,000 | — | — | 150,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.4 | PV Homeschool (Monitoring & Evaluation) |
50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.5 | Awareness Programs |
50,000 | 9,000 | 9,000 | 9,000 | 77,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.6 | Land Registration/Legal Property System |
100,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 190,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.7 | PV Database System |
50,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 80,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.8 | Entrepreneurial Class Development |
100,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 130,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74,000 | 1,081,000 | 399,000 | 409,000 | 409,000 | 2,232,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Holistic Human Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.2.1 | PV & EBD TOT ( Kairiru Island) |
120,163 | 150,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 570,163 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Development for Communities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.1 | Feasibility for Chicken & Piggery (Topo Survey & Outgrowers Program) |
205,000 | 200,000 | 405,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.2 | Lihir Integrated Livestock Limited (Establishment Grant) |
200,000 | 6324837 | 6,524,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.3 | Feasibility — Lihir Savings & Loans (Establishment Grant) |
53,000 | 200,000 | 100000 | 353,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.4 | Lihir Finance Feasibility Study |
100,000 | 200,000 | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.5 | Feasibility
— National Distribution Centre |
100,000 | 200000 | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.6 | Feasibility — Niu Island Grasruts Hausing Skim |
100,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.7 | PV Homeschools establishment |
600,000 | 250,000 | 70,000 | 920,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
258,000 | 1,500,000 | 7,074,837 | 70,000 | 0 | 8,902,837 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Infrastructures Development for LSDL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.4.1 | Office Infrastructure |
300,000 | 50,000 | 350,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.4.2 | Staff Accommodation |
300,000 | 200,000 | 500,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.4.3 | Logistical Support ( Vehicle & Boat) |
125,000 | 450,000 | 575,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.4.4 | Building — Lihir Savings & Loans Society |
250,000 | 250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
975,000 | 700,000 | 0 | 0 | 1,675,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EST BUDGET | 452,163 | 4,158,163 | 8,273,837 | 579,000 | 509,000 | 13,380,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chapter FIVE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Programmes | Project Component | Implementer | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Establishment of Mine Closure Committee |
1. Administration Support For Mine Closure Committee | LGL | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 250,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2. Logistic Support | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Establishment of draft policies for Mine Closure Plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Transfer of Assets( Existing Infrastructures within SML & LMP) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Mine Closure Investment Funds | LGL | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 1,500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Continuation of Existing Trust Funds |
1. Putput & Ladolam Relocation Trust Fund | LGL | 106,450 | 106,450 | 106,450 | 106,450 | 106,450 | 532,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2. Putput Plant Site Trust Fund | 106,450 | 106,450 | 106,450 | 106,450 | 106,450 | 532,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Kapit Relocation Trust Fund | 106,450 | 106,450 | 106,450 | 106,450 | 106,450 | 532,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Londolovit Customary Land Owners Trust Fund | 41,817 | 41,817 | 41,817 | 41,817 | 41,817 | 209,087 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Lihir Land Owners Trust Fund | 212,150 | 212,150 | 212,150 | 212,150 | 212,150 | 1,060,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Ladolam Land Owners Trust Fund | 139,982 | 139,982 | 139,982 | 139,982 | 139,982 | 699,912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Trust Funds Contributions | 713,298 | 713,298 | 713,298 | 713,298 | 713,298 | 3,566,492 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1,063,298 | 1,063,298 | 1,063,298 | 1,063,298 | 1,063,298 | 5,316,492 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
35
(a) | Parallel Development |
(b) | Balance Development |
1
(c) | Sustainable Development |
(d) | Stable Development |
2
3
1. | had no definitive development plan for the economic development of Lihir; |
||
2. | erroneously link the attainment of the Four Objectives to the Lihir Project which is in essence based on a “hand out mentality”; | ||
3. | erroneously expected LGL to drive or propagate the envisaged developments for us when LGL’s focus is totally different from ours; and |
4
4. | erroneously did not take ownership and control of the processes and systems required to successfully implement the IBP to realize the Four Objectives. |
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Appendix G(1)
|
Putput Ladolam Relocation Agreement | |
Appendix G(2)
|
Putput Community Agreement | |
Appendix G(3)
|
Pit and Stockpile | |
Appendix G(4)
|
Kapit Relocation Agreement | |
Appendix G(5)
|
Londolovit Community River Agreement | |
Appendix G(6)
|
Londolovit Township Agreement | |
Appendix G(7)
|
Kunaye Airport Settlement Agreement | |
|
||
36
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Putput Ladolam Relocation |
Mental Development. | 1. | AWARENESS
a. Parents’ commitment to Education.
b. Board of Management commitment to
Education.
c. Children’s commitment to Education.
|
General Awareness to encourage stakeholders to commit to the Education of the children. | 2006 — 2010 | |||||||||
LMALA/NRLLG | 2. | LIHIR EDUCATION PLAN.
- Short Term Implementation Plan.
- Implementation of LEP.(Long Term)
|
Lihir Education Committee to develop a five year plan. | 2006 — 2010 2007 |
||||||||||
LMALA/NRLLG | 3. | Higher Education Plan. (General Awareness)
-Scholarship
-Resource Centre
-Distance Education
-Adult Learning
|
Lihir Education Committee to develop a five year plan. | 2007 — 2010 | ||||||||||
Employment and Monitoring Committee (LMALA) | 4. | Training, Employment and Localisation. | Lihir Education Committee to develop a five year plan. | 2007 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LMALA & LSDP Chapter 4 | 5. | Personal Viability Courses. | Refer to PV Schedules Chapter 4 for each xxxx program. | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
Physical Development. | ||||||||||||||
Trustees of the Trust Fund. | 1. | 20 x group D Houses. | A plan to address issue of Group D new Houses. To be provided through Trust Fund. Nominated requirement is 20 houses over 5 years. To be discussed with Trustees. | July 0000 | ||||||||||
XXX | 2. | Maintenance of Relocation Houses. | A position paper on Maintenance of Relocation
Houses and Facilities to be prepared by LGL by
the end of June. -Develop a maintenance Plan. -Major Maintenance. -Minor Maintenance. |
2006 — 2010 June/July 06 |
||||||||||
Social Services Parliamentary Committee. | 3. | HEALTH PROGRAM
- Lihir Health Plan.
- Curative Health Programs.
- Preventive Health Programs.
|
A program to be developed by the committee under the Social Services Parliamentary Committee of the NRLLG. Ownership is a long term issue to be considered in the context of mine closure planning. | 2006 — 2010 September 06 |
1
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
- Short Term Health Program.
- Comprehensive Health Program.
- Ownership & Management of the
facilities.
|
2006 2006 2007 |
|||||||||||||
LGL/NRLLG/NSPA. | 4 | Village Development System.
- Sanitation & Garbage Collection
- Dislodging of Septic Tanks
- School Transport Assistance.
- A plan for 2007 onwards.
|
Provided for under the VDS Grants allocation. | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
VPC/NSPA | 5. | * Village layout.
* Village Electrification (Chapter 3)
* Water supply.
|
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan and apply the principles to the following; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||
VPC | 6. | Xxxx Development Plan to expand Xxxx
Budgets.
-VDS Program.
-Community Facilities Maintenance.
-Beautification.
-Water Supply.
|
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan and apply the principles to the following; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||
LLG | 7. | Sports & Recreation A sports and recreation plan. |
A plan to establish committee and develop a five year plan. | 2007 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LLG/NSPA. | 8. | Sea Wall A feasibility Study |
There is a need for a feasibility study into this project, then a plan can be formulated to implement the project | 2007
September 06 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 9. | Clean-up program. -A plan to implement the Clean-up program. |
A plan to implement the Clean-up program. | 2007 — 2010 2006 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 10. | A strategy to initiate dialogue on these issues. | 2008 | |||||||||||
*Food/Water *Shelter *Clothing Issues. |
||||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA/NRLLG /STATE/NIPG |
11. | A Strategy to initiate dialogue on these Issues; Management of | 2007 | |||||||||||
• Land |
||||||||||||||
• Forest |
||||||||||||||
• Soil |
||||||||||||||
• Waste |
||||||||||||||
• Air Quality |
||||||||||||||
• The Environment |
||||||||||||||
• The Population. |
||||||||||||||
LGL | 12. | Outstanding/Incomplete Commitments.
ü Water supply.
ü Village Electrification.
ü Masahet
ü Village Layout Planning.
ü Reef passage.
ü
*Putput |
2
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
ü * Lakunam.
ü Upgrade and seal relocation
roads. (in progress).
ü Cemetery Improvement. |
||||||||||||||
Spiritual Development |
1. | Sunday School | ||||||||||||
2. | Spiritual Groups. | |||||||||||||
Law & Order Committee. | Emotional Development |
1. | LAW AND ORDER COMMITTEE. | Law & Order Committee to Plan a strategy to
address problems identified by the
communities. -Influx -Squatters -Liquor Related Issues. |
September 2006 | |||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 2. | NRLLG Communication (Capacity Building) | A strategy to activate the Linkage between
both systems. -Implementation using the system |
2006 2007 — 2010 |
||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 3. | EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. | Employment opportunities will be addressed through the HHD Programs |
|||||||||||
Parliamentary Social Services Committee |
4. | Youth & Women | * LMALA to develop a plan for Youth & Women in line with chapter 1 plan for Youth & Women. | 2006 2007 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 5. | NEURO — LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING.
LEGAL PROPERTY SYSTEM To be looked at in the following years |
LMALA will explore the idea in the near future. | 2008 — 2010 | ||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 6. | INFLUX. Refer to No. (1 ) priority, Emotional Development). |
NRLLG to develop strategy to address issue. | 2008 | ||||||||||
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT. | ||||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 1. | FINANCIAL PLAN Develop proposal on the financial plan. |
LGL has engaged financial experts to develop proposals. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 2. | COMPENSATION PAYMENT.
ü Specific Compensation
ü General Compensation
|
LGL to draw up formula as per the government’s laws. | |||||||||||
LMALA/NRLLG/State | 3. | GEOTHERMAL OWNERSHIP/ACCOMMODATION LEASING. |
NRLLG/LMALA to forward letter to Mining Minister on these offer and request progress into this issue. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 4 | RELOCATION BUSINESSES. | LGL to be provided with information relating to each business by LMALA | 2006 |
3
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 5. | Business Management Course. | ||||||||||||
LGL | 6. | T. Niapmas Haus Boi | Xxx to investigate amount, report back then progress and conclude issue. | 2006. | ||||||||||
LGL | 7. | Putput Ladolam TRUST FUNDS i. Ladolam Relocation Trust Funds. |
i. A annual payment of K107,000.00 & land use adjustments Formular | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LMALA/Chapter 4 | 8. | LSDP Projects. Make consultation with chapter 4. |
Make consultation with chapter 4. | 2007 — 2010 | ||||||||||
9. | MMC/MRO Deal Check or make consultation with Joachim on the progress. |
Work Under progress led by JNC Chairman. | 2006 | |||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 10. | LEVERAGE | A plan to leverage K20 million annually. | 2006 — 2010 |
4
Priority Programs and Projects of Putput Plantsite.
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Putput Plantsite
|
Mental Development | 1. | AWARENESS
a. Parents’ commitment to Education.
b. Board of Management commitment to
Education.
c. Children’s commitment to Education.
|
General Awareness to encourage stakeholders to commit to the Education of the children. | 2006 — 2010 | |||||||||
2. | LIHIR EDUCATION PLAN. - Short Term Implementation Plan.
- Implementation of LEP.
|
Lihir Education Committee to develop a five plan. | 2006 — 2010 2006 2007 |
|||||||||||
j
|
3. | Higher Education Plan. (General
Awareness) -Scholarship -Resource Centre -Distance Education -Adult Learning |
Lihir Education Committee to develop a five year plan. | 2007 | ||||||||||
Employment and | 4. | Training, Employment and Localisation. | Lihir Education Committee to develop a five plan. | 2006 | ||||||||||
Monitoring Committee (LMALA) |
||||||||||||||
LMALA & LSDP Chapter 4 | 5. | Personal Viability Courses. | Refer to PV Schedules Chapter 4 for each xxxx program. | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
Physical Development. | ||||||||||||||
Trustees of the Trust Fund. | 1. | Houses. | A plan to address issue of new Houses. To be provided through Trust Fund. To be discussed with Trustees. | July 0000 | ||||||||||
XXX | 2. | Maintenance of VDS Houses. | A position paper on Maintenance of VDS Houses
and Facilities to be prepared by LGL by the end
of June. -Develop a maintenance Plan. -Major Maintenance. -Minor Maintenance. |
2006 — 2010 June/July 06 |
||||||||||
Social Services Parliamentary Committee. | 3. | HEALTH CURATIVE PROGRAM
- Lihir Health Plan.
- Curative Health Programs.
- Preventive Health Programs.
- Short Term Health Program.
- Comprehensive Health Program.
- Ownership & Management of the
facilities.
|
A program to be developed by the committee under the Social Services Parliamentary Committee of the NRLLG. Ownership is a long term issue to be considered in the context of mine closure planning. | 2006 — 2010 September 06 2006 2006 2007 |
||||||||||
LGL/NRLLG /NSPA. | 4. | Village Development System. - Sanitation & Garbage Collection
- Dislodging of Septic Tanks
- School Transport Assistance.
- A plan for 2007 onwards.
|
Provided for under the VDS Grants allocation. | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
VPC/NSPA | 5. | * Village layout. | A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan |
1
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
* Village Electrification (Chapter 3) * Water supply. |
and apply the principles to the following ; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||||
VPC | 6. | Xxxx Development Plan to expand Xxxx
Budgets. -VDS Program. -Community Facilities Maintenance -Beautification -Water Supply. |
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan and apply the principles to the following ; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||
LLG | 7. | Sports & Recreation A sports and recreation plan. |
A plan to establish committee and develop a five year plan. | 2007 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LLG/NSPA. | 8. | Sea Wall A feasibility Study |
There is a need for a feasibility study into this project, then a plan can be formulated to implement the project | 2007 September 06 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 9. | Clean-up program. -A plan to implement the Clean-up program. |
A plan to implement the Clean-up program. | 2007 — 2010 2006 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 10. | A strategy to initiate dialogue on
these issues. *Food/Water *Shelter *Clothing Issues. |
LMALA to devise the strategy to initiate and develop a plan to the issues identified. | |||||||||||
LGL/LMALA/NRLLG /STATE/NIPG |
11. | A Strategy to initiate dialogue on these Issues; Management of | ||||||||||||
• Land • Forest • Soil • Waste • Air Quality • The Environment • The Population. |
||||||||||||||
12. | a · Step Maintenance
|
LMALA to develop maintenance plan. | ||||||||||||
13. | b · TV/ Telephone Lines
|
LGL with LMALA to develop a plan to implement the programs. | ||||||||||||
Law & Order Committee. | Emotional Development | 1. | LAW AND ORDER COMMITTEE. | Law & Order Committee to Plan a strategy to
address problems identified by the communities. -Influx -Squatters -Liquor Related Issues. |
September 2006 | |||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 2. | NRLLG Communication (Capacity Building) | A strategy to activate the Linkage between both
systems. -Implementation using the system |
2006 2007 — 2010 |
||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 3. | EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. | Employment opportunities will be addressed through the HHD Programs |
|||||||||||
Parliamentary Social Services Committee |
4. | Youth & Women | * LMALA to develop a plan for Youth & Women in line with chapter 1 plan for Youth & Women. | 2006 2007 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 5. | NEURO — LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING.
LEGAL PROPERTY SYSTEM To be looked at in the following years |
2008 — 2010 | |||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 6. | INFLUX. | A plan to address and control the influx issue must be | 2008. |
2
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Refer to No. (1 ) priority, Emotional Development). | developed by the institution responsible. | |||||||||||||
Spiritual Development | 1. | Sunday School. | ||||||||||||
2. | Spiritual Groups. | |||||||||||||
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT. | ||||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 1. | FINANCIAL PLAN. Develop proposal on the financial plan. |
2006 | |||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 2. | COMPENSATION PAYMENT. ü Specific Compensation.
-Noise & Dust.
-Anap’s Boundary Issue.
-Latsansan outstanding Issue.
-General Compensation.
ü Inconvenience Allowances.
|
LGL shall develop the formula according or inline with the PNG Laws for the benefit LGL/LMALA must devise strategy to pay this Inconvenience payment. LGL must also devise strategy to accommodate the amount to be paid | 2006 | ||||||||||
3. | Geothermal Generation Ownership | NRLLG/LMALA to forward letter to Mining Minister on these offer and request progress into this issue. | 2006 | |||||||||||
4. | 1. Business Spin Off |
|||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 5. | Plantsite BUSINESSES. | LGL to be provided with information relating to each business | May 2006 | ||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 6. | Business Management Course. | ||||||||||||
LGL | 7. | T. Niapmas Haus Boi | Xxx to investigate amount, report back then progress and conclude issue. | 2006. | ||||||||||
LGL | 8. | Plantsite TRUST FUNDS | A annual payment of K104,000.00 & land use adjustments Formular | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LMALA/Chapter 4 | 9. | LSDP Projects. Make consultation with chapter 4. |
2007 — 2010 | |||||||||||
MMC Deal Check or make consultation with Joachim on the progress. |
2006. | |||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 10. | Leverage | A plan to leverage the K20 million per annum. | 2007 -2010. |
3
Priority Programs and Projects Pit & Stockpile.
Community | IBP | Type of | ||||||||||||
Group | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Pit and Stock pile.
|
Mental Development | 1. | AWARENESS
a. Parents commitment to Education.
b. Board of Management commitment to
Education.
c. Children’s commitment to
Education.
|
General Awareness to encourage stakeholders to commit to the Education of the children. | 2006-2010 | |||||||||
2. | LIHIR EDUCATION PLAN. - Short Term Implementation Plan. - Implementation of LEP. |
Lihir Education Committee to develop a five year plan. | 2006 –2010 2006 2007 |
|||||||||||
3. | Higher Education Plan. (General
Awareness) -Scholarship. -Resource Centre. -Distance Education. -Adult Learning |
Lihir Education Committee to develop a five year plan. | 2007 | |||||||||||
Employment and Monitoring Committee (LMALA) | Department name will change as per the new structure. | 4. | Training, Employment and Localisation. | Lihir Education Committee to develop a five plan. | 2006 | |||||||||
LMALA & LSDP Chapter 4 | 5. | Personal Viability Courses. | Refer to PV Schedules Chapter 4 for each xxxx program. | 2006-2010 | ||||||||||
Physical Development. | ||||||||||||||
Trustees of the Trust Fund. | 1. | VDS Houses. | A plan to address issue of VDS Houses or housing Assistance to the Block owners. | July 0000 | ||||||||||
XXX | 2. | Maintenance of VDS Houses. | A position paper on Maintenance of VDS
Houses and Facilities to be prepared by LGL
by the end of June. -Develop a maintenance Plan. -Major Maintenance. -Minor Maintenance. |
2006 -2010 June/July 06 |
Community | IBP | Type of | ||||||||||||
Group | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Social Services Parliamentary Committee. | 3. | HEALTH CURATIVE PROGRAM
- Lihir Health Plan.
- Curative Health Programs.
- Preventive Health Programs.
- Short Term Health Program.
- Comprehensive Health Program.
- Ownership & Management of the
facilities.
|
A program to be developed by the committee
under the Social Services Parliamentary
Committee of the NRLLG. Ownership is a long term issue to be considered in the context of mine closure planning. |
2006 –2010 September 06 2006 2006 2007 |
||||||||||
LGL/NRLLG/NSPA | 4. | Village Development System.
- Sanitation & Garbage Collection
- Dislodging of Septic Tanks
- School Transport Assistance.
- A plan for 2007 onwards.
|
Provided for under the VDS Grants allocation. | 2006-2010 | ||||||||||
VPC/NSPA | 5. | * Village layout. * Village Electrification (Chapter 3) * Water supply. |
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC
to plan and apply the principles to the
following; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. |
|||||||||||
VPC | 6. | Xxxx Development Plan to expand Xxxx
Budgets. -VDS Program. -Community Facilities Maintenance -Beautification. -Water Supply. |
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC
to plan and apply the principles to the
following; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. |
|||||||||||
LLG | 7. | Sports & Recreation A sports and recreation plan. |
A plan to establish committee and develop a five year plan. | 2007-2010 | ||||||||||
LLG/NSPA. | 8. | Sea Wall A feasibility Study |
There is a need for a feasibility study into this project, then a plan can be formulated to implement the project | 2007 September 06 | ||||||||||
LMALA | 9. | Clean-up program. -A plan to implement the Clean-up program. |
A plan to implement the Clean-up program. | 2006 2007–2010 |
||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 10. | a. Preservation of Ailia Sacred Rock.
b. Preservation of Kokots Masalai.
|
A plan to implement the programs identified. | |||||||||||
LMALA | 10. | A strategy to initiate dialogue on
these issues. * Food/Water *Shelter * Clothing Issues. |
||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA/NRLLG /STATE/NIPG |
11. | A Strategy to initiate dialogue on
these Issues; Management of |
Refer to chapter for 2 leadership to addressing these issues. |
Community | IBP | Type of | ||||||||||||
Group | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
• Land
• Forest
• Soil
• Waste
• Air Quality
• The Environment
• The Population. |
||||||||||||||
Spiritual Development |
1. | - Sunday School - Spiritual Groups. |
A specialist will be engaged to develop a plan to address the spiritual needs in the area, | |||||||||||
2. | Spiritual Groups. | - Sunday School | ||||||||||||
Law & Order Committee. | Emotional Development |
1. | LAW AND ORDER COMMITTEE. | Law & Order Committee to Plan a strategy to
address problems identified by the
communities. -Influx -Squatters |
September 2006 | |||||||||
-Liquor Related Issues. | ||||||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 2. | NRLLG Communication (Capacity Building) |
A strategy to activate the Linkage between
both systems. -Implementation using the system |
2006 2007-2010 |
||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 3. | EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. | Employment opportunities will be addressed through the HHD Programs |
|||||||||||
Parliamentary Social Services Committee |
4. | Youth & Women | * LMALA to develop a plan for Youth & Women in line with chapter 1 plan for Youth & Women. | 2006 2007 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 5. | NEURO – LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING. LEGAL PROPERTY SYSTEM |
To be looked at in the following years. | 2008-2010 | ||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 6. | INFLUX. Refer to No. (1 ) priority, Emotional Development). |
2008 | |||||||||||
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT. | ||||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 1. | FINANCIAL PLAN Develop proposal on the financial plan. |
LGL has consultants working on this issue. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 2. | COMPENSATION PAYMENT. ü Specific Compensation
• Compensation of Awat
(Param) |
Community | IBP | Type of | ||||||||||||
Group | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
• Compensation of Letosal
(Palaruhuo)
• Red Soil Payment
• Megapode payment
- Frontage of Portion 764,765,766.- Backdate compensation of portion 764,765,766. • |
||||||||||||||
ü General Compensation.
ü |
||||||||||||||
LMALA/NRLLG/State | 3. | GEOTHERMAL OWNERSHIP/ACCOMMODATION LEASING. |
NRLLG/LMALA to forward letter to Mining Minister on these offer and request progress into this issue. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 4. | BUSINESSES SPIN Offs. | LGL to be provided with information relating to each business and provide block owners businesses the opportunity to contracts within the pit & Stock pile. | May 2006 | ||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 5 | Business Management Course. | ||||||||||||
LGL | 6 | TRUST FUNDS | A annual payment of K104,000.00 & land use adjustments Formular | 2006-2010 | ||||||||||
LMALA/Chapter 4 | 7 | LSDP Projects. Make consultation with chapter 4. |
Make consultation with Chapter 4. | 2007-2010 | ||||||||||
8 | MMC Deal Check or make consultation with Joachim on the progress. |
2006. | ||||||||||||
LMALA/ LGL | 9 | LEVERAGE | A plan to leverage the K20 million annually. | 2006–2010. |
Priority Programs and Projects Kapit Relocation.
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Kapit Relocation
|
Mental Development | 1. | AWARENESS
a. Parents commitment to Education.
b. Board of Management commitment to
Education.
c. Children’s commitment to Education.
|
General Awareness to encourage stakeholders to commit to the Education of the children. | 2006 – 2010 | |||||||||
2. | LIHIR EDUCATION PLAN. | Lihir Education Committee to develop a five plan. | 2006 – 2010 | |||||||||||
a.
Short Term
Implementation Plan.
|
2006 2007 |
|||||||||||||
b. – Implementation of LEP. |
||||||||||||||
3. | Higher Education Plan. (General
Awareness) -Scholarship -Resource Centre -Distance Education -Adult Learning |
Lihir Education Committee to develop a five year plan. | 2007 | |||||||||||
Employment and Monitoring Committee (LMALA) | 4. | Training, Employment and Localisation. | Lihir Education Committee to develop a five plan. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LMALA & LSDP Chapter 4 | 5. | Personal Viability Courses. | Refer to PV Schedules Chapter 4 for each xxxx program. | 2006 – 2010 | ||||||||||
Physical Development. | ||||||||||||||
Trustees of the Trust Fund. | 1. | Relocation houses. | A plan to address issue of Relocation Houses. To be provided through Trust Fund. Nominated requirement is 20 houses over 5 years. To be discussed with Trustees. | July 0000 | ||||||||||
XXX | 2. | Maintenance of Relocation Houses. | A position paper on Maintenance of
Relocation Houses and Facilities to be prepared by LGL by the end of June. -Develop a maintenance Plan. -Major Maintenance. -Minor Maintenance. |
2006- 2010 June/July 06 |
1
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Social Services Parliamentary Committee. | 3. | HEALTH CURATIVE PROGRAM
ü Lihir Health Plan.
ü Curative Health Programs.
ü Preventive Health Programs.
ü Short Term Health Program.
ü Comprehensive Health Program.
ü Ownership & Management of the
facilities.
|
A program to be developed by the committee
under the Social Services Parliamentary
Committee of the NRLLG. Ownership is a long term issue to be considered in the context of mine closure planning. |
2006 – 2010 September 06 2006 2006 2007 |
||||||||||
LGL/NRLLG/NSPA. | 4. | Village Development System.
ü Sanitation & Garbage Collection
ü Dislodging of Septic Tanks
ü School Transport Assistance.
ü A plan for 2007 onwards.
|
Provided for under the VDS Grants allocation. | 2006 – 2010 | ||||||||||
VPC/NSPA | 5. | ü Village layout.
ü Village Electrification
(Chapter 3)
ü Water supply.
|
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan and apply the principles to the following; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||
VPC | 6. | Xxxx Development Plan to expand Xxxx
Budgets.
ü VDS Program.
ü Community Facilities
Maintenance
ü Beautification
ü Water Supply.
|
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan and apply the principles to the following; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||
LLG | 7. | Sports & Recreation A sports and recreation plan. |
A plan to establish committee and develop a five year plan. | 2007 – 2010 | ||||||||||
LLG/NSPA. | 8. | Sea Wall A feasibility Study |
There is a need for a feasibility study into this project, then a plan can be formulated to implement the project | 2007 September 06 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 9. | Clean-up program. | A plan to implement the Clean-up program. | 2007 – 2010 2006 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 10. | A strategy to initiate dialogue on
these issues.
ü Food/Water
ü Shelter
ü Clothing Issues.
|
A plan to implement the program identified. | 2007 – 2010 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA/NRLLG /STATE/NIPG |
11. | A Strategy to initiate dialogue on
these Issues; Management of ü Land
ü Forest
ü Soil
ü Waste
ü Air Quality
ü The Environment
ü The Population.
|
2007 – 2010 |
2
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Spiritual Development |
Sunday School Spiritual Groups |
A consultant will develop a plan to address the issue. | September 2006 | |||||||||||
Law & Order Committee. | Emotional Development |
1 | LAW AND ORDER COMMITTEE. | Law & Order Committee to Plan a strategy to
address problems identified by the
communities.
ü -Influx
ü -Squatters
ü -Liquor Related Issues.
|
September 2006 | |||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 2 | NRLLG Communication (Capacity Building) | A strategy to activate the Linkage between both systems. | 2006 |
||||||||||
• Implementation using the system |
2007-2010 |
|||||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 3. | EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. | Employment opportunities will be addressed through the HHD Programs |
|||||||||||
Parliamentary | 4. | Youth & Women | * LMALA to develop a plan for Youth & Women | 2006 | ||||||||||
Social Services | in line with chapter 1 plan for Youth & | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Committee | Women. | |||||||||||||
LMALA | 5 | NEURO – LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING. LEGAL PROPERTY SYSTEM To be looked at in the following years. |
2008-2010 | |||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 6. | INFLUX. Refer to No. ( 1 ) priority, Emotional Development). |
2008 | |||||||||||
Spiritual Development |
1 | Sunday School. | ||||||||||||
2 | Spiritual Groups. | |||||||||||||
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT. | ||||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 1. | FINANCIAL PLAN. Develop proposal on the financial plan. |
2006 | |||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 2. | COMPENSATION PAYMENT.
ü Specific Compensation
• Hardship allowances.
• Land Use Payments.
• Outstanding Land use Payments.
• Deprivation of Traditional land (Haus
Boi).
• Megapode.
ü General Compensation.
|
LGL to pay for the compensation as agreed to by the parties. |
3
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
LMALA/NRLLG/ State |
3. | GEOTHERMAL OWNERSHIP/ACCOMMODATION LEASING. |
NRLLG/LMALA to forward letter to Mining Minister on these offer and request progress into this issue. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 4. | RELOCATION BUSINESSES. | LGL to be provided with information relating to each business | May 2006 | ||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 5. | Business Management Course. | ||||||||||||
LGL | 6. | RELOCATION TRUST FUNDS | A annual payment of K104,000.00 & land use adjustments Formular | 2006 -2010 | ||||||||||
LMALA/Chapter 4 | 7. | LSDP Projects. Make consultation with chapter 4. |
2007 -2010 | |||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 8. | MMC Deal Check or make consultation with Joachim on the progress. |
2007 | |||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 9. | LEVERAGE | A plan to leverage K20 million annually. | 2006 – 2010 |
4
Priority Programs and Projects Of Chapter 2.
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Londolovit Community River |
Mental Development | 1 | AWARENESS
a. Parents commitment to Education.
b. Board of Management commitment to Education.
c. Children’s commitment to Education.
|
2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
2 | LIHIR EDUCATION PLAN. | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||||
- Short Term Implementation Plan. | 2006 | |||||||||||||
- Implementation of LEP. | 2007 | |||||||||||||
3. | Higher Education Plan. (General Awareness) | 2007 | ||||||||||||
ü -Scholarship
ü -Resource Centre
ü -Distance Education
ü -Adult Learning |
||||||||||||||
Employment and Monitoring Committee (LMALA) | 4. | Training, Employment and Localisation. | 2006 | |||||||||||
LMALA & LSDP Chapter 4 | 5. | Personal Viability Courses. | 2006 — 2010 | |||||||||||
Physical Development. | ||||||||||||||
Trustees of the Trust Fund. | 1. | VDS Houses. | A plan to address issue of VDS Houses. To be
provided through Trust Fund. * Provided for under the VDS Grants allocation |
July 0000 | ||||||||||
XXX | 2. | Maintenance of VDS Houses. | A position paper on Maintenance of VDS Houses
and Facilities to be prepared by LGL by the end of
June. -Develop a maintenance Plan. -Major Maintenance. -Minor Maintenance. |
2006 — 2010 June/July 06 |
||||||||||
3 | Power Supply. | A plan to develop village electrification. | 2007 | |||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx Maintenance.
Upper Londolovit road Maintenance. |
1
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Social Services Parliamentary Committee. | 5 | HEALTH CURATIVE PROGRAM
ü Lihir Health Plan.
ü Curative Health Programs.
ü Preventive Health Programs.
ü Short Term Health Program.
ü Comprehensive Health Program.
ü Ownership & Management of the
facilities.
|
A program to be developed by the committee under
the Social Services Parliamentary Committee
of the NRLLG. Ownership is a long term issue to be considered in the context of mine closure planning. |
2006 — 2010 September 06 2006 2006 2007 |
||||||||||
XXX/XXXXX/XXXX. | 0 | Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx.
ü Sanitation & Garbage Collection
ü Dislodging of Septic Tanks
ü School Transport Assistance.
ü A plan for 2007 onwards.
|
Provided for under the VDS Grants allocation. | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
VPC/NSPA | 7 | * Village layout. * Village Electrification (Chapter 3) * Water supply. |
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan and apply the principles to the following ; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||
VPC | 8 | Xxxx Development Plan to expand Xxxx
Budgets.
ü -VDS Program.
ü -Community Facilities Maintenance
ü -Beautification
ü -Water Supply.
|
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan and apply the principles to the following ; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||
LLG | 9 | Sports & Recreation A sports and recreation plan. | A plan to establish committee and develop a five year plan. | 2007 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LLG/NSPA. | 10. | Sea Wall A feasibility Study |
There is a need for a feasibility study into this project, then a plan can be formulated to implement the project | 2007 September 06 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 11 | Clean-up program. -A plan to implement the Clean-up program. |
A plan to implement the Clean-up program. | 2007 — 2010 2006 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 12. | A strategy to initiate dialogue on these
issues.
ü Food/Water
ü Shelter
ü Clothing Issues.
|
LMALA to draw up | |||||||||||
LGL/LMALA/NRLLG /STATE/NIPG |
13 | A Strategy to initiate dialogue on these
Issues; Management of ü Land
ü Forest
ü Soil
ü Waste
ü Air Quality
ü The Environment
ü The Population. |
2
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
XXX/XXXXX | 00 | Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Construction | Conduct feasibility studies and construct bridge. | 2007 | ||||||||||
Spiritual Development. | Sunday School | A consultant will be engaged to develop a plan to address this program. | 2006. | |||||||||||
Law & Order Committee. |
Emotional Development |
1 |
Spiritual Groups. LAW AND ORDER COMMITTEE. |
Law & Order Committee to Plan a strategy to address problems identified by the committee. ü Influx
ü -Squatters
ü -Liquor Related Issues.
|
September 2006 |
|||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 2 | NRLLG Communication (Capacity Building) | A strategy to activate the Linkage between both
systems. -Implementation using the system. |
2006 2007 — 2010 |
||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 3. | EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. | Employment opportunities will be addressed through the HHD Programs |
|||||||||||
Parliamentary Social Services Committee |
4. | Youth & Women | * LMALA to develop a plan for Youth & Women in line with chapter 1 plan for Youth & Women. | 2006 2007 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 5 | NEURO — LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING. LEGAL PROPERTY SYSTEM | To be looked at a later date. | 2008 — 2010 | ||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 6. | INFLUX. Refer to No. (1) priority, Emotional Development). |
Chapter 1 will be responsible for the program in consultation with LMALA. | 2008 | ||||||||||
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT. | ||||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 1. | FINANCIAL PLAN Develop proposal on the financial plan. |
LGL shall engage consultants to draw up the Plan. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 2. | COMPENSATION PAYMENT.
v Damp Compensation
v Dalavit Masalai Compensation.
|
LGL is paying Land Use to some owners. Xxx to
provide the names to LMALA.
v LGL suggested that Damp Compensation be
paid as allowances to the landowners of land use
for the storage of water. |
|||||||||||
v |
||||||||||||||
LMALA/NRLLG/State | 3. | INVESTMENTS * GEOTHERMAL OWNERSHIP * ACCOMMODATION LEASING. |
NRLLG/LMALA to forward letter to Mining Minister on these offer and request progress into this issue. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 4. | BUSINESS SPIN OFFS. | LGL to be provided with information relating to each business | 2006 May 2006 |
||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 5 | Business Management Course. | ||||||||||||
LGL | 7 | TRUST FUNDS | A annual payment of K104,000.00 & land use adjustments Formular | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LMALA/Chapter 4 | 8. | LSDP Projects. Make consultation with chapter 4. |
Consultation must be made to Chapter 4. | 2007 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LMALA/ NRLLG/ LGL | 9 | MMC Deal | Check or make consultation with Joachim on the progress. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 10 | LEVERAGE | A plan to leverage K20 million annually. | 2006 — 2010. |
3
Priority Programs and Projects Of Chapter 2.
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Londolovit Plantation |
Mental Development | 1 | AWARENESS
a. Parents commitment to Education.
b. Board of Management commitment to Education.
c. Children’s commitment to Education.
|
2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
2. | LIHIR EDUCATION PLAN. - Short Term Implementation Plan. - Implementation of LEP. |
2006 — 2010 2006 2007 |
||||||||||||
3. | Higher Education Plan. (General Awareness) -Scholarship -Resource Centre. -Distance Education -Adult Learning |
2007 | ||||||||||||
Employment and Monitoring Committee (LMALA) | 4. | Training, Employment and Localisation. | 2006 | |||||||||||
LMALA & LSDP Chapter 4 | 5. | Personal Viability Courses. | 2006 — 2010 | |||||||||||
Physical Development. | ||||||||||||||
Trustees of the Trust Fund. | 1. | VDS Houses. | A plan to address issue VDS Houses. To be
provided through Trust Fund. _catered for under the Xxxx Development Budgets. |
July 0000 | ||||||||||
XXX | 2. | Maintenance of VDS Houses. | A position paper on Maintenance of Relocation
Houses and Facilities to be prepared by LGL by the
end of June. -Develop a maintenance Plan. -Major Maintenance. -Minor Maintenance. |
2006- 2010 June/July 06 |
||||||||||
Social Services Parliamentary Committee. | 3 | HEALTH CURATIVE PROGRAM
- Lihir Health Plan.
- Curative Health Programs.
- Preventive Health Programs.
- Short Term Health Program.
- Comprehensive Health Program.
- Ownership & Management of the facilities.
|
A program to be developed by the committee
under the Social Services Parliamentary Committee
of the NRLLG. Ownership is a long term issue to be considered in the context of mine closure planning. |
2006 — 2010 September 06 2006 2006 2007 |
1
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
LGL/NRLLG/NSPA. | 4 | Village Development System.
- Sanitation & Garbage Collection
- Dislodging of Septic Tanks
- School Transport Assistance.
- A plan for 2007 onwards.
|
Provided for under the VDS Grants allocation. | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
VPC/NSPA | 5. | * Village layout. * Village Electrification (Chapter 3) * Water supply. |
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to
plan and apply the principles to the following ;
Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. |
|||||||||||
VPC | 6 | Xxxx Development Plan to expand Xxxx Budgets. -VDS Program. -Community Facilities Maintenance -Beautification -Water Supply. |
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to
plan and apply the principles to the following ;
Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. |
|||||||||||
LLG | 7. | Sports & Recreation. A sports and recreation plan. |
A plan to establish committee and develop a five year plan. | 2007 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LMALA | 8 | Clean-up program. -A plan to implement the Clean-up program. |
A plan to implement the Clean-up program. | 2007 — 2010 2006 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 9 | A strategy to initiate dialogue on these issues. * Food/Water * Shelter * Clothing Issues. |
2008 | |||||||||||
LGL/LMALA/NRLLG /STATE/NIPG |
10 | A Strategy to initiate dialogue on these Issues;
Management of
• Land
• Forest
• Soil
• Waste
• Air Quality
• The Environment
• The Population.
|
2007 — 2010. | |||||||||||
a. A plan to construct town Authority Office.
b. Development of Commercial Blocks.
c. Development of Industrial Area.
d. Construction of Office Complex.
e. Construction of Court House.
f. Lihir Main Sports Facility.
g. Guest House.
h. Construction of a Sports Field to cater for
outdoor games.
i. Construction of a Grand stand.
j. Construct a Hall for indoor games and rally.
k. Construct A volleyball & Basketball Court
l. Construct a Swimming Pool and ablution
blocks.
|
* The committee to develop a plan to construct
the Town Authority Office. * A strategy to be devised by the committee to develop the commercial blocks. A plan to develop the Industrial Area. A strategy to develop the office complex |
2008 |
2
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Spiritual Development | 1. | Sunday School | A Specialist to be engaged to Draw up program. | September 2006 | ||||||||||
2 | Spiritual Groups. | |||||||||||||
Law & Order Committee. | Emotional Development | 1 | LAW AND ORDER COMMITTEE. | Law & Order Committee to Plan a strategy to
address problems identified by the communities.
-Influx -Squatters -Liquor Related Issues. |
September 2006 | |||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 2 | NRLLG Communication (Capacity Building) |
A strategy to activate the Linkage between both
systems. -Implementation using the system |
2006 2007—2010 |
||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 3. | EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. | Employment opportunities will be addressed through the HHD Programs |
|||||||||||
Parliamentary Social Services Committee |
4. | Youth & Women | * LMALA to develop a plan for Youth & Women in line with chapter 1 plan for Youth & Women. | 2006 2007 |
||||||||||
LMALA | 5 | NEURO — LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING. LEGAL PROPERTY SYSTEM. | To be looked at in the following years. | 2008 — 2010 | ||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 6. | INFLUX. Refer to No. (1 ) priority, Emotional Development). |
2008 | |||||||||||
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT. | ||||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 1. | FINANCIAL PLAN Develop proposal on the financial plan. |
2006 | |||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 2. | COMPENSATION PAYMENT.
ü Specific Compensation.
ü General Compensation.
|
2006 — 2010 | |||||||||||
LMALA/NRLLG/State | 3. | GEOTHERMAL OWNERSHIP/ACCOMMODATION LEASING. | NRLLG/LMALA to forward letter to Mining Minister on these offer and request progress into this issue. | 2006 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 4. | LANDOWNER BUSINESSES. | LGL to be provided with information relating to each business so that LGL may give preference in giving contracts to these business. | May 2006 | ||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 5 | Business Management Course. | ||||||||||||
LGL | 6 | TRUST FUNDS | A annual payment of K104,000.00 & land use adjustments Formular | 2006 — 2010 |
3
Type of | ||||||||||||||
Community | IBP Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
LMALA/Chapter 4 | 7 | LSDP Projects. Make consultation with chapter 4. |
2007 — 2010 | |||||||||||
8 | MMC/MRO Deal Check or make consultation with Joachim on the progress. |
2006 | ||||||||||||
9. | Set up Town Authority | 2007 | ||||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 10 | LEVERAGE | A plan to leverage K20 million annually. | 2006 — 2010. |
4
Priority Programs and Projects for Kunaie Airport Specific Issue.
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
Kunaye Airport
|
Mental Development | 1 | AWARENESS a. Parents’ commitment to Education.
b. Board of Management commitment to
Education.
c. Children’s commitment to Education.
|
General Awareness to encourage stakeholders to commit to the Education of the children. | 2006 — 2010 | |||||||||
2 | LIHIR EDUCATION PLAN. | Lihir Education Committee to develop a five plan. | 2006 — 2010 | |||||||||||
- Short Term Implementation Plan. | 2006 | |||||||||||||
- Implementation of LEP. | 2007 | |||||||||||||
3. | Higher Education Plan. (General | Lihir Education Committee to develop a five year | 2007 | |||||||||||
Awareness) | plan. | |||||||||||||
ü -Scholarship
ü -Resource Centre
ü -Distance Education
ü -Adult Learning |
||||||||||||||
Employment and | 4. | Training, Employment and Localisation. | Lihir Education Committee to develop a five plan. | 2006 | ||||||||||
Monitoring Committee (LMALA) |
||||||||||||||
LMALA & LSDP Chapter 4 | 5. | Personal Viability Courses. | Refer to PV Schedules Chapter 4 for each xxxx program. | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
Physical Development. | ||||||||||||||
Trustees of the Trust Fund. | 1. | VDS Houses. | A plan to address issue of VDS Houses. To be provided through Xxxx Development Budget. | July 2006 | ||||||||||
LGL | 2. | Maintenance of VDS Houses. | Responsibility of each xxxx or individuals who
owns the VDS houses. LGL will -Develop a maintenance Plan. -Major Maintenance plan. -Minor Maintenance plan. |
2006- 2010 June/July 06 |
||||||||||
Social Services Parliamentary Committee. | 3 | HEALTH CURATIVE PROGRAM
- Lihir Health Plan.
- Curative Health Programs.
- Preventive Health Programs.
- Short Term Health Program.
- Comprehensive Health Program.
- Ownership & Management of the
facilities.
|
*A program to be developed by the committee under the Social Services Parliamentary Committee of the NRLLG. * Ownership is a long term issue to be considered in the context of mine closure planning. | 2006 — 2010 September 06 2006 2006 2007 |
1
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
LGL/NRLLG/ NSPA. | 4 | Village Development System.
ü Sanitation & Garbage
Collection
ü Dislodging of Septic
Tanks
ü School Transport
Assistance.
|
Provided for under the VDS Grants allocation. | 2006 — 2010 | ||||||||||
VPC/NSPA | 5. | * Village layout.
* Village Electrification (Chapter 3)
* Water supply.
|
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan and apply the principles to the following ; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||
VPC | 6 | Xxxx Development Plan to expand Xxxx
Budgets.
ü VDS Program.
ü Community Facilities
Maintenance
ü Beautification
ü Water Supply.
|
A plan to educate and build capacity of VPC to plan and apply the principles to the following ; Catered for under Xxxx Budgets. | |||||||||||
LLG | 7. | Sports & Recreation A sports and recreation plan. | A plan to establish committee and develop a five year plan. | 2007 — 2010 | ||||||||||
LLG/NSPA. | 8. | Sea Wall | There is a need for a feasibility study into | 2007 | ||||||||||
A feasibility Study | this project, then a plan can be formulated to implement the project. | September 06 | ||||||||||||
LMALA | 9 | Clean-up program. -A plan to implement the Clean-up |
A plan to implement the Clean-up program. | 2007 — 2010 2006 |
||||||||||
program. | ||||||||||||||
LMALA | 10. | A strategy to initiate dialogue on
these issues.
ü Food/Water
ü * Shelter
ü * Clothing Issues.
|
LMALA to draw up a plan to initiate dialogue on these issues. | 2007 | ||||||||||
LGL/LMALA/NRLLG | 11. | A Strategy to initiate dialogue on | LMALA to draw up a plan to initiate dialogue on | 2007 | ||||||||||
/STATE/NIPG | these Issues;
Management of
ü Land
ü Forest
ü Soil
ü Waste
ü Air Quality
ü The Environment
ü The Population.
|
these issues. | ||||||||||||
a. Expansion of Terminal
b. Water Supply.
c. Power Supply.
d. Bridge Crossing
e. Access Roads maintenance
f. Water Supply Connection.
g. Housing Furniture |
||||||||||||||
Spiritual Development | Sunday School Spiritual Groups. | LMALA and denomination Head to draw up a plan to initiate dialogue on these issues. | ||||||||||||
Law & Order Committee. | Emotional Development | 1 | LAW AND ORDER COMMITTEE. | Law & Order Committee to Plan a strategy to
address problems identified by the communities.
• -Influx
• -Squatters
• -Liquor Related Issues.
|
September 2006 |
2
IBP | Type of | |||||||||||||
Community | Reference | Development | Priority | Project | Comments. | Year | ||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 2 | NRLLG Communication (Capacity Building) | A strategy to activate the Linkage between both systems. | |||||||||||
-Implementation using the system | 2006 2007-2010 |
|||||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 3. | EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. | Employment opportunities will be addressed through the HHD Programs |
|||||||||||
Parliamentary | 4. | Youth & Women | * LMALA to develop a plan for Youth & Women in | 2006 | ||||||||||
Social Services | line with chapter 1 plan for Youth & Women. | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Committee | ||||||||||||||
LMALA | 5 | NEURO — LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING. | To be looked at in the following years. | 2008-2010 | ||||||||||
LEGAL PROPERTY SYSTEM | ||||||||||||||
NRLLG/LMALA | 6. | INFLUX. | 2006 | |||||||||||
Refer to No. (1) priority, Emotional Development). | ||||||||||||||
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT. | ||||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 1. | FINANCIAL PLAN | 2006 | |||||||||||
Develop proposal on the financial plan. | ||||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 2. | COMPENSATION PAYMENT. | ||||||||||||
LMALA/NRLLG/State | 3. | GEOTHERMAL OWNERSHIP/ACCOMMODATION | NRLLG/LMALA to forward letter to Mining Minister | 2006 | ||||||||||
LEASING. | on these offer and request progress into this issue. | |||||||||||||
LGL/LMALA | 4. | BUSINESSES SPIN Offs. | LGL to be provided with information relating to each business | May 2006 | ||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 5 | Business Management Course. | ||||||||||||
LGL | 6 | TRUST FUNDS | A annual payment of K104,000.00 & land use adjustments Formular | 2006 -2010 | ||||||||||
LMALA/Chapter 4 | 7 | LSDP Projects. Make consultation with chapter 4. | 2007 -2010 | |||||||||||
8 | MMC Deal Check or make consultation with Joachim on the progress. | |||||||||||||
9. | Inconveniences. | 2006 - 2010 | ||||||||||||
LMALA/LGL | 10 | LEVERAGE | A plan to leverage K20 million annually. | 2006 -2010. |
3
Appendix H(1)
|
Revised Land Use Rates Table | |
Appendix H(2)
|
Revised Economic Trees Rates Table |
Revised Land Use Rates Formula
Category | 1995 IBP | Cumulative | Current CPI | 2005 | Population | 2006 | Expectation | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate | Rate | Factor | Base rate | Factor * | Rate | Factor * | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Social Inconvenience |
K15/Ha | 15 | 2.37 | 35.55 | 0.16 | 41.238 | 2 | 82.476 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xxxx & Nuisance |
K30/Ha | 45 | 2.37 | 106.65 | 0.16 | 123.714 | 2 | 247.428 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cleared Land |
K15/Ha | 60 | 2.37 | 142.2 | 0.16 | 164.952 | 2 | 329.904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Damaged Land |
K22.50/Ha | 82.5 | 2.37 | 195.525 | 0.16 | 226.809 | 2 | 453.618 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lost Land * |
K30/Ha | 112.5 | 2.37 | 266.625 | 0.16 | 309.285 | 2 | 618.57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Land * |
K30/Ha | 112.5 | 618.57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional Lost Land * |
K30/Ha | 112.5 | 618.57 |
* | These categories are not cumulative but refer to specific provision in the IBP for certain portions — payable at the Lost Land Rate | |
* | The population factor is an adjustment for the past ten years movement. Hereafter it will be 2.2% p.a. | |
* | The expectation factor is a one off adjustment for this year only. |
1 | 3/10/2008 | R. Brew |
Rates | ||||||||||||
Small | Medium | Large | ||||||||||
Description | New Rate | New Rate | New Rate | |||||||||
Aibika, Bubirier, Te, Lioh, Kar |
1.19 | 2.37 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Aila |
1.19 | 2.37 | 3.56 | |||||||||
Acacardo |
2.37 | 4.74 | 9.48 | |||||||||
Bamboo Clump (Tinanik) |
2.37 | 11.85 | 23.70 | |||||||||
Bamboo Giant (12 Sticks) |
3.56 | 7.11 | 14.22 | |||||||||
Banana |
1.19 | 4.74 | 11.85 | |||||||||
Bean |
0.47 | 1.19 | 2.37 | |||||||||
Betel Nuts |
11.85 | 23.70 | 53.33 | |||||||||
Black Palm |
4.74 | 9.48 | 18.96 | |||||||||
Breadfruit (see canoe tree) |
16.59 | 35.55 | 47.40 | |||||||||
Bukbuk (refer malay apple) |
2.37 | 11.85 | 23.70 | |||||||||
Cabbage |
1.19 | 2.37 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Caboe trees (Nor, Maniom, Sambo &
Yendon) |
||||||||||||
Large 50 cm diameter at base |
237.00 | |||||||||||
Medium 30cm - 49 dia at base |
118.50 | |||||||||||
Small 15cm - 30cm at base |
23.70 | |||||||||||
Seedlings 10cm - 15 cm |
11.85 | |||||||||||
Capsicum |
0.47 | 1.19 | 2.37 | |||||||||
Cassava (Tapioka) mounds |
1.19 | 2.37 | 3.56 | |||||||||
Casurina (yar) |
2.37 | 5.93 | 11.85 | |||||||||
Chilli (Lonbo) |
1.19 | 2.37 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Citrus — orange |
2.37 | 7.11 | 14.22 | |||||||||
Citrus — mandarin |
2.37 | 3.56 | 7.11 | |||||||||
Citrus — lemon |
1.19 | 3.56 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Citrus — pamoloy |
1.19 | 3.56 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Cocoa — conventional |
10.67 | 26.07 | 53.33 | |||||||||
Cocoa — hybrid |
14.22 | 41.48 | 82.95 | |||||||||
Coconut |
17.78 | 37.92 | 77.03 | |||||||||
Coconut — hybrid |
11.85 | 21.33 | 42.66 | |||||||||
Corn |
0.47 | 1.19 | 2.37 | |||||||||
Cucumber |
1.19 | 2.37 | 3.56 | |||||||||
Firewood tree |
1.19 | 3.56 | 7.11 | |||||||||
5 corner fruit |
0.71 | 1.90 | 2.37 | |||||||||
Flowers, shrubs, tangit |
0.47 | 1.19 | 2.37 | |||||||||
Galip |
4.74 | 11.85 | 23.70 | |||||||||
Ginger (clumps) |
0.24 | 0.71 | 1.19 | |||||||||
Guava |
1.19 | 2.37 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Kapok |
1.19 | 3.56 | 7.11 | |||||||||
Malay apple (laulau) |
2.37 | 5.93 | 11.85 | |||||||||
Mango |
4.74 | 11.85 | 23.70 | |||||||||
Okari (talis) |
1.19 | 3.56 | 7.11 | |||||||||
Olion |
0.24 | 0.47 | 1.19 | |||||||||
Pandus (non-edible) |
2.37 | 5.93 | 11.85 | |||||||||
Pandanus — am |
4.74 | 9.48 | 18.96 |
Rates | ||||||||||||
Small | Medium | Large | ||||||||||
Description | New Rate | New Rate | New Rate | |||||||||
Pandanus — ho, biar, bunanie |
4.74 | 9.48 | 18.96 | |||||||||
Pao |
1.78 | 5.33 | 10.67 | |||||||||
Passionfruit |
0.47 | 1.19 | 2.37 | |||||||||
Pawpaw |
1.19 | 2.37 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Peanut (mound) |
0.24 | 0.71 | 1.19 | |||||||||
Pepper vine, daka |
2.96 | 5.93 | 11.85 | |||||||||
Pineapple |
1.19 | 3.56 | 7.11 | |||||||||
Pitpit clump edible |
1.19 | 2.37 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Pitpit clump non-edible |
0.47 | 0.95 | 1.90 | |||||||||
Poison root vines |
0.71 | 1.19 | 2.37 | |||||||||
Pumpkin |
1.19 | 2.37 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Ratan cane clump |
2.37 | 5.93 | 11.85 | |||||||||
Sago (edible) |
17.78 | 35.55 | 71.10 | |||||||||
Sago (non-edible) |
7.11 | 16.59 | 35.55 | |||||||||
Soursop, bresput |
1.19 | 3.56 | 7.11 | |||||||||
Sugar cane clump |
1.19 | 3.56 | 7.11 | |||||||||
Sweet potato mound |
4.74 | 9.48 | 14.22 | |||||||||
Taro mound |
1.19 | 4.74 | 9.48 | |||||||||
Taro kongkong |
1.19 | 3.56 | 7.11 | |||||||||
Timber trees (hard) |
7.11 | 14.22 | 42.66 | |||||||||
Timber trees (semi-hard) |
4.74 | 9.48 | 18.96 | |||||||||
Lesser known timber |
2.37 | 5.93 | 11.85 | |||||||||
Tabacco brus |
1.19 | 2.37 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Tomato |
0.47 | 1.19 | 2.37 | |||||||||
Ton |
7.11 | 14.22 | 28.44 | |||||||||
Tulip tree |
1.19 | 2.37 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Waterlily — kangkong |
1.19 | 1.90 | 2.37 | |||||||||
Watermelon |
1.19 | 2.37 | 5.93 | |||||||||
Yam (mound) |
1.19 | 3.56 | 7.11 |
38
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | mill throughput increasing from 2.8 Mtpa to 4 Mtpa; | ||
• | changes to the harbour base rehabilitation strategy; | ||
• | mining additional pits including Lienetz and Kapit; | ||
• | removing the low-grade ore stockpile from the plan; | ||
• | orderly reductions in workforce numbers leading to mine closure; and | ||
• | orderly progress of rehabilitation activities leading towards mine closure. |
• | socio-economic considerations including community, government and corporate expectations and requirements for closure; | ||
• | the mine’s environmental setting; and | ||
• | the current environmental status of the mine. |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Component | Sub Total (Million PNGK) | |||
Open pit and Mine |
53.7 | |||
Process plant |
25.2 | |||
Town and other infrastructure |
6.6 | |||
Sub-total |
85.5 | |||
Employee Redundancies |
17.0 | |||
Five year monitoring period |
27.4 |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
PAGE | ||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
I | |||
PART A PREAMBLE |
1 | |||
A.1 INTRODUCTION |
1 | |||
A.1.1 Location |
1 | |||
A.1.2 Project Overview |
1 | |||
A.1.3 Ownership and Corporate Details |
2 | |||
A.1.4 History of Site and Previous Work |
3 | |||
A.1.5 Approach to Closure planning |
5 | |||
A.1.6 Scope of This Report |
6 | |||
A.2 PROJECT SETTING |
8 | |||
A.2.1 Climate and Precipitation |
8 | |||
A.2.2 Topography |
8 | |||
A.2.3 Geology |
9 | |||
A.2.4 Seismology |
10 | |||
A.2.5 Hydrogeology |
10 | |||
A.2.6 Hydrology |
10 | |||
A.2.7 Vegetation |
11 | |||
A.2.8 Fauna |
11 | |||
A.2.9 Socio-Economic Environment |
13 | |||
A.3 REGULATORY, COMPANY AND OTHER FRAMEWORK CRITERIA |
14 | |||
A.3.1 Legislative Requirements |
14 | |||
A.3.2 Corporate Requirements, Loan Agreement and Lease
Requirements |
16 | |||
A.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION |
19 | |||
A.4.1 Site Layout |
19 | |||
A.4.2 Mining and Milling Operations |
19 | |||
A.4.3 Open Pit Mine |
20 | |||
A.4.4 Stockpiles |
22 | |||
A.4.5 Process Summary |
23 | |||
A.4.6 Waste Rock |
25 | |||
A.4.7 Tailings Management and Disposal |
26 | |||
A.4.8 Townsite, Infrastructure, Buildings
and Services |
27 |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
A.4.9 Quarries |
28 | |||
A.4.10 Surface Water Run-off and Sediment Control |
29 | |||
A.5 CLOSURE SCHEDULE AND STRATEGY |
31 | |||
A.5.1 Closure Schedule |
31 | |||
A.5.2 Planned Closure |
31 | |||
A.5.3 Goals and Assumptions |
33 | |||
A.5.4 Rehabilitation Strategy |
36 | |||
A.6 RISK MANAGEMENT |
38 | |||
PART B ENVIRONMENTAL AND BIO-PHYSICAL CLOSURE PLAN |
40 | |||
B.1 PLANNED CLOSURE — STAGE 1 END OF PIT OPERATIONS |
40 | |||
B.1.1 Context |
40 | |||
B.1.2 Closure Methodology For Stage 1 |
42 | |||
B.2 PLANNED CLOSURE — STAGE 2 END OF MILL OPERATIONS |
45 | |||
B.2.1 Context |
45 | |||
B.2.2 Closure Methodology for Stage 2 |
49 | |||
B.2.3 Kapit Village |
50 | |||
B.3 PLANNED CLOSURE — STAGE 3 — POST CLOSURE MONITORING |
51 | |||
B.3.1 Context |
51 | |||
B.3.2 Monitoring Plan |
51 | |||
B.4 BALANCE DATE CLOSURE |
53 | |||
B.5 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES SINCE 1999 CONCEPTUAL MINE CLOSURE
PLAN (CMCP) |
54 | |||
B.6 COST ESTIMATE |
55 | |||
B.6.1 Introduction |
55 | |||
B.6.2 Methodology |
55 | |||
B.6.3 Basis of Estimate |
56 | |||
B.6.4 Balance Date Closure Estimate Assumption and Schedule |
57 | |||
B.7 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE COSTS FOR PLANNED AND BALANCE
DATE CLOSURE |
58 | |||
PART C SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLOSURE PLANNING |
62 | |||
C.1 INTRODUCTION |
62 |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.2 SOCIO ECONOMIC SETTING |
64 | |||
C.3 LIHIR SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SEDP) |
66 | |||
C.3.1 Socio-Economic Development Plan (the Plan) |
67 | |||
C.3.2 Implementation of the SEDP |
67 | |||
C.3.3 Land Use and Compensation |
70 | |||
C.3.4 Community Health |
71 | |||
C.3.5 Human Resource Development |
73 | |||
C.3.6 Civil Infrastructure |
74 | |||
C.3.7 Community and Social Impact Issues |
74 | |||
C.3.8 Environment |
75 | |||
C.3.9 Commercial Development |
76 | |||
C.3.10 Specific Issues |
78 | |||
C.3.11 Sustainable Development and Closure (The Lihir Destiny) |
80 | |||
C.0 XXXXXXXXXXXX |
00 | |||
X.0 XNG GOVERNMENT SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POLICY |
85 | |||
C.5.1 Community Sustainable Development Planning |
85 | |||
C.5.2 Tax Credit Scheme and SSG |
87 | |||
C.5.3 Integration of Sustainable Development
Policy and Mine Closure Policy |
88 | |||
C.5.4 Premature Closure |
88 | |||
C.6 MINE REVENUES AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDING |
89 | |||
C.6.1 General |
89 | |||
C.6.2 LMC Contributed Revenues |
89 | |||
C.6.3 Government Funding Sources |
91 | |||
C.6.4 Lihirian Wages |
92 | |||
C.6.5 Available Funds |
93 | |||
C.7 MINE CLOSURE ISSUES AND IMPACTS |
94 | |||
C.7.1 Introduction |
94 | |||
C.7.2
Planned Closure — Stage 1 (2022) |
94 | |||
C.7.3 Planned Closure — Stage 2 (2040) |
99 | |||
C.7.4 Balance Date Closure (2004) |
103 |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.8 SOCIO ECONOMIC CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES |
108 | |||
PART D SUMMARY |
111 | |||
D.1 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
111 | |||
D.2 ACTION ITEMS |
113 | |||
D.2.1 Risk Assessment and Management |
113 | |||
D.2.2 Current and On-going Studies |
113 | |||
D.2.3 Further Studies |
114 | |||
D.3 CLOSURE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS |
117 | |||
GLOSSARY |
118 | |||
REFERENCES |
120 |
Table 1
|
Estimated General Closure Costs (2040) | 1 | ||||
Table A.1.1
|
Key Dates (LGL 2004) | 3 | ||||
Table A.2.1
|
Summary of Ore Deposits | 10 | ||||
Table A.2.2
|
Vegetation zones | 11 | ||||
Table A.3.1
|
Corporate Requirements, Loan Agreements, Lease Requirements | 17 | ||||
Table A.3.2
|
International Standards | 18 | ||||
Table A.4.1
|
Mine Ore and Waste Production Summary | 20 | ||||
Table A.4.2
|
Pit Information | 21 | ||||
Table A.5.1
|
Mine Closure Assumptions Stage 1 Planned Closure | 34 | ||||
Table A.5.2
|
Mine Closure Assumptions Stage 2 Planned Closure | 35 | ||||
Table A.5.3
|
Mine Closure Assumptions Stage 3 Planned Closure | 36 | ||||
Table A.6.1
|
Aspects and Impacts Summary Matrix — Biophysical | 39 | ||||
Table A.6.2
|
Aspects and Impacts Summary Matrix — Socioeconomic | 39 | ||||
Table B.1.1
|
Summary of Stage 1 — Pit Closure Items | 41 | ||||
Table B.2.1
|
Stage 2 Plant Site Decommissioning | 46 | ||||
Table B.2.2
|
Stage 2 — Open Pit Closure | 48 | ||||
Table B.2.3
|
Stage 2 — Townsite and Other Facilities | 49 | ||||
Table B.3.1
|
Stage 3 Planned Closure — Post Closure Monitoring | 52 |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Table B.5.1
|
Summary of Major Changes Since 1999 | 54 | ||||
Table B.7.1
|
Summary of Closure Rounded Cost Estimates | 59 | ||||
Table B.7.2
|
Summary of Changes to Mine Closure Costs Since 1999 Conceptual Mine Closure Plan | 60 | ||||
Table C.6.1
|
Lihir Sustainable Community Development Plan — LMC Contributed Revenues | 90 | ||||
Table C.6.2
|
State Funding Commitments Which Impact Lihir Island Directly | 92 | ||||
Table C.6.3
|
Summary of 5 Year Funding including Lihirian Wages | 93 | ||||
Table C.7.1
|
Employee Numbers (Current and Projected) | 94 | ||||
Table C.7.2
|
Planned Closure — Stage 1 (2022) Socio Economic Impacts and Issues | 96 | ||||
Table C.7.3
|
Mining Workforce (Contract Staff) — Projected Reductions | 97 | ||||
Table C.7.4
|
Services affected by mine closure | 98 | ||||
Table C.7.5
|
Stage 2 Closure (2040) Socio Economic Impacts and Issues | 100 | ||||
Table C.7.6
|
Balance Date Closure (2004) Socio Economic Impacts and Issues | 104 | ||||
Table C.8.1
|
Costs associated with redundancies | 109 |
Figure A.1.1
|
Location Plan | |
Figure A.1.2
|
Current Site Layout | |
Figure A.1.3
|
Mine Schedule — Planned Closure | |
Figure A.5.1
|
Mine Schedule — Balance Date Closure | |
Figure A.5.2
|
Stage 1 (2022) Closure Arrangement | |
Figure A.5.3
|
Low Grade Stockpile Material Balance | |
Figure A.5.4
|
Stage 2 (2040) Closure Arrangement | |
Figure A.5.5
|
Balance Date Closure Arrangement | |
Figure A.5.6
|
1999 Arrangement for Closure |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
(continued)
Appendix I
|
Corporate Requirements, Loan Agreements, and Lease Requirements | |
Appendix II
|
Current LMC Water Use Permits (WUP) | |
Appendix III
|
Data Collection and Reporting Schedule for EMMP Elements | |
Appendix IV
|
Cost Estimates | |
Appendix V
|
Photographs | |
Appendix VI
|
Accounting Implications — Mine Closure Provision |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
A.1 | INTRODUCTION | |
A.1.1 | Location | |
The Lihir Gold Limited’s (LGL) operations are located on Niolam Island, in the New Ireland Province of Papua New Guinea. As Niolam Island is the principal island of the Lihir Group, it is generally referred to as Lihir Island. At its widest points, the island measures 22 km from north to south and 14.5 km from east to west. Lihir Island has a surface area of approximately 197 km2 and is situated approximately 900 km northeast of Port Moresby, the capital of Papua New Guinea, The mine site is located on the island’s east coast, see Figure A.1.1. | ||
A.1.2 | Project Overview | |
The project comprises an open pit mine, ore processing plant, and supporting infrastructure including port facilities, airstrip, diesel and geothermal power stations, water supply facilities, accommodation camps and motel, access roads, and a communications system. The existing site layout is shown in Figure A.1.2. | ||
Ore processing is by pressure oxidation with high-grade ore processed as it is mined whereas low-grade ore is stockpiled in a number of locations for later processing. Tailing is discharged at depth to the ocean via a Deep Sea Tailing placement Pipeline (DSTP). Waste rock is deposited beneath sea water in Xxxxx Xxxxxxx by bottom dump barges. | ||
Mining is expected to continue until the end of 2022 and, following cessation of mining activity, processing of the stockpiled low-grade ore will continue for approximately 22 years, nominally until 2040. This is followed by a two year closure works period and a further five year monitoring period to 2046. The mine and mill operating schedule is shown on Figure A.1.3. |
Page 1
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
A.1.3 | Ownership and Corporate Details | |
LIHIR Gold Limited (LGL) is the owner of the Lihir Gold mine and processing facility. Lihir Management Company Limited (LMC) manages the project on behalf of LGL. LGL is a public Company, the ownership of which is approximately as follows (LGL 2004): |
• | Institutions and General Public: 79.5%; | ||
• | Rio Tinto: 14.5%; and | ||
• | Mineral Resources Lihir (MRL): 6.0%. |
MRL holds its shares in trust on behalf of the people of Lihir. | ||
Stock exchange listings: |
• | Australian Stock Exchange LHG; | ||
• | Nasdaq Stock Exchange LIHRY; and | ||
• | Port Moresby Stock Exchange LHG |
The Company may be contacted at: |
Head Office
Xxxxx 0, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx
Cnr. Champion Parade & Xxxxxxxx Street
Port Moresby
Papua New Guinea
Phone: (x000) 000 0000
Fax: (x000) 000 0000
Page 2
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
A.1.4 | History of Site and Previous Work | |
A.1.4.1 | History of Site | |
Table A.1.1 Key Dates (LGL 2004) |
August 1982
|
Gold mineralization identified | |
September 1983
|
Exploration commenced | |
March 1995
|
Special Mining Lease granted | |
June 1995
|
Integrated Benefits Package adopted | |
October 1995
|
Initial public offering launched | |
November 1995
|
Construction started | |
May 1997
|
First gold pour | |
February 1999
|
Conceptual Mine Closure Plan published | |
September 1999
|
One millionth ounce poured | |
June 2001
|
Two millionth ounce poured | |
October 2001
|
Heat Recovery Plant commissioned | |
December 2001
|
Record annual gold production (647, 942oz) | |
July 2003
|
Maiden dividend paid out | |
November 2003
|
US $151 million raised for key capital projects |
A.1.4.2 | Discovery and Exploration | |
A geological survey of Papua New Guinea, conducted by the Bureau of Mineral Resources (BMR) between 1969 and 1974, identified hydrothermal alteration and thermal activity on Lihir Island, suggesting an environment favourable to epithermal gold mineralization. Following sampling in 1982 by Kennecott Explorations Australia (KEA) and its joint venture partner, Niugini Mining Limited, a major drilling exercise was initiated, which by the end of 1984 had identified the presence of a large gold resource. | ||
In 1988 the RTZ Corporation (now Rio Tinto) acquired Kennecott from BP Minerals America, thereby taking over as the Lihir Joint Venture partner with Niugini Mining Limited. Following test drilling, metallurgical, geotechnical, geothermal, groundwater, environmental and engineering studies, a Feasibility Report was produced in 1992 and submitted to the Papua New Guinea Government. After extensive community consultation, the Joint Venture was issued with a Special Mining Lease in 1995 and later that year, Lihir Gold Limited (LGL) acquired the Lihir Joint Venture Project. Site clearing began in 1995 and, in accordance with the negotiated agreements, villagers occupying the area designated for the process plant site were relocated to new village sites. The processing plant was completed in 1997 and the mine began |
Page 3
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
producing gold soon after. Since then, annual gold production has increased from about 244,000 ounces to over 600,000 ounces. | ||
A.1.4.3 | Previous Reports Related to Mine Closure | |
The following reports relevant to the proposed closure program were reviewed in preparation of this Closure Plan: |
• | XXX, 0000. Lihir Gold Project Environmental Plan, Volume C Appendices. Report prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Kennecott Explorations (Australia) Ltd and Niugini Mining Limited Joint Venture. CR235/17. | ||
• | XXX, 0000. Lihir Project Final Environmental Plan, Volume B Main Report, Supplement to Volume C. Report prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Lihir Joint Venture. CR235/23. | ||
• | XXX, 0000. Lihir Project, New Ireland Province, PNG — Environmental Management and Monitoring Program — Report prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Lihir Joint Venture. CR 235/27. | ||
• | XXX, 0000. Lihir Project, New Ireland Province, PNG — Environmental Baseline, Volumes 1-3. Prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Lihir Joint Venture. CR 235/30/v2 | ||
• | EGi, 1998. Sulphur Oxidation Control and Acid Drainage Management for Operation and Closure: Site Visit Report. | ||
• | XXX, 0000. Conceptual Mine Closure Plan (CMCP) for Lihir Gold Project. Report prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Lihir Joint Venture. CR 235/32/v4. | ||
• | Wildlife Research, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, 2002. The distribution and abundance of nesting marine turtles in the Lihir, Xxxxx and Tanga Island Groups. Final report. | ||
• | LMC 2000, Environmental Management and Monitoring Program 2002-2003. CR EnvIR00:001. | ||
• | LMC 2004, Environmental Management and Monitoring Program (Operations Phase) 2004-2007, Draft Report. | ||
• | XXX 0000, Xxxxx Sustainability Community Development Plan, Draft Report. |
Page 4
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
A.1.5 | Approach to closure planning | |
The mine closure plan is being developed towards compliance with: |
• | PNG Government’s policy and regulatory requirements; | ||
• | LMC loan agreements and lease conditions including the Special Mining Lease; | ||
• | LMC commitments given in the 1992 Environmental Plan; | ||
• | LMC commitments given in the 1995 Integrated Benefits Package, (now under revision); | ||
• | Rio Tinto policy, business practice, closure planning standards and guidelines; and | ||
• | International standards for best practice. |
These documents are discussed further in Section A.3 — Regulatory, Company and Other Framework criteria. Costs for all closure activities have been estimated following discussions with LMC personnel during interviews and site visits conducted throughout September to December 2004. Costs are in 2004 PNG Kina without allowance for future inflation or discounting. | ||
As required under the Department of Mining’s proposed guidelines for Community Sustainable Development Planning (CSDP) for all major mining projects (DOM 2003), the MCP will be a rolling 5-year plan, subject to annual review. A final closure plan will be prepared by LMC and submitted to the Government in the last five years of the project. | ||
The terminology of the CSDP has not been finalised and current discussions suggest the term Socio Economic Development Plan (SEDP) may be preferred by the government. Consequently the terms SCDP and SEDP are used in this report and apply to the same process. |
Page 5
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
A.1.6 | Scope of This Report |
The document, is presented in four parts and updates the LMC mine closure plan, five years after the Conceptual Mine Closure Plan (CMCP) was issued in 1999 (LMC 1999). The updated mine closure plan, in addition to documenting advances in physical closure works planning, significantly updates the socio-economic aspects of the 1999 CMCP. The report puts into context the LMC philosophy of long term sustainable development planning to ensure long-term benefits to the community during and after the operation of the mine. | ||
In addition to updating information contained within the 1999 CMCP, the report is designed to: |
• | Help ensure that adequate provision of funds is being made to meet closure costs; | ||
• | Enable closure considerations to be integrated into current operations planning; | ||
• | Identify regulatory and corporate requirements, commitments and agreements; | ||
• | Provide the basis for the preparation of future updates as closure planning parameters become better known; | ||
• | Identify areas of investigation required for the closure plan; and | ||
• | Provide a framework for discussion between LMC and local landowner groups and State and Provincial governments. |
The 2004 Mine Closure Plan is presented in four parts: Part A (Preamble), Part B (Environment and Bio-physical), Part C (Socio-Economic) and Part D (Summary and Conclusions). | ||
Part A (Preamble) provides a discussion of general items, and background. |
Page 6
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Part B (Environmental and Biophysical) describes the environmental issues, impacts, requirements, commitments, plans and costs relating to closure of the mine site. | ||
Part C (Socio-Economic) describes the socio-economic issues, requirements, commitments, plans and costs relating to closure of the mine site, including the aims and plans to help achieve sustainable development for the people of Lihir Island. | ||
Part D (Summary and Conclusions), provides an overall summary and an action item list. | ||
Addressing environmental and socio-economic issues in separate parts recognizes that social issues and the needs and wishes of the various stakeholders are integral to mine closure and the successful sustainable planning. | ||
Although each part of the report is tailored towards a slightly different audience, the parts are cross referenced and closely linked. Therefore each part should be read in conjunction with the others to promote an understanding of all of the issues and commitments relating to the life and eventual closure of the mine. | ||
The Mine Closure Plan is a work in progress and will evolve over the life of the mine. |
Page 7
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
A.2 | PROJECT SETTING | |
A.2.1 | Climate and Precipitation | |
Temperatures at Lihir are relatively constant from month to month and vary little throughout the day. The average range is from 19oC to 35oC and relative humidity is consistently high. Two wind seasons occur over the year and vary in duration from year to year, but generally the winds are predominantly from the south-east in May to October and from the northwest in November to April. | ||
Rainfall on Lihir Island is relatively evenly distributed throughout the year with no strong wet or dry seasons evident. However the rainfall varies enormously across the island and with altitude. The average precipitation at the mine site is 4,800 millimetres per year. Because of its latitude, 3º 07 S, the island is not affected by tropical cyclones being well above the southern cyclone belt. |
A.2.2 | Topography | |
Much of the island is mountainous, with several peaks rising up to 600 m above sea level. Sub-catchments in the upper elevations of the Xxxxx Xxxxxxx are steep and vary in elevation from about 100 m – 550 m above sea level. Vegetation in these catchments is generally undisturbed, dense and characterized as primary rainforest. The narrow coastal plain and nearby slopes are widely used for subsistence gardening and have secondary growth cover. Parts of the narrow coastal plain, particularly in the northern and eastern areas are formed on coral platforms. | ||
The seabed drops away rapidly from the coastline and in many places submarine cliffs occur below the corals which fringe the coast. Below the drop offs, the ocean floor lies at a depth of approximately 1600m deep immediately around the island. Further out there is a series of ocean trenches, which are the assumed ultimate location for tailings and reach depths of over 3000 m. Because of its origins within a volcanic crater, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx features a gently shelving seabed composed mainly of muddy, fine-grained volcanic sands with some detached coral reefs, which become partly exposed at low tide (LMC 1992). |
Page 8
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
A.2.3 | Geology | |
Lihir Island was formed during periods of intense volcanic activity. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, in which all of the known ore deposits are located, is the youngest of the volcanic features in the area. The northeast slopes of the Xxxxx xxxxxxx have collapsed allowing part of the caldera base to become submerged by the ocean to form Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. | ||
The rocks of the caldera are primarily comprised of andesitic and basaltic lava flows, tuffs and agglomerates which have been subjected to different types of alteration, mineralization and hydrothermal activity. Gold mineralization occurs in the central part of the caldera and all of the rocks in the vicinity of this mineralization have been affected by hydrothermal activity (LMC 1992). | ||
Geothermal reservoirs are present in the caldera, covering an area of at least 2 km2. Discharges in the form of thermal hot springs and fumaroles occur in surrounding areas. Steam and gas discharges occur on the nearby Kapit Beach and zones of submarine gas seepage are regularly observed in Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. Discharges of hydrogen sulphide are commonly associated with all of these features. | ||
The geothermal reservoir is fed by hot fluids that rise from the depths along geologic fractures, mix with infiltrating rainwater and eventually discharge to the sea. At shallow levels of the system, temperatures can reach 100oC at the water table and can exceed 200o C at depth. | ||
Several adjacent and partly overlapping ore deposits lie beneath the floor of the Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. The major reservoirs are known by Minifie, Lienetz and Kapit as summarised in Table A.2.1. Ore reserves are thought not to extend under the steep slopes of the caldera rim. |
Page 9
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Table A.2.1 Summary of Ore Deposits |
DEPOSIT | GOLD MINERALIZATION | |
Minifie
|
Occurs mostly between the original ground surface (about 50 metres above sea level) and 150 metres below sea level. | |
Lienetz
|
Occurs at elevations between 140 metres above and 250 metres below sea level. | |
Kapit
|
Occurs between 50 metres and 250 metres below sea level. |
A.2.4 | Seismology | |
Lihir Island is located at about 3o 07’ S and 152o 38’ W in the West Melanesian Arc seismic source zone of Papua New Guinea (Ripper and Xxxx, 1993). Several magnitude 8 and above earthquakes have been attributed to this zone. New Ireland and Lihir Island lie just north of the likely limit of the contact between the South Bismark Plate and the Solomon Plate as it wraps around New Britain. The area is one of the most highly seismically active plate margins in the world. Consequently, frequent, small nearby earthquakes and infrequent, more distant but potentially destructive large earthquakes can impact the mine site. | ||
A.2.5 | Hydrogeology | |
The groundwater system in the pit area is highly complex and includes flows derived from rainfall infiltration into the upper regions of the caldera, sea water intrusions and erratic high pressure areas caused by volcanic activity. An extensive system of depressurizing, dewatering and cooling water/steam xxxxx exist in and around the pit. |
A.2.6 | Hydrology | |
The Island has a large number of watercourses, the largest of which are the Londolovit River (which drains to the northeast coast) and the Wurtol River (which drains to the southwest coast). Key watercourses relating to the site are the Londolovit River and the two main streams draining the caldera: Kapit and Ladolam Creeks. The latter two discharge into Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. |
Page 10
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
Rainfall is highly variable on a day to day basis. During high rainfall, sediment is rapidly transported into the Harbour contributing to the formation of a sediment plume. The plume, which is observed regularly, is significantly influenced by surface water runoff and groundwater discharge from the site. | ||
A.2.7 | Vegetation | |
There are four main pre-mining vegetation zones present on Lihir as in Table A.2.2. |
VEGETATION ZONE | ||
(AND APPROX. ELEVATIONS) | DETAILS | |
Shoreline
|
Hibiscus and other common strand formation plants. | |
Coastal Plain: 10-175m above sea level |
This belt contains secondary forest, grassland, gardens and garden regrowth, settlements and plantations. Key vegetation includes: coconut and cocoa, areca palm, bamboo, breadfruit, banana, sago, paw paw and other trees. | |
175-400m
|
Steep terrain, mainly a mosaic of secondary to more mature rainforest. Lower hill slopes and deeper soils have garden and garden regrowth areas. | |
400m and above
|
Rugged terrain with steep slopes, thin soils with mature forest, not used for gardening. |
A.2.8 | Fauna | |
A diverse range of terrestrial fauna exists, with similar distributions to the rest of New Ireland. Fauna includes marsupials, reptiles, amphibians, rodents and mammals including wild pigs. There is a xxxx xxxx population, including forest dwellers, sea birds and waders. One particular bird (the Melanesian scrubfowl — Megapodius eremite eremit, a member of the megapode family) uses the geothermal areas to incubate its eggs. Pigs and megapode eggs are traditionally significant as a source of food. | ||
There is an absence of large rivers or estuaries on the island and it is thought that this has limited the establishment and adaptation of marine species in the freshwater environment. The streams which drain the mountains of Lihir are short and fast flowing with erratic flow volumes almost drying up in low flow periods and producing |
Page 11
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
torrents during heavy rain. Fish habitats on the island occur mainly in the low-gradient zones along the narrow stretch of coastal plain and are characterized by riffles and pools. Freshwater fauna consist mainly of fish, prawns and eels (LMC 1996). | ||
Within Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, there exists bottom dwelling (benthic) fauna such as macro-invertebrates in the form of worms and burrowing and surface crustaceans and a small benthic fish population. | ||
Coral reefs fringe the coastline of the island and provide a rich marine habitat. There are not many live corals in the shallow water due to wave disturbance but at greater depths a variety of corals exist. At depths greater than 50m and below, the corals are less in number and are more thin and brittle. Marine fauna such as molluscs, starfish and sea-cucumbers live in the shallow water and many types of crustaceans such as crab, lobster and shrimp live in the reef areas. | ||
A rich variety of reef fish make up the largest group of fish around the island. Ocean fish (Pelagics) are also numerous and include squid, tuna and sharks. Turtles have been observed in the ocean, and in particular Leatherback Turtles, which have in the past infrequently used a section of the Kapit beach to lay their eggs. Little is known about fauna in the deep surrounding ocean floor and trenches. | ||
A.2.8.1 | Air Quality | |
Ambient air quality can vary throughout the year due to natural and anthropogenic sources. In addition to process plant discharges to atmosphere, mining activities and weather conditions can combine to create localised levels of dust, and LMC operate dust suppression measures such as spraying water on haulage roads to counteract this. | ||
Natural sources affecting air quality include emissions from the geothermal xxxxx and hot springs, which discharge steam and gases including hydrogen sulphide to the air. |
Page 12
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
A.2.9 | Socio-economic Environment | |
A brief synopsis of the traditional socio-economic environment is described below. | ||
A.2.9.1 | Population and Settlement | |
The population of Lihir Island is mainly spread among villages around the coast with less in the more rugged parts of the island. Londolovit is and remains the population centre of the island. | ||
A.2.9.2 | Land Use | |
Approximately 90ha of plantations of coconut, cocoa and sago were located within Xxxxx Xxxxxxx prior to the mine development. Near the coast, the caldera also contained extensive thickets of bamboo which were used by the villagers for building materials. Behind the plantations were approximately 60ha of garden and garden regrowth. Further inland and on the lower slopes was secondary forest that contained a few active gardens. On the steeper and higher slopes, more mature forest existed and is still evident today. | ||
A.2.9.3 | Economy | |
Villages on Lihir Island and the nearby islands traditionally have subsistence economies comprising shifting cultivation and wild pig farming. Gardens provide a major source of food including a variety of vegetables and fruit. The islanders traditionally obtain many of their raw materials and foods from the forest, including timber, sago and bamboo for building purposes. Although garden cultivation provides the main source of food, fishing in the sea remains an important food source and social activity. |
Page 13
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
A.3 | REGULATORY, COMPANY AND OTHER FRAMEWORK CRITERIA | |
A.3.1 | Legislative Requirements | |
A.3.1.1 | Relevant Acts | |
The main acts governing mining operations in PNG are: |
• | Environment Act (2000). | ||
• | Mining Act (1992). |
A.3.1.2 | Environment Act (2000) | |
i) General | ||
A new environment regime was introduced to Papua New Guinea (PNG) by the Environment Xxx 0000 and its associated regulations. The Environment Xxx 0000 (the Act): |
• | repealed the Environmental Planning Act (1978), Water Resources Act (1982) and the Environmental Contaminants Act (1978), and incorporated their requirements; | ||
• | imposed a regime of environmental approvals and licensing aimed at protecting PNG’s environment (applies to, and may affect, both new and existing projects); and | ||
• | established the Environment Council as a crucial decision making body. |
Statutory environmental requirements have remained unchanged under the new Environment Act, and the present LMC Water Use Permits (WUPs) that were issued prior to the 2000 Environment Act, will continue to operate with the new regime. | ||
ii) Water Permits | ||
Water Use Permits (WUPs) are issued by the PNG Department of Environment and Conservation to regulate water extracted from rivers and the ocean, and limit the volume and concentration of discharged pollutants. Concentration limits detailed in WUPs are based on international standards for the protection of fresh and marine |
Page 14
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
waters including the Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council (ANZECC) 2000 Guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. LMC’s compliance with the requirements of the WUPs is monitored through the current Environmental Monitoring and Management Program (XXXX 0000-0000). A listing of the 23 original LMC Water Use Permits is attached in Appendix II. Five permits have since lapsed or been amalgamated into 18 valid water use permits. | ||
A.3.1.3 | Mining Act (1992) | |
The section of the Mining Xxx 0000 of direct relevance to closure is Section 152 “entitled removal of mining plant, ore, tailings, etc., on expiry, etc. of tenement”. Implications of Section 152 for closure are: | ||
Mining plant can be either removed by the holder of a tenement following surrender of the tenement, or be sold by the Department of Mining and removed. In the event of a sale, the proceeds are retained by the State. However, this section is interpreted subject to the existence of any valid agreement between the holder of the tenement and owner of the land where the plant is located. | ||
Any tailings, other materials or mined ore left upon the land following surrender of the tenement and not within a prescribed period removed or treated by the holder of the tenement, shall become the property of the State. | ||
In addition, Section 19 of the Act states that a mining development contract takes precedence over the Act, except where conflict between regulators and developers exists, in which case the provisions of the Act prevail. In the case of the Lihir Gold Mine, therefore, Section 152 is not applicable to Special Mine Lease 6 (SML 6) covering the area of mining operations, but is presumed to be applicable to leases granted for quarrying and the provision of infrastructure (e.g. Lease for Mining Purposes Nos. 125 and 126, Lease for Mining Purposes Nos. 34 and 35, and Mining Easements Nos. 71, 72 and 73). |
Page 15
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
A.3.1.4 | Other Acts | |
The Environment Xxx 0000, repeals a number of environmental statutes. Those which remain and are in part applicable to LMC’s operations are listed below; |
• | Public Health (Drinking Water) Act (1984). | ||
• | Conservation Areas Act (1980). | ||
• | Dumping of Wastes at Sea Act (1979). | ||
• | International Trade (Fauna and Flora) Act (1979). | ||
• | Fauna (Protection and Control) Act (1966). |
These Acts only have a minor impact on Lihir operations beyond the requirements of the Environment Xxx 0000 and Mining Xxx 0000. | ||
A.3.2 | Corporate Requirements, Loan Agreement and Lease Requirements | |
In addition to the regulatory requirements for mine closure, there are a wide variety of LMC and other Corporate documents having relevance to closure. In addition certain loan and lease agreements require adherence to environmental performance which impact closure. There are also international standards of good practice dealing with closure. Many of these requirements and standards cover similar issues and goals. The main identified documents are listed in Tables A.3.1 and A.3.2, with selected items discussed further in Appendix 1. |
Page 16
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
DOCUMENT | AUTHOR AND DATE | COMMENTS | ||
Community and Environmental Policy
|
XXX, 0000 | Discussed in Appendix I | ||
Environmental Plan
|
LMC, 1992 | Discussed in Appendix I | ||
Environmental Management and Monitoring
Program
|
XXX, 0000 (Draft) | Will supersede 2002-2004 when issued. Update in progress. Discussed in Appendix I | ||
Integrated Benefits Plan (IBP) Revised IBP — The Sustainable Development Community Plan (SDCP) |
LMC 1995 LMC 2004 (Draft) |
SDCP will supersede IBP when issued. Discussed in Appendix I | ||
Mining Development Contract
|
State of PNG, March 17, 1995 | Discussion in Appendix I | ||
Loan Agreements; Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Agreement, Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, Mining Industry Consultants Agreement. |
Retired | Assumed retired when loan ended in 2003. Discussed in Appendix I | ||
Mining Leases SML 6, ML 125,126, Lease for Mining purposes 34, 35, |
State of PNG, March 17, 1995 State of PNG, July 21, 1995 |
Discussed in Appendix I | ||
Mining Easements 71, 72, 73
|
State of PNG, September 21, 1995 | |||
Rio Tinto Statement of Business Practice
|
Rio Tinto, 2003 | Discussed in Appendix I | ||
Rio Tinto Closure Planning Standard
|
Rio Tinto, 2004 | Discussed in Appendix I | ||
Rio Tinto Closure Planning Guidance
|
Rio Tinto 2004 |
International standards which have been reviewed for preparation of the closure plan include the documents listed in Table A.3.2. The closure scenarios as presented in this report comply with the understood intent of all Regulations, Corporate and International documents referred to in this section, unless noted otherwise. |
Page 17
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
DOCUMENT | AUTHOR AND DATE | |||
•
|
Sustainable Development Policy & Sustainability Planning Framework for the Mining Sector in PNG (Green Paper) |
Department of Mining, PNG Government, 2003. | ||
•
|
Pollution Prevention & Abatement Handbook (PPAH) | World Bank 1998. | ||
•
|
IFC Guidelines for mining and milling — Open Pit | World Bank (IFC), 1995 (Draft). | ||
•
|
IFC Guidelines for Precious Minerals Mining | World Bank (IFC), 2004 (Draft). | ||
•
|
IFC Safeguard Policy — OP4.01 Environmental Assessment, | World Bank (IFC), 1998. | ||
•
|
IFC Procedure for Environmental and Social Review of projects | |||
•
|
Environmental Assessment Sourcebook and updates | World Bank, 1991-2002. | ||
•
|
World Bank Equator Principles | World Bank, 2003. | ||
•
|
Strategic Framework for Mine Closure | Australia and New Zealand Minerals and Energy Council (ANZMEC) & Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), 2000. | ||
•
|
Minerals Industry Code for Environmental Management | Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), 2000. | ||
•
|
Mining Rehabilitation Handbook | Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), 1998. | ||
•
|
Mine Closure Policy | Minerals Council of Australia (MCA, 1999. | ||
•
|
Guidelines for Mine Closure Planning | Queensland Mining Council, Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | ||
•
|
Best Practice in Environmental Management in Mining; | |||
• Mine
Planning for Environmental Protection.
|
Environment Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | |||
• Community
consultation and involvement.
|
Environment Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | |||
• Land form design for
rehabilitation.
|
Environment Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | |||
• Tailings
Containment.
|
Environment Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | |||
• Rehabilitation
and Revegetation
|
Environment Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | |||
• Managing
Sulphidic Mine Wastes and Acid Drainage
|
Environment Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | |||
• Environmental
Risk Management.
|
Environment Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | |||
Environment Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | ||||
• Water
Management. |
||||
•
|
Mine close out criteria: life of mine planning objectives | Dept. of Mines and Energy, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | ||
•
|
Technical Guidelines for the environmental management of exploration and mining | Natural Resources and Mines (Formerly Dept of Mines and Energy), Queensland Government, Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. | ||
•
|
Environmental Management Framework and Policy | The Mining Association of Canada (MAC), 1995. | ||
•
|
A Guide to the Management of Tailings Facilities | The Mining Association of Canada (MAC), 1998. | ||
•
|
Mining & Environment Guidelines adopted at the United Nations International Roundtable on Mining & the Environment (The Berlin Guidelines) |
United Nations, 1994. | ||
•
|
Berlin II Guidelines for Mining and Sustainable Development (Updates the original Berlin guidelines) | United Nations, 2002. | ||
•
|
Environmental Guidelines for Mining Operations | United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) & the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 1998. | ||
•
|
Mine Rehabilitation for Environment and Health Protection | United Nations Environment Programme/World Health Organisation, 1998. | ||
•
|
Environmental Management of Mine Sites. TR 30. | United Nations Environment Programme, 1994. | ||
•
|
The Business Charter for Sustainable Development | International Chamber of Commerce, 1991. | ||
•
|
Sustainable development framework. | International Council on Mining and Metals, 2003. | ||
•
|
International Standard for Environmental Management -ISO 14001 |
International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), 1996. |
Page 18
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
A.4 | PROJECT DESCRIPTION | |
A.4.1 | Site Layout | |
The current site layout is shown in Figure A.1.2 and the following sections provide a general description of the project components. | ||
A.4.2 | Mining and Milling Operations | |
A.4.2.1 | Ore Reserve | |
Mineable reserves at the end Q2 2004 amount to about 566,000 Kg of recoverable gold, contained in 161 million tonnes of ore, averaging about 3.52 grams of gold per tonne. | ||
A.4.2.2 | Brief overview of the mining and milling schedule |
• | Site operations began in 1995; | ||
• | Mining of the Minifie ore body, processing of high grade ore and stockpiling of low grade ore began in 1997; | ||
• | Mining of the Lienetz ore body started in 2002; | ||
• | Mining of the Kapit ore body to follow in 2010 after the low-grade stockpile that currently lies on top of it is removed; | ||
• | All mining operations are anticipated to finish in 2022; | ||
• | Low Grade Stockpiles to be processed following cessation of mining; | ||
• | Milling ceases in 2040 after processing of the low-grade stockpiles ends. |
Mining operations remove about 47 million tonnes of waste from the pit per annum. Most of the waste rock is transferred using haul trucks to bottom-dump barges, and then disposed in the harbour. Table A.4.1 shows ore, waste and tailings cumulative production at key dates. |
Page 19
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
CUMULATIVE MINE PRODUCTION (Mt) | ||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTION |
1999 | 2004 | 2022 | 2040 | ||||||||||||
Ore delivered to ROM |
5.5 | 24 | 105 | 181 | ||||||||||||
LG Stockpiled |
n/a | 35 | 98 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Waste Rock |
n/a | 190 | 770 | 770 | ||||||||||||
Tailings (Ore milled) |
5.4 | 24 | 109 | 190 |
A.4.3 | Open Pit Mine | |
A.4.3.1 | General | |
Mine Site elements that relate to operations in the pit: |
• | Workshop, offices and miscellaneous buildings; | ||
• | Barge loading wharf; | ||
• | Screening and dewatering plant; | ||
• | Heavy Equipment; | ||
• | Pit Slopes; | ||
• | Mine electrical, and miscellaneous items; |
A.4.3.2 | Description of Open Pit Mine | |
The Lihir Gold deposit is made up of several adjacent and partly overlapping mineral deposits beneath the floor of the caldera, the principal reserves being Minifie, Lienetz and Kapit. | ||
Development of the Minifie and Lienetz reserves is by conventional open pit mining however development of the Kapit reserve will require construction of a xxxxxx dam in Xxxxx Xxxxxxx to allow the final pit wall to extend beyond the current coastline. |
Page 20
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
Geology
|
• | Epithermal sulphide ore in an inactive volcanic crater. | ||
Pit geometry
|
• | Final dimension of the pit estimated at 2 km x 1.4 km, with a final depth of 185 m below sea level. | ||
• | Bench heights: 12 m and 6 m. | |||
• | Maximum final pit slope angle: 47 degrees. | |||
• | Minifie deposit — actively mined since start up originally measured approx 1000 m x 600 m | |||
• | Lienetz deposit — measures approximately 800 m x 400 m | |||
• | Kapit deposit — measures approximately 450 m x 300 m | |||
• | All pits taper in size at depth | |||
Mine production
|
• | The remaining life-of-mine strip ratio is about 4:1 (waste: high-grade ore + low-grade ore). | ||
• | The remaining high-grade strip ratio is approximately 9:1 (waste + low-grade ore: high-grade ore) |
A.4.3.3 | Mining | |
Mining is undertaken using RH200 shovels loading a fleet of Cat 785 and 777 haul trucks. Much of the mined material is soft enough to free dig but blasting is carried out as a safety precaution against mining into high pressure geothermal zones. | ||
The mine equipment fleet is serviced in the plant workshop and associated warehouse, tyre shop and miscellaneous buildings. Mine operations has its own set of offices, fuel station and crib hut. | ||
The Barge Wharf is specific to the mine, and the barges themselves are contractor operated. | ||
The pit also has its own screening plant for crushing and screening aggregate for drill hole stemming and general use. | ||
The mine equipment fleet also includes, CAT 375 Excavators, D10 Dozers and drills, graders and loaders. | ||
The mine is dewatered, depressurized and cooled in advance of mining activity by a system of bores. A large number of horizontal bores are installed for localized depressurization of the in-pit walls. Discharges from bores are currently directed, by |
Page 21
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
pumping as necessary to the two perimeter drainage channels (Kapit and Ladolam). Plans are being developed to collect these discharges, separate contact from non-contact water, and discharge the effluent in a controlled manner to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. | ||
Surface water due to rainfall and runoff is collected in a series of sumps in the pit. The position of these sumps are moved as work in the pit progresses. Collected runoff is currently pumped to the Ladolam perimeter drainage channel on the southern side of Minifie pit and discharged to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. The flow will also be collected and separated from non-contact water for controlled discharge. | ||
A.4.3.4 | Pit Walls | |
The pit wall rock consists of weak weathered material often of high temperature. As such there is limited precedent for assessing wall stability during development. Experience being obtained through observation of current mine performance will be used to develop stable final pit walls. At closure, the pit-wall area above sea level is estimated to be about 196 ha of which over 50% is expected to comprise Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) material. | ||
A.4.3.5 | Xxxxxx Dam | |
The current mine plan requires construction of a xxxxxx dam in Xxxxx Xxxxxxx to allow development of the Kapit Reserve. Due to the quantities and timing of material required it is most likely that the bulk of material used for embankment construction will be ROM waste and hence PAF. | ||
A.4.4 | Stockpiles | |
The mine plan adopts a declining cut-off grade strategy, which requires the highest grade ore to be processed first with low grade material stockpiled for late processing. The following section discusses the strategy for handling the high and low grade. | ||
A.4.4.1 | Run of Mine (ROM) Stockpiles | |
Run Of Mine (ROM) stockpiles are located in the area adjacent to the primary crushing station and receive High Grade Ore (HGO) from the pit (see Figure A.1.2). |
Page 22
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
The ore is processed at the crushing station and transported to the processing area via a conveyor system. The ROM stockpile is classified depending on sulphur content (high, medium and low) to control the sulphur grade sent to the processing plant. | ||
A.4.4.2 | Low Grade Ore (LGO) stockpiles | |
The current mine plan includes provision for the stockpiling of approximately 90 million tonnes of low grade ore. Current stockpiles include Kapit South, Kapit North and Harbour Platform low-grade ore stockpiles, see Figure A.1.2. | ||
Development of Kapit Pit will require relocation of the Kapit North stockpile and development of the Kapit Village and Wild West low grade stockpiles, see Figure A.5.2. Low grade ore will also be stockpiled within Minifie pit towards the end of pit life. | ||
The low grade ore is Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) and reactivity varies greatly ranging from days to weeks while other material may have a lag period of several years. | ||
A.4.4.3 | Topsoil Stockpiles | |
Topsoil is removed from areas that are required for site operations. The topsoil is either used to aid re-vegetation of disturbed areas no longer affected by site operations or stockpiled for later use. The estimated current volumes of the main topsoil stockpiles (Kapit and Magazine) are about 83,000 m3 and 499, 000 m3 respectively. | ||
A.4.5 | Process Summary | |
A.4.5.1 | General | |
Within the sulphide ore, gold occurs in Iron Sulfide (Pyrite) crystals. The pyrite is reacted with oxygen under high pressure and temperature in an acidic environment, and the gold is recovered via Carbon-In-Xxxxx (CIL) processing. |
Page 23
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
Ore is loaded into the primary crusher xxxxxx by haul truck and after crushing, is transferred via a conveyor system to the run-of-mine stockpile at the processing plant located at Xxxxxx Xxxxx (xxxxxxxxxxxxx 0 xx east of the mine) (Figure A.1.2). Crushed ore proceeds to the grinding circuit (comprising a Semi-Autogenous Grinding (SAG) mill and a ball mill). Following milling, the ore is washed and thickened to remove chlorides and stored in pre-oxidation tanks before being oxidized in the pressure oxidation autoclaves. | ||
Slurry from the pressure oxidation process is then subjected to Counter Current Decantation (CCD) thickeners to remove soluble acidic materials. Neutralization of the acid is then achieved using lime to raise the pH to a minimum of 10. Sodium Cyanide solution is used to xxxxx the gold from the slurry before the gold is desorbed from solution onto carbon in a CIL circuit. The carbon is washed in hydrochloric acid and the gold is then recovered by an electro-winning and an electro-refining process before being smelted into gold bullion. | ||
A.4.5.2 | Improvements to Milling Operations Since Start Up1 | |
A number of improvements have been made to the milling operation since start-up in 1997 and this has led to an increase in throughput from the original design capacity of 2.8Mtpa to 4Mtpa. Major areas of improvement have included; |
• | Installation of additional oxygen generation capacity; | ||
• | Installation of additional power generation capacity; | ||
• | Installation of a pilot flotation plant; | ||
• | Improvements in autoclave availability and modification to internal design; | ||
• | Installation of a heat recovery circuit to recycle heat generated in the autoclaves; | ||
• | Installation of a pebble crushing circuit; |
1 | A McDonald , LMC, 8th Mill Operators conference, Townsville, QLD, Australia July 2003 |
Page 24
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
• | Additional autoclave feed pumping capacity. |
Various improvements have expanded the processing plant’s operating range allowing greater flexibility in processing varying grades of ore hardness and sulphur. Further upgrades may be done prior to closure and will be incorporated in later updates to the mine closure plan. | ||
A.4.5.3 | Utilities | |
Raw water for process is pumped from Londolovit xxxx and supplemented by collection of caldera catchment water. | ||
Potable water for the Putput village is supplied by clean water pic ups from the caldera creeks. | ||
Power for the mine and mill site is generated by a 50 MW oil fuel power station, a 6 MW additional plant, with a 30 MW geothermal plant under construction. | ||
Domestic and industrial waste is disposed of in an incinerator located on-site. The incinerator reduces the volume of waste buried in landfill pits. Sewage is discharged to the Deep Sea Tailings Pipeline (DSTP) for ocean disposal. | ||
A.4.6 | Waste Rock | |
Waste rock characterization, ARD potential and disposal | ||
Waste rock at the site is divided into two main classes, soft waste rock (incompetent) and hard waste rock (competent). Soft waste rock comprises soil and marginal rock which often breaks down to a soil when exposed and reworked. Hard waste rock is made up of durable rock which does not breakdown or degrade. The vast majority of waste rock is PAF with short lag times. The remaining life of mine mass of waste rock is about 680 Mt with the vast majority placed in Xxxxx Xxxxxxx (see Figure A.1.2). Haul trucks transport the waste rock to bottom-dump barges which then travel out to the designated disposal point and dump the rock. A fleet of five 975 m3 capacity self propelled bottom-dump barges operate 24 hours a day, |
Page 25
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
receiving the waste rock at the loading dock and travelling to and from the disposal site. | ||
Large waste sinks rapidly to the ocean floor, which was originally between 300 and 500m below sea level at the dump point. Fines from the bottom dumped waste and wash waste from the barge doors is a source of surface contaminant plumes in Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. The depth of the waste pile is monitored and reported in accordance with the applicable Water Use Permit (WUP). | ||
Competent waste rock has been used to construct the Harbour Platform, which is an area of reclaimed land at the edge of Xxxxx Xxxxxxx used for low grade ore stockpiling, see Figure A.1.2. The bulk of waste rock in the Harbour Platform is PAF and will require removal below sea level at mine closure to limit long term acid generation. | ||
A small amount of hard waste rock is stockpiled on land, for use in haul road maintenance and as armouring for perimeter drainage channels. | ||
A.4.7 | Tailings Management and Disposal | |
Various effluent streams including the tailings from the gold processing plant are directed to a mix tank and then de-aeration tank prior to discharge. The de-aeration tank process is designed to release entrained air in the tailings stream to the atmosphere prior to discharge. The effluent is discharged to the sea via the Deep Sea Tailings Pipeline (DSTP). The pipe runs at a steep gradient in a tunnel through a coral platform to a depth of 125 m below sea level before the tailings are discharged to the ocean. The tailing solids eventually deposit on the seabed at depths of between 900 to 2,000 m. It is expected that over the life of the project, the quantity of tailing solids will be in the order of 200Mt. | ||
The discharge of tailings to the ocean is regulated by Water Use Permit (WUP) (#29/990) issued by the PNG Government (see Appendix II). The WUP specifies allowed discharge rates and water quality criteria applicable within a designated offshore mixing zone. Regular monitoring is undertaken at multiple locations and |
Page 26
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
depths throughout the mixing zone and also at the de-aeration tank prior to discharge. | ||
The effluent streams discharged via the outfall include: |
• | Thickened Carbon-in-Xxxxx (CIL) tailings; | ||
• | Counter Current Decantation (CCD) washwater from the pressure oxidation autoclaves; | ||
• | Cooling water from the oxygen and power plants; | ||
• | Sewage from the processing plant and mine areas; and | ||
• | Seawater pumped to the de-aeration tank when necessary to prevent air entering the pipeline. |
There are plans in place to increase the rate of the discharge through the tailings line. | ||
A.4.8 | Townsite, Infrastructure, Buildings and Services | |
A list of on and off-site facilities is presented in tabular form in Part B and is summarised below. | ||
A.4.8.1 | Townsite | |
The Londolovit townsite accommodates about 2,000 people and includes family housing, duplexes, dongas, recreational facilities, government offices and schooling, medical centre and other infrastructure and buildings. Utilities include potable water from Londolovit xxxx, power from a nominally 6 MW generating plant, supplemented by townsite diesel generators. Sewage is treated in a sewage treatment plant at the townsite before being discharged to the ocean. Domestic waste is treated at an incinerator on the mine site and any excess waste is burned and buried in a landfill facility. An airstrip located north of the townsite is surfaced with coronous material and is used for daylight activity. |
Page 27
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
A.4.8.2 | Port Facilities | |
A general purpose wharf has been constructed in the vicinity of the plant to facilitate cargo ships that dock at the site. A small boat harbour has also been constructed nearby, protected by a breakwater. Traffic through the port comprises of imports of fuel oil, mine and processing plant consumables and general cargo. The small boat harbour is used for work boats and other general boating requirements. | ||
A.4.8.3 | Mine Site Roads | |
Within the mine area, over 4 km of haul roads have been constructed outside of the pit, leading to the crusher, maintenance facilities, waste rock, ROM stockpile and low grade stockpiles. Hard mine waste rock and crushed basalt are used in the construction of these roads. Other roads connecting the remaining parts of the site accommodate a fleet of light vehicles. | ||
A.4.8.4 | Public Access Roads | |
A ring road has been constructed around the Island connecting all major villages and population centres. | ||
A.4.8.5 | Telecommunications | |
The basic communications system on the island was substantially upgraded during site development and now provides high-quality links with New Ireland, Port Moresby, other parts of PNG and overseas. Included are a microwave link and a telephone network to provide services for the public and mine operations. Radio, television and satellite transmission facilities are established. | ||
A.4.9 | Quarries | |
About 9 major quarries and 10 smaller pits have been used on the island to provide a variety of materials for aggregate and pavement surfacing materials during construction and operations phases. The locations of selected quarries are shown in Figure A.1.2. Basalt makes up the bulk of the surfacing material for the haul roads as well as aggregate and fines for concrete production. Coronous material is used |
Page 28
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
for road surfacing as it is durable and readily available. By the end of operations in 2044, quarries, occupying a total area of approximately 40 ha, are expected to have been mined. Quarries no longer in use are progressively rehabilitated (Photo 39, Appendix V). | ||
A.4.10 | Surface Water Run-off and Sediment Control | |
A.4.10.1 | Surface Water | |
Since construction and the beginning of mine operations, the two main streams within the caldera (Kapit and Ladolam Creeks) have been modified to become drainage conduits for the mine-pit perimeter drainage system, geothermal waters and mine contract water. Various sections are lined with high density polyethylene and/or rip rap as a mean of erosion control. The drains discharge to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx near the mouths of the original creeks, as indicated on Figure A.1.2 | ||
The channels allow some cooling of hydrothermal waters before discharge. They also direct flow into sediment traps which a) significantly reduce the amount of suspended material entering the harbour and b) allow further time for water containing geothermal discharges to cool prior to discharge to the Xxxxx xxxxxxx. | ||
Work is also underway to intercept contact water, separate the flows from non contact water and re-direct flows to controlled discharge to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. | ||
It is expected that the non-contact water diversion channels will be maintained at closure but may be incrementally modified, replaced and rebuilt as the pit expands. | ||
A.4.10.2 | Sediment Control Strategy | |
A surface plume of suspended sediment is regularly observed in Xxxxx Xxxxxxx and is thought to mainly result from the following: |
• | Suspended fines from the waste rock material discharged from the bottom opening barges; | ||
• | Erosion of the diversion channels, harbour base and low grade stockpiles; |
Page 29
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
• | ARD leachate from the harbour base on-land stockpiles; and | ||
• | Pit sump, pit dewatering bore and geothermal discharges. |
A Mine Water, Sediment and ARD Management Plan (MWSAMP) has been devised to help address the discharge of contact water to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx and the associated sediment plume issues. The MWSAMP is an operational strategy but is described here since elements of it will remain as part of closure. | ||
The plan includes a number of engineering strategies for the separation and collection of sediment and water runoff from the mine site including: |
• | The construction of pit perimeter diversion drainage channels to segregate the clean runoff from undisturbed regions of the caldera catchment from mine site contact water. | ||
• | Optimisation of the Kapit sediment trap to better collect and retain stream-derived sediment. | ||
• | Lining of pit drainage channels to minimise erosion and associated high sediment runoff. | ||
• | Collection of pit sump, hydrothermal and dewatering well and Kapit North low grade stockpiles contact waters and directing them to a mix tank and then to a controlled discharge. | ||
• | The improved collection of spillage and wash down of ore from the conveyor system and stockpiles at the processing plant. |
Page 30
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
A.5 | CLOSURE SCHEDULE AND STRATEGY | |
A.5.1 | Closure Schedule | |
The process of mine closure planning was initiated during the development of the mine and has been a part of on-going site operations since then. The planning process involves the development of a conceptual mine closure plan, ongoing mine and environmental planning, and stakeholder discussions. | ||
In this report three separate closure planning scenarios are considered as follows: |
• | Planned closure consisting of Stage 1 — Pit closure, Stage 2 — Final closure and Stage 3 — Post closure monitoring. This is the preferred closure schedule. | ||
• | Balance date closure, to conform with general accounting practice, in which closure liabilities at end of 2004 are assessed. This condition is analogous to unscheduled sudden closure. | ||
• | Changes since the 1999 Conceptual Mine Closure Plan summarised to provide a comparison to the 2004 closure plans listed in the preceding two bullets. |
The closure schedule adopted for the Planned Closure is shown in Figure A.1.3. The closure schedule for the Balance Date closure is shown on Figure A.5.1. | ||
A.5.2 | Planned Closure | |
A.5.2.1 | Stage 1 — Pit Closure | |
Cessation of mining is expected at the end of 2022 at which time Stage 1 — Pit Closure will occur. At that time, open pit mining and waste rock disposal will cease. Milling operations will continue to process stockpiled low-grade ore. The site arrangement in 2022 is shown on Figure A.5.2 and a schematic of the proposed stockpile use is presented in Figure A.5.3. | ||
Stage 1 closure will involve flooding of the open pit, decommissioning or downsizing of the associated equipment fleet and buildings and some downsizing of the accommodation camp. |
Page 31
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
A.5.2.2 | Stage 2 — Final Closure | |
Processing of low grade ore is expected to be completed in 2040 at which time Stage 2 — Final Closure will occur. Stage 2 will involve removal and decommissioning of plant site buildings, structure and infrastructure and transfer of assets to the local community and/or regulators as required. Closure activities will include remediation and revegetation of the decommissioned areas and removal and disposal of the Kapit pit xxxxxx dam embankment and Harbour Base. | ||
Unwanted buildings in the town site will be demolished with the remaining buildings transferred over time to the local community and/or regulators. Kapit Village will be re-established. The closed Stage 2 condition is illustrated on Figure A.5.4. | ||
Major capital works are expected to be completed during 2040 and 2041. | ||
A.5.2.3 | Stage 3 — Post Closure Monitoring and Maintenance | |
Monitoring is a continuous part of site operations and will continue from 2022 (Stage 1 closure) until 2040 as an operational cost. Monitoring during Stages 2 and 3 is considered a closure cost. | ||
Stage 1 post closure monitoring will commence at the cessation of mining and continue until the end of Stage 2 post-closure monitoring. | ||
Stage 3 post closure monitoring will commence at the cessation of the main closure works and continue for five years from 2042 to about 2046, or until the achievement of compliance with appropriate closure criteria, whichever is the longer. | ||
A.5.2.4 | Balance Date Closure | |
The selected Balance Date for closure is December 31, 2004. Closure of the operations then would hypothetically involve cessation of mining and milling and securing or removing the low grade stockpiles in a manner to achieve compliance with post closure criteria. In addition, decommissioning of buildings and |
Page 32
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
infrastructure similar to that outlined in the Planned Closure options would be needed. | ||
The conditions immediately prior to Balance Date Closure are shown on the current site general arrangement drawing, Figure A.1.2, while the closed condition is shown on Figure A.5.5. | ||
A.5.2.5 | 1999 Conceptual Mine Closure Plan (CMCP) | |
The 1999 CMCP is similar to the planned closure option although there have been changes to the schedule and other operational components since 1999. The 1999 closure case is shown in plan on Figure A.5.6. | ||
A.5.3 | Goals and Assumptions | |
Tables A.5.1 to A.5.3 provide a summary of the environmental goals and assumptions associated with each general activity related to mine closure. The objectives are similar for the three plans considered as noted in the table. The goals relate to the cessation, decommissioning and rehabilitation of activities. Further details as to how the objectives apply in the three closure scenarios are discussed in Part B. | ||
Closure targets for the project elements and activities for both within and outside of the site mine areas will be determined during discussions between LMC, the government and local landowners between now and the actual closure dates. |
Page 33
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
ACTIVITY | OBJECTIVES | PROPOSED END USE AND PROGRAM | ||||||
Open Pit and Mining
Equipment
|
• | Ensure that the pit is geotechnically, geothermally and geochemically stable for long term environmental impacts. | • • |
Pit void filled with seawater Workshops and facilities downsized to fit low grade stockpile equipment fleet. |
||||
• • |
Ensure mineable ore is not
sterilized. Seal off unsafe areas from public access. |
• | Mining heavy equipment screening plant and dewatering equipment, gold plant; salvaged or cleaned and dumped in pit. | |||||
• • |
Revegetate exposed walls and benches to the maximum extent practicable. | • • |
Barge Wharf removed. Revegetate pit slopes, maintain drainage. Provide access between Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx xxx Xxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. |
|||||
• | Xxxxxxxx Xxxx 0 removed. | |||||||
Tailings and Waste Rock
|
• | Leave in stable condition. | • | Assumed that underwater disposal requires no closure works. |
Page 34
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
PROPOSED END USE AND | ||||||||||
ACTIVITY | OBJECTIVES | PROGRAM | ||||||||
Low Grade Stockpiles | ||||||||||
• • • • |
Kapit Village Wild West Harbour Base Harbour Platform |
• • • • |
Ensure millable ore is not
sterilized or made
inaccessible Ensure that runoff from the stockpile footprints is of an acceptable quality with respect to pH and metals concentrations. Stabilise the stockpile footprints to minimise erosion. Return the footprints to at least their previous land capability. |
• • • |
Grade, Lime, Topsoil and
Revegetate Footprints. Return Kapit Village to original site. Excavate harbour platform to below sea level. |
|||||
• | Xxxxxx dam removed to allow tidal flushing of pit void and navigable access | |||||||||
Open Pit | See Table A.5.1 | • | Miscellaneous Upgrades. | |||||||
Plant site | • | Leave behind all buildings which are of potential use to the local community in a state that is fit for the intended use. | • | End use is Graded, Limed, Topsoiled, Revegetated land. | ||||||
• | Remove Buildings unless agreed with community/government. Sell, salvage or disburse as much as possible. Clean unsalvageable material, dump in pit. | |||||||||
• • • • |
Remove all superstructure,
equipment and scrap that is
either not wanted by the
local people or unsafe.
Safely dispose of, or treat, contaminated soil Stabilise disturbed land to minimise erosion. Return disturbed land to at least its previous land capability, where practicable. |
• • |
Provide access Putput Village
to Kapit Village. Maintain power, water and utilities appropriate to Putput and Kapit Villages |
|||||||
Town Site | Leave in manner agreed to by the local community | • | Agree building, infrastructure and utilities requirements. | |||||||
• | Demolish unwanted facilities, clean and dump in pit. | |||||||||
Other Items | Leave in manner agreed to by community. | • | Rehabilitation or demolition as decided. |
Page 35
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
ACTIVITY | OBJECTIVE | PROPOSED END USE AND PROGRAM | ||||||
Staffing
|
• • • |
Provide sufficient staff to
monitor and maintain landforms. Maintain final land form for transfer to regulators. Ensure funds are in place and responsibility assigned for ongoing maintenance, if any. |
• • • • |
Minor works, clean up drainage works etc.
Agree environmental and social
monitoring program. Support community institutions. Undertake final site topography and bathymetry. |
Balance date closure program would be as outlined in Table A.5.1 to A.5.3 above except: |
• | Kapit Village and Wild West stockpile do not yet exist. Kapit North and Kapit South stockpile will be relocated to the below water portions of the pit along with the Harbour Base stockpile. | ||
• | There will be extensive retrenchment and redundancies due to the unplanned nature of Balance Date Closure. |
A.5.4 | Rehabilitation Strategy | |
Rehabilitation at the site involves the progressive rehabilitation of disturbed areas during operations and specific rehabilitation following Stage 1 and Stage 2 Closure or Balance Date Closure. The overall objective for rehabilitation is to leave the site in a physically and geochemically safe and stable condition. | ||
More specific goals however include: |
• | Securing excavated areas including pits and quarries; | ||
• | Ensuring adequate drainage and erosion control; | ||
• | Managing waste material including waste rock, tailings and contaminated soil; | ||
• | Promoting revegetation of disturbed areas as far as possible back to pre-mine vegetation types; |
Page 36
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
• | Where practical restore land for agricultural use; | ||
• | Minimising the adverse visual impact of the site; and | ||
• | Removing equipment, buildings and infrastructure, unless useful to the community. |
Disturbed areas as they are relinquished are progressively rehabilitated to establish a vegetative cover initially for erosion control and also to achieve long-term land use goals. Initial revegetation is by seed broadcasting of quick growing legume and grass species and where necessary, specific species are used to target specific problems. For example, in particularly erosion prone areas ‘fences’ of vetiver grass are planted and along foreshore areas, salt tolerant morning glory vines are used. | ||
Local species and other PNG indigenous trees are then planted, where appropriate, with an emphasis upon commercial nut and fruit trees. Natural recolonisation by local species tends to be swift and leads to the development of a self-sustaining productive ecosystem. | ||
Areas requiring rehabilitation are summarised in the Tables in Part B. |
Page 37
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
A.6 | RISK MANAGEMENT | |
Reference to Australian Standard 4360 (AS/NZ, 2004) describes risk management as the culture, processes and structures that are directed towards realising potential opportunities whilst managing adverse effects. Risk management is an integral part of good management practice and an essential element of good corporate governance. | ||
In recognition of this, a risk-based approach has been adopted during preparation of the updated closure plan to help identify and develop appropriate management strategies for the identified potential social, health, safety, environmental and economic impacts associated with the Lihir gold mine project commensurate with the proposed closure timetable. | ||
A summary of the identified potential impacts associated with the Bio-physical and Socio-economic aspects of the project are summarised in the following Tables A.6.1 and A.6.2 respectively. Proposed management strategies associated with each of the identified potential impacts and aspects are provided within Parts B and C of the updated closure plan report text. It is anticipated that a program of detailed risk assessments will be undertaken for each of the main identified potential aspects/impacts during future closure plan updates and once the identified action items described in Part D have been further progressed. |
Page 38
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
Impact* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aspect | Contaminated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Item | Component | Stability | Landform | Geochemistry | Sites | Human Health | Biological | |||||||||||||||||||
Terrestrial | Open Pits |
X | x | x | — | x | x | |||||||||||||||||||
LGO Stockpile |
— | x | x | — | — | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
Plantsite |
— | x | — | x | x | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Infrastructure |
— | x | — | x | x | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Marine | Waste rock |
X | x | x | — | x | x | |||||||||||||||||||
Tailings |
— | — | x | — | x | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
Harbour Base |
X | x | x | — | x | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
Terrestrial runoff/discharge |
— | x | x | — | x | x |
* | Impact Summary Description: Stability — seismic, static, progressive failure scenarios; Landform — sediment/erosion control, land use, water management, heritage, land use; Geochemistry — ARD, metal leaching, geothermal, water quality, discharge of, etc; Contaminated Sites — hydrocarbons, reagents etc; Human Health — fatalities due instability, tsunami, chronic/acute due metal leaching, ARD reagents etc; Biological — flora, fauna, marine biota, chronic/acute, local/regional. |
Impact* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aspect | Transport and | Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Item | Component | Utilities | Social Progress | Infrastructure | Development | Agriculture | Trust Fund | |||||||||||||||||||
Stakeholders | National Government |
x | x | x | — | — | x | |||||||||||||||||||
Provincial Government |
x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
Local Lihirian’s |
x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Provinces |
— | x | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
LMC/LGL |
— | x | — | — | — | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
NGO’s |
* | Impact Summary Description: Utilities — electricity, power, water, sanitation, communications; Social Progress — health, education, justice, law and order; Transport and Infrastructure — roads, wharfs; bridges; Business Development — employment, training, local business; Agriculture — food security and standard of living; Trust Funds — Sustainable Community Development Plan (SCDP). |
Page 39
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
The activities associated with the three stages of planned closure are outlined in this Part B and form the basis of the cost estimate detailed in Section B.7 and Appendix IV. | ||
B.1 | PLANNED CLOSURE — STAGE 1 END OF PIT OPERATIONS | |
B.1.1 | Context | |
LMC has identified sufficient reserves to sustain mining until the end of 2022. At the completion of mining, stockpiles of low-grade ore will be sufficient to continue milling and processing for a further 18 years until 2040. Stage 1— Pit closure will commence at the end of 2022 with the cessation of mining. Stage 1 is assumed to involve the closure and rehabilitation of the following mine components: |
• | The open pit mine and all associated systems; | ||
• | Most mining equipment and associated infrastructure; and | ||
• | Townsite Camp 1. |
The proposed schedule for Stage 1 and 2 planned closure is shown in Figure A.1.3. Stage 1 post closure monitoring program established as part of the Stage 1—Pit Closure will continue as shown on the figure, throughout the remaining project life, ending concurrently with the Stage 2 monitoring program in 2046. Again, Stage 1 monitoring is assumed to be part of normal operation and is not costed. | ||
Figure A.5.2 shows the expected general arrangement of the pit and associated systems at the cessation of mining at the end of 2022, together with the expected general arrangement of haul roads, low-grade ore stockpiles, process plant, and associated project infrastructure on the Site Mine Lease (SML) at the time. The area of land requiring rehabilitation by LMC’s operations in Stage 1 totals approximately 170 ha and is itemised in Table B.1.1. | ||
Components of the Stage 1 planned closure are summarised in Table B.1.1 with more details provided under cost estimates in Section B.7. |
Page 40
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
ITEM | DESCRIPTION | QUANTITY | ||||
1. Plant Workshop |
• | Plant workshop (part to remain for | ||||
Stage 2 equipment service) | 1 | |||||
Decommissioned in Stage 2 but |
• | Hastings xxxx house |
1 | |||
downsized due to revised fleet, |
• | Tyre shop |
1 | |||
see item 6 below. |
• | Wash Down Bay | 1 | |||
• | Zenex Building and workshop | 1 | ||||
• | Cement and drilling mud storage | 1 | ||||
• | Lakaka workshop | 1 | ||||
• | Hydraulic hose shed | 1 | ||||
• | Footing rehabilitation | 3 Ha | ||||
2. Mine Offices |
• | Mine Offices | 1 | |||
• | Environment Office | 1 | ||||
• | Toilet Block | 1 | ||||
• | Conference Room | 1 | ||||
• | Geotech Containers and Dewatering office | 1 lot | ||||
• | Rehabilitation | 1.5 Ha | ||||
3. Crib Hut and Miscellaneous |
• | Crib hut fuel farm |
1 | |||
Buildings |
• | Fuel Station | 1 | |||
• | Lakaka Crib hut and site offices | 1 | ||||
• | Rehabilitation | 1.5 Ha | ||||
4. Barge Wharf |
• | Barge wharves | 2 | |||
• | Services; light plants, toilet, water | |||||
and fuel tanks, power and communication | 1 lot | |||||
• | Rehabilitation | 5 Ha | ||||
5. Screening and Dewatering |
• | Dewatering xxxxx, transformers, | ||||
pumps, pipelines, well decommissioning. | 1 lot | |||||
• | Lakaka Crushing and screening plant | 1 | ||||
• | Rehabilitation | 3 Ha | ||||
6. Heavy Mining Equipment |
• | RH 200 shovels | 4 | |||
• | Cat. 785 trucks | 29 | ||||
75% decommissioned in Stage 1 |
• | Cat. 777 trucks | 5 | |||
25% decommissioned in Stage 2 |
• | Cat. 375 Excavation | 5 | |||
• | Cat D10 Dozers | 5 | ||||
• | Drills | 7 | ||||
• | Graders | 2 | ||||
• | Loaders | 2 | ||||
• | Rehabilitation | 1.0 Ha | ||||
7. Pit Slopes for rehabilitation |
• | Minifie Pit | 35 Ha | |||
• | Lienitz Pit | 68 Ha | ||||
• | Kapit Pit | 0 Ha | ||||
• | Other | 57 Ha | ||||
8. Low Grade Stockpile |
• | No work in Stage 1 | Stage 2 | |||
9. Mine Electrical |
• | Primary control room | 1 | |||
10. Mine Miscellaneous Items |
• | Fencing | 1 lot | |||
• | Security | 1 Building | ||||
• | Roads and Drainages | 1 lot | ||||
• | Rehabilitation | 1 Ha | ||||
11. Town Site |
• | Camp 1 | 1 | |||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.5Ha |
Page 41
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
B.1.2 | Closure Methodology For Stage 1 | |
B.1.2.1 | Plant Workshop, Mine Offices, Crib Hut, and Other Buildings and Miscellaneous Structures | |
All equipment and facilities will be removed to ground level, concrete footings will be broken out as far as possible and covered with soil. Material for disposal will be sorted for contaminated or hazardous waste, cleaned if necessary and disposed in the open pit. Hazardous materials will be removed from site to an approved disposal area. | ||
Material of agreed usefulness, but not resold by LMC, will be stockpiled for recovery by the community. Material will be resold to third parties if possible, and if no other agreement is in place with the community, the closure estimate resale and salvage value is assumed to be nil. The plant workshop will remain but with reduced capacity to service equipment associated with low grade stockpile handling. | ||
B.1.2.2 | Barge Wharves | |
The two barge wharves and associated facilities, tanks and services will be demolished, loaded on trailers and moved to the laydown area for sorting, dumping or recovery as outlined above. The foreshore will be graded, armoured and rehabilitated. | ||
B.1.2.3 | Screening and Dewatering Infrastructure | |
The screening plant will be removed for storage, disposal, salvage or resale as described in B.1.3.1 above. Dewatering xxxxx will have pumps, transformers and piping removed and will be backfilled or grouted and capped if above the final pit water level. Disturbed areas will be rehabilitated. | ||
B.1.2.4 | Heavy Equipment | |
It is assumed 25% of the heavy equipment will be retained in service until 2040 to assist with low grade stockpile handling. Sufficient trucks will be retained for low grade stockpile hauling. Surplus equipment will be resold, salvaged, transferred to the community or cleaned and dumped in the pit. |
Page 42
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
B.1.2.5 | Pit Slopes | |
The open pit will be flooded by sea water. For the planned closure scenario this would involve breaching the cofferdam around Kapit Pit. All potentially acid forming cofferdam material will be left below sea water level. A causeway of non acid forming (NAF) rock, complete with bridge or culverts to allow free flow of tidal water to the pit, will remain to provide access from Putput village to Kapit Village. | ||
Open Pit slopes will be graded as necessary, with drainage installed as final pit walls are developed. Rehabilitation is assumed to involve only areas above sea level and below the 1052 bench. Slopes above RL1052 are assumed to be rehabilitated as part of normal mining operations. For this area, topsoil will be spread on the benches, with seeding by broadcast or sprayer, planting saplings as required. Lime addition at a rate of $3,000 K/ha is assumed. | ||
It is assumed haulage of low grade material from the Wild West stockpile will occur along a bench purpose built as a haul road around the western side of the open pit, then running across a causeway past the harbour base to the plant site. Pit walls and drainage will be maintained as part of the operating haul road therefore no allowance is made for significant drainage or slope repairs on closure. Such repairs are considered an operating cost during low grade ore processing. It is assumed caldera drainage will be intercepted in a drainage channel to divert non contract water away from PAF pit walls as far as practicable and as planned under the MWSAMP, see Part A. | ||
B.1.2.6 | Low Grade Stockpiles | |
There is no closure work for low grade stockpiles in Stage 1. As the stockpiles are removed during Stage 2 foot prints will be progressively rehabilitated. Rehabilitation costs are, however, included in Stage 2. | ||
B.1.2.7 | Town Site | |
There will be a reduction in staff at end of pit operations but most town site facilities will remain. It is assumed Camp 1 will be decommissioned but other facilities xxxx |
Xxxx 43
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 | ||
remain until 2040 perhaps with a planned reduction as part of the operating strategy from 2022 to 2040. This is discussed further in the socio-economic work in Part C. |
Page 44
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
B.2 | PLANNED CLOSURE — STAGE 2 END OF MILL OPERATIONS | |
B.2.1 | Context | |
Stage 2 of the proposed program of closure will commence with the cessation of processing and run for about 2 years while the major decommission capital works occur. Stage 2 will involve the closure and rehabilitation of items outlined in Tables B.2.1 to B.2.3 and shown on Figure A.5.4. | ||
The main items are: |
• | Mill and Processing Plant decommissioning; | ||
• | Final Pit Closure; and | ||
• | Town Site and associated facilities decommissioned or transferred. |
The schedule for these items is included on Figure A.1.3. The critical path item is plant decommissioning which is shown to take 2 years. | ||
Tables B.2.1 to B.2.3 for the Plant, Open Pit and Townsite show the closure components, additional details are provided in the cost estimate tables in Appendix IV. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
ITEM | DESCRIPTION | QUANTITY | ||||||||
1. Crusher | • | Crusher, Apron Feeder, Reclaim Feeder | 1 lot | |||||||
• | CV001 Conveyor | 78 m | ||||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.2 Ha | ||||||||
2. Conveyors | • | CV002 Conveyor | 880 m | |||||||
• | CV003 Conveyor | 362 m | ||||||||
• | Transfer Station1 | 1 | ||||||||
• | Trolley take up Tower | 1 | ||||||||
• | CV2/CV3 Transfer Station | 1 | ||||||||
• | CV3/Stacker Transfer Station | 1 | ||||||||
• | Radial Stacker | 68 m | ||||||||
• | Coarse Ore Stockpile | 1 | ||||||||
• | Mill Feed Conveyor | 152 m | ||||||||
• | Reclaim Feeders | 1 lot | ||||||||
• | Escape Tunnels | 2 | ||||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 1.5 Ha | ||||||||
3. Grinding Circuit | • | Sag mill and Associated Infrastructure | 1 | |||||||
• | Ball Mill Storage | 1 | ||||||||
• | Soft Ore reclaim Apron Feeder | 1 | ||||||||
• | Ball Storage | 1 | ||||||||
• | Pebble Crushing Plant | 1 | ||||||||
• | Knelson Concentrators | 1 | ||||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.3 Ha | ||||||||
4. Pressure Oxidation | • | Auto claves and Associated Infrastructure | 1 lot | |||||||
• | Pre oxidation Plan | 1 lot | ||||||||
• | Heat Recovery Plant | 1 lot | ||||||||
• | Maintenance storage shed and Autoclave Building | 2 | ||||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.35 Ha | ||||||||
5. Thickeners | • | Grinding thickeners | 2 | |||||||
• | CCD Thickeners | 2 | ||||||||
• | Flotation Tanks | 4 | ||||||||
• LPA Blower | 4 | |||||||||
• Float Conditioning Tanks | 1 | |||||||||
• Reagent Tanks and Agitators | 2 | |||||||||
• Flotation Tank Cells | 5 | |||||||||
• Rougher Tanks Xxxxxx | 1 | |||||||||
• PAX Tanks | 2 | |||||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.9 Ha | ||||||||
6. CIL | • | CIL Tanks, pumps, agitators, crane jib | 8 | |||||||
• | Carbon Stripping Plant | 1 | ||||||||
• | Carbon Regeneration Plant | 1 | ||||||||
• | Lime Tanks agitators and pumps | 1 | ||||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.4 Ha | ||||||||
7. Gold Recovery | • | Gold recovery plant and tanks | 1 | |||||||
• | Cyanide | Detox Tank | 1 | |||||||
• | Cyanide | Storage Tank | 1 | |||||||
• | Reagent | Preparation Tank | 1 | |||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.5 Ha |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
ITEM | DESCRIPTION | QUANTITY | ||||||
8. Oxygen Plant | Note this may be transferred to the community | |||||||
• | Linde Plant | 1 | ||||||
• | Praxair Plant | 1 | ||||||
• | Filtered water plant | 1 | ||||||
• | Plant Air | 1 lot | ||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.6 Ha | ||||||
9. Power Station
(This refers to
|
• | Power Station — Wartsila | 1 | |||||
the heavy fuel
oil motor
|
• | Tank farm | 1 | |||||
generating plant)
|
• | Fuel Prep Area | 1 | |||||
• | Incinerator | 1 | ||||||
• | Wartsila workshop | 1 | ||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.8 Ha | ||||||
10. 30 MW Power Station
|
• | 30 MW Power Station | 1 | |||||
• | Cooling Plant | 1 | ||||||
• | Steam Line | 1 | ||||||
• | Building | 1 | ||||||
• | Miscellaneous Items | 1 lot | ||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.8 Ha | ||||||
11. Lime Plant
|
• | Lime Plant | 1 | |||||
• | Lignisol and Flocculent Storage | 1 | ||||||
• | Caustic Mixer | 1 | ||||||
• | Acid Storage | 1 | ||||||
• | Demineralization Plant | 1 | ||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.5 Ha | ||||||
12. Oil & Water Tanks
|
• | HD Fuel Oil Tanks | 2 | |||||
• | Light Oil Tanks | 2 | ||||||
• | Tank Farm Sump Pump | 1 | ||||||
• | Containment Pond Sump Pump | 1 | ||||||
• | Process Tank | 1 | ||||||
• | Fire Pumps | 1 lot | ||||||
• | Sea Water Pumps | 1 lot | ||||||
• | Chlorination Plant | 1 | ||||||
• | Potable Water Tank | 1 | ||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.9 Ha | ||||||
13. Tailings
|
• | Tailings Line CIL to Drop Xxx | 0 xxx | |||||
• | Xxxx Xxx | 0 | ||||||
• | Tailings line | 362 m | ||||||
• | Mix Tank | 1 | ||||||
• | Tailings Junction Box | 1 | ||||||
• | De-Aeration system | 1 | ||||||
• | Disposal System | 1 | ||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.4 Ha | ||||||
14. Major Buildings
|
• | Warehouse | 1 | |||||
• | Admin Office | 1 | ||||||
• | Laboratory | 1 | ||||||
• | Construction Warehouse | 1 | ||||||
• | Core shed | 1 | ||||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.2 Ha |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
ITEM | DESCRIPTION | QUANTITY | ||||
15. Minor Buildings |
• | Minor Buildings | 1 lot | |||
16. Workshop |
• | Workshop and Stores | 7 | |||
17. Electrical |
• | Primary Control Room | 1 | |||
• | Box and Extension | 2 | ||||
• | Filtered Water and Sea Water Building | 2 | ||||
• | Other Items | 6 | ||||
• | Rehabilitation | 0.1 Ha | ||||
18. Miscellaneous |
• | Fence, roads, drainage etc. | 1 lot | |||
• | Rehabilitation | 1.0 Ha |
ITEM | DESCRIPTION | QUANTITY | ||||
Plant Workshop
|
• | See Table B.1.1 | 1 lot | |||
Heavy Equipment
|
• | See Table B.1.1. | 1 lot | |||
• | 25% remaining to be decommissioned | |||||
Low
Grade Stockpile footprint
|
1. | Kapit Village | 67 Ha | |||
rehabilitation |
||||||
2. | Wild West | 37 Ha | ||||
3. | Harbour Base | 0 Ha | ||||
4. | Other | 56 Xx | ||||
Xxxxxx Dam
|
• | Excavate 2m below sea level and dispose in Pit | 0.9 Mt | |||
Harbour Base
|
• | Excavate 2m below sea level and dispose in Pit | 3.7 Mt |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
ITEM | DESCRIPTION | QUANTITY | ||
1. Town site |
• Houses | 50 | ||
• Duplexes | 32 | |||
• Sporting and Social Club | 1 lot | |||
• Government Houses | 32 | |||
• Private Rental Houses | 5 | |||
• 16 man Camp | 1 | |||
• 100 — 150 man Camp (proposed) | 1 | |||
• Sewage Treatment Plant | 1 | |||
• Water Treatment Plant | 1 | |||
• Camp 1 (removed in Stage 1) | 1 | |||
• Security, Camp Office, Miscellaneous | 1 lot | |||
• Communications | 1 lot | |||
• Single Dongas | 11 | |||
• Twenty Man Camp | 1 | |||
• Environment Department and Lab | 1 | |||
• NGS Warehouse | 1 | |||
• Camp 2 | 1 | |||
• Town Office, Camp Office, Miscellaneous | 1 lot | |||
• Intl. Primary School | 1 | |||
• Senior Dongas (planned) | 40 | |||
• Power Station | 1 | |||
• Town Maintenance | 1 | |||
• Rehabilitation | 0.5 Ha | |||
2. Airport |
• Assumed handed over to Government | 1 | ||
3. Londolovit Xxxx |
• Surplus pumps and electrical | 1 lot | ||
• Rehabilitation | 0.1 Ha | |||
4. Main Roads |
• Rehabilitation before hand over | 1 lot | ||
5. Quarries |
• Miscellaneous Quarries | 9 | ||
6. Town Electrical |
• Londolovit Control Room | 1 | ||
• Town Power Station | 1 | |||
• Town Site Transformers | 1 lot | |||
7. Town Miscellaneous |
• Fencing, Sewage, Security, Drainage Roads etc. | 1 lot |
B.2.2 | Closure Methodology for Stage 2 | |
B.2.2.1 | Plant Site | |
The overall concept for building removal, hazardous waste handling, rehabilitation, disposal, salvage, distributions to the community are as planned for Stage 1 and discussed in Section B.1. |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
There are a number of underground structures, tanks, services tunnels and the like which will be removed and backfilled to smooth grades. Allowance has been made for a power line to Putput Village and to leave one switch room to service the power line. | ||
B.2.2.2 | Open Pit Mine | |
Items remaining from Stage 1 include the plant workshop, plus the 25% of the open pit equipment fleet which was left to handle the low grade stockpile. | ||
The Wild West and Kapit Village stockpile footprints will be reclaimed while the remaining parts of the Kapit Xxxxxx Dam embankment and Harbour Platform will be excavated to 2 m below sea level and surplus material dumped in Kapit Pit. | ||
B.2.2.3 | Town Site | |
Items include the town site and related facilities including power generation, water supply, sewage, airports, roads etc. It is assumed 50% of the remaining townsite infrastructure will be demolished and the sites rehabilitated subject to negotiation with the community and regulators. | ||
The airport will be handed over to the Government. One pump and associated equipment will be left to provide water supply from Londolovit xxxx. The sewage treatment plant at the townsite will be maintained and handed over in operating condition. All roads will be repaired to design standards and handed over as-is to the community. The 6 MW power supply to Londolovit will be maintained and relinquished in operating condition. Miscellaneous quarries around the site will be regraded as required and seeded for growth as needed, although many minor quarries are showing unaided regrowth. | ||
B.2.3 | Kapit Village | |
It is assumed Kapit Village will be re-established with 100 village style houses serviced with power and water as agreed following community consultations. |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
B.3 | PLANNED CLOSURE — STAGE 3 — POST CLOSURE MONITORING | |
B.3.1 | Context | |
After the major decommissioning work is completed there will be a five year maintenance and monitoring period. During the period, compliance will be checked and once a stable condition is reached or at five years whichever is greater, the lease will be relinquished. | ||
It is assumed that a small maintenance crew will remain with some earth moving equipment or more likely this equipment will be hired locally. A crew of environmental monitors, community assistance officers and a small LMC management presence will remain. Immediately prior to handing over the property to the State, a comprehensive topographic and bathymetric survey will occur, so the transferred landform is documented. | ||
In addition, there will be a requirement for annual compliance reporting, possibly some miscellaneous design work to handle residual closure problems, and including equipment maintenance and upgrading during transition to final transfer. | ||
In many mine closures, a landform maintenance trust fund is established to allow the new owners to maintain the final landform. This landform maintenance trust fund is identified as a line item but with no cost at this time as it has been assumed to be included in the various post closure trusts identified in the Lihir SCDP discussed in Part C. | ||
The Stage 3 activities are discussed further in the sections below. | ||
B.3.2 | Monitoring Plan | |
The aim of post-closure monitoring will be to demonstrate that the key environmental issues and targets identified during closure planning have been effectively managed by the closure program. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
ITEM | DESCRIPTION | QUANTITY | ||||||
Monitoring
|
• | Program to be designed using elements of current program described in Appendix III | Assume 30% of current monitoring program | |||||
Maintenance Crew
|
• | Fix up minor landslips in pit | Contractor supplied crew | |||||
• | Fix up shore protection | |||||||
• | Repair rehabilitated parts as required | |||||||
• | Maintain drainage | |||||||
• | Other minor repairs | |||||||
Final Survey
|
• | Topography | 1 | |||||
• | Bathymetry | 1 | ||||||
External Audits, miscellaneous designs |
• | Annual inspection, compliance reports, miscellaneous design |
5 (1 per year) | |||||
Xxxx Xxxxx 0 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Fund |
• | Minor works program | To be reviewed — probably included in SCDP |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
B.4 | BALANCE DATE CLOSURE | |
Balance Date Closure is set at December 31st, 2004. A basic assumption is the Balance Date Closure will be an orderly event with an end result generally conforming to the end of mine landforms as intended after the Planned Closure as described in Section B.2. The assumed closed landform is shown in Figure A.5.5. | ||
Hence the balance date closure activities will include most activities in the Stage 1 to 3 planned closure. Due to the unscheduled nature of Balance Date Closure there are however some significant variations in work items assumed to be as follows: |
• | Wild West Stockpile, Kapit Village Stockpile and Kapit Pit do not exist at December 31, 2004; | ||
• | Kapit North, Kapit South and Harbour Base Stockpile will be relocated into Minifie pit; and | ||
• | An open cut channel will be excavated from Minifie Pit to the ocean to flood the pit. |
In addition to the physical works associated with Balance Date Closure, there are significant costs related to warehoused items, severance of contracts, redundancies etc. These liability items are not covered in this report. |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine— Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
B.5 | SIGNIFICANT CHANGES SINCE 1999 CONCEPTUAL MINE CLOSURE PLAN (CMCP) | |
Table B.5.1 shows a summary of the major changes since the 1999 CMCP. Since the 1999 plan there have been changes in legislation and corporate criteria, however, these have not radically impacted the closure strategy. The changes since 1999 are more related to changes in mine life and closure assumptions. Tables B.7.1 and B.7.2 show summaries of the impact of these changes to the estimated cost of closure. |
1999 CMCP | For Planned Closure | For Balance Date Closure | ||||||||
•
|
Cease Mining 2011. | • | Cease Mining 2022. | • | Cease mining and milling Dec. 31, 2004. | |||||
•
|
Cease Milling 2027. | • | Cease Milling 2040. | |||||||
•
|
Mill through put 2.8 Mtpa. | • | Upgraded to 4.5 Mtpa. | • | Upgraded to 4 Mtpa. | |||||
•
|
Included K19.6 Million ($5.5 US million) for redundancies retraining, personnel costs. | • | Orderly reduction in work force assumed to not require redundancies or re-training beyond normal operating programs. | • | Redundancies, re-training, personnel costs would be incurred along with other contract obligations to customers and suppliers. | |||||
•
|
Includes progressive rehabilitation costs of K36 Million ($10 US Million). | • | Orderly progress to closure means that most progressive rehabilitation becomes an operating cost. Site rehabilitation costs are minor post closure. | • | Major cost associated with rehabilitation and removal of low grade stockpiles > 120 million Kina. | |||||
•
|
Harbour base rip rapped in situ, clay covered, topsoiled and seeded. | • | Harbour base and xxxxxx dam embankment removed to below sea level. | • | Harbour base removed to be low sea level. | |||||
•
|
Scrap steel used to start local business. | • | Similar could be adopted. | • | Similar could be adopted. | |||||
•
|
Assumed capping LGOS in situ at K121 million ($34 US Million). | • | N/A | • | LGOS placed in Minifie pit. | |||||
•
|
Minifie, Lienetz — mining of 2 ore bodies to form 1 main pit | • | include mining of Kapit Expansion to 3 ore bodies to | • | N/A unless unscheduled closure occurs at the end of mining operations when stockpiles are at their maximum | |||||
•
|
3 LGOS — Kapit North, Kapit South, Harbour base |
• | Kapit Pit expansion, construction of a xxxxxx dam | |||||||
• | Inclusion of 2 additional LGOS — Kapit Village and Wild West. | |||||||||
• | Relocation of Kapit Village for Kapit Village LGOS. | |||||||||
• | Re-establishment & re-settlement of Kapit Village. after closure |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
B.6 | COST ESTIMATE | |
B.6.1 | Introduction | |
Cost estimates are provided for the Planned Closures in Stages and for the Balance Date Closure. Previously estimated 1999 Closure Plan costs have not been checked and are taken directly from the 1999 report. | ||
The cost estimate is provided to LMC for budget purposes and no third party shall rely on the estimate unless directed to by written permission of LMC. | ||
The closure works will likely be done by a combination of local contractor and LMC workforce as such there will be highly variable indirect costs. Some elements will attract high accommodation, administration etc costs while local contractors may not carry large overheads. For the purposes of the current estimate, indirect costs are assumed to be a flat 50% of the estimated costs after contingency in Appendix IV. | ||
A 20% contingency has been allowed on capital work items for labour and materials. In addition, a global allowance of 15% has been included to cover LMC corporate costs and engineering design support during closure. The indirect cost allowance, contingency and corporate costs should be reviewed by LMC. No other risk allowance has been included. | ||
Detailed cost estimate work sheets are included in Appendix IV and show the assumptions, quantities, labour and equipment rates, productivities, crew sizes and the like. These have been developed with the assistance of LMC site staff. | ||
All estimates are done in 2004 Kina with no allowance for inflation or discounting. | ||
B.6.2 | Methodology | |
The estimate was done using Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets. In general costs were built up from labour and equipment hourly rates agreed to with LMC. Closure items were broken down into small work packages and each of the packages assessed in |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
greater detail as to equipment requirement, crew sizes, productivity, required resources etc. based on current mine site experience. | ||
A unit rate of 24,000 Kina/hectare was provided by LMC for topsoil spreading and seeding. | ||
Crew and equipment compositions, assumed in the estimate, may not be the same as eventually used since the mine fleet and local contractor equipment will change over time. Similarly, no allowance has been made for future project expansions unless they are in the current mine plan, for example mill demolition assumes the current plant layout and expansion associated with the current Float Circuit Bankable Feasibility study is not included. | ||
B.6.3 | Basis of Estimate | |
The cost estimate is based on the closure plans outlined in Sections B.1 to B.4. Generally if there is uncertainty in the work scope, a conservative position has been adopted (more expensive) in preparing the estimate such that further refinements in closure planning may result in lower rather than higher cost. | ||
Quantities were partly provided by LMC, while some were newly developed from “as built” drawings. A library of structural drawings showing details of buildings and facilities was prepared and studied in detail to help define the extent of closure and demolition. | ||
The primary cost estimator has been working on site for over a year and is familiar with local operators, contractor capability, logistical constraints and productivity. | ||
Labour and other costs were assumed to be current Lihir contract award rates. | ||
Equipment costs were current Lihir operating or contractor hire costs. | ||
No significant permanent new materials are required for closure so no costs were obtained from suppliers. |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
It is assumed as normal in the mining industry, that work will be initially carried out by LMC staff with some hire of local equipment and contractors/consultants as required. As closure proceeds, more contractors will be used and LMC staff involvement will reduce. | ||
B.6.4 | Balance Date Closure Estimate Assumption and Schedule | |
The basic schedule for planned closure is shown on Figure A.1.3. Balance date closure was assumed to require similar activity durations as those indicated on Figure A.1.3 to develop the approximate schedule shown on Figure A.5.1. Thus capital works estimates made for scheduled closure, are closely applicable to the Balance Date Closure case. |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
B.7 | SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE COSTS FOR PLANNED AND BALANCE DATE CLOSURE | |
A summary of the estimated costs for the options considered are presented in Table B.7.1. Details of the various items are presented in Appendix IV for the Planned Closure scenarios and Balance Date Closure conditions, and in the 1999 CMCP for the 1999 case. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
TOWN AND | ENGINEERING AND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLANT | OPEN PIT | INFRASTRUCTURE | INDIRECT | CONSTRUCTION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLOSURE | CLOSURE | CLOSURE | CLOSURE | SUBTOTAL | COSTS(6) | MANAGEMENT | REDUNDANCIES | TOTAL M | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASE | M KINA | M KINA | M KINA | MONITORING | M KINA | X 50% | X 15%(7) | M KINA | KINA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Planned Closure (2) Stage 1 2022 |
0.0 | 9.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 9.8 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 17.9 | 34.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage 2 2040 |
25.2 | 53.7 | 6.6 | 0.0 | 85.5 | 42.8 | 12.8 | 17.0 | 158.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage 3 2046 |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 27.4 | 27.4 | 13.7 | 4.1 | N/A | 45.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Planned Closure Costs |
237.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Date
closure Dec.
31,
2004
(2),(5) |
25.2 | 156.8 | 6.7 | 27.4 | 216.1 | 108.1 | 32.4 | 36.4 | 393.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999
(1),(4),(9)
CMCP |
57.5 | 6.8 | Included in plant site | 0 | 64.3 | 19.6 | (8) | Included in indirect | 83.9 |
(1). | Converted from US$ at 0.28 US$ = 1 Kina, includes redundancies and re-training costs, ($5.5 US Million) includes progressive rehabilitation $10 US Million. | |
(2). | Includes 20% contingency for Planned closure and Balance Date Closure | |
(3). | All figures in 2004 Kina. | |
(4). | 1999 CMCP contingency not known. | |
(5). | Assumes LGOS relocation to Minifie Pit. | |
(6). | Assume indirect costs equal 50% of capital cost, but exclude relocation of low grade ore to Minifie Pit put under Balance Date Closure conditions. | |
(7). | Assume 15% of capital cost plus contingency but exclude relocation of low grade ore to Minifie pit under Balance Date Closure Condition. | |
(8). | Allowance for management etc. from 1999 report. | |
(9). | A further 121 million Kina was identified for capping LGOS under a sudden closure scenario. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
ITEM | COST INCREASE K MILLION |
CUMULATIVE INCREASE K MILLION |
||||||
Wild West Stockpile Rehab |
2.6 | 2.6 | ||||||
Kapit Village Stockpile Rehab |
4.7 | 7.3 | ||||||
Kapit Village Re-instatement |
12.0 | 19.3 | ||||||
Excavate Kapit Xxxxxx Dam |
4.8 | 24.1 | ||||||
Remove Harbour Base to EL. 998 |
19.9 | 44.0 | ||||||
Indirect Costs |
61.4 | 105.4 | ||||||
Engineering and Construction Management |
18.4 | 123.8 | ||||||
Total | 123.8 |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.1 | INTRODUCTION | |
Part C of the Mine Closure Plan describes the social and economic issues and planning leading to closure. | ||
The socio economic closure planning strategy is designed to achieve a sustainable future for the Lihirian community, and is embodied in the Lihir Integrated Benefits Package (IBP). | ||
The IBP is a document which incorporates all of the commitments and benefits that the people of Lihir were promised in return for their agreement that the project proceed. The package provides an extensive range of benefits for all Lihirians. It includes assistance in the form of relocation housing, improved village layout planning, reticulated water and power supplies, and funding for social infrastructure development, such as roads, health and education. | ||
Following ongoing negotiations, the IBP has been recast as the Socio-Economic Development Plan (the Plan). The Plan builds on the IBP and is designed to provide a roadmap for a sustainable future for Lihirian communities. Periodic renegotiation of stakeholder agreements such as the IBP are an essential element of long term mining operations, if the relationship between landowners and the mine proponent are to be maintained. Such renegotiations can effectively adjust for agreement successes, unforeseen social and economic impacts, as well as provide a forum for relationship building as the project matures. | ||
It is acknowledged by all parties to the Plan that any realistic strategy aimed at sustainability will require the development of Lihirian capacity and capability for governance. This includes the Lihirian leadership, agencies representing the community and the community itself. | ||
If the operation closes in about forty years as currently anticipated, i.e. in 2040, the period leading to closure is the opportunity for the people of Lihir to build their own |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
future. To do so will require considerable leadership and planning but the opportunity exists. | ||
Part C of this closure plan assesses the likely impacts and costs of the various closure scenarios in terms of the following: |
• | the welfare of the Lihirian population; | ||
• | government infrastructure and services; and | ||
• | business and employment. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.2 | SOCIO — ECONOMIC SETTING | |
Since the 1980’s, the advent of exploration, construction and mining operations on Lihir Island have led to substantial change in the social and economic structure and wellbeing of the Lihirian community. Not all change has been positive or embraced by all Lihirians, but for most, the opportunity to benefit from the development is evident from the extensive participation in the mining project throughout the community. | ||
The Lihir group of islands comprises Niolam, Mali, Masahet and Mahur. The name Lihir (or Lir) traditionally refers to the language which is shared by the inhabitants of all these islands. For the purposes of this report, the term Lihir, will therefore comprise all the island group. | ||
The estimated population of Lihir is more than 13,000 people not including about 3,000 immigrant settlers. The population has more than doubled since the project began. As experienced at other projects in PNG, developments such as the Lihir gold mine are an attraction for non resident Lihirians to return home, and for non Lihirians from the PNG mainland and surrounding islands to participate in the perceived wealth generation activities, including employment and spin-off business opportunities. | ||
The Lihir population is spread among villages around the coast, with less in the more rugged parts of the island. Notably in the less accessible western and north-western areas. Villages close to the mine site (Putput, Kapit, Londolovit, Kunaye, Zuen and Malie) have been classed as Mine Affected Villages (MAV), and as such, receive direct benefits and compensation payments relating to social and environmental impacts from the mine development. Other communities indirectly affected also receive benefits. | ||
An influx of opportunistic settlers, including migrants from other parts of the country with no work arrangements and little or no technical skills, has led to increasing land and social pressures on the island. An estimated 3,000 immigrant settlers are now resident on Lihir Island. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.3 | LIHIR SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SEDP) | |
The SEDP (the Plan), also referred to herein as CSDP, is a comprehensive and complex document describing the interrelationships between a host of stakeholders including government, government agencies, committees, communities and LMC. The plan sets out to define how each of these groups will need to interrelate and perform, to maximize benefits, and sets out to redefine the distribution of benefit streams in a way that is equitable for the various beneficiaries. The following discussion summarises the intent of the plan in a closure planning context and is not a reproduction nor captures all of the necessary detail of such an important document. | ||
The Plan as described in this report comprises the following 10 elements: |
1. | Sustainable Community Development Plan (the Plan) | ||
2. | Land Use and Compensation | ||
3. | Community Health | ||
4. | Human Resource Development | ||
5. | Infrastructure | ||
6. | Community and Social Issues | ||
7. | Environment | ||
8. | Commercial Development | ||
9. | Specific Issues | ||
10. | Sustainability |
The Plan has a 5 year planning and budget cycle. In an attempt to demonstrate the potential benefit streams resulting from implementation of the Plan, indicative revenue streams as planned budgets are estimated and presented for the budget cycle (2004 to 2008) based on LMC sourced projections. These allocations are discussed and shown in Table C.6.1 in Section C.6 of this report. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.3.1 | Socio-Economic Development Plan (the Plan) | |
LMC has been reviewing the IBP with a negotiating committee representing the local level government and the Lihir mine area landowners since mid 2001. | ||
The original IBP was signed at Potzlaka Government Station on the 25th of April, 1995. The package represented the formal agreement of the people of Lihir to the start of the Lihir Gold project. The original document was formulated over a period of almost five years. | ||
The IBP is a document which seeks to incorporate all of the commitments and benefits that the people of Lihir were promised in return for their agreement that the project proceed. As well as the agreement between the community and the company, it also contains the agreements reached between the people of Lihir and the national, provincial and local level governments. | ||
The parties have agreed that the original IBP document needs to be substantially re-oriented to address the development needs of the people of Lihir over the period of the project. The negotiating committee has presented a paper entitled the Lihir Strategic Development Plan as their blueprint for the future of Lihir. This document introduces the concept of the Lihir Destiny, which sets the objective of being financially independent and self reliant both during and beyond the mine life. | ||
The Plan embodies the principles and agreements of the original agreement and incorporates the requirements of the negotiating committee. It is the principle output of the review process currently underway and represents a structure for the planning, implementation and monitoring necessary for a sustainable future. | ||
C.3.2 | Implementation of the SEDP | |
The Plan has a five-year planning horizon, to be reviewed and updated annually, and is a joint commitment with the local level government to ensure that all money expended in Lihir is part of a single overall plan. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.3.2.1 | Key Implementation Agencies | |
At a local governance level, the key agencies and authorities with prime responsibility for implementation of the Plan include: | ||
Village Planning Committees — These committees are established under local level government reforms and are responsible for planning and regulating development in their respective communities. LMC intends to direct its community development budget through these planning committees. Each committee will have the authority to set expenditure priorities, and to identify new projects, within these annual budget allocations. The funds for the committee budgets are allocated on a per capita basis amongst the 15 local government wards, with specific allowances for the direct impact and indirect impact communities as appropriate. | ||
The funds include the Village Development Scheme funds, which have been allocated on a per capita community basis since 2001, and make up the bulk of the proposed annual xxxx budget. Additional funds are made available for the direct impact communities and a new element, the Quality of Life payment, recognises that the lifestyle of all Lihirian communities has been impacted by the advent of the mine. Further funds are provided to cater for community asset maintenance and for minor works in education and health. | ||
A guaranteed level of funding for the Village Planning Committees to manage on an annual basis is a first for Lihir and will place new demands on the members of the planning committees to deliver projects to the satisfaction of the community. | ||
LMC will fund a program of capacity building within the local level government to help with the implementation of the Plan. | ||
Xxxx Planning Committees (WPC) and the Local Level Government (LLG) — The projects and plans developed by the village planning committees are submitted to the xxxx planning committees and then to the local level government for endorsement and ratification. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Once the local level government approves the village planning committees initiatives, the approval is relayed to a Special Purpose Authority, which is responsible for project implementation. The Plan commits LMC to release funds to the authority based on this approval. | ||
Special Purpose Authority (SPA) — This body has been established by the local level government as an implementation agent for all local level government projects and activities. | ||
Nimamar Rural Local Level Government (NRLLG) — This government body is the only constitutional authority on Lihir. As such, the Plan calls for LMC to develop a sound working relationship and long-term partnership with the authority. LMC will provide resources and management expertise to assist the local level government to become a functioning and effective government for Lihir and an example for elsewhere in PNG. |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.3.2.2 | Planning Process | |
Initial work has been done on developing a planning and implementation process based on the Village Planning Committee and Xxxx Planning Committee structure. The relationship between the key decision makers involved in the implementation of the Plan is shown below: |
C.3.2.3 | Monitoring and Evaluation | |
A formal process of monitoring the ongoing success or otherwise of the various projects and programs is the key to the success of the plan. The Plan calls for a formal review process to ensure that the Plan is flexible and adapted to the changing circumstances on the ground, and in the community. | ||
While the long term program objectives and vision for the plan will remain in place, the annual program will change as needs are identified and agreed. | ||
C.3.3 | Land Use and Compensation | |
Large amounts of money have been paid to the Lihir community since the project commenced as compensation for various forms of damage loss and inconvenience. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
This was particularly the case during the construction phase. As levels of compensation have decreased with reduced levels of new activity, new ways and means of claiming and increasing compensation are needed. | ||
Land Use payments, which are provided to cover the surrender of access to traditional land for the period of the project, will continue for the life of the mine. As such, these payments are arguably more significant to the community than is compensation. LMC has proposed that compensation rates remain at the current (CPI adjusted) levels, but has offered a revised method of setting Land Use payment rates. | ||
This revised method takes into account population growth as a factor, as well as the annual CPI adjustment, which ensures that the payments remain consistent in money value terms over a period. To allow for the fact that the population, who is to share these payments, increases steadily over time, an adjustment factor to cover the past seven years will be made on a one off basis. The annual adjustment factor for Land Use payments thereafter will be the CPI (as determined by the PNG National Statistical Office), and an allowance for population growth of 2.2%. | ||
C.3.4 | Community Health | |
Improved community health including health facilities and ongoing services, is one of the core expectations of the community as a result of the project going ahead. In the relatively short time since the hospital at Londolovit was opened, a noticeable improvement has been seen in many basic areas. In the main, these improvements have been in rates of child mortality, the nutritional status of women, and in malaria and filariasis prevention and control. | ||
The advent of the mine has brought health issues, as well as health benefits and a long-term health intervention strategy is required to manage all of these impacts on the community. The affects of the so-called ‘diseases of development’ are already starting to appear, e.g. heart problems and illnesses associated with diet and obesity are becoming widespread. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
A major health program is already underway, with an initial focus on the communicable diseases that are currently most prevalent on Lihir, i.e. malaria, TB, and filariasis. These programs will be maintained to reduce or eliminate to the extent possible, the impact of these diseases. An ongoing program of interventions to deal with the issues for pregnant women and children will be maintained. | ||
A program to bring all of the facilities on Lihir up to the minimum standards as defined by the National Department of Health (NDoH) under the National Health Plan will be carried out. These standards represent a minimum that has not in fact been achieved in any health district in PNG. Each aid post and health sub centre will be upgraded so that the facilities will be physically adequate. A long-term program of selective upgrading over and above the minimum standards will be carried out depending on the requirements of each facility. | ||
Developing the quality aspect of the health service delivery system on Lihir will also be a major focus. The central health centre built by LMC will continue to function as a base facility for each of the government institutions and the medical centre staff will carry out periodic visits to provide a referral and technical support role. Training of staff at all levels will be part of the function of the centre, in conjunction with the NDoH and will be consistent with the policies and priorities of the National Health Plan. | ||
Development of local level capability will be implemented through the Lihir Health Committee, made up of representatives from the community and the company, and chaired by the local level government. The Lihir Health Committee will guide the development of health policy on Lihir, as well as dealing with local issues as they arise. | ||
Prevention is recognised as a more effective long-term policy than a simply curative approach, although the importance of the curative system must not be overlooked. A longer term program of improving the capability of local level institutions, and through ongoing community awareness and education programs will facilitate prevention rather than cure as the principal tool for dealing with health issues on a long-term basis. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.3.5 | Human Resource Development | |
The Plan negotiating committee has expressed very clear views on the need to develop the capacity of Lihirians to manage their own affairs. The life of the project clearly represents the best, and perhaps the only opportunity, that Lihirians are likely to have to achieve this in any meaningful way. | ||
LMC understands and accepts this principle, and it will feature as a core objective of the Plan. | ||
A major component of the Human Resource Development component is to develop a program to reform the education system on Lihir. The International Education Agency of PNG will be retained to provide the technical management of a program that will upgrade the whole education system on Lihir. As with health intervention, there will be a program of physical upgrading of facilities, from village based pre schools through to the Primary schools. | ||
The International Education Agency (IEA) project manager will work with the Lihir Education Committee (LEC) and the National Department of Education and they will be responsible for upgrading the capabilities, and the quality of the delivery of education to the children of Lihir. A major review of the long-term requirements of Lihir in terms of education will be directed by the Lihir Education Committee and will provide the basis for the long-term plan. The Lihir Education Committee is to be chaired by the local level government and will comprise community and company representatives. | ||
The Company has instituted training programs for its Lihirian employees. These programs, which are primarily aimed at training people to work in the mining industry, will develop a cadre of technically trained manpower on Lihir that will have skills and experience that will be valuable in other mining projects, or in other industries, whether on Lihir or elsewhere in PNG. | ||
Training in job skills will be supplemented by adequate and suitable work experience to allow individuals to progress to supervisory or management levels. A number of |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Lihirians have started on this pathway already, and the process will continue to ensure Lihirian participation in the mining project is maximised. | ||
C.3.6 | Civil Infrastructure | |
Improved capital infrastructure was promised as part of the benefits to the Lihir community. The main item that has provided an immediate benefit to the community is the ring road, which was completed as a joint project by the National Government and LMC before the start of construction. Since that time, the road has been significantly upgraded, in particular the section from the airport to Palie via the mine site. | ||
The negotiating committee has prepared a program of infrastructure development covering the next five years. The priority areas established include the provision of permanent water supplies, drainage and sanitation, further extension of electrical reticulation and the maintenance and upgrade of the ring road. | ||
The Special Purpose Authority will have a key role to play in the planning, design and implementation of these projects. This will ensure that the capacity for implementing such works is developed on Lihir as part of the local level government system. LMC will provide technical support (and finance) to facilitate this process. | ||
C.3.7 | Community and Social Impact Issues | |
Development on the scale of the Lihir project generates an enormous impact on the local community. Much of this impact is beneficial, in terms of increased incomes, jobs and better health and education facilities. However, there is also a negative aspect, as people become far more money minded, and traditional attitudes and relationships change along with the focus on cash. The influx of migrants from other parts of PNG brings new ideas and behaviour patterns that are not always an improvement on traditional behaviours. | ||
The Company recognises that these changes create stress within the community. A Social Impact Committee has been established, and it will take the lead role in defining such issues, and in the design and implementation of program to minimise |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
negative impacts. One such initiative has been the introduction of the Peace Foundation Melanesia, which is working with communities on Lihir to facilitate dispute resolution without conflict. | ||
LMC has also established a Social Monitoring and Research section within Community Relations. This is a first for PNG and it provides LMC with professional guidance and analysis on community issues. The Social Monitoring and Research section will work closely with the local level government Social Impact Committee and will provide a secretariat to that body. | ||
Under the overall scope of this program, there will be individual projects that address the needs of sports and recreation, women, youth and spiritual development. | ||
C.3.8 | Environment | |
There are two distinct components to the environmental monitoring and management program operated by LMC. The first is the technical aspect, which is covered by the requirements of the PNG government, as well as by the standards of Rio Tinto and the World Bank. There is a substantial quantity of scientific study and analysis already available on the environmental impact of the project, dating back to the baseline work carried out in the 1980’s and 90’s. | ||
The technical monitoring and ongoing research will continue as the basis for the reporting LMC is required to provide to the Government of Papua New Guinea, Rio Tinto and the International community. | ||
The Plan requires that all reports, and the results of all research work carried out, be made available to the Lihir community, and its representative agencies. As these are technical reports, however, it is acknowledged that they do not always answer the concerns of the community in language that is readily understood. The information will be provided in translated form, again to the extent that is feasible given the technical nature of the information. | ||
To address this issue of communication and understanding, the Company has commissioned a sociological survey to define exactly what the perceptions of the |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
community are, in terms of environmental impact and issues, and how best to answer those concerns in a way that will be culturally appropriate, communally comprehendible and personally credible for the community. | ||
A key to this will be to develop the involvement of more Lihirians in the monitoring program itself. This has been initiated by the establishment of a Lihirian staffed company that will carry out field survey work on a contractor basis. LMC also seeks to identify suitable Lihirians to study environmental science and related disciplines. | ||
LMC recognizes that excellence in environmental management and an open partnership with the community are essential to the success of the mining operation, and the long-term relationship with the community. The Plan commits LMC to the following actions: |
• | Consult with the community to share information and listen to their concerns and expectations. | ||
• | Develop and implement an integrated social and environmental management system to facilitate sustainable and ongoing performance improvement. | ||
• | Maintain environmental and social monitoring programs and report the results in a clear and transparent manner. | ||
• | Comply with applicable PNG environmental laws and regulations as well as corporate standards and guidelines and, where these do not exist, adopt internationally recognized standards of best practice. | ||
• | Minimise the amount of waste generated and optimise the use of natural resources. | ||
• | Participate with government and industry organizations in further development of social and environmental policies, codes and practices aimed at improving performance. |
C.3.9 | Commercial Development | |
Significant expenditure and activities during the construction period facilitated a multitude of private business opportunities. As the project matures and the level of commercial activity decreases, the availability of viable commercial opportunities has decreased. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
LMC remains committed to fostering the development of a sustainable business sector on Lihir. Where mine contracts can be provided to local firms on a proper commercial basis this will continue to be done, but at the same time, there is a need to identify viable opportunities that are not dependent on the mine. | ||
Currently, all business is dependent on the mine for its existence. In the Lihir Strategic Development Plan, the negotiating committee recognises this as a weakness and has incorporated a Lihir Economic (Non Mining) Development Action Plan into the document. The Plan aims to actively develop a commercial sector on Lihir that is not dependent on the mine to provide for the post mine period. This is a long-term program, and the opportunities created by the mine need to be used wisely to enable the transition. LMC will work with the community, within its own Commercial Development policy, to facilitate this objective. | ||
A new Contract Administration section is now functioning within LMC to ensure that the processing and award of all contracts is done in a transparent and fair manner. The Commercial Development Office (CDO) of LMC will be involved to ensure that community issues are taken into account in the tendering and award process. | ||
To help facilitate the start up of new businesses, or the growth of existing ones, increased funding will be provided under the Interest Free Loan Scheme managed by the CDO. The amount available will be increased from K200,000 to K750,000 and the amounts available to individual business applicants will increase from the present K5,000 limit. This will be a revolving facility which will need to be paid back to ensure the maximum availability of new finance for Lihirian businesses. | ||
The Commercial Development Office will continue to provide administrative and logistic support to those businesses that seek it, and will continue to assist with project development and commercial evaluations on request. | ||
Training for Lihirians in various aspects of business administration and financial management will also be provided in conjunction with government agencies, on a regular basis. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
The key to LMC’s business development policy for the next five years, (and beyond), is to build on the existing business development base to develop a viable, self-sustaining business community, with a minimal dependency on the mine. | ||
LMC’s Business Development Policy is clearly intent on meeting these objectives: |
C.3.10 | Specific Issues | |
There are three subsidiary agreements within the original IBP that address specific community issues. These issues relate in the main to the Relocation community, the |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Plantsite community and the Londolovit community. The Plan recognizes that circumstances have changed and that the agreements need modification. | ||
C.3.10.1 | Relocation Agreement | |
The actual relocation phase has now been completed, but there are ongoing issues and responsibilities that LMC has toward those people that were originally relocated, and their direct descendants. | ||
A separate sub agreement will be prepared to clarify the arrangements that will be in place to deal with the needs and concerns of the original relocatees and their direct descendants. Issues of a general community development nature, i.e. those which impact the community as a whole, will be catered for under the arrangements referred to earlier under the Plan. The special Community Development Fund provided for under the original Putput Community Agreement will be maintained, but incorporated into the proposed annual xxxx allocation. | ||
C.3.10.2 | Plantsite Agreement | |
The Plantsite issues are covered under the main IBP agreement, although the operation of the Plantsite Trust Fund will require special attention. Responsibility for the operation of the trust fund rests with the Board of Trustees appointed under the original IBP agreement. | ||
C.3.10.3 | Londolovit Community Agreement | |
This agreement deals with community development issues, in particular the development of the Londolovit plantation area and the involvement of the traditional land owners in that process. | ||
The funds that have been provided for community development under the earlier agreement will now be incorporated into the xxxx budget structure. It is further proposed that the Londolovit River Community trust be amalgamated with the Londolovit Landowners Trust Fund to simplify their operation. |
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |||
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Acknowledgment of the proximity of these three communities to the physical presence of the mine, and therefore a greater level of physical and social impact is reflected in the sliding scale under the Village Development Scheme allocation, and the ‘Quality of Life’ community compensation proposal. | ||
C.3.11 | Sustainable Development and Closure (The Lihir Destiny) | |
The common theme of the Plan and that of the negotiating committee is financial independence and self reliance for a future Lihirian society. It is recognised by all parties that appropriate and necessary infrastructure and services for the community needs to be provided at a level and standard that will be able to be maintained once the mine closes. | ||
Any meaningful or realistic measure of sustainability requires the development of Lihirian capacity and capability for governance from the agencies representing the community; i.e. the local level government and the Special purpose Authority it has established. | ||
C.3.11.1 | Post Mine Provisions | |
A Long Term Investment Fund was included in the IBP, virtually as an afterthought to the process. It was agreed that LMC would pay an annual sum of K 10,000 into this fund, but no discussion took place on any detail relating to this fund, how it should be managed, and what exactly it was providing for. | ||
No formal trust instrument was prepared, largely because of a lack of clarity to intention, but the annual payments have been made, and a sum of some K130,000 is currently on deposit under this provision. It is proposed that this amount be used as a starting contribution to the more substantial long-term provisions proposed hereafter. |
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
LMC propose to establish three new, separate funds for the long term i.e. post mine, situation. They will be focussed on providing funds to maintain the operation of the infrastructure in three key areas: |
• | Health | ||
• | Education | ||
• | General Infrastructure Maintenance |
An amount of K100,000 per annum for each of the above areas, i.e. K300,000 per annum in total, will be placed into a long-term investment fund, under the control of a professional fund manager. | ||
An Investment Board shall be established to monitor the funds to ensure that the fund manager adheres to the investment policy laid down by the board and as amended over time. The funds would be under the control of the fund manager, and would be invested overseas (as well as in PNG at the discretion of the manager). The fund would be maintained in US dollars to ensure value is sustained. | ||
Membership of the Board will include LMC, Nimamar Local Level Government, the New Ireland Provincial Government, the Lihir community, Department of Mining and the Department of Treasury. | ||
It will be a requirement that the Board submit an annual report to constitutional agencies including the Nimamar Local Level Government, the New Ireland Provincial Government and the PNG Minister For Mining. | ||
It is the expectation of the company that the Nimamar Local Level Government or its successor, will be responsible for the management and control of all community assets post mine, and so the funds from the trust will be released through the Nimamar Local Level Government and Special Purpose Authority, or whatever legally constituted successor agency is in place to fulfil the function of local governance. |
Page 81
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Nominations to the Board should be reviewed regularly, at least at the time of each project review, i.e. every five years. | ||
It is not expected that these funds will be accessed during the life of the mine. They will be accumulated to provide a substantial capital sum. This fund will be available to the community at mine closure to ensure that the facilities and services they have come to expect will continue to be available. | ||
It is not possible to provide for an indefinite period. This arrangement acknowledges the need to provide in a significant and meaningful way for the post mine situation at this early stage. The adequacy of the provision will be able to be monitored over the course of the project life. | ||
Should the community decide to direct a percentage of royalty payments and/ or dividends into these funds, it will of course boost the amount available at project closure. No assumptions are made about the capacity of the Government, either National or Provincial, to contribute to this provision, or to provide support funding and personnel at the end of the mine life. Whatever is available will be in addition to the trust fund provisions, and will therefore be a bonus. | ||
This provision is not intended to provide funds for capital expenditures. They are for the purpose of maintaining services and maintaining community assets that exist at the closure of the mine. They are not intended to cover any costs associated with the closure of the mine itself, nor of mine related assets which will be provided for independently as part of the mine closure planning process. | ||
An independent fund manager will control and manage the funds. The Investment Board previously mentioned will oversee the investment of the funds. | ||
The Investment Board will guide the fund manager, and receive and endorse the annual report from the manager, as well as the audit report. |
Page 82
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
This board will not be authorised to draw down on the funds, except to pay legitimate expenses of administration, until the formal surrender of the Special Mining Lease from LMC to the Government of PNG. | ||
The funds will then be available, (but not as a lump sum payment) to the Nimamar Local Level Government, or its successor, to pay the annual costs of maintaining and running the health, education and other social service programs, (but not salaries of public servants), and the maintenance and upkeep of civil infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, electricity supply etc. | ||
These funds will not last forever, but they will provide a substantial reserve to allow for a period of phased reduction in activity after closure. It is impossible to gauge the degree to which national government finance will be able to contribute to this requirement at this point in time, but clearly any contribution that they can make will assist the process. |
Page 83
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
The principal stakeholders associated with the mining operations and who will be impacted through the closure of the mine are listed below: |
• | Government (national, provincial, local) | ||
• | Special Mining Lease (SML) landowners (Lihir Management Area Landowners Association — LMALA) | ||
• | Non-SML landowners (other Lihirians) | ||
• | Civil Society Groups (women’s, youth and church groups) | ||
• | Mining and Non-Mining Businesses | ||
• | LMC | ||
• | Mine Employees | ||
• | Non-Lihirian residents who have settled in the area (squatters, others) |
The mine closure issues and impacts affecting the various stakeholders are discussed in Section C.7 Mine Closure Issues and Impacts. |
Page 84
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
In 2002 the PNG Department of Mining (DoM) convened a National Steering Committee (NSC), to oversee the development of a Sustainable Development Policy and a Sustainability Planning Framework for PNG’s mining provinces. The development of a policy and planning framework was considered necessary to guide provincial and local level governments, mine-affected communities and resource developers in making sustainable investment decisions on the use of the remaining mining benefit streams in the lead up to and after closure. | ||
The following summary outlines the principal recommendations of the policy documentation: |
• | all mining project area stakeholders (including the developer) are required to participate in the development of a Community Sustainable Development Planning (CSDP) process; | ||
• | resource developers are required to provide the CSDP partners with specific information on benefit stream projections and the company initiatives to support social and economic development throughout the whole of the mining project cycle; | ||
• | Special Purpose Authorities (SPA) are to be established in each project area to assist in the design, implementation and monitoring of the CSDP; | ||
• | A Sustainability Planning Division would be established within the Department of Mining to assist in the design and monitoring of CSDPs and the coordination of national government inputs; | ||
• | Special Support Grant payments would be progressively abolished and replaced with a more flexible approach for the use of the Tax Credit Scheme. |
The DoM proposes to establish a process of Community Sustainable Development Planning (CSDP) for all major mining projects. It is proposed that the CSDP: |
• | be a plan for the sustainable development of mine-affected communities or project area communities through the different stages of the mining project cycle; |
Page 85
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | be formally integrated with the provincial, district and local-level planning and budgeting process in the host province under the joint supervision of the Department of Planning and Rural Development and the Department of Mining; | ||
• | be a multi-stakeholder process involving all of the primary stakeholders involved in the development of a major mining project. (the national government, the provincial government, the project district and LLG, project area communities, civil society groups and the mining company). | ||
• | be coordinated by the national government through a Development Planning Committee (DPC) for each major mining project area. |
It is proposed that the CSDPs should be a rolling 5-year plan which is subject to annual review and should also be based on a budgetary process which clearly matches planned expenditures with forecast revenues. | ||
Developers will be expected to provide specific inputs to the process which are either based on its own plans and projections or on its commitments under the Mining Development Contract, the Development Forum, or an approved Environmental Impact Statement. These specific inputs are listed below: |
• | A rolling 5-year forecast model of the total amount of revenue which is expected to accrue to the Project Area, based on projected mine output, project commodity prices, and the benefit-sharing agreements which have been negotiated through the Development Forum; | ||
• | A rolling 5-year plan for expenditures within the project area under the Tax Credit Scheme, including a justification for such expenditures; | ||
• | A rolling 5-year forecast of the amount of revenue which is expected to accrue to a host provincial government, for use outside the mining project area, and plans for any Tax Credit Scheme expenditures made outside the project area (but within the province), in order to inform the relevant provincial, district and local-level plans. | ||
• | Business development plans, training and localisation plans, | ||
• | Special provision for relocation and resettlement plans, food security plans, AIDS awareness plans and any other plans for the management of community affairs which are intended to benefit or support project area communities; |
Page 86
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | Environmental management plans produced in accordance with the permit granted by the Director for Environment and Conservation; and | ||
• | Mine closure plans required under the terms of the government’s Mine Closure Policy. |
DoM proposes that expenditures controlled by developers under the Tax Credit Scheme should be progressively converted into tax-creditable Development Levies during the operational life of a major mining project. This means that the developer as part of a multi-stakeholder Development Planning Committee would have the flexibility to convert tax credits into development levies which could be used by a provincial or local level government to support infrastructure development, maintenance, capacity building and Trust Fund accumulation. | ||
It is proposed that this arrangement be known as the ‘Tax Credit Conversion Scheme’, and that Development Levies paid under this scheme to local-level governments or their instrumentalities should also be managed in accordance with a Community Sustainable Development Plan. | ||
In terms of mine closure on Lihir, the Tax Credit Conversion Scheme would provide both the NIPG and the Nimamar LLG with an additional source of revenue to support Trust Fund accumulation. | ||
The DoM believes that Special Support Grants to provincial governments which host a major mining project should be removed as soon as possible. Grants of this kind can only be justified during a mine’s construction phase, or during a transition phase following mine closure. The DoM recognises that the sudden elimination of Special Support Grants currently paid to provincial governments in respect of existing projects will have a dramatic effect on provincial plans and budgets. There are two options for mitigating this negative impact: |
• | Special Support Grants could be removed in stages over a period of 3-4 years, in much the same way that the national government is |
Page 87
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
already committed to removal of the Mining Levy imposed on the industry. |
• | Immediate withdrawal of Special Support Grants could be offset by an allowance for developers to spend an additional 0.25% of their gross revenues on Tax Credit projects for the benefit of the provincial population resident outside of the mining project area. |
The second of these options would have the effect of raising the standard limit of Tax Credit expenditures in the host province to 1% of the developer’s gross revenues. |
The DOM does not propose the establishment of a Mine Closure Planning process to run parallel to the Community Sustainable Development Planning process as it could lead to a waste of time and resources for all parties. The intent is to convert the process of Community Sustainable Development Planning to a mine closure planning process at a predetermined time in the mining project cycle and maintain the continuity of the DPC or a reconstituted Mine Closure Planning Committee to assist in the development of the mine closure plan. |
On the issue of premature mine closure, the DOM notes that there should be some avenue for communication between the national government and the operators of a major mining project about contingency plans for ‘premature closure’ resulting from the incidence of civil unrest in the project area. The Department is aware that this issue may not be suitable for inclusion in a multi-stakeholder planning process, but that a contingency plan still needs to be developed as part of an overall Mine Closure Policy. | ||
In summary, the proposed DOM policy and planning framework has significant implications for sustainable development and mine closure planning on Lihir. Under the policy, LMC will be required to be an active participant in the preparation and development of a Community Sustainable Development Planning process covering the whole of the mining project cycle including preparations for mine closure. |
Page 88
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
The SEDP has a number of revenue streams to fund the activities described earlier in this section of the report. The funding streams are a combination of mine generated revenues, Government and land owner payments. | ||
The SEDP revenue streams are planned on a 5 year rolling budget cycle as described in Section C.3. Government and land owner funding is closely tied to mine production and as such depends on actual mine performance predicted by the mine plan. For planned closure as described in Section B, these revenue streams are intended to provide funds to provide a platform to assist with the long term sustainability of the Lihir communities. | ||
These funds do not constitute a closure cost since they represent a cost of doing business. When the mine ultimately closes, the mine related revenue streams are assumed to be phased out. The accumulated funds in the various Trusts described in Section C.3.11.1 are expected to provide a platform for the maintenance of health and education services and the maintenance of community assets after the mine closes. | ||
Costs dealing with the possibility and risks that the planned funds are not sufficient at closure are not dealt with here. | ||
This section briefly outlines the 5 year budget cycle anticipated revenue contributed by LMC, Government and local funding based on the Lihir Socio-Economic study (Project Design and Management 2003). The 5 year planned revenues are the subject of on-going negotiations but are expected to reduce over time and cease at the end of the mine life. |
LMC generated revenues for the period 2004 to 2008 as listed in Table C.6.1. |
Page 89
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Table C.6.1 — | Lihir Sustainable Community Development Plan — LMC Contributed Revenues |
CLOSURE PLAN SECTION | DESCRIPTION | PERIOD 2004 TO 2008 KINA | ||
C.3.1 |
Plan Management and Implementation including Village Development Fund | 29,035,000 | ||
C.3.3 |
Land Use and Compensation | 32,600,000 | ||
C.3.4 |
Community Health | 16,500,000 | ||
C.3.5 |
Human Resource Development | 5,460,000 | ||
C.3.6 |
Civil Infrastructure | 21,150,000 | ||
C.3.7 |
Community and Social Impact | 3,815,000 | ||
C.3.8 |
Environmental Monitoring | 1,400,000 | ||
C.3.9 |
Commercial Development | 7,750,000 | ||
C.3.10 |
Specific Issues | 1,655,000 | ||
C.3.11 |
Post Mine Provisions | 4,775,000 | ||
Total | 124,140,000 |
The period leading to planned closure in 2040 will provide for a continuance of funding for the items listed in Table C.6.1 with a likely reduction in annual funds available as the mine matures and the operating emphasis changes from pit operations to milling. Notwithstanding the planned reduction in LMC contributed revenues over the course of the mine life, the substantial investments made available to the CSDP, will assist with the transition to sustainable development and self reliance as an attainable goal for the Lihirian community. | ||
In addition to these revenue streams, the post mine provisions discussed in Section C.3.10.1 have an annual guaranteed funding level of K300,000 equally allocated between three long-term investment funds i.e. Health, Education and General Infrastructure Maintenance Trusts. Assuming these funds were invested over the term of the mine (40 years), adjusted for CPI increases (2.5%) and earned 6% compound interest, the future value would exceed K60 million. Additionally, and by way of example, should the annual investment be increased to K1,000,000 with additional land owner funds, the return would exceed K160 million. Clearly, an opportunity exists to capitalise on surplus revenue streams during the life of mine guaranteeing access to funds for the future. |
Page 90
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
However, under the Balance Date closure scenario, the funding is assumed to be rapidly phased out following the Balance Date. |
Table C.6.2 lists funds available from Government sources. The State returns a portion of the collected Royalties and Taxes (in the form of Special Support Grants and Tax Credits) to the New Ireland Provincial Government and the local level government on Lihir. The local level government obtains further funds from equity (share ownership) in LGL. The items in Table C.6.2 below are those which directly flow to Lihir. There are other benefits flowing to New Ireland Provincial Government in addition to these. | ||
The items listed in Table C.6.2 depended on the financial performance of LGL. As such the value of these items is set by achieved production and by the stock price and dividend payments associated with company operations. | ||
Continued successful operation or improvement in operation would maintain the SSG, Royalties and Dividends at close to current levels. Equity will depend on external market fluctuations and valuations. | ||
These revenue sources will effectively cease on cessation of production. The revenue sources would also cease on the Balance Date Closure date. |
Page 91
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
THEORETICAL VALUE | ||||||||
ITEM |
BENEFICIARY | SOURCE | KINA MILLION | COMMENT | ||||
New Ireland Provincial | State of PNG | 1996-2001 12 | Only 71% of | |||||
Special |
Government | based on 1% of | 2002-Closure 87 | agreed amount | ||||
Support Grant |
Nimamar Development | value of mine | 1996-2001 4 | has been paid | ||||
Authority | production | 2002-Closure 37 | by State | |||||
Equity in Lihir |
Lihir Land Owners | Share Purchase | • Currently 6.8% | Market | ||||
share in Lihir. | capitalisation | |||||||
• Option to increase | currently K3 | |||||||
this to 15% | billion | |||||||
Special Mining lease land | Set at 2% of | 1996-2001 46 | Paid in Full by | |||||
Owners 20% | Production | LMC. | ||||||
Nimamar Development | 2002-Closure 248 | |||||||
Royalties |
Authority 30% | |||||||
Provincial Government | ||||||||
50% | ||||||||
Tax Credits |
New Ireland Provincial | Claim from PNG | Total value K5 million | |||||
Government | Government | per year during pit | ||||||
Possible post | operation. K2 million | |||||||
2007 | per year during | |||||||
stockpile processing. |
Page 92
Lihir Management Company Limited | December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Funds currently available over the next 5 year period are summarised on Table C.6.3. | ||
These funds will decrease when open pit mining ceases and the area of disturbance reduces. Mine revenue related funds, SSG, royalties, equity etc. will continue through to mill closure 2040, but at a rate dependent on mine production and gold price fluctuations. | ||
If the mine enters a Balance Date type closure most of these funds would cease on the Balance Date. | ||
Table C.6.3 Summary of 5 Year Funding including Lihirian Wages |
ITEM |
2004-2008 MILLION KINA | COMMENT | ||||||
LMC |
124.1 | Commitments in the SCDP | ||||||
Government |
27.0 | Based on Production | ||||||
Rounded income included to | ||||||||
Lihirian Wages (LMC and
Contractors) |
150.0 | show total benefit streams to | ||||||
Lihirians | ||||||||
Total |
301.1 |
Page 93
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.7 | MINE CLOSURE ISSUES AND IMPACTS | |
C.7.1 | Introduction |
December 1998 1 | December 2004 2 | December 2022 3 | December 2040 4 | |||||||||||||
Category | (CMCP) | (Balance Date Closure) | (Stage 1 closure) | (Stage 2 Closure) | ||||||||||||
Lihirians |
258 | 386 | 127 | 100 | ||||||||||||
Other PNG |
312 | 579 | 464 | 464 | ||||||||||||
Third Country
Nationals |
0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Expatriate |
101 | 77 | 15 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Total LMC
Employees |
671 | 1062 | 606 | 571 | ||||||||||||
Contractor
Employees |
1576 | 1897 | 1200 | (5) | 1200 | (5) | ||||||||||
Total |
2918 | 4021 | 2412 | 2342 |
Note: | ||
1, 2: | Figures from LMC HR Department, December 2004 | |
3, 4: | Figures from Finance Department, September 2004 | |
5: | Estimated |
C.7.2 | Planned Closure — Stage 1 (2022) |
Page 94
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Page 95
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Area of Impact | Impacts and Issues | Comments | ||
Employment
|
• Reduced employment opportunities particularly mine contractor staff
associated with local businesses.
|
• Opportunity for diversion of pit contractor workforce to ore
stockpile reclaim and transport work. |
||
• Pit operations FIFO staff repatriated with reduction in support services.
|
• Refer to Table C.7.1 for employee reductions. |
|||
Local Businesses
|
• The requirement for support services will be affected with the potential for
contract work being reduced. • Refer to Table C.7.4 for the types of services affected.
|
• An opportunity exists for local businesses to adsorb a greater
equity in existing JV’s between now and 2022. This would likely offset contract staff reductions. |
||
Training and Education
|
• LMC training effort redirected to required mill process training
requirements. • No impact on education facilities or services.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan support for long term
education facilities and services. |
||
• Accelerate Lihirian training and skilling prior to Stage 1 closure to
maximize Lihirian workforce. |
||||
Health Services
|
• No impact on health services for Lihir communities.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan support for long term
health facilities and services. |
||
Population
|
• Increased population pressures due to improved birth rates and health
facilities. • Loss of employment will have some affect on cash incomes in the Lihirian
community due to assimilation of migrant population.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan support for alternate
business opportunities leading to Stage 1 closure may ameliorate increased social pressures. |
||
Standards of Living
|
• Loss of earnings will result in some decline in standards of living for a part
of the Lihirian community.
|
• Health, education and government services will be maintained
due to Sustainable Community Development Plan. |
||
• Land pressures will limit additional subsistence gardening opportunities. |
||||
Police and Court
Facilities
|
• No likely impact and all services maintained at appropriate levels.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan support for long term
government services. |
||
Emergency Facilities
|
• No likely impact and all services maintained at appropriate levels.
|
• LMC operations require maintenance of emergency services. |
||
Utilities
|
• No likely impact to water, sanitation, rubbish disposal, drainage or
communications.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan support for long term
utility services. |
||
• Some reduction likely in power reticulation requirements. |
||||
Transport
|
• Some reduction in transport requirements due to reduced workforce.
|
• Excess vehicles may be available for resale to the community. |
||
Environment
|
• Increased population at 2022 will place additional pressures on land
clearing for subsistence activities.
|
• LMC environmental awareness programs aimed at mitigating
ongoing environmental pressures. |
Page 96
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Current Mining Situation (2004) | Projected Post Pit Closure (2022) | |||||||||||||||
Company | No. Employees | No. Lihirians | No. Employees | No. Lihirians | ||||||||||||
Western Tug & Barge |
46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
(all FIFO) | ||||||||||||||||
Zenex Drilling |
180 | 90 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx |
||||||||||||||||
XXXX Xxxxxxxx |
||||||||||||||||
Xxxxx |
27 | 15 | 15 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Lakaka — mine |
130 | 67 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Lakaka — road
maintenance |
50 | 40 | ||||||||||||||
Hastings Xxxxxxx &
other contractors |
38 | 0 | 20 | 10 | ||||||||||||
LMC — mining |
248 | 70 | 240 | 150 | ||||||||||||
LMC — mine
maintenance |
160 | 0 | 109 | 52 | ||||||||||||
LMC — drilling &
exploration |
50 | 25 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Totals |
879 | 267 | 440 | 268 |
Page 97
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | Electrical installation & maintenance | ||
• | Building maintenance | ||
• | Hardware supply | ||
• | Minor construction works | ||
• | Industrial safety gear and clothing | ||
• | Personnel recruitment, labour hire, supply of security guards | ||
• | Catering services | ||
• | Janitorial services | ||
• | Rubbish collection | ||
• | Grass cutting etc | ||
• | Auto Services, vehicle hire, parts and maintenance | ||
• | Town/Residential area / Hospital maintenance — including carpentry, plumbing, painting maintenance | ||
• | Retail supermarkets |
Page 98
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.7.3 | Planned Closure — Stage 2 (2040) | |
C.7.3.1 | General |
Page 99
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Area of Impact | Impacts and Issues | Comments | ||
Employment
|
• All non Lihirian and expatriate employees repatriated to place of origin.
• Significant numbers of Lihirians cease employment with little opportunity to continue
with meaningful work on Lihir.
• A small number of employees and local businesses will be needed for the
rehabilitation and monitoring phases of closure.
|
• Under the Sustainable Community Development
Plan (SCDP) , there are a set of Operational
Trusts and Long Term Investments to help
provide support for sustainable community
development after mine closure. |
||
Local Businesses
|
• The requirement for the majority of support services would cease.
• In the absence of contracts with LMC, most local businesses would be affected.
• Businesses
servicing ongoing local demands — such as village trade stores, vehicles
and small boat transport will continue.
|
• Refer to Table C.7.4 for the types of services
affected.
• Potential opportunity for contract work and
support services to complete closure, including
maintenance and monitoring.
• Alternative business opportunities created during
the life of mine may provide ongoing employment
and incomes on Lihir. |
||
Training and
Education
|
Training • LMC training activities will cease.
• The workforce will no longer be required and the need for the associated technical
skills that the apprenticeship and technical training provided will cease.
• Potential opportunities for additional training in the post-closure maintenance and
monitoring period (Stage 3).
• Potential opportunities for training in the management and maintenance of certain
utility facilities planned for transfer to the local community. May include the power
generation, water supply and treatment facilities.
Education
• By 2040, there is expected to have been significant development in education services
(including the community, primary and high schools)
• Final Closure is thus unlikely to have a major impact upon the delivery of the
educational services.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan
support for long term education facilities and
services.
• Through the current training programs, LMC will
have trained many Lihirians by 2040, in a range
of basic and technical training
• LMC will assist Lihirians in gaining employment
elsewhere after mine closure through targeted
training programs.
• LMC will identify potential training opportunities
for utilities to be transferred to the government
and local communities
• Under the SCDP, LMC will have supported the
effective delivery of the national educational
reforms across Lihir. |
Page 100
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Area of Impact | Impacts and Issues | Comments | ||
Health Services
|
• The development of the health services on Lihir is expected to be significantly
improved compared to the situation prior to the mine development.
• It is expected that there will be a robust health care infrastructure and management
system in place to deliver efficient and effective services following mine closure.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan
support for long term health facilities and
services.
• Provision of improved health and health care
services on Lihir is one of the major benefits
expected from the mine development.
• The Government will be responsible for the
management and maintenance of Lihir’s health
care system after mine closure. |
||
Population
|
• End of employment at the mine and support services will result in a reduction in
populations.
• Projections include 2% long term population growth for Lihirian communities. This
equates to unsustainable populations approaching 30 000 by 2040.
• In-migration by people seeking work at the mine or other local businesses will reduce.
• Exodus of people expected to other parts of PNG to look for employment opportunities
and in particular those skilled workers who have received education, training and
scholarships through their association with the mine and the educational and training
programs provided.
|
• Opportunity for labour intensive alternative
business development on Lihir during the life of
mine.
• People intensive development would result in
changed customary lifestyles. |
||
Standards of Living
|
• Significant impacts to individuals who make their living from the mine, either providing
goods and services to the mine-site and camp or those being directly employed to
work at the site.
• Communities standard of living impacted as a result of loss of earnings.
• People will leave Lihir to search for work, with some pressure reduced on food
sources.
|
• Health, education and government services will
be maintained due to Sustainable Community
Development Plan.
• As part of the SCDP agreements, Trusts will help
provide support to the community after the mine
has closed.
• Refer to the population comments above. |
||
Police and Court
Facilities
|
• It is likely there will have been substantial progress in the development and
implementation of the Law and Order Committee’s strategy.
• Potential for some civil unrest upon final closure.
• Impacts upon existing police resources
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan
support for long term government. |
Page 101
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Area of Impact | Impacts and Issues | Comments | ||
Emergency
Facilities
|
• It is envisaged an agreement between LMC, the government and the local community
will have been made in order to transfer the emergency services upon closure in 2040.
|
• At present almost all emergency services on Lihir
are provided by LMC. Search and rescue
operations, fire services and medical evacuations
are provided at the company’s discretion without
any charge. |
||
Utilities
|
• It is expected that following closure, 50% of the remaining townsite infrastructure will
be demolished and the sites rehabilitated subject to negotiation with the community
and regulators.
• Under the SCDP there are plans to develop the Londolovit township with a town
authority to be established to manage and plan for the development.
• Water supply and associated equipment will be left to provide water from Londolovit
xxxx.
• The 6MW power supply to Londolovit will be maintained and transferred for use to
provide electricity to the local community.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan
support for long term utility services. |
||
Transport
|
• Following closure, the remaining light and heavy vehicles will be resold, salvaged or
transferred to the community.
• The airport will be handed over to the Government.
• All roads will be repaired to design standards and handed over as-is to the community.
|
• Agreements to be made between LMC, local
community and government for transfer of roads,
airport and vehicles. |
||
Environment
|
• A post monitoring and maintenance phase (Stage 3) will be initiated.
• An extensive rehabilitation and revegetation programme will have been undertaken to
include the following;
• Return of the land to conditions capable of supporting prior land use;
• Mitigation of significant adverse effects on the environment;
• Use of waste rock for backfill and of topsoil for reclamation to the extent feasible;
• Recontouring of slopes to minimise erosion and runoff;
• Planting of native species of vegetation to prevent erosion and to encourage self-
sustaining development of a productive ecosystem on the reclaimed land; and
• Decrease
in the Island’s population after 2040 will reduce pressures on
land clearing for subsistence activities.
|
• LMC environmental remediation and
rehabilitation programs during and following
closure aimed at achieving end land use criteria..
• Exception will be the footprint of the main pit that
will be flooded to provide a lake.
• Details of LMC rehabilitation activities following
closure is discussed in Part B of this report. |
Page 102
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.7.4 | Balance Date Closure (2004) | |
C.7.4.1 | General |
Page 103
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Area of Impact | Impacts and Issues | Comments | ||
Employment
|
• All mine operations
and associated
activities cease
resulting in the
loss of employment
for vast majority
of staff and
contractors.
• Services provided
by local
contractors and
businesses cease
with minor
exceptions such as
ongoing community
infrastructure
maintenance.
• Potential
employment
opportunities may
exist to complete
closure depending
on social
conditions.
• All non Lihirian
and expatriate
employees will be
repatriated to
place of origin.
• Vast majority of
Lihirian employees
would cease
employment
immediately with
little opportunity
to continue with
meaningful work on
Lihir.
• Lihirian employees
would almost all
initially remain in
their home
villages.
• Those with
sufficient
education, trade
certification or
work experience
would gradually
leave the island as
they found jobs
elsewhere in PNG.
|
• Largest impact on LMC workforce
affected would be
PNG and Lihirian
staff — 90% of
workforce are from
PNG, 37% of
workforce are
Lihirians.
• Refer to Table
C.7.1 — LMC
Employee categories
• Repatriation of
employees and
payment of
statutory
redundancy
entitlements to
take effect. |
||
Local
Businesses
|
• Local landowner
businesses that
rely on direct LMC
contracts for their
livelihood cease to
operate almost
immediately.
• Smaller local
enterprises relying
indirectly on the
mining operations
and the presence of
a large population
of wage earners,
would gradually
close.
• Local companies are
likely to lay off
employees, many of
whom are non-
Lihirian.
• Local companies
that had
diversified their
activities,
acquired assets or
investments
elsewhere in the
country would have
any ongoing income.
• Businesses with
loan exposures,
would likely fail
to meet repayments
resulting in
repossession of
assets by banks.
• Without any other
major form of
economic activity
virtually all
business activity
on the island would
stop.
• Businesses that
would survive would
be those that
serviced ongoing
local demands —
such as village
trade stores,
vehicles and small
boat transport.
|
• Refer to Table
C.7.4 for the types
of services
affected.
• Potential
opportunity for
contract work and
support services to
complete closure. |
Page 104
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Area of Impact | Impacts and Issues | Comments | ||
Training and
Education
|
Training
• All in-house formal apprenticeship and
competency-based staff training would cease.
• Scholarships
and sponsorships discontinued.
• The Tutorme Women’s Training Centre would likely
cease operation.
Education
• LMC financial support for education facilities and
services cease.
• Impact on the community schools and the high school
would be principally felt due to the withdrawal of
operational support costs.
• Royalty payments and compensation cease and
subsidies, transport services, utilities (power and
water), school materials and supplies would be
seriously affected.
• Some ancillary staff made redundant.
• Salaries of teaching staff are covered by the
National Teaching Service, and are unlikely to be
affected.
• The High school’s boarding school functions may be
closed, affecting some students from the outer
islands.
|
• Sustainable
Community
Development Plan
supporting
education
facilities and
services would
be phased out.
|
||
Health Services
|
• Major impact on health services for Lihir communities.
• Improvements in health status of Lihirians and the
high standard of buildings and equipment would mean
that some of the gains made would not be lost.
• The medical service contractor would be withdrawn,
the health centre at Londolovit would have reduced
staff and no qualified medical practitioner.
• Given the Centre’s total dependence on mining related
revenues for its staffing and operations, the service
would struggle.
• Palie Health Centre would continue to provide
services and maintain core staff.
• Community Health Workers servicing rural aid posts on
Lihir and surrounding islands may lose their funding
support from the local level government.
• Visiting specialists and health campaigns (including
TB treatment, HIV/AIDS/STD programs) would be
reduced, dental services would reduce.
• Much of the outreach work currently supported by LMC
would cease and it is unlikely that vaccination rates
would remain at the high level currently attained. |
• Sustainable
Community
Development Plan
supporting long
term health
facilities and
services would be phased out. • Health services on
Lihir are more
vulnerable than
education services
to premature mine
closure because of
the dependence of
some services on
mining revenues for
staffing and
operational costs.
• The Lihir Medical
Centre is
principally
dependent on an
annual LMC grant of
around US$1.5
million (K6
million) to support
its staff and
operations.
• Under the IBP
agreement the
national government
allocates an annual
administrative
grant of K150,000
to support the
salaries of
selected staff.
• The bulk of the
salaries for core
medical personnel
such as doctors and
nurses are paid by
LMC. |
Page 105
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Area of Impact | Impacts and Issues | Comments | ||
Population
|
• Population numbers will be reduced following repatriation of non-Lihirian
employees and contractors.
• Impacts on population size and location of Lihir community is likely to be
minimal.
• There is likely to be an exodus of Lihirians looking for opportunities elsewhere
in PNG.
|
• Declining economic situation in PNG may mean
that opportunities are low • People with qualifications and skills might find
employment, but with Public Service cutbacks and
without any new industrial/mining projects, many
Lihirians will opt to stay where they have land rights
and known amenities.
• The closure of other PNG mine sites means that
there are already many people with industry-
specific skills elsewhere in PNG. |
||
Standards of
Living
|
• The Lihirian population will experience a dramatic decline in living standards
due to reduced incomes.
• As all forms of cash cropping have declined since the period of exploration, it
would be some years before the pre-mining levels of copra and cocoa
production were returned for example.
• The advances in the living standards at a household level for the majority of
Lihirians are dependent on wages earned directly or indirectly from the mine.
• Few Lihirians could maintain their current living standard for longer than a few
months.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan
supporting Health, education and government
services would be phased out. |
||
Food Security
|
• Purchasing power would be affected although savings and termination
entitlements ensure that people could continue to buy in the short term.
• Supermarket sales would decline and may ultimately close soon after closure.
• Boats could travel to New Ireland for supplies and small local trade stores
would benefit in the short-term.
|
• Refer to LMC Socio-Economic surveys 2003.
• Land pressures have placed limits on subsistence
gardening.
• The majority of Lihirians, including those who are
employed, still have gardens and grow food for
their families. |
||
Police and Court
Facilities
|
• Existing police services will be strained, but police withdrawal unlikely.
• Long term services unlikely to be maintained at current level.
• LMC assistance would cease, with ensuing negative effects on the efficiency
and effectiveness of police operations on Lihir.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan support
for long term government services would be
phased out.
• LMC assists police operations in a number of ways
with transport, fuel and other material support.
The company has also helped with the training and
establishment of auxiliary and community policing. |
Page 106
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Area of Impact | Impacts and Issues | Comments | ||
Emergency Facilities |
• Lihirians would lose LMC emergency services.
• The ambulances at Palie and Londolovit would remain but budget provisions
would not be adequate to maintain and replace vehicles in the long term.
• Unless provision for a post-closure transfer of responsibility to LLG were
arranged, Lihir would have no emergency fire service.
• Emergency Medivacs are subsidised by LMC — not feasible after closure.
|
• At present almost all emergency services on Lihir
are provided by LMC.
• Search and rescue operations (especially relating
to boats lost at sea), fire services and medical
evacuations of people in the community are
provided at the company’s discretion without any
charge. |
||
Utilities
|
• Government property such as power lines, satellite dishes, transmitters, pylons
etc and the airport power supply would remain.
• Power generation from the power stations would be significantly reduced.
• Water supply and sanitation affected due to resource and maintenance
requirements.
|
• Sustainable Community Development Plan support
for long term utility services would be phased out.
• Currently the water supply and sewerage to the
township is operated by LMC. |
||
Transport
|
Land • Decline in the use of motor vehicles as the cash economy declined.
• Fuel imports by LMC would cease — supply costs would rise.
• Contractors may maintain passenger vehicles and charge fares.
• Short term, maintenance of vehicles would be possible (due to the training of
mechanics) but in the long-term the number of vehicles would decline as
people would not have the means for replacing them.
Sea• Wharf facilities at the mine site and those at Londolovit would remain.
• Maintenance of facilities would be minimal, due to reduced cash flows.
• Majority of owners would be unable to derive income from their boats and
therefore unable to maintain engines or buy fuel readily.
Air• Air services significantly impacted as mining project personnel currently
account for 98% of all passengers, and 90% of all freight is carried for LMC.
• Currently LMC pay all maintenance costs for the airport.
• It is more likely that in the long term services would be provided irregularly on
an ‘on call’ basis, as is the case in several other places in PNG.
|
• Excess vehicles may be available for resale to the
Lihirian community.
• The majority of boats on Lihir are owned by
Lihirians. Many are contracted by the company to
transport employees from Malie, Masahet and
Mahur.
• Most air travel by Lihirians is currently paid for by
LMC, government or businesses and involves only
a handful of people.
• The airport would not be maintained at current
levels, and the airport facilities would deteriorate
and be downgraded to perhaps a weekly or
monthly basis. |
||
Environment
|
• Orderly shutdown would be required including implementation of planned
closure rehabilitation, decommissioning, monitoring and maintenance
programs
|
• Part B of this Report details the environmental
issues and impacts associated with balance date
closure. |
Page 107
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
C.8 | SOCIO ECONOMIC CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES |
Page 108
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Severance Payments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected | Average Salary - | 3 months salary | 3 weeks salary for each | Other – Relocation | Total Severance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee category | Employee No.s (1) | Redundancies | Kina (K) (2) | (K) | year of service (K) (3) | costs (K) (4) | Payments (K) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Expats |
77 | 77 | 275,000 | 68,750 | 47,596 | 4,000 | 9,266,654 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other PNG Nationals |
579 | 579 | 33,000 | 8,250 | 19,038 | 3,000 | 17,537,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lihirians |
386 | 386 | 25,000 | 6,250 | 14,423 | Not applicable | 7,979,808 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Third Country
Nationals |
20 | 20 | 92,000 | 23,000 | 53,077 | 3,000 | 1,581,538 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total LMC workforce |
1062 | 1062 | 36,365,019 |
Severance Payments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected | Projected | 3 weeks salary for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee No.s | Employee No.s | Projected | Average Salary - | each year of service | Other – Relocation | Total Severance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee category | (At Time of Closure) | (After Closure) | Redundancies | Kina (K) | 3 months salary (K) | (K) | costs (K) | Payments (K) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expats |
77 | 15 | 62 | 275,000 | 68,750 | 47,596 | 4,000 | 7,461,462 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other PNG
Nationals |
579 | 464 | 115 | 33,000 | 8,250 | 19,038 | 3,000 | 3,483,173 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lihirians |
386 | 127 | 259 | 25,000 | 6,250 | 14,423 | Not applicable | 5,354,327 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third Country
Nationals |
20 | 0 | 20 | 92,000 | 23,000 | 53,077 | 3,000 | 1,581,538 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total LMC workforce |
1062 | 606 | 456 | 17,880,500 |
Severance Payments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected | Projected | 3 weeks salary for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee No.s (5) | Employee No.s | Projected | Average Salary - | each year of service | Other - Relocation | Total Severance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee category | (At Time of Closure) | (After Closure) | Redundancies | Kina (K) (2) | 3 months salary (K) | (K) | costs (K) | Payments (K) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expats |
7 | 0 | 7 | 275,000 | 68,750 | 47,596 | 4,000 | 842,423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other PNG
Nationals |
464 | 0 | 464 | 33,000 | 8,250 | 19,038 | 3,000 | 14,053,846 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lihirians |
100 | 0 | 100 | 25,000 | 6,250 | 14,423 | Not applicable | 2,067,308 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third Country
Nationals |
0 | 0 | 0 | 92,000 | 23,000 | 53,077 | 3,000 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total LMC workforce |
571 | 0 | 571 | 16,963,577 |
(1) | Employee numbers for 2004 rom HR data (November 2004). Numbers for 2022 and 2040 from Finance Depts. revised xxxxxxx mine life.xls | |
(2) | Average Salary based on average salaries from HR | |
(3) | 3 weeks salary for each service year. Average years of service; Expats-3, Nationals-10, Lihirians-10, TNG-10 | |
(4) | Other — Relocation costs. Includes relocation of personal effects, allowance for financial counselling, hotel accomodation (5 days), storage of personal effects (3 months)-details from LMC redundancy policy | |
(5) | Employee numbers from LMC revised xxxxxxx mine life.xls. Does not include staff needed for rehabiltation activities (2 years) & monitoring and maintenance (5 years) |
Page 109
Lihir Management Company Limited
|
December 31, 2004 | |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
K million | ||||
Balance Date Closure (31 December 2004) |
36.4 | |||
Stage 1 - 2022 |
17.9 | |||
Stage 2 - 2040 |
17.0 |
Page 110
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
D.1 | SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS | |
This update to the 1999 Mine Closure Plan has been written based on site and regulatory conditions to calendar year end 2004. There have been significant changes in the mine operations compared to those envisioned when the first closure plan was prepared in 1999. These changes, and where possible likely future developments in the mine’s operating conditions, have been taken into account in developing the closure strategies outlined in this report. | ||
An improved understanding of the environmental and bio-physical setting of the Mine has been obtained since 1999, from ongoing studies for the closure plan and other related work. Currently a major initiative is underway, as part of an updated Environmental Impact Assessment, to further understand the impacts of the Mine and data from this work will be relevant in future closure plan updates. | ||
LMC consider that community involvement and community support throughout the mine life is integral to orderly mine closure. Hence this report contains a detailed description of current programs and planned programs aimed at helping the community achieve a sustainable destiny. | ||
A comprehensive and detailed estimate of costs, both for planned closure and for unscheduled ‘balance date’ closure has been prepared in a format suitable for periodic updates. The cost for both planned and balance date closures have increased since the 1999 estimate, due to a combination of expanded mine operations and an improved understanding of the closure scope. | ||
Major risks have been identified related to closure although much work needs to be done on detailed risk assessment and preparation of risk management plans, see Section D.2 below. | ||
Closure planning is a progressive activity and this closure plan assumes that the commitment to incremental rehabilitation will be maintained. As noted in Section D.3, the closure plan will be updated annually for the balance date closure and this |
Page 111
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
provides an opportunity to regularly capture changes which impact mine closure. More comprehensive five yearly updates will occur for the planned closure. | ||
Although closure is a progressive process, the Mine closure is scheduled to occur in two main stages as follows: |
• | Closure of pit operations in 2022; and | ||
• | Closure of milling and remaining operations in 2040. |
This time frame allows for continuous improvements to closure planning which will be reflected in the annual and five yearly closure plan updates. | ||
A number of action items, including on-going studies and further studies are identified in the following subsections, as a framework for assisting in closure plan updates. |
Page 112
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
D.2 | ACTION ITEMS | |
D.2.1 | Risk Assessment and Management | |
Section A.6 (Risk Management) summarises the potential impacts associated with the bio-physical and socio-economic aspects of the project. The proposed management strategies associated with each of the identified potential impacts are detailed within Parts B and C of the report. To further these strategies, detailed risk assessments and risk management plans will be undertaken for each of the significant potential impacts where information is presently insufficient or unavailable. | ||
The risk assessment process will define a series of action items for advancing the closure planning. | ||
D.2.2 | Current and On-going Studies | |
Drainage and Sediment Control | ||
Studies into drainage and sediment control continue as part of the implementation of the MWSAMP, primarily to reduce the intensity and extent of surface turbid plumes that are generated within Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. Work in progress includes separation of contact and non-contact water via diversions, improvements to the sediment trap(s) and augmentation of mill water supply from caldera creeks. Long term integrity of water management and diversion structures will form part of final closure. | ||
Bathymetric Studies | ||
Bathymetric studies are underway for both the Deep Sea Outfall project (DSO2) and the existing Deep Sea Tailings Placement (DSTP) system. Investigations include a comprehensive oceanographic profiling study and sampling program to support the establishment of a representative physical oceanographic database. These data will also provide input to the engineering design of the pipeline and outfall. Data from these studies will be needed to confirm closure assumptions related to the outfalls and tailing placement. |
Page 113
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
Waste Rock Disposal | ||
Regular quarterly surveys of the submerged waste rock pile, are currently being taken as part of the existing EMMP. The survey data needs to be assessed to determine if the current dumping location is meeting the requirement for a minimum 100 m of ocean water column above the rock dump. Potential impacts to the near shore sedimentation rates and coral reefs will also need to be assessed. The closure plan may need to be adjusted if the offshore rock dump does not meet the water depth criteria at end of pit life and if long term impacts are identified. | ||
Biological Studies | ||
Studies are being continued to identify short and long term impacts of the Mine on local and regional flora and fauna (terrestrial and marine). | ||
Other Studies | ||
In parallel with studies related to closure, many other programs are in place aimed at improving operations. These programs collect data that is relevant to closure. | ||
D.2.3 | Further Studies | |
D.2.3.1 | General | |
The following is a list of studies proposed to improve closure planning. This is not a complete list and other items will emerge from the risk assessment/risk management planning process. | ||
D.2.3.2 | Acid Rock Drainage Studies and Control Strategy | |
Management of ARD from the low-grade ore stockpile footprints, harbour platform and open pit has been identified as a significant closure issue. A preliminary assessment of ore and waste rock geochemistry was undertaken as part of the Environmental Plan technical studies (NSR, 1988). However, to fully characterise the ARD potential and determine closure implications, additional studies will be undertaken. |
Page 114
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
D.2.3.3 | Final Void Study | |
A final void study is proposed to determine the most appropriate and feasible long-term options for pit closure. The study may have significant implications for the pit design and therefore is regarded as a matter of priority. The study will include investigations into pit wall stability, predicted pit water quality including ARD generated from the pit walls, groundwater inputs (particularly geothermal groundwater), freshwater and seawater inputs and engineering designs including the mechanisms of exchange between pit and ocean waters. | ||
D.2.3.4 | Contaminated Land Studies | |
A register will be prepared of areas of hydrocarbon and metal contamination resulting from operational activities. This work, and a parallel monitoring program, will provide information for rehabilitation and cleanup programs. Where possible improvements will be proposed to operations to reduce closure work. | ||
D.2.3.5 | Human Health Studies | |
Although operational issues related to human health do not necessarily directly impact physical closure, health is an important factor in community issues which are so critical to orderly closure. Therefore, studies to identify the direct and indirect impacts on local and regional human health resulting from the mine sites activities will be continued. This work will include health and safety issues at the site and any indirect impacts from mine site activities. | ||
D.2.3.6 | Government Liaison | |
Regular discussions with the Government on the progress of rehabilitation and closure planning will continue. LMC will seek advice and clarification where necessary, and provide input where appropriate into policy development. For the latter in particular, the PNG Department of Mining’s (DOM) Green Paper on Sustainable Development Policy and Sustainability Planning Framework for the Mining Sector in PNG will be an essential element of continued discussions between LMC and the Government. It is the aim of LMC’s ongoing closure planning liaison |
Page 115
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
process to ensure that mine closure planning is conducted in the full knowledge of, and with full approval of, the PNG Government. | ||
D.2.3.7 | Community Consultation | |
LMC recognise that consultation with all stakeholders but specifically Lihirians needs to become an integral part of the closure planning process. LMC will continue consultations and discussions with the Lihirian community to establish the preferred closure options. As part of on-going consultation, the Lihirians in particular will be asked to determine which mine facilities are potentially of the most use to them, and the preferred end use for all rehabilitated land. | ||
D.2.3.8 | Social progress | |
As part of the Socio-Economic Development Plan support for long term health, education and government services facilities and services, LMC will identify further socio-economic studies where applicable. | ||
D.2.3.9 | Business Development | |
Further socio-economic studies and discussions with the community will enable LMC to identify the potential for alternative business opportunities to be created during the life of mine which may provide ongoing employment and incomes on Lihir. |
Page 116
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
D.3 | CLOSURE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS | |
The closure plan will undergo regular review throughout the project life. LMC propose to formally update the Mine Closure Plan (MCP) every five years, although the balance date closure plan will be updated on an annual basis. Moreover, LMC propose to conduct an annual review of the MCP with the annual review conducted as part of the site’s Environmental Management System. The review will involve key personnel associated with all aspects of mine closure and the results of the review will be formally documented. Further updates of the mine closure plan will take into account results of the formal annual reviews. |
Page 117
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
ARD
|
Acid Rock Drainage | |
CCD
|
Counter Current Decantation | |
CDO
|
Commercial Development Office | |
CIC
|
Civil Infrastructure Committee | |
CIL
|
Carbon in Xxxxx | |
CLTF
|
Customary Landowners Trust Fund | |
CMCP
|
Conceptual Mine Closure Plan | |
CSDP
|
Community Sustainable Development Planning (DoM) | |
DOM
|
Department of Mining | |
DOT
|
Department of Treasury | |
DSO
|
Deep Sea Outfall | |
DSTP
|
Deep Sea Tailings Pipe | |
EMMP
|
Environmental Monitoring and Management Plan | |
EP
|
Environmental Plan | |
HAF
|
Housing Assistance Fund | |
HGO
|
High Grade Ore | |
IBP
|
Integrated Benefits Package | |
IEA
|
International Education Agency | |
IFL
|
Interest Free Loan Scheme | |
ITPC
|
Interim Town Planning Committee | |
JNC
|
Joint Negotiating Committee | |
XX
|
Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Consultants | |
KRT
|
Kapit Relocation Trust | |
LBDAC
|
Lihir Business Development Advisory Committee | |
LCLT
|
Londolovit Customary Landowners Trust | |
LEC
|
Lihir Education Committee | |
LEP
|
Lihir Education Plan | |
LAOC
|
Lihir Law and Order Committee | |
LGL
|
Lihir Gold Limited | |
LGOS
|
Low Grade Ore Stockpile | |
LHC
|
Lihir Health Centre |
Page 118
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
LHCC
|
Lihir Health Co-ordination Committee | |
LLG
|
Local Level Government | |
LLT
|
Lihir Landowners Trust | |
LMALA
|
Lihir Mining Area Landowners Association | |
LMC
|
Lihir Management Company | |
LRCA
|
Londolovit River Community Agreement | |
MAV
|
Mine Affected Villages | |
MCP
|
Mine Closure Plan | |
MWSAMP
|
Mine Water, Sediment ARD Management Plan | |
NAF
|
Non Acid Forming | |
NIPG
|
New Ireland Provincial Government | |
NRLLG
|
Ninamar Rural Local Level Government | |
NSC
|
National Steering Committee | |
NSO
|
National Statistical Office | |
P&LRT
|
Putput and Ladolam Relocation Trust | |
PAF
|
Potentially Acid Forming | |
PHC
|
Palie Health Centre | |
PNG
|
Papua New Guinea | |
PPT
|
Putput Plantsite Trust | |
ROM
|
Run of Mine | |
SAG
|
Semi Autogenous Grinding | |
SEDP
|
Socio-Economic Development Plan (LMC) | |
SIC
|
Social Impact Committee | |
SML
|
Site Mine Lease | |
SPA
|
Special Purpose Authority | |
SSG
|
Special Support Grants | |
VDS
|
Village Development Scheme | |
VPC
|
Village Planning Committee | |
WPC
|
Xxxx Planning Committee | |
WUP
|
Water Use Permit |
Page 119
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
1. | Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council (ANZECC), 2000, Guidelines for fresh and marine water quality, Version October 2000. | |
2. | Department of Mining, PNG Government, 2003, Green Paper, Sustainable Development Policy and Sustainability Planning Framework for the Mining Sector in PNG. | |
3. | EGi, 1998. Sulphur Oxidation Control and Acid Drainage Management for Operation and Closure: Site Visit Report. | |
4. | Geochemical Characteristics of the Lienetz and Minifie Deposit Materials, Implications for Mining. Prepared by Xxxxxx Xxxxxx and Associates Pty Ltd for Kennecott-Niugini Mining Joint Venture and NSR Environmental Consultants. 1998. | |
5. | International Finance Corporation (IFC) 1995, Draft IFC Guideline for mining and milling — Open Pit. | |
6. | IFC 2004, Draft Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Precious Minerals Mining. | |
7. | IFC, 1998, Safeguard Policy, Environmental Assessment, OP4.01. | |
8. | IFC, 1998, Procedure for Environmental and Social Review of projects. | |
9. | Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Consultants, 2003, Mine Water, Sediment and ARD Management Plan (MWSAMP), Hydrology Review, Final Report M091650201. | |
10. | Lihir Gold Limited (LGL), 2004, Factsheet 1. | |
11. | LGL, Company History, LGL website, xxx.xxxxx.xxx.xx, 2004. | |
12. | XXX, 0000. Lihir Gold Project Environmental Plan, Volume C Appendices. Report prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Kennecott Explorations (Australia) Ltd and Niugini Mining Limited Joint Venture. CR235/17. | |
13. | XXX, 0000. Lihir Project Final Environmental Plan, Volume B Main Report, Supplement to Volume C. Report prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Lihir Joint Venture. CR235/23. | |
14. | XXX, 0000. Lihir Project, New Ireland Province, PNG — Environmental Management and Monitoring Program — Report prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Lihir Joint Venture. CR 235/27. | |
15. | XXX, 0000. Lihir Project, New Ireland Province, PNG — Environmental Baseline, Volumes 1-3. Prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Lihir Joint Venture.CR235/30/v2. |
Page 120
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
16. | XXX, 0000. Conceptual Mine Closure Plan (CMCP) for Lihir Gold Project. Report prepared by NSR Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd for Lihir Joint Venture — 1999 CR 235/32/v4. | |
17. | LMC, Environmental Management and Monitoring Program 2002-2003. February 2000. CR EnvIR00:001. | |
18. | XXX, 0000, A McDonald, 0xx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx. | |
19. | XXX, 0000, Environmental Management and Monitoring Program (Operations Phase) 2004-2007, Draft Report. | |
20. | Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), 2000, Minerals Industry Code for Environmental Management. | |
21. | Ministerial Council on Mineral and Petroleum Resources (MCMPR) (Formerly the Australia and New Zealand Minerals and Energy Council (ANZMEC)) and Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), 2000, Strategic Framework for Mine Closure. | |
22. | Rio Tinto, 2003, Statement of Business Practice. | |
23. | Rio Tinto, 2004, Closure Planning Standard. | |
24. | Rio Tinto, 2004, Closure Planning Guidelines. | |
25. | Ripper, I. and Xxxx, H. 1993. Return Periods and Probability of Occurrence of Large Earthquakes in Papua New Guinea, ONG Dept of Mining and Petroleum Report 93/1. | |
26. | Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand (2004), Risk Assessment, AS/NZS 4360:2004, Homebush, NSW. | |
27. | Wildlife Research, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, 2002. The distribution and abundance of nesting marine turtles in the Lihir, Xxxxx and Tanga Island Groups. Final report. | |
28. | World Bank, 1998, Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook (PPAH). | |
29. | World Bank, 1998, Environmental Assessment of Mining Projects, Update 22 | |
30. | World Bank 1999, Environmental Assessment Sourcebook, Report 22088. | |
31. | World Bank, 2003, Equator Principles. |
Page 121
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Figure A.1.1
|
Location Plan | |
Figure A.1.2
|
Current Site Layout | |
Figure A.1.3
|
Mine Schedule — Planned Closure | |
Figure A.5.1
|
Mine Schedule — Balance Date Closure | |
Figure A.5.2
|
Stage 1 (2022) Closure Arrangement | |
Figure A.5.3
|
Low Grade Stockpile Material Balance | |
Figure A.5.4
|
Stage 2 (2040) Closure Arrangement | |
Figure A.5.5
|
Balance Date (2004) Closure Arrangement | |
Figure A.5.6
|
1999 Arrangement for Closure |
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Lease Requirements
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
COMMUNITY AND
ENVIRONMENT POLICY November 2004 |
• | Consult with the community to share information and listen to their concerns and expectations throughout the project life including mine closure. |
• | Develop and implement an integrated social and environmental management system, including setting objectives and targets to facilitate sustainable and continual performance improvement. |
• | Maintain environmental and social monitoring programs and report the results in a clear and transparent manner. |
• | Comply with applicable PNG environmental laws and regulations as well as corporate standards and guidelines and, where these do not exist, adopt internationally recognised standards of practice. |
• | Minimise the amount of waste generated, work towards eliminating polluting releases causing environmental harm from the operation and optimise the use of natural resources. |
• | Participate with government and industry organisations in further development of social and environmental policies, codes and practices aimed at improving performance. |
• | Provide opportunities for community involvement in LMC business activities. |
“YUMI WOK WANTAIM” | ||||
(Lets all work together) | ||||
Xxxx Xxxx
MANAGING DIRECTOR
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
I.1 | Existing LMC Environmental Commitments |
• | A description of the project and its viability; | ||
• | The proposed development and associated activities and operations; | ||
• | The development timetable; | ||
• | The existing social, physical and biological environment; | ||
• | The environmental impacts and safeguards; | ||
• | The principles and objectives for environmental management and monitoring; and | ||
• | The proposed strategy for mine rehabilitation and abandonment. |
Page I-2
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | LMC’s monitoring and reporting commitments to the PNG Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC), Department of Mining (DoM) and community representatives; | ||
• | LMC’s monitoring requirements which arose from the identification of key environmental issues documented in the Lihir Project Environmental Plan (EP); | ||
• | The specific monitoring elements, and the rationale behind these monitoring programs. This includes the statutory monitoring associated with the Water Use Permits held by LMC and the routine environmental monitoring and reporting programmes. |
• | Implementation of LMC’s environmental management policies and procedures; and | ||
• | To detail monitoring of the mine’s environmental impacts and LMC’s compliance with PNG regulatory permits and licences. |
Page I-3
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Page I-4
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | Administrative and accommodation buildings for the company’s workforce; | ||
• | Installations and infrastructure directly used in the mining and processing of ore; and. | ||
• | Roads in the mining area. |
• | Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Agreement | ||
• | Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency | ||
• | Mining Industry Consultants Agreement |
• | ‘the Lessee shall do all things necessary to surrender the lease (or easement) or part of the lease (or easement) to the State.’ |
Page I-5
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | International Chamber of Commerce Business Charter for Sustainable Development; | ||
• | Environmental Charter of the International Council on Metals and the Environment; and | ||
• | Australian Minerals Industry Code for Environmental Management. |
Page I-6
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | Early Planning and funding for closure; | ||
• | Progressive decommissioning and landscape rehabilitation; | ||
• | Consulting fully with stakeholders; and | ||
• | Integrating closure strategies with mine plans. |
• | Preparation of a closure study to identify legal requirements, landowner and community expectations, and impacts to be addressed; | ||
• | Development of a closure strategy to identify closure objectives, measures and options for meeting the objectives, and cost estimation; | ||
• | Development of socio-economic strategy including communications plans; | ||
• | Decommissioning (e.g. the act of closure); and | ||
• | Post closure management and monitoring. |
Page I-7
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | The World Bank Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook (PPAH) (1998). | ||
• | World Bank Environmental Assessment Sourcebook (1991, as amended). | ||
• | The IFC environmental, health and safety guidelines (1991-1993). | ||
• | The IFC Safeguard Policies and IFC procedures (1986-1998). | ||
• | World Bank Equator Principles (2003). |
• | Part 1 — Summary of key policy lessons in pollution management; | ||
• | Part 2 — Presents good practice notes on implementation of policy objectives, based on experience with World Bank Group Projects and lessons learned from policies and practices from other agencies and organizations in this field; | ||
• | Part 3 — Provides detailed guidelines to be applied in the preparation of World Bank Projects. The guidelines, cover almost 40 industrial sectors and include current thinking on abatement and control, numerical targets for reducing pollution and maximum permissible emissions levels. |
Page I-8
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | Draft IFC Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines for Mining and Milling — Open Pit (1995). | ||
• | Draft IFC Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Precious Minerals Mining (2004). |
• | Return of the land to conditions capable of supporting prior land use, equivalent uses or other acceptable uses; | ||
• | Elimination of significant adverse effects on adjacent water resources; | ||
• | Use of waste rock for backfill and of topsoil (or other acceptable materials) for reclamation to the extent feasible; | ||
• | Recontouring of slopes to minimise erosion and runoff; | ||
• | Planting of native species of vegetation to prevent erosion and to encourage self-sustaining development of a productive ecosystem on the reclaimed land; | ||
• | Post-closure acid rock drainage and tailings management, reduction of ARD formation by sealing off pyrite containing waste from oxidation and percolating water; and | ||
• | Budget and schedule for pre- and post-abandonment reclamation activities. |
Page I-9
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Page I-10
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | environmental and socio-cultural issues and impacts, | ||
• | management, training and monitoring, | ||
• | reclamation |
• | Environmental aspects and impacts | ||
• | Tailings treatment, management and disposal | ||
• | Decommissioning, rehabilitation and closure planning |
Page I-11
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | Stakeholder involvement; | ||
• | Planning; | ||
• | Financial provision; | ||
• | Implementation; | ||
• | Standards; and | ||
• | Relinquishment. |
• | Integration of environmental, social and economic considerations into decision-making and management, consistent with the objective of sustainable development; | ||
• | Openness transparency and improved accountability through public environmental reporting and community engagement; | ||
• | Compliance with all statutory requirements, as a minimum; and | ||
• | A continually-improving standard of environmental performance and, through leadership, the pursuit of excellence throughout the minerals industry. |
Page I-12
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
• | Ensuring resources are adequate to implement the environmental plans during operations and closure. |
• | Planning for closure in the design phases of a project and regularly reviewing to accommodate changes in site conditions, technology and community expectations |
• | Mine Planning for Environmental Protection | ||
• | Community consultation and involvement | ||
• | Land form design for rehabilitation | ||
• | Tailings Containment | ||
• | Rehabilitation and Revegetation | ||
• | Environmental Risk Management | ||
• | Water Management |
Page I-13
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Page I-14
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Page I-15
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
Lihir Management Company Limited Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 |
WATER USE | ||
PERMITS | DESCRIPTION | |
29/825
|
Discharge Sewage effluent from Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx | |
00/000
|
Xxxxx abstraction for road dust suppression | |
29/827
|
Discharge storm water from multiple mine sources to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx | |
29/890
|
Water abstraction for mine roads dust suppression | |
29/891
|
Water abstraction for village water supply | |
29/892
|
Water abstraction for Londolovit townsite supply | |
00/000
|
Xxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx storm water run-off | |
29/894
|
Discharge of commercial & industrial area storm run-off | |
29/895
|
Storm water run-off from road between airport & plant-site | |
29/896
|
Discharge runoff from accommodation area to Lakunbut Creek — lapsed as it relates to discharge from construction site | |
29/897
|
Storm water run-off from Airport to local watercourses | |
29/898
|
Discharge storm water from process plant to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. | |
29/959
|
Discharge soft waste into the sea off Putput Point — lapsed as waste material is covered by WUP 29/989 | |
29/989
|
Discharge waste rock from mine into the sea# | |
29/898(b)
|
Discharge waste rock into Xxxxx Xxxxxxx# | |
29/990
|
Discharge of treated mill tailing to the sea | |
29/991
|
Abstract water from Londolovit River for Mill process water | |
29/1039
|
Discharge treated sewage from process plant to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx | |
29/1047
|
Discharge rainfall runoff into Ladolam Creek — lapsed as runoff is covered by WUP29/1171 | |
29/1048
|
Discharge interceptor water into Xxxxx Xxxxxxx* | |
29/1049
|
Discharge of interceptor water * | |
29/1170
|
Seawater abstraction for process plant cooling water | |
29/1171
|
Discharge storm water runoff and leachate from stockpiles to the sea at Xxxxx Xxxxxxx |
* | These two water use permits have been combined to one WUP29/1049 as they are dealing with the same water and being charged twice | |
# | These two permits have been combined to WUP 29/989 as they are dealing with the same waste material |
Page II-1
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Elements
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Data Collection Frequency | Reporting | |||||||||||||||||
Environmental Monitoring & Management Plan (EMMP) Elements | D | F | M | Q | A | O | Q | A | ||||||||||
4.1
|
Meteorology | |||||||||||||||||
4.2
|
Stream Flows and Suspended Sediment | |||||||||||||||||
4.3
|
Groundwater Monitoring | |||||||||||||||||
4.4
|
Rate of land Disturbance | |||||||||||||||||
4.5
|
Waste Rock and Submerged Waste pile | |||||||||||||||||
4.5.1 Waste Rock Dumping Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
4.5.2 Submerged Waste pile Dimensions | ||||||||||||||||||
4.6
|
Near shore Sedimentation | |||||||||||||||||
4.7
|
Fringing Coral Reefs | 2 yr | ||||||||||||||||
4.8
|
Sewerage Effluent and Dilution Behaviour | |||||||||||||||||
4.9
|
Tailing Stream Chemistry and Temperature | |||||||||||||||||
4.10
|
Physico-chemical monitoring of ocean | |||||||||||||||||
4.10.1 Physical Oceanographic Monitoring | 2m | |||||||||||||||||
4.10.2 Oceanic Water Quality | ||||||||||||||||||
4.11
|
Chemistry and Biology of Ocean Sediments | 3 yr | ||||||||||||||||
4.12
|
Mine, Plant Site and Low Grade Ore Stockpile Runoff Water Quality | |||||||||||||||||
4.13
|
Fish, Shellfish and Seagrass Bio-monitoring | |||||||||||||||||
4.14
|
Vegetation Diversity and Cover | 2 yr | ||||||||||||||||
4.15
|
Megapodes | |||||||||||||||||
4.16
|
Lower Londolovit River Monitoring | |||||||||||||||||
4.16.1 Physico-chemical monitoring | ||||||||||||||||||
4.16.2 Biological Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||||
4.17
|
Air Quality Monitoring (Dust and SO2) | |||||||||||||||||
4.18
|
Noise | |||||||||||||||||
4.20
|
Additional Statutory Monitoring in Relation to Specific WUPs | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.1
|
WUP 29/826 — Lakunbut Creek abstraction | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.2
|
WUP 29/890 — Abstraction for mine roads dust suppression | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.3
|
WUP 29/891 — Abstraction for village supply | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.4
|
WUP 29/892 — Londolovit townsite water supply | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.5
|
WUP 29/893 — Londolovit townsite runoff | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.6
|
WUP 29/894 — Commercial area runoff | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.7
|
WUP 29/895 — Mine road stormwater runoff | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.8
|
WUP 29/897 — Airport Runoff | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.9
|
WUP 29/1049 — Discharge from pit xxxxx | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.10
|
WUP 29/1170 — Process plant cooling water | |||||||||||||||||
5.2.1
|
Incinerator, Power House and Autoclave stakes | |||||||||||||||||
5.2.2
|
Geothermal Power Plant |
Page III-1
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Figure A.1.1
|
Location Plan | |
Figure A.1.2
|
Current Site Layout | |
Figure A.1.3
|
Mine Schedule — Planned Closure | |
Figure A.5.1
|
Mine Schedule — Balance Date Closure | |
Figure A.5.2
|
Stage 1 (2022) Closure Arrangement | |
Figure A.5.3
|
Low Grade Stockpile Material Balance | |
Figure A.5.4
|
Stage 2 (2040) Closure Arrangement | |
Figure A.5.5
|
Balance Date (2004) Closure Arrangement | |
Figure A.5.6
|
1999 Arrangement for Closure |
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Lease Requirements
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENT POLICY November 2004 |
• | Consult with the community to share information and listen to their concerns and expectations throughout the project life including mine closure. | |
• | Develop and implement an integrated social and environmental management system, including setting objectives and targets to facilitate sustainable and continual performance improvement. | |
• | Maintain environmental and social monitoring programs and report the results in a clear and transparent manner. | |
• | Comply with applicable PNG environmental laws and regulations as well as corporate standards and guidelines and, where these do not exist, adopt internationally recognised standards of practice. | |
• | Minimise the amount of waste generated, work towards eliminating polluting releases causing environmental harm from the operation and optimise the use of natural resources. | |
• | Participate with government and industry organisations in further development of social and environmental policies, codes and practices aimed at improving performance. | |
• | Provide opportunities for community involvement in LMC business activities. |
Xxxx Xxxx
MANAGING DIRECTOR
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
I.1 | Existing LMC Environmental Commitments | |
i) LMC Community and Environment Policy | ||
Lihir Management Company (LMC) recognizes excellence in environmental management and an open partnership with the community are essential to the success of the Lihir Gold Mine, and the long-term development of the community. Lihir Gold therefore has a commitment to sound environmental management in consultation with its neighbouring communities. This is reflected through the Company’s Community and Environmental Policy (Appendix 1). Fundamental to the policy is the Company environmental vision as described in the policy. | ||
ii) LMC Environmental Plan (1992) | ||
As part of the legislative process for new mineral developments, LMC produced an Environmental Plan in 1992 for the Lihir Gold Mine. The Environmental Plan includes the following: |
• | A description of the project and its viability; | ||
• | The proposed development and associated activities and operations; | ||
• | The development timetable; | ||
• | The existing social, physical and biological environment; | ||
• | The environmental impacts and safeguards; | ||
• | The principles and objectives for environmental management and monitoring; and | ||
• | The proposed strategy for mine rehabilitation and abandonment. |
Page I-2
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
• | LMC’s monitoring and reporting commitments to the PNG Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC), Department of Mining (DoM) and community representatives; | ||
• | LMC’s monitoring requirements which arose from the identification of key environmental issues documented in the Lihir Project Environmental Plan (EP); | ||
• | The specific monitoring elements, and the rationale behind these monitoring programs. This includes the statutory monitoring associated with the Water Use Permits held by LMC and the routine environmental monitoring and reporting programmes. |
• | Implementation of LMC’s environmental management policies and procedures; and | ||
• | To detail monitoring of the mine’s environmental impacts and LMC’s compliance with PNG regulatory permits and licences. |
Page I-3
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Page I-4
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
• | Administrative and accommodation buildings for the company’s workforce; | ||
• | Installations and infrastructure directly used in the mining and processing of ore; and. | ||
• | Roads in the mining area. |
• | Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Agreement | ||
• | Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency | ||
• | Mining Industry Consultants Agreement |
• | ‘the Lessee shall do all things necessary to surrender the lease (or easement) or part of the lease (or easement) to the State.’ |
Page I-5
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
• | International Chamber of Commerce Business Charter for Sustainable Development; | ||
• | Environmental Charter of the International Council on Metals and the Environment; and | ||
• | Australian Minerals Industry Code for Environmental Management. |
Page I-6
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
• | Early Planning and funding for closure; | ||
• | Progressive decommissioning and landscape rehabilitation; | ||
• | Consulting fully with stakeholders; and | ||
• | Integrating closure strategies with mine plans. |
• | Preparation of a closure study to identify legal requirements, landowner and community expectations, and impacts to be addressed; | ||
• | Development of a closure strategy to identify closure objectives, measures and options for meeting the objectives, and cost estimation; | ||
• | Development of socio-economic strategy including communications plans; | ||
• | Decommissioning (e.g. the act of closure); and | ||
• | Post closure management and monitoring. |
Page I-7
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
• | The World Bank Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook (PPAH) (1998). | ||
• | World Bank Environmental Assessment Sourcebook (1991, as amended). | ||
• | The IFC environmental, health and safety guidelines (1991-1993). | ||
• | The IFC Safeguard Policies and IFC procedures (1986-1998). | ||
• | World Bank Equator Principles (2003). |
• | Part 1 — Summary of key policy lessons in pollution management; | ||
• | Part 2 — Presents good practice notes on implementation of policy objectives, based on experience with World Bank Group Projects and lessons learned from policies and practices from other agencies and organizations in this field; | ||
• | Part 3 — Provides detailed guidelines to be applied in the preparation of World Bank Projects. The guidelines, cover almost 40 industrial sectors and include current thinking on abatement and control, numerical targets for reducing pollution and maximum permissible emissions levels. |
Page I-8
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
• | Draft IFC Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines for Mining and Milling — Open Pit (1995). | ||
• | Draft IFC Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Precious Minerals Mining (2004). |
• | Return of the land to conditions capable of supporting prior land use, equivalent uses or other acceptable uses; | ||
• | Elimination of significant adverse effects on adjacent water resources; | ||
• | Use of waste rock for backfill and of topsoil (or other acceptable materials) for reclamation to the extent feasible; | ||
• | Recontouring of slopes to minimise erosion and runoff; | ||
• | Planting of native species of vegetation to prevent erosion and to encourage self-sustaining development of a productive ecosystem on the reclaimed land; | ||
• | Post-closure acid rock drainage and tailings management, reduction of ARD formation by sealing off pyrite containing waste from oxidation and percolating water; and | ||
• | Budget and schedule for pre- and post-abandonment reclamation activities. |
Page I-9
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Page I-10
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
• | environmental and socio-cultural issues and impacts, | ||
• | management, training and monitoring, | ||
• | reclamation |
• | Environmental aspects and impacts | ||
• | Tailings treatment, management and disposal | ||
• | Decommissioning, rehabilitation and closure planning |
Page I-11
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
• | Stakeholder involvement; | ||
• | Planning; | ||
• | Financial provision; | ||
• | Implementation; | ||
• | Standards; and | ||
• | Relinquishment. |
• | Integration of environmental, social and economic considerations into decision-making and management, consistent with the objective of sustainable development; | ||
• | Openness transparency and improved accountability through public environmental reporting and community engagement; | ||
• | Compliance with all statutory requirements, as a minimum; and | ||
• | A continually-improving standard of environmental performance and, through leadership, the pursuit of excellence throughout the minerals industry. |
Page I-12
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
• | Ensuring resources are adequate to implement the environmental plans during operations and closure. |
• | Planning for closure in the design phases of a project and regularly reviewing to accommodate changes in site conditions, technology and community expectations |
• | Mine Planning for Environmental Protection | ||
• | Community consultation and involvement | ||
• | Land form design for rehabilitation | ||
• | Tailings Containment | ||
• | Rehabilitation and Revegetation | ||
• | Environmental Risk Management | ||
• | Water Management |
Page I-13
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Page I-14
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Page I-15
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
WATER USE | ||
PERMITS | DESCRIPTION | |
29/825
|
Discharge Sewage effluent from Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx | |
00/000
|
Xxxxx abstraction for road dust suppression | |
29/827
|
Discharge storm water from multiple mine sources to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx | |
29/890
|
Water abstraction for mine roads dust suppression | |
29/891
|
Water abstraction for village water supply | |
29/892
|
Water abstraction for Londolovit townsite supply | |
00/000
|
Xxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxx storm water run-off | |
29/894
|
Discharge of commercial & industrial area storm run-off | |
29/895
|
Storm water run-off from road between airport & plant-site | |
29/896
|
Discharge runoff from accommodation area to Lakunbut Creek — lapsed as it relates to discharge from construction site | |
29/897
|
Storm water run-off from Airport to local watercourses | |
29/898
|
Discharge storm water from process plant to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. | |
29/959
|
Discharge soft waste into the sea off Putput Point – lapsed as waste material is covered by WUP 29/989 | |
29/989
|
Discharge waste rock from mine into the sea# | |
29/898(b)
|
Discharge waste rock into Xxxxx Xxxxxxx# | |
29/990
|
Discharge of treated mill tailing to the sea | |
29/991
|
Abstract water from Londolovit River for Mill process water | |
29/1039
|
Discharge treated sewage from process plant to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx | |
29/1047
|
Discharge rainfall runoff into Ladolam Creek – lapsed as runoff is covered by WUP29/1171 | |
29/1048
|
Discharge interceptor water into Xxxxx Xxxxxxx* | |
29/1049
|
Discharge of interceptor water * | |
29/1170
|
Seawater abstraction for process plant cooling water | |
29/1171
|
Discharge storm water runoff and leachate from stockpiles to the sea at Xxxxx Xxxxxxx |
* | These two water use permits have been combined to one WUP29/1049 as they are dealing with the same water and being charged twice | |
# | These two permits have been combined to WUP 29/989 as they are dealing with the same waste material |
Page II-1
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Elements
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Data Collection Frequency | Reporting | |||||||||||||||||
Environmental Monitoring & Management Plan (EMMP) Elements | D | F | M | Q | A | O | Q | A | ||||||||||
4.1
|
Meteorology | |||||||||||||||||
4.2
|
Stream Flows and Suspended Sediment | |||||||||||||||||
4.3
|
Groundwater Monitoring | |||||||||||||||||
4.4
|
Rate of land Disturbance | |||||||||||||||||
4.5
|
Waste Rock and Submerged Waste pile | |||||||||||||||||
4.5.1 Waste Rock Dumping Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
4.5.2 Submerged Waste pile Dimensions | ||||||||||||||||||
4.6
|
Near shore Sedimentation | |||||||||||||||||
4.7
|
Fringing Coral Reefs | 2 yr | ||||||||||||||||
4.8
|
Sewerage Effluent and Dilution Behaviour | |||||||||||||||||
4.9
|
Tailing Stream Chemistry and Temperature | |||||||||||||||||
4.10
|
Physico-chemical monitoring of ocean | |||||||||||||||||
4.10.1 Physical Oceanographic Monitoring | 2m | |||||||||||||||||
4.10.2 Oceanic Water Quality | ||||||||||||||||||
4.11
|
Chemistry and Biology of Ocean Sediments | 3 yr | ||||||||||||||||
4.12
|
Mine, Plant Site and Low Grade Ore Stockpile Runoff Water Quality | |||||||||||||||||
4.13
|
Fish, Shellfish and Seagrass Bio-monitoring | |||||||||||||||||
4.14
|
Vegetation Diversity and Cover | 2 yr | ||||||||||||||||
4.15
|
Megapodes | |||||||||||||||||
4.16
|
Lower Londolovit River Monitoring | |||||||||||||||||
4.16.1 Physico-chemical monitoring | ||||||||||||||||||
4.16.2 Biological Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||||
4.17
|
Air Quality Monitoring (Dust and SO2) | |||||||||||||||||
4.18
|
Noise | |||||||||||||||||
4.20
|
Additional Statutory Monitoring in Relation to Specific WUPs | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.1
|
WUP 29/826 — Lakunbut Creek abstraction | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.2
|
WUP 29/890 — Abstraction for mine roads dust suppression | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.3
|
WUP 29/891 — Abstraction for village supply | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.4
|
WUP 29/892 — Londolovit townsite water supply | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.5
|
WUP 29/893 — Londolovit townsite runoff | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.6
|
WUP 29/894 — Commercial area runoff | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.7
|
WUP 29/895 — Mine road stormwater runoff | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.8
|
WUP 29/897 — Airport Runoff | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.9
|
WUP 29/1049 — Discharge from pit xxxxx | |||||||||||||||||
4.20.10
|
WUP 29/1170 — Process plant cooling water | |||||||||||||||||
5.2.1
|
Incinerator, Power House and Autoclave stakes | |||||||||||||||||
5.2.2
|
Geothermal Power Plant |
Page III-1
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
1. | Aerial view of Pit operations | |
2. | View of Pit operations (looking East) | |
3. | View of Pit operations (looking North | |
4. | Low Grade Ore Stockpiles (LGOS) | |
5. | Kapit South stockpile (looking South) | |
6. | Topsoil stockpiles | |
7. | Panorama of Xxxxx Xxxxxxx (looking East) | |
8. | Northern drainage channel & discharge point to sediment trap | |
9. | Kapit sediment trap | |
10. | Northern drainage channel (looking West) | |
11. | Northern drainage channel (looking East) | |
12. | Construction of northern drainage channel | |
13. | Completed northern perimeter drainage channel | |
14. | Southern Perimeter Drainage Channel | |
15. | Southern Perimeter Drainage Channel Monitoring point and Discharge point | |
16. | Dewatering bores | |
17. | Stream sampling point and monitoring station | |
18. | Pit de-pressurisation bores | |
19. | Geothermal vents | |
20. | 6MW Geothermal power station | |
21. | Geothermal hot springs | |
22. | Natural geothermal activity | |
23. | Kapit Beach (looking North West) | |
24. | Kapit Beach foreshore | |
25. | Kapit Beach – geothermal discharges and sulphurous deposits | |
26. | Crushing Plant | |
27. | Conveyor and run of mine stockpile | |
28. | Autoclaves | |
29. | Oxygen Plant | |
30. | Processing Plant | |
31. | Settlement Pond and Oil Tank Farm | |
32. | Tailings De-aeration Plant | |
33. | Oil tanks, boat wharves, mine site and caldera (looking West) | |
34. | Loading barge with waste rock | |
35. | Bottom dump barge | |
36. | Operating quarry (Kul) | |
37. | Operating quarry (Putput) |
Page V-1
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
38. | Natural revegetation of abandoned quarry (Potzlaka) | |
39. | Natural revegetation of abandoned quarry (Putput) | |
40. | Revegetated pit benches (South Western pit rim) | |
41. | Revegetated pit benches (Western pit rim) | |
42. | Mine site — rehabilitated road verges | |
43. | Airport – rehabilitated airstrip verges | |
44. | LMC Nursery –shade house used for growing seedlings for revegetation/transplantation | |
45. | LMC Nursery – seedlings awaiting transplanting | |
46. | Lihir Airport | |
47. | Lihir Medical Centre |
Page V-2
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 1. Aerial view of Pit operations | Plate 2. View of Pit operations (looking East) | |
(Caldera rim in background)
Page V-3
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
(Kapit South (covered) & Kapit North (uncovered))
Plate 5. Kapit South stockpile (looking South) (Northern pit perimeter channel in foreground) |
Plate 6. Topsoil stockpiles | |
Page V-4
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Kapit Beach | Kapit Sediment Trap | Kapit South LGOS |
Plate 8. Northern drainage channel & discharge point to sediment trap |
Plate 9. Kapit sediment trap | |
Page V-5
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 10. Northern drainage channel (looking West) (in between Kapit South and Kapit North LGOS) |
Plate 11. Northern drainage channel (looking East) |
|
Plate 12. Construction of northern drainage channel |
Plate 13. Completed northern perimeter drainage channel |
|
Page V-6
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 14. Southern Perimeter Drainage | Plate 15. Southern Perimeter Drainage | |
Channel (including geothermal effluent discharges) | Channel | |
(Monitoring point and Discharge point) | ||
Plate 16. Dewatering bores | Plate 17. Stream sampling point and monitoring station |
|
Page V-7
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 18. Pit de-pressurisation bores | Plate 19. Geothermal vents | |
Plate 20. 6MW Geothermal power station | Plate 21. Geothermal hot springs | |
Page V-8
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 22. Natural geothermal activity | Plate 23. Kapit Beach (looking North West) | |
Plate 24. Kapit Beach foreshore | Plate 25. Kapit Beach – geothermal discharges including gases and sulphur deposits |
|
Page V-9
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 26. Crushing Plant | Plate 27. Conveyor and run of mine stockpile | |
Plate 28. Autoclaves | Plate 29. Oxygen Plant | |
Page V-10
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 30. Processing Plant | Plate 31. Settlement Pond and Oil Tank Farm | |
Plate 32. Tailings De-aeration Plant | Plate 33. Oil tanks, boat wharves, mine site and caldera (looking West) |
|
Page V-11
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 34. Loading Barge with waste rock | Plate 35. Bottom dump barge | |
Plate 36. Operating quarry (Kul) | Plate 37. Operating quarry (Putput) | |
Page V-12
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 38. Natural revegetation of abandoned quarry (Potzlaka) |
Plate 39. Natural revegetation of abandoned quarry (Putput) | |
Plate 40. Revegetated pit benches (South Western pit rim) |
Plate 41. Revegetated pit benches (Western pit rim) | |
Page V-13
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 42. Mine site — rehabilitated road verges | Plate 43. Airport – Rehabilitated verges | |
Plate 44. LMC Nursery –shade house used for growing seedlings for revegetation/transplantation |
Plate 45. LMC Nursery — seedlings awaiting transplanting | |
Page V-14
Lihir Gold Mine – Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Plate 46. Lihir Airport | Plate 47. Lihir Medical Centre | |
Page V-15
Lihir Gold Mine — Mine Closure Plan Update 2004
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) 2004 | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL COST SUMMARY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Date Closure - 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | PLANT SUMMARY |
ls | 1 | 25,150,289 | 25,150,289 | |||||||||||||||
2 | MINE SUMMARY |
ls | 1 | 156,823,388 | 156,823,388 | |||||||||||||||
3 | TOWN SUMMARY |
ls | 1 | 6,716,688 | 6,716,688 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 188,690,364 |
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Planned Closure Stage 1 -2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | PLANT SUMMARY |
ls | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
2 | MINE SUMMARY |
ls | 1 | 9,684,447 | 9,684,447 | |||||||||||||||
3 | TOWN SUMMARY |
ls | 1 | 136,606 | 136,606 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 9,821,053 |
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Planned Closure Stage 2 - 2040 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | PLANT SUMMARY |
ls | 1 | 25,150,289 | 25,150,289 | |||||||||||||||
2 | MINE SUMMARY |
ls | 1 | 53,749,294 | 53,749,294 | |||||||||||||||
3 | TOWN SUMMARY |
ls | 1 | 6,580,081 | 6,580,081 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 85,479,663 |
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Planned Closure Stage 3 - 2042 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | FIVE YEAR MONITORING PERIOD |
ls | 1 | 27,383,874 | 27,383,874 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 27,383,874 |
Page 1 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Hourly | ||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Rate | ||||||
LABOUR RATES | ||||||||
LMC EMPLOYEES | ||||||||
1 | Expat Supervisor |
200 | ||||||
2 | Expat Tardesman |
120 | ||||||
3 | National Supervisor |
65 | ||||||
4 | National L/H Tradesman |
45 | ||||||
5 | National Tradesman |
35 | ||||||
CONTRACTORS | ||||||||
9 | Expat Supervisor |
200 | ||||||
10 | Expat Tardesman |
120 | ||||||
11 | National Supervisor |
65 | ||||||
12 | National L/H Tradesman |
45 | ||||||
13 | National Tradesman |
35 | ||||||
14 | L/H Labourer |
12 | ||||||
15 | Labourer |
8 | ||||||
16 | ||||||||
17 | Transport |
10 |
- XXX Xxxxx Rates
- currency conversions; Kina 1.00 = US$0.26 and Kina 1.00 = AUS$0.40
Plant No | Description | Rate US$ | Rate PGK | |||||||||
LAKAKA PLANT | 0.26 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
HOURLY RATES | ||||||||||||
72 | Cat 330 Excavator |
103.49 | 369.60 | |||||||||
75 | Cat 330 Excavator |
68.27 | 243.81 | |||||||||
211 | PC120 Excavator |
36.40 | 130.00 | |||||||||
212 | PC300 Excavator |
87.85 | 313.75 | |||||||||
214 | PC200 Excavator |
58.07 | 207.39 | |||||||||
258 | D85E Dozer |
96.78 | 345.66 | |||||||||
261 | Komatsu D155 Dozer |
124.12 | 443.30 | |||||||||
308 | WA470 Loader |
82.09 | 293.19 | |||||||||
309 | WA250 Loader |
53.48 | 191.00 | |||||||||
404 | 623 Grader |
65.77 | 234.88 | |||||||||
405 | 623 Grader |
65.77 | 234.88 | |||||||||
504 | Roller - SD100 |
49.18 | 175.65 | |||||||||
505 | Roller - SD100 |
49.18 | 175.65 | |||||||||
604 | Hino Dump |
52.32 | 186.84 | |||||||||
620 | MT30 |
112.26 | 400.92 | |||||||||
621 | MT31 |
91.02 | 325.07 | |||||||||
622 | MT32 |
112.26 | 400.92 | |||||||||
623 | Hino Dump |
52.32 | 186.84 | |||||||||
624 | Hino Dump |
52.32 | 186.84 | |||||||||
625 | Hino Dump |
52.32 | 186.84 | |||||||||
1081 | IR Roller |
46.55 | 166.24 | |||||||||
1215 | Cat 330 Excavator |
68.27 | 243.81 | |||||||||
1216 | Cat 330 Excavator |
68.27 | 243.81 | |||||||||
1621 | Cat 16G Grader |
77.58 | 277.06 | |||||||||
1622 | Cat 16G Grader |
77.58 | 277.06 | |||||||||
1689 | Cat 988 Loader |
125.67 | 448.84 | |||||||||
2006 | Cat D400 Truck |
88.44 | 315.85 | |||||||||
2007 | Cat D400 Truck |
88.44 | 315.85 | |||||||||
2008 | Cat D400 Truck |
88.44 | 315.85 | |||||||||
2009 | Cat D400 Truck |
88.44 | 315.85 | |||||||||
2013 | Cat 773 Truck |
108.61 | 387.88 | |||||||||
75R | Cat 330 Rockbreaker |
103.53 | 369.77 |
Plant No | Description | Rate US$ | Rate PGK | |||||||||
XXX PLANT | 0.26 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
HOURLY RATES | ||||||||||||
1 | Forklift - 32/28T |
40.40 | 155.40 | |||||||||
2 | Forklift - 10T |
13.18 | 50.70 | |||||||||
3 | Forklift - 6T |
13.18 | 50.70 | |||||||||
4 | Forklift - 2.5T |
11.22 | 43.15 | |||||||||
5 | Prime Mover 6x4 |
16.12 | 62.00 | |||||||||
6 | Prime Mover 6x6 |
16.90 | 65.00 | |||||||||
7 | Trailer - 40Ft/35T |
1.56 | 6.00 | |||||||||
8 | Low Loader - 110T |
3.90 | 15.00 | |||||||||
9 | Trailer - SLM for 20FT |
5.20 | 20.00 | |||||||||
10 | Mobile Crane - 16T |
18.20 | 70.00 | |||||||||
11 | Mobile Crane - 18T |
45.50 | 175.00 | |||||||||
12 | Mobile Crane - 30T |
41.60 | 160.00 | |||||||||
13 | Mobile Crane - 45T |
67.60 | 260.00 | |||||||||
14 | Mobile Crane - 60T |
35.10 | 135.00 | |||||||||
15 | Manitowoc 4100W - 250T |
104.00 | 400.00 | |||||||||
16 | Body Truck - 15T |
15.60 | 60.00 | |||||||||
17 | Body Truck + Hiab |
16.38 | 63.00 | |||||||||
18 | Pickup 4x4 |
8.84 | 34.00 |
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | Rehabilitation Rate |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assume depth of top soil = 200mm |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qty top soil for 1000m2 = 200m3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
D400 + Loader required for 4 hrs to cart
topsoil from stockpile to site |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1 shift can complete 1000 m2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assume crew is 1 LH + 6 labourers per
shift |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assume I x Cat 330 excavator for 1 shift |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour Cost |
hr | 70 | 60.00 | 4,200 | |||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Plant Cost - Excavator |
hr | 70 | 243.81 | 17,067 | |||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Plant Cost - D400 |
hr | 4 | 315.85 | 1,263 | |||||||||||||||||||
1.4 | Plant Cost - Loader to load top soil |
hr | 4 | 448.84 | 1,795 | (1000m2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
1.5 | Sub-Total |
24,326 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1.6 | Rate per Sq.m |
m2 | 1 | 24.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Removal Rate for Concrete Plinths |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Assume I x Cat 330 excavator with
hydraulic rock breaker |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assume I x Cat 330 excavator with bucket
to load out |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1 x D400 to cart |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allow for 2 local labourers as spotters |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hourly Rate |
hr | 1 | 481.00 |
Page 2 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) | |||||||||||||||
COST SUMMARY 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | CRUSHER |
ls | 1 | 396,768 | 396,768 | |||||||||||||||
2 | CONVEYORS |
ls | 1 | 1,084,102 | 1,084,102 | |||||||||||||||
3 | GRINDING CIRCUIT |
ls | 1 | 708,235 | 708,235 | |||||||||||||||
4 | PRESSURE OXIDATION |
ls | 1 | 1,932,650 | 1,932,650 | |||||||||||||||
5 | THICKENERS |
ls | 1 | 1,500,096 | 1,500,096 | |||||||||||||||
6 | CIL |
ls | 1 | 911,328 | 911,328 | |||||||||||||||
7 | GOLD RECOVERY |
ls | 1 | 435,678 | 435,678 | |||||||||||||||
8 | OXYGEN PLANTS |
ls | 1 | 1,778,484 | 1,778,484 | |||||||||||||||
9 | POWER STATION |
ls | 1 | 1,506,892 | 1,506,892 | |||||||||||||||
10 | 30MW POWER STATION |
ls | 1 | 898,804 | 898,804 | |||||||||||||||
11 | LIME PLANT |
ls | 1 | 427,692 | 427,692 | |||||||||||||||
12 | OIL & WATER TANKS |
ls | 1 | 904,342 | 904,342 | |||||||||||||||
13 | TAILINGS |
ls | 1 | 676,308 | 676,308 | |||||||||||||||
14 | MAJOR BUILDINGS |
ls | 1 | 1,036,020 | 1,036,020 | |||||||||||||||
15 | MINOR BUILDINGS |
ls | 1 | 451,127 | 451,127 | |||||||||||||||
16 | WORKSHOPS |
ls | 1 | 880,582 | 880,582 | |||||||||||||||
17 | ELECTRICAL |
ls | 1 | 919,111 | 919,111 | |||||||||||||||
18 | MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS |
ls | 1 | 3,036,156 | 3,036,156 | |||||||||||||||
19 | GENERAL AND OVERHEAD COST ITEMS |
ls | 1 | 1,474,200 | 1,474,200 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 20,958,574 | |||||||||||||||||||
Contingency @ 20% (on all costs) |
ls | 1 | 4,191,715 | |||||||||||||||||
PLANT SUMMARY |
Total | 25,150,289 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Cost (PNG Kina) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Page 3 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
These notes are applicable to all worksheets and are given here so as not to be repeated. | ||
1 | General Demolition | |
1.1 | The scope of work includes all identified equipment and facilities to be removed to be generally demolished down to ground level, including all plinths and up stands. Concrete slabs and services below ground will remain. | |
1.2 | The predominant method of material disposal from demolished buildings, facilities and equipment at the mine site is via direct placement / disposal into the mine pit base. | |
1.3 | Material which poses a risk to health or the environment e.g. tyres, electrical transformers, fuels, chemicals, re-agents and similar hazardous materials including — but not limited to — asbestos, ceramic fibre, chlorofluorocarbons (CFC s), Polychlorobiphenyls (PCB s), radioactive materials or mercury — to be removed from the site and to be disposed of as directed by the Project Manager | |
1.4 | Material agreed by LMC to be of value for re-use by the local indigenous population which can be viably retained will be stockpiled in defined locations for subsequent recovery by local residents. | |
1.5 | External vendors removing selected items of salvageable material which have been sold to outside organisations who are to remove materials from site at their cost shall be treated as an outside contractor and shall complete all site and safety inductions and shall comply with all operating and safety procedures applicable to the site | |
1.6 | Ground slabs may remain. All reinforcing bars and anchor bolts shall be cut or ground flush with top of slab level. | |
Top of slab shall be deemed to be top of plinth in the case of large plinths, (i.e. where the plinth is actually the predominant upper surface level) with prevailing ground contours adjusted by filling and grading to suit such a surface level. It is assumed selected filing shall be stockpiled during mining operations | ||
All areas shall be left suitable for access by vehicles or personnel without the risk of punctures or trip hazards. | ||
1.7 | Where existing ground slabs within former building footprints fall to sumps or trench drains, such sump or trench drain inverts shall be holed or cracked to ensure water cannot collect and then backfilled and compacted with clean fill to prevailing existing surface contours. | |
1.8 | The adjacent surrounding ground shall be locally graded away from slabs — to prevent ponding and to allow runoff to flow into existing stormwater ditches or drains around the demolition site. | |
1.9 | All works shall comply with the Demolition Plan and Demolition Methodology Statement |
Page 4 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
CRUSHER | ||||||||||||||||||||
Primary Crusher, Conveyor CV001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl Crusher, Bins,
Apron Feeders, Structural Steel, Conveyors,
etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Crusher |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Conveyor CV001 = 78m length |
lm | 78 | |||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Crusher |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Remove 2 x steel bins, store at wharf lay down area |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Remove Structural Steel |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Remove crusher |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.4 | Remove Primary Ore Apron Feeder |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.5 | Remove Soft Ore Reclaim feeder |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.6 | Electrical covered in Section 16 - Electrical work |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Conveyor CV001 = 362m length |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume conveyor can be cut into 20 Std 3m Modules plus 7 special modules and
shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | Number of standard 3m modules = 20 |
ea | 20 | |||||||||||||||||
2.3 | Number of Special Modules = 7 |
ea | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
2.4 | Rubber belts - 78m x 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections so that the one crew handles all the conveyor sections. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load straight onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Crusher |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the crusher can be dismantled and stacked in 30 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
No of shifts required |
shift | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x45 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
hr | 260 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x60 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
hr | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard |
hr | 68 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover and low loader is used to move material to lay down yard |
hr | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | Conveyor CV001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume 6 x 3m std modules can be dismantled and stacked in a 12-hour shift. |
||||||||||||||||||||
No of Std 3m modules |
ea | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
No of special modules |
ea | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
No of shifts required |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
hr | 160 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard |
hr | 68 | ||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Local |
hr | 8 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Transport - Labourers |
hr | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Crusher |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 8 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 432 | 344.00 | 148,608 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman (half-time) |
hr | 180 | 135.00 | 24,300 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 360 | 260.00 | 93,600 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 360 | 68.00 | 24,480 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Prime Mover + Low Loader to remove heavy sections to lay down yard (half-
time)
|
hr | 180 | 80.00 | 14,400 | |||||||||||||||
1.6 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 24 | 481.00 | 11,544 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 316,932 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Conveyor CV001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 72 | 172.00 | 12,384 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 60 | 160.00 | 9,600 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 31,836 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level and work consists of placing topsoil and grading only |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Area of site |
m2 | 2,000 | 24.00 | 48,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 48,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 396,768 |
Page 5 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
CONVEYORS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Primary Crushed Ore Conveyor, Stacker & Mill Feed Conveyors, Stacker , Reclaim Feeders & Escape Tunnels | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 1,2,3,4,5,43,56,57,64. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl conveyors, transfer
stations & stacker |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G reclaim feeders and escape tunnels |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Conveyor CV002 - Primary Crushed Ore Conveyor = 880m length |
lm | 880 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Conveyor CV003 - Stacker Feed Conveyor = 362m length |
lm | 362 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Transfer Stn 1 - western end |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Trolley Take up Tower-western end |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | CV2/CV3 Transfer Station-item 56 - Dwg 131 - M - 015 |
|||||||||||||||||||
6 | CV3/Stacker Transfer Station-item 57- Dwg 131 - M - 016 |
|||||||||||||||||||
7 | Radial Stacker item 3 - 68m radius |
lm | 68 | |||||||||||||||||
8 | Coarse Ore Stockpile-item 4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
9 | Mill Feed conveyor-item 5 |
lm | 152 | |||||||||||||||||
10 | Reclaim Feeders-item 43 - Dwg 132 - M - 002 |
|||||||||||||||||||
11 | Escape Tunnels - 2 x 28m length |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Conveyor-CV002 = 880m length |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Assume conveyor can be cut into 128 Std Modules plus trusses and special modules and
shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Number of standard 6m modules = 128 |
ea | 128 | |||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Number of Special Modules item 2 = 5 |
ea | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
1.4 | Number of Trusses = 2 x 21m + 1 x 38m (assume 2 x 19m) |
ea | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
1.5 | Rubber belts - 880m x 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Conveyor CV003 - Stacker Feed Conveyor = 362m length |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume conveyor can be cut into 37 Std Modules plus trusses and special modules and
shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | Number of standard 6m modules = 37 |
ea | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
2.3 | Number of Special Modules = 2 |
ea | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
2.4 | Number of Trusses = 5 approx 20m each |
ea | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
2.5 | Trolley Take up tower |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.6 | Rubber belts - 362m x 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.0 | Transfer Station Western End |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Dismantle in sections |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.2 | No of bolt together sections = 6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.3 | Drive Unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.4 | Trolley Take up Unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.5 | Support Framing |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.0 | Trolley Take Up Tower-Western End |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Dismantle in sections |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.2 | No of bolt together sections = 6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.3 | Drive Unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.4 | Trolley Take up Unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.5 | Support Framing |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.0 | CV2/CV3 Transfer Station-item 56 |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Remove chute and bin |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.2 | Remove apron feeder |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.3 | Remove head end pulley and motor unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.4 | Dismantle Frame |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.5 | Demolish footings |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.0 | CV3/Stacker Transfer Station-Dwg 131 - M - 016 |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Remove chute and bin |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.2 | Remove apron feeder |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.3 | Remove head end pulley and motor unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.4 | Dismantle Frame |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.5 | Demolish footings |
|||||||||||||||||||
7 | Radial Stacker CV004 = 68m |
|||||||||||||||||||
7.1 | Remove chute and bin |
|||||||||||||||||||
7.2 | Remove apron feeder |
|||||||||||||||||||
7.3 | Remove head end pulley and motor unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
7.4 | Dismantle Frame |
|||||||||||||||||||
7.5 | Demolish footings |
|||||||||||||||||||
8 | Coarse Ore Stockpile - |
|||||||||||||||||||
8.1 | Use any remaining LG Ore as fill on site-no cost |
|||||||||||||||||||
8.2 | Remove remaining ore and clean up for re-hab |
|||||||||||||||||||
9 | Mill Feed Conveyor CV005 = 152m |
|||||||||||||||||||
8.1 | Dismantle in standard sections = 29 x 3m units |
ea | 29 | |||||||||||||||||
8.2 | Special sections = 6 |
ea | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
8.3 | Trusses = 3 |
ea | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
8.4 | Reclaim Feeders-dismantle and remove through tunnels-ship out as 2 x single items |
|||||||||||||||||||
8.5 | Trolley Take up unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
8.6 | Apron Feeder = 1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
10 | Reclaim Feeders |
|||||||||||||||||||
10.1 | Remove steel plates, chutes, hoppers & bins |
|||||||||||||||||||
10.2 | Remove apron feeder-lifts out through top |
|||||||||||||||||||
10.3 | Dismantle Frame |
|||||||||||||||||||
10.4 | Demolish footings |
|||||||||||||||||||
11 | Escape Tunnels = 2 x 28m |
|||||||||||||||||||
11.1 | Excavate, Remove, Backfill and re-habilitate |
Page 6 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections so that the one crew handles all the conveyor sections. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load staright onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Conveyors CV2 - length = 880lm |
lm | 880 | |||||||||||||||||
Assume 6 x 6m std modules can be dismantled and stacked in a 12-hour shift. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Time to handle 128x6m Std Modules |
shift | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time to handle 5 Special Modules |
shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time to handle 4 x truss lengths approx 20m long |
shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
No of shifts required |
shift | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
hr | 160 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard |
hr | 68 | ||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - total demolition period |
shift | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | Conveyors CV3 - length = 362lm |
lm | 362 | |||||||||||||||||
Assume 6 x 6m std modules can be dismantled and stacked in a 12-hour shift. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Time to handle 37x6m Std Modules |
shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time to handle 2 Special Modules |
shift | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time to handle 4 x truss lengths approx 20m long |
shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
No of shifts required |
shift | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
hr | 160 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard |
hr | 68 | ||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - total demolition period |
shift | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
3 | Transfer Stn Western End |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 5 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition period. |
shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | Trolley Take Up Tower |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 5 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition period. |
shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | CV2/3 Transfer Station |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 4 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition period. |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
6 | CV3/Stacker Transfer Station |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 4 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition period. |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | Radial Stacker |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 4 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition period. |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
8 | Coarse Ore Stockpile |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be removed in 2 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allow Cat 330 Excavator plus 2 x D400 Dump Trucks |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition period. |
shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
9 | Reclaim Feeders |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 4 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
At this rate, the 2 items can be completed in 8 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition period. |
shift | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | Mill Feed Conveyor |
lm | 880 | |||||||||||||||||
Assume 6 x 6m std modules can be dismantled and stacked in a 12-hour shift. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Time to handle 29x3m Std Modules |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time to handle 6 Special Modules |
shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time to handle 3 x truss lengths approx 20m long |
shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
No of shifts required |
shift | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
hr | 175 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard |
hr | 68 | ||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - total demolition period |
shift | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
11 | Escape Tunnels |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume tunnels have to be excavated and removed |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be done in 6 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one Cat 330 Excavator (c/w operator) is available. |
hr | 243.81 | ||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition period. |
shift | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Local |
hr | 8 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Transport - Labourers |
hr | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Conveyor CV002 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 374 | 172.00 | 64,397 |
Page 7 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 312 | 160.00 | 49,920 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 312 | 68.00 | 21,216 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Remove Fencing ( Labour only) |
lm | 1,200 | 10.00 | 12,000 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 176,393 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Conveyor CV003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 130 | 172.00 | 22,291 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 108 | 160.00 | 17,280 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 108 | 68.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Fencing ( Labour only) |
lm | 300 | 10.00 | 3,000 | |||||||||||||||
2.5 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 78,775 | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Transfer Station Western End |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 72 | 172.00 | 12,384 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 60 | 160.00 | 9,600 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 54,924 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Trolley Take up Unit — Western End |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 72 | 172.00 | 12,384 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 60 | 160.00 | 9,600 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||||||
4.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 54,924 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | CV2/3 Transfer Station |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||||||
5.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||||||
5.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,580 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | CV3/Stacker Transfer Station |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||||||
6.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||||||
6.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||||||
6.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,580 | |||||||||||||||||||
7 | Radial Stacker |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
7.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||||||
7.2 | 20 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||||||
7.3 | Truck + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||||||
7.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,580 | |||||||||||||||||||
8 | Coarse Ore Stockpile |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 Labourers and 1 Excavator |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour |
hr | 24 | 32.00 | 768 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 24 | 243.81 | 5,852 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Dump Trucks D400 (x 2) |
hr | 20 | 631.70 | 12,634 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 10 | 481.00 | 4,810 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 24,063 | |||||||||||||||||||
9 | Reclaim Feeders |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 120 | 172.00 | 20,640 | |||||||||||||||
9.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 100 | 160.00 | 16,000 | |||||||||||||||
9.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 100 | 68.00 | 6,800 | |||||||||||||||
9.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 72,300 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | Mill Feed Conveyor |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 130 | 172.00 | 22,291 | |||||||||||||||
10.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 108 | 160.00 | 17,280 | |||||||||||||||
10.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 108 | 68.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||||||
10.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 75,775 | |||||||||||||||||||
11 | Escape Tunnels |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 1 L/H and 6 Labourers and 1 excavator |
||||||||||||||||||||
11.1 | Labour (1 L/H at 12 Kina/hr, 6 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 96 | 60.00 | 5,760 | |||||||||||||||
11.2 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 96 | 243.81 | 23,406 | |||||||||||||||
11.3 | D400 to haul rubble |
hr | 48 | 315.85 | 15,161 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 44,327 | |||||||||||||||||||
12 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level in each item above |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
12.1 | Area of site = 1462*10 |
m2 | 14,620 | 24.00 | 350,880 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 350,880 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 1,084,102 |
Page 8 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
GRINDING CIRCUIT | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sag Mill & Classification, Ball Mill Storage, Pebble Crusher, Knelson Concentrators | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 6,39,90,92 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl Sag Mill,
Ball Storage, Pebble Plant, Knelson Cells |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete foundations and footings where
practical |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good ground and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Sag Mill and associated infrastructure |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Ball Mill Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Soft Ore Reclaim Apron Feeder Dwg 132 - M - 004 |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Ball Storage Dwg 132 - M - 025 |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Pebble Crushing Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
6 | Knelson Concentrators |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Sag Mill |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Ball Mill |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Soft Ore Reclaim Apron Feeder |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Ball Stoage |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Pebble Crusher |
|||||||||||||||||||
Crusher Station |
||||||||||||||||||||
Conveyors 7,8,9. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Take Up Towers x 3 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Conveyor Trestle Supports x 3 |
||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Knelson Cells |
|||||||||||||||||||
Scalping Screens, Feed Chutes, Overflows, Underpans etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Splitter box |
||||||||||||||||||||
Knelson Cells |
||||||||||||||||||||
Reactor |
||||||||||||||||||||
Launder |
||||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load straight
onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sag Mill & Ball Mill |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume work can be completed in 30 shifts |
shift | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume 250T crane I available to lift ball xxxxx as required |
hr | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
hr | 260 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
hr | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + low loader is available to move heavy items |
hr | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is available to move other items |
hr | 68 | ||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Soft Ore Reclaim Apron Feeder |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 10 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allow to Remove all Hoppers, Bins & Chutes |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allow to Remove Apron Feeder |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allow to Remove framework & Stairs |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ball Storage 18m x 16m |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume concrete bins can be dismantled in 4 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne excavator + rock hammer is available. |
shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30T excavator and 2 x D400’s required to move rubble |
shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pebble Crusher |
Page 9 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
Assume crusher + conveyors can be dismantled in 10 shifts |
shift | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Knelson Cells |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 10 shifts |
shift | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rehabilitation |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume an area of 3000m2 |
m2 | 3,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Apply the standard rate per sq metre for the work |
||||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Sag Mill |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 12 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 00 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 432 | 376.00 | 162,432 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 360 | 135.00 | 48,600 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | 250 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman (part-time) |
hr | 72 | 400.00 | 28,800 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Prime Mover + Low Loader |
hr | 72 | 80.00 | 5,760 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 360 | 68.00 | 24,480 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 298,932 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Soft Ore Reclaim Apron Feeder |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 8 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 144 | 204.00 | 29,376 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 120 | 135.00 | 16,200 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 82,596 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Ball Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 1 LH + 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Labour (1 LH at K10/hr, 4 unskilled at K 8/hr) |
hr | 48 | 44.00 | 2,112 | |||||||||||||||
2 | Cat 330 + Rock Hammer |
hr | 24 | 369.77 | 8,874 | |||||||||||||||
2 | Cat 330 |
hr | 24 | 243.81 | 5,852 | |||||||||||||||
2 | D400’s x 2 |
hr | 48 | 315.85 | 15,161 | |||||||||||||||
3 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 60,859 | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Pebble Crusher |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 144 | 172.00 | 24,768 | |||||||||||||||
3 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 120 | 260.00 | 31,200 | |||||||||||||||
3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||||||
3 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 92,988 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Knelson Concentrators ( Not installed yet) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 1 L/H and 6 Labourers and 1 excavator |
||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 144 | 172.00 | 24,768 | |||||||||||||||
4 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 144 | 260.00 | 37,440 | |||||||||||||||
4 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 144 | 68.00 | 9,792 | |||||||||||||||
4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 100,860 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Area of site |
m2 | 3,000 | 24.00 | 72,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 72,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 708,235 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 10 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
PRESSURE OXIDATION | ||||||||||||||||||||
Autoclaves & Infrastructure incl Building, Pre Oxidation, Heat Transfer, Plant Control Room and Maintenance Storage Shed | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 8,9,34,83,84 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl Autoclaves, Tanks,
Heat Recovery plant and Buildings |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete foundations and footings where
practical |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good ground and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Autoclaves and associated infrastructure |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Pre Oxidation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Heat Recovery Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Maintenance Stoarge Shed and Autoclave Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Autoclaves |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | 3 x Autoclaves & associated pipework |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Pre Oxidation |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | 4 x Tanks & associated pipework |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Heat Recovery |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | 3 x Flash vessels |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.2 | 3 x Quench Vessels |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.3 | 3 x Heater Vessels |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.4 | Substantial Pipework |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.5 | Substantial Ductwork & Pipework |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Buildings |
|||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load staright
onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Autoclaves |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 10 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) and low loader is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 60 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre Oxidation |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 30 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) and low loader is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Heat Recovery |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the whole plant can be dismantled in 40 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) and low loader is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Plant Control Room |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 30 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) and low loader is
available. |
Page 11 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Buildings |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the building can be dismantled in 20 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rehabilitation |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume an area of 5000m2 for the Autoclave building |
m2 | 5,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume an area of 2000m2 for other sections |
m3 | 2,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Apply the standard rate per sq metre for the work |
||||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Autoclaves |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 12 tradesmen 12 Labourers and 2 cranes |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour |
hr | 720 | 516.00 | 371,520 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 600 | 135.00 | 81,000 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | 250 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman (part-time) |
hr | 216 | 400.00 | 86,400 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Prime Mover + Low Loader (part-time) |
hr | 216 | 80.00 | 17,280 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 600 | 68.00 | 40,800 | |||||||||||||||
1.6 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 625,860 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Pre-Oxidation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 432 | 274.00 | 118,368 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 360 | 260.00 | 93,600 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 360 | 68.00 | 24,480 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 265,308 | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Heat Recovery |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 540 | 344.00 | 185,760 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 450 | 135.00 | 60,750 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 450 | 68.00 | 30,600 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 305,970 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Plant Control Room |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 432 | 344.00 | 148,608 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 432 | 344.00 | 148,608 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 432 | 68.00 | 29,376 | |||||||||||||||
4.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 355,452 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Buildings |
|||||||||||||||||||
Apply Unit Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Autoclave building |
m2 | 1,000 | 129.00 | 129,000 | |||||||||||||||
5 | Maintenance Storage Shed |
hr | 200 | 271.00 | 54,200 | |||||||||||||||
5 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 212,060 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Apply Unit Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Autoclave Area |
m2 | 5,000 | 24.00 | 120,000 | |||||||||||||||
6 | Other Areas |
m2 | 2,000 | 24.00 | 48,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 168,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 1,932,650 |
Page 12 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
THICKENERS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grinding thickener 1 & 2, CCD 1 & 2, Pilot Flotation Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 7,10,11,75,93 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl Thickener
Tanks, Flotation Plant and Asociated pipework |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete foundations and footings
where practical |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good ground and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Grinding Thickener 1 - approx 18m Dia |
||||||||||||||||||||
Grinding Thickener 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
CCD Thickener 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
CCD Thickener 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pilot Flotation Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
LPA Blower |
||||||||||||||||||||
Flotation Conditioning Tanks 1&2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Reagent Head Tanks & Agitators |
||||||||||||||||||||
Flotation Tank Cells 1&2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Flotation Tank Cells 3&4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Flotation Tank Cell 5 and Rougher Tailings Xxxxxx |
||||||||||||||||||||
PAX Mixing Tank |
||||||||||||||||||||
PAX Stoarge Tank |
||||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
LPA Blower x 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Conditioning Tanks x 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Clarkson Feeders x 7 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Head Tanks x 3 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Flotation Cells x 5 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Flotation Agitators x 5 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rougher Tailings Xxxxxx x 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rougher Concentrate Pump x 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rougher Tailings Pump x 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
PAX Storage Tank x 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Feed Pumps x 3 |
||||||||||||||||||||
PAX Mixing Tank x 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
PAX Transfer Pump, Mixing Agitator, Exhaust, Drum Enclosure |
||||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Thickeners |
||||||||||||||||||||
Calculate rate per tank |
||||||||||||||||||||
Apply rate to other tanks |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pilot Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Estimate time to dismantle plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Asume tanks can be removed in one piece |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grinding Thickener 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume work can be completed in 20 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition for one tank |
shift | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pilot Flotation Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the plant can be dismantled in 25 shifts |
Page 13 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total demolition time |
shift | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rehabilitation |
||||||||||||||||||||
Calculate Area of site |
||||||||||||||||||||
Apply the standard rate per sq metre for the work |
||||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Grinding Thickener 1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Assume a crew of 12 tradesmen 12 Labourers and 2 cranes |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Labour (12 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 00 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 288 | 516.00 | 148,608 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 240 | 135.00 | 32,400 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman (half-time) |
hr | 120 | 260.00 | 31,200 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Prime Mover + Low Loader (half-time) |
hr | 120 | 80.00 | 9,600 | |||||||||||||||
1.6 | Prime Mover + Trailer (half time) |
hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||||||
1.7 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 258,828 | |||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Grinding Thickener 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
As Above |
Subtotal | 258,828 | ||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | CCD Thickener 1 |
|||||||||||||||||||
As Above |
Subtotal | 258,828 | ||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | CCD Thickener 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
As Above |
Subtotal | 258,828 | ||||||||||||||||||
3.0 | Pilot Flotation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 360 | 172.00 | 61,920 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 300 | 260.00 | 78,000 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 300 | 68.00 | 20,400 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 189,180 | |||||||||||||||||||
4.0 | Buildings |
|||||||||||||||||||
Apply Unit Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Autoclave building |
hr | 120 | 168.00 | 20,160 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | Maintenance Storage Shed |
hr | 100 | 150.00 | 15,000 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 64,020 | |||||||||||||||||||
5.0 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Apply Unit Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Tank Areas |
m2 | 8,000 | 24.00 | 192,000 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | Pilot Flotation Plant - (32 x 17)+50% |
m2 | 816 | 24.00 | 19,584 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 211,584 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) |
1,500,096 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 14 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
CIL | ||||||||||||||||||||
CIL Tanks & Assoc. Pipework, Carbon Stripping, Carbon Regen., Milk of Lime Tank | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 12,13, 14, 40 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle & remove from site all mechanical equipment incl CIL
Tanks, Carbon Stripping & Regeneration Plant, Milk of Lime
Tank etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete foundations and
footings where practical |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good ground and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
CIL Tanks Dwg 135 - M - 001 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Carbon Stripping Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Carbon Regeneration Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Milk of Lime Tank |
||||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
CIL Tanks x 8 plus overhead pumps, Agitators, Crane Jib etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Carbon Stripping Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Carbon Regeneration Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Milk of Lime Tank plus agitators & Pumps |
||||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and
load straight onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
CIL Tanks |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume work can be completed in 60 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Time |
shift | 72 | ||||||||||||||||||
Carbon Stripping Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 20 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Time |
shift | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Carbon Regeneration Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 10 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Time |
shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Milk of Lime Tank |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 10 shifts |
Page 15 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Time |
shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rehabilitation |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume an area on 2500m2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Apply the standard rate per sq metre for the work |
||||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1.0 | CIL Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 864 | 344.00 | 297,216 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 720 | 135.00 | 97,200 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 720 | 68.00 | 48,960 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 472,236 | |||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Carbon Stripping Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 288 | 172.00 | 49,536 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 240 | 260.00 | 62,400 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 240 | 68.00 | 16,320 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 157,116 | |||||||||||||||||||
3.0 | Carbon Regeneration Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 144 | 172.00 | 24,768 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 120 | 260.00 | 31,200 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 92,988 | |||||||||||||||||||
4.0 | Milk of Lime Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 1 L/H and 6 Labourers and 1 excavator |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 144 | 172.00 | 24,768 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | 45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 120 | 260.00 | 31,200 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||||||
4.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 92,988 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Area of site = 200*20 |
m2 | 4,000 | 24.00 | 96,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 96,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 911,328 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 16 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | |||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | ||||||||||||||||
GOLD RECOVERY | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gold Recovery Plant incl Building, Tanks, Cyanide Detox & Storage Tanks and Reagent Preparation Plant | |||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | |||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 15,16,18,19 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle & remove from site all mechanical equipment incl
CIL Tanks, Carbon stripping & Regen. Plant, Milk of Lime Tank etc |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete foundations and footings where
practical |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Make good ground and rehabilitate |
|||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | |||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Gold Recovery Plant & Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cyanide Detox Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cyanide Dstiorage Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reagent Preparation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Gold Recovery Plant & Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cyanide Detox Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cyanide Storage Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reagent Preparation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | |||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load
staright onto trailer |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
|||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gold Recovery Plant & Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assume work can be completed in 15 shifts |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total Demolition Time |
shift | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cyanide Detox Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 7 shifts |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total Demolition Time |
shift | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cyanide Storage Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 10 shifts |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total Demolition Time |
shift | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
Reagent Preparation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 10 shifts |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total Demolition Time |
shift | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assume an area of 5000m2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Apply the standard rate per sq metre for the work |
|||||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS |
Page 17 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Gold Recovery Plant & Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 8 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 216 | 344.00 | 74,304 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 180 | 135.00 | 24,300 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 144 | 68.00 | 9,792 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 48 | 481.00 | 23,088 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 131,484 | |||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Cyanide Detox Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 108 | 172.00 | 18,576 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 90 | 135.00 | 12,150 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 72 | 68.00 | 4,896 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 36 | 481.00 | 17,316 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 52,938 | |||||||||||||||||||
3.0 | Cyanide Storage Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 144 | 172.00 | 24,768 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 120 | 135.00 | 16,200 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 96 | 68.00 | 6,528 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 36 | 481.00 | 17,316 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 64,812 | |||||||||||||||||||
4.0 | Reagent Preparation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 1 L/H and 6 Labourers and 1 excavator |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 144 | 172.00 | 24,768 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | 20 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 120 | 135.00 | 16,200 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||||||
4.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 36 | 481.00 | 17,316 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 66,444 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Area of site |
m2 | 5,000 | 24.00 | 120,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 120,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 435,678 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 18 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
OXYGEN PLANTS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Linde and Praxair Plants, Filtered Water Plant & Plant Air (Stand By) | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 22,67 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site to wharf all mechanical plant, pipework, fittings
and buildings |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services as required |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Linde Plant |
m2 | 3,500 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Praxair Plant |
m2 | 2,500 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Filtered Water Plant Dwg 181 - M - 001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Plant Air (Stand By) Dwg 181 - M - 001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Linde Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Gold Recovery Plant & Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Cyanide Detox Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Cyanide Dstiorage Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.4 | Reagent Preparation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Praxair Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Gold Recovery Plant & Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Cyanide Detox Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | Cyanide Storage Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.3 | Reagent Preparation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.0 | Filtered Water Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Filtered Water package Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.2 | Pumps |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.3 | Filtered Water Tnk |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.0 | Plant Air (Stand By) |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Compressors |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.2 | Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections so that the one crew handles most of the work |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load staright onto
trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
Estimate cost of buildings on square metre basis |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Linde Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Assume plant can be dismantled into modules and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Assume time for dismantling is 90 shifts |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.4 | Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.5 | Total Demolition Time |
shift | 108 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Praxair Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume plant can be dismantled into modules and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | Assume time for dismantling is 45 shifts |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.3 | Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.4 | Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
Page 19 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
2.5 | Total Demolition Time |
shift | 54 | |||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Linde Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 12 tradesmen 12 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (12 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 00 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 1,296 | 516.00 | 668,736 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 1,080 | 135.00 | 145,800 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | 250 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman (half-time) |
hr | 540 | 400.00 | 216,000 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 1,080 | 68.00 | 73,440 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Prime Mover + Low Loader to remove sections to lay down yard (part-time) |
hr | 360 | 80.00 | 28,800 | |||||||||||||||
1.6 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 1,161,636 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Praxair Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 12 tradesmen 12 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (12 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 00 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 648 | 516.00 | 334,368 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 540 | 135.00 | 72,900 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 540 | 68.00 | 36,720 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 472,848 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Area of Linde site |
m2 | 3,500 | 24.00 | 84,000 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | Area of Praxair site |
m2 | 2,500 | 24.00 | 60,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 144,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 1,778,484 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 20 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
POWER STATION | ||||||||||||||||||||
Power Generation Plant, Tank Farm, Fuel Prep Plant, Incinerator, Wartsila Workshop | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 23,46,47,48,71 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl
buildings |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services as required |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Power Stn Dwg Wartsila 1V76L3525 |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Tank farm |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Fuel Prep |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Incinertaor |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Wartsila Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Power Station 80m x 35m |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Assume the mechanical generators can be dismantled into modules and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Assume time to dismantle is 90 shifts |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Dismantle each motor generator for removal |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.4 | The primary control room will have to remain until last |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Power Stn Tank Farm |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume each tank can be cut into sections and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | Number of tanks = 4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Fuel Prep |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Assume all parts can be dismantled into workable sections and dumped. |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Incinerator |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Assume the whole plant will be dismantled and either dumped or salvaged. |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.2 | Assume the incinerator will remain until last |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Actual size = 80 x 35 |
|||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections so that the one crew handles all the conveyor
sections. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load staright onto
trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Power Stn - Mechanical Equipment |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the whole plant can be demolished in 90 x 12-hour shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250 tonne and 60-tonne crane (c/w operators and dogmen) are
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 108 |
Page 21 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
Tank Farm |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one tank can be dismantled in 3 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
At this rate, the 4 items can be completed in 12 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fuel Prep |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 4 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
At this rate, the 2 items can be completed in 8 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Incinerator |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 4 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
At this rate, the 2 items can be completed in 8 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Building |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume they have to be excavated and removed |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be done in 20 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one Cat 330 Excavator (c/w operator) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen — skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers — Leading Hand — Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers — unskilled — Local |
hr | 8 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Transport — Labourers |
hr | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Power Station |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 12 tradesmen 12 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (12 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 12 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 1,296 | 516.00 | 668,736 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 250 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman (part-time) |
hr | 324 | 400.00 | 129,600 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman (half-time) |
hr | 648 | 135.00 | 87,480 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Prime Mover + Low Loader (part-time) |
hr | 324 | 80.00 | 25,920 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Prime Mover + Trailer (half-time) |
hr | 648 | 71.00 | 46,008 | |||||||||||||||
1.6 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 963,516 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Tank farm |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 8 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 168 | 344.00 | 57,792 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 140 | 135.00 | 18,900 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 140 | 68.00 | 9,520 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 36 | 481.00 | 17,316 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 103,528 | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Fuel Prep |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 120 | 172.00 | 20,640 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 100 | 175.00 | 17,500 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 100 | 68.00 | 6,800 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 24 | 481.00 | 11,544 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 56,484 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Incinerator |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 120 | 172.00 | 20,640 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 100 | 175.00 | 17,500 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 100 | 68.00 | 6,800 | |||||||||||||||
4.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,712 |
Page 22 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
5 | Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 8 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 288 | 172.00 | 49,536 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 240 | 175.00 | 42,000 | |||||||||||||||
5.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 192 | 68.00 | 13,056 | |||||||||||||||
5.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 133,452 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Area of site = (80x60)+(70*50) |
m2 | 8,300 | 24.00 | 199,200 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 199,200 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 1,506,892 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 23 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
30MW POWER STATION | ||||||||||||||||||||
Power Generation Plant, Tank Farm, Fuel Prep Plant, Incinerator, Wartsila Workshop | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl
buildings relating to the 30MW Power Station |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services as required |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 30 MW Power Stn |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Cooling Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Steam line |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Other items |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Power Station 40m x 35m |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Assume the
mechanical equipment can be dismantled into modules and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Assume time to dismantle is 90 shifts |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Dismantle each turbine and condensor for removal |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.4 | The primary control room will have to remain until last |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Cooling Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume each
item can be dismantled and shipped out as such if required |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | Number of cooling towers = 4 |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Steam Line |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Assume the steam line will be cut into sections and dumped |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.2 | Footings to be cut to ground line and covered |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Assume the building will be demolished and some materials salveged |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Other Items |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Associated building to be demolished and dumped |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.2 | Carpark to be rehabilitated |
|||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections so that the one crew handles all the
conveyor sections. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load staright
onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Power Stn |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the mechanical plant can be dismantled in 30 x 12-hour shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250 tonne and 60-tonne crane (c/w operators and dogmen)
are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
No allowance for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cooling Towers |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one tank can be dismantled in 3 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
At this rate, the 4 items can be completed in 12 shifts |
Page 24 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Steam Line |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 20 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Building |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 10 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
At this rate, the 2 items can be completed in 8 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Items |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume they have to be excavated and removed |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be done in 8 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one Cat 330 Excavator (c/w operator) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations, for a total construction
period of 10 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Local |
hr | 8 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Transport - Labourers |
hr | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Power Station |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 12 tradesmen 12 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (12 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 12 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 360 | 516.00 | 185,760 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 250 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman (part-time) |
hr | 90 | 400.00 | 36,000 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman (half-time) |
hr | 180 | 135.00 | 24,300 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Prime Mover + Low Loader (part-time) |
hr | 90 | 80.00 | 7,200 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Prime Mover + Trailer (half-time) |
hr | 180 | 71.00 | 12,780 | |||||||||||||||
1.6 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 294,900 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Cooling Towers |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 8 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 168 | 344.00 | 57,792 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 140 | 135.00 | 18,900 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 140 | 68.00 | 9,520 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 115,072 | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Steam Line |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 288 | 172.00 | 49,536 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 240 | 160.00 | 38,400 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 240 | 68.00 | 16,320 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 120 | 481.00 | 57,720 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 161,976 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 6 unskilled at 8 K/Hr) |
hr | 144 | 258.00 | 37,152 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 120 | 160.00 | 19,200 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||||||
4.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 93,372 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Other Items |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
Page 25 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
5.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) x 10 shifts |
hr | 36 | 172.00 | 6,192 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 30 | 160.00 | 4,800 | |||||||||||||||
5.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 24 | 68.00 | 1,632 | |||||||||||||||
5.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 41,484 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Area of site = 100x80 |
m2 | 8,000 | 24.00 | 192,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 192,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 898,804 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 26 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
LIME PLANT | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lime Plant, Lignisol & Floc Storage, Caustic Mixer, Acid Storage, | ||||||||||||||||||||
Demin Plant | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 24, 38, 20,21,29 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl
conveyors, transfer stations & stacker |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Lime Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Lignisol & Floc Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Caustic Mixer |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Acid Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Demineralisation plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Lime Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Assume lime plant can be demolished into modules and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Disassemble into individual components |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Dismantle building |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Lignisol & Floc Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume the plant can be demolished into modules and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | Disassemble into individual components |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.3 | Remove building |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Caustic Mixer |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Assume the plant can be demolished into modules and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Disassemble into individual components |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Remove building |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Acid Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Assume the plant can be demolished into modules and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Demineralisation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Assume the plant can be demolished into modules and shipped out as such |
|||||||||||||||||||
8 | Acid Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the
plant can be demolished into modules and shipped out as such |
||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Demineralisation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the
plant can be demolished into modules and shipped out as such |
||||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections so that the one crew handles all
the sections. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and
load staright onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lime Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the whole plant can be demolished in 10 x 12-hour shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250 tonne and 60-tonne crane (c/w operators
and dogmen) are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lignisol & Floc Storage |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the whole plant can be demolished in 5 x 12-hour shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250 tonne and 60-tonne crane (c/w operators
and dogmen) are available.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Caustic Mixer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the whole plant can be demolished in 4 x 12-hour shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250 tonne and 60-tonne crane (c/w operators
and dogmen) are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
Page 27 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acid Storage |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the whole plant can be demolished in 4 x 12-hour shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume
one 250 tonne and 60-tonne crane (c/w operators and dogmen) are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Demineralisation Plant |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume the whole plant can be demolished in 5 x 12-hour shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 250 tonne and 60-tonne crane (c/w operators
and dogmen) are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers -
Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers -
unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Lime Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 6 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 144 | 258.00 | 37,152 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 120 | 135.00 | 16,200 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 90,372 | |||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Lignisol & Floc Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 72 | 258.00 | 18,576 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 72 | 135.00 | 9,720 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 61,236 | |||||||||||||||||||
3.0 | Caustic Mixer |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,580 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Acid Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||||||
4.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,580 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Demineralisation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 72 | 172.00 | 12,384 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 60 | 160.00 | 9,600 | |||||||||||||||
5.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||||||
5.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 54,924 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Area of site = 100x50 |
m2 | 5,000 | 24.00 | 120,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 120,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 427,692 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 28 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
OIL & WATER TANKS | ||||||||||||||||||||
HDFO Tanks, Light Oil Tanks, Sump Pumps , Containment Sump Pump, Process Tank, Fire Pumps, Sea Water Pump, Chlorination Plant & Potable Water Tank | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 25, 26, 27, 37, 42, 49, 53. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site heavy and light fuel tanks, sump
pumps, process and fire pumps, sea water pump stn, Cl2 plant and pot
water tank |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove any contaminated soil |
||||||||||||||||||||
Backfill containment sumps, make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2 x XXXX Xxxxx Xxx 000 - X- 000 |
|||||||||||||||||||
0 | 0 x Light Oil Tanks Dwg 192 - P- 001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Tank Farm Sump
Pump - Dwg 192 - P- 001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Containment Pond sump pump |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Process Tank 123 |
|||||||||||||||||||
6 | Fire Pumps |
|||||||||||||||||||
7 | Sea Water Pumps |
|||||||||||||||||||
8 | Chlorination
Plant - Dwg 181 - M - 001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
9 | Potable Water
Tank - Dwg 181 -M - 001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2 x HDFO Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume Tanks can be cut into sections and shipped out as such |
||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 2 x Light Oil Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume Tanks can be cut into sections and shipped out as such |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allow to take up Fuel Lines from Wharf. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Tank Farm Sump Pump |
|||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and ship out as an item |
||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Containment Pond sump pump |
|||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and disopose of as an item |
||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Process Tank 123 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume Tanks can be cut into sections and shipped out as such |
||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Fire Pumps |
|||||||||||||||||||
Allow for Fire Pumps and Process Water Pumps |
||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Sea Water Pumps |
|||||||||||||||||||
Allow for demolition of whole Sea Water Pump Station |
||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Chlorination Plant |
|||||||||||||||||||
Allow for Disposal of Toxic Chemicals |
||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Potable Water Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assume Tanks can be cut into segments and either shipped out
or disposed of. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load
straight onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping
or into dump. |
||||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 2 x HDFO Tanks |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume tanks need to be flushed and cleaned prior to dismantling |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one tank can be dismantled in 12 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
At this rate, the 2 items can be completed in 24 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 60-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
Page 29 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | shift | 29 | ||||||||||||||
2
|
2 x Light Oil Tanks | |||||||||||||||
Assume tanks need to be flushed and cleaned prior to dismantling | ||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 10 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
At this rate, the 2 items can be completed in 20 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | shift | 24 | ||||||||||||||
3
|
Tank Farm Sump Pump | |||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 2 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | shift | 3 | ||||||||||||||
4
|
Containment Pond sump pump | |||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 4 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||
5
|
Process Tank 123 | |||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 4 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||
6
|
Fire Pumps & Process Pumps | |||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 4 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||
7
|
Sea Water Pumps & Plant | |||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 5 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||
8
|
Chlorination Plant | |||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 3 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | shift | 4 | ||||||||||||||
9
|
Potable Water Tank | |||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 3 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | shift | 4 | ||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen - skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Labourers - Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx | xx | 0 | |||||||||||||
0
|
Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx | xx | 10 | |||||||||||||
1
|
2 x HDFO Tanks | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 348 | 344.00 | 119,712 | |||||||||||
1.2
|
60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 290 | 135.00 | 39,150 | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 290 | 68.00 | 19,720 | |||||||||||
1.5
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 207,442 | |||||||||||||||
2
|
2 x Light Oil Tanks | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
2.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) x 15 shifts | hr | 288 | 172.00 | 49,536 | |||||||||||
2.2
|
45 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 240 | 260.00 | 62,400 | |||||||||||
2.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 240 | 68.00 | 16,320 | |||||||||||
2.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Page 30 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
3
|
Tank Farm Sump Pump | Subtotal | 157,116 | |||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
3.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 36 | 172.00 | 6,192 | |||||||||||
3.2
|
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 30 | 160.00 | 4,800 | |||||||||||
3.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 30 | 68.00 | 2,040 | |||||||||||
3.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 41,892 | |||||||||||||||
4
|
Containment Pond sump pump | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
4.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||
4.2
|
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||
4.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 21,720 | |||||||||||||||
5
|
Process Tank 123 | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
5.1
|
Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 60 | 344.00 | 20,640 | |||||||||||
5.2
|
60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 135.00 | 6,750 | |||||||||||
5.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||
5.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 59,650 | |||||||||||||||
6
|
Fire Pumps & Process Pumps | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
6.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 60 | 204.00 | 12,240 | |||||||||||
6.2
|
60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 135.00 | 6,750 | |||||||||||
6.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||
6.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 51,250 | |||||||||||||||
7
|
Sea Water Pumps & Plant | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
6.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 72 | 204.00 | 14,688 | |||||||||||
6.2
|
60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 60 | 135.00 | 8,100 | |||||||||||
6.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||
6.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 55,728 | |||||||||||||||
8
|
Chlorination Plant | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
6.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 48 | 204.00 | 9,792 | |||||||||||
6.2
|
60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 40 | 135.00 | 5,400 | |||||||||||
6.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 40 | 68.00 | 2,720 | |||||||||||
6.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 46,772 | |||||||||||||||
9
|
Potable Water Tank and Fittings | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
6.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 48 | 204.00 | 9,792 | |||||||||||
6.2
|
60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 40 | 135.00 | 5,400 | |||||||||||
6.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 40 | 68.00 | 2,720 | |||||||||||
6.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 46,772 | |||||||||||||||
10
|
Rehabilitation | |||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level | ||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates | ||||||||||||||||
10.1
|
Area of site = 180 x 50 | m2 | 9,000 | 24.00 | 216,000 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 216,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 904,342 | |||||||||||||||
Page 31 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 - Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||
TAILINGS | ||||||||||||
Tailings Drop Box, Lines, Mix Tank, De-aeration system and disposal system | ||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||
Items covered - 58,17,59,45. | ||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl pipes, drop boxes, mix tanks and tailings disposal system | ||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinforced concrete footings etc | ||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services | ||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate | ||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||
Items | ||||||||||||
1
|
Tailings line from CIL to drop Xxx | |||||||||||
0
|
Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxx - Xxx 000 - X - 000 | |||||||||||
0
|
Tailings Lines | lm | 362 | |||||||||
4
|
Mix Tank | |||||||||||
5
|
Tailings Junction Box | |||||||||||
6
|
De-Aeration system - Dwg 162 - M - 002 | |||||||||||
7
|
Disposal System Dwg 162 - M - 001 | |||||||||||
1
|
Tailings line from CIL to drop Box | |||||||||||
1.1
|
CIL Tailings dischagre launder | |||||||||||
1.2
|
Tail feed box | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Tail Bypass Box | |||||||||||
1.4
|
41m Pipe | |||||||||||
1.5
|
Transfer Box | |||||||||||
1.6
|
33m pipe | |||||||||||
1.7
|
Sampler Feed launder - Primary & Secondary | |||||||||||
1.8
|
Detox tanks 1 & 2 | |||||||||||
1.9
|
Pipework 2 x 23m | |||||||||||
2
|
Tailings Drop Box | |||||||||||
2.1
|
Size = 6015 x 5300x 4000 Deep - about 1700 below GL | |||||||||||
2.2
|
Allow to demolish with rock breaker | |||||||||||
2.3
|
Excavate rubble, cart to dump and backfill | |||||||||||
3
|
Tailings Lines | |||||||||||
3.1
|
Approximate Length = | |||||||||||
3.2
|
Number of standard 6m pipe Lengths = xx | |||||||||||
3.3
|
Number of Rubber Lengths = 5 | |||||||||||
3.4
|
Number of Specials = xx | |||||||||||
4
|
Mix Tank | |||||||||||
4.1
|
Assume conveyor can be cut into sections and carted out to dump as such | |||||||||||
4.2
|
Number of sections = 10 | |||||||||||
4.3
|
Assume 30 xxxxx xxxxx & Trailer | |||||||||||
4.4
|
Assume Cat 330 Excavator for backfill | |||||||||||
5.0
|
Tailings Junction Box | |||||||||||
5.1
|
Cut pipes entering and leaving box with Oxy Acetylene equipment | |||||||||||
5.2
|
Remove box | |||||||||||
5.3
|
Cart to disposal site | |||||||||||
6
|
De-Aeration system | |||||||||||
6.1
|
Dismantle in sections | |||||||||||
6.2
|
Assume all top sections can be removed by Crane | |||||||||||
6.3
|
Allow to demolish to Ground Level | |||||||||||
6.4
|
Backfill tank and surrounding sump | |||||||||||
7
|
Disposal System | |||||||||||
7.1
|
Block Off pipes & Seal | |||||||||||
7.2
|
Fill as required | |||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections so that the one crew handles all the conveyor sections. | ||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load staright onto trailer | ||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
Page 32 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 - Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Tailings line from CIL to drop Box | |||||||||||||||
Assume 30 Tonne Crane plus Trailer | ||||||||||||||||
Allow for Cat 330 to assist in pulling out pipes | ||||||||||||||||
Assume all can be dismantled in 10 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | Shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||
2
|
Drop Box | |||||||||||||||
Assume the installation can be dismantled and removed in 6 x 12-hour shifts. | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | Shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Allow for Cat 330 with rock breaker for 2 shifts | Shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Allow for Cat 330 and D400 to load and remove | Shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Allow for Cat 330 and D400 to backfill | Shift | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | Shift | 8 | ||||||||||||||
3
|
Tailings lines | |||||||||||||||
Assume all can be dismantled in 10 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | Shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||
4
|
Mix Tank | |||||||||||||||
Assume all can be dismantled in 4 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | Shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||
5
|
Junction Box | |||||||||||||||
Assume all can be dismantled in 4 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | Shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||
6
|
De-Aeration System | |||||||||||||||
Assume top can be dismantled in 5 shifts | Shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||||||
Allow Cat 330 + Rockbreaker to demolish top for 3 shifts | Shift | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Allow Loader to load + D400’s to cart fill + Cat 330 to place | ||||||||||||||||
Allow 3 shifts for backfill | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | Shift | 8 | ||||||||||||||
7
|
Disposal System | |||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 4 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact | ||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period | Shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen - skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Labourers - Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers - unskilled - Local | hr | 8 | |||||||||||||
4
|
Transport - Labourers | hr | 10 | |||||||||||||
1
|
Tailings line from CIL to drop Box | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers to dismantle and remove | ||||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 6 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 144 | 258.00 | 37,152 | |||||||||||
1.2
|
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 144 | 160.00 | 23,040 | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||
1.4
|
Cat 330 to assist | hr | 120 | 243.81 | 29,258 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 97,610 | |||||||||||||||
2
|
Drop Box | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers to dismantle and remove |
Page 33 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
2.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 96 | 172.00 | 16,512 | |||||||||||
2.2
|
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 96 | 160.00 | 15,360 | |||||||||||
2.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 80 | 68.00 | 5,440 | |||||||||||
2.4
|
Cat 330 with Rock Breaker | hr | 96 | 369.77 | 35,497 | |||||||||||
2.5
|
Cat 330 with D400 to cart and dump | hr | 96 | 559.66 | 53,728 | |||||||||||
2.6
|
Cat 330 with D400 to backfill | hr | 96 | 559.66 | 53,728 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 180,265 | |||||||||||||||
3
|
Pipelines | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane | ||||||||||||||||
3.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 144 | 172.00 | 24,768 | |||||||||||
3.2
|
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 120 | 160.00 | 19,200 | |||||||||||
3.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 96 | 68.00 | 6,528 | |||||||||||
3.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 79,356 | |||||||||||||||
4
|
Mix Tank | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane | ||||||||||||||||
4.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||
4.2
|
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||
4.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||
4.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,580 | |||||||||||||||
5
|
Junction Box | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane | ||||||||||||||||
4.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||
4.2
|
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||
4.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||
4.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,580 | |||||||||||||||
6
|
De-Aeration System | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
6.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||
6.2
|
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||
6.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||
6.4
|
Demolish top | hr | 36 | 369.77 | 13,312 | |||||||||||
6.5
|
Backfill - Cat 330 | hr | 36 | 243.81 | 8,777 | |||||||||||
6.6
|
Backfill - Loader | hr | 36 | 448.84 | 16,158 | |||||||||||
6.7
|
Backfill - D400’s x 2 (half-time) | hr | 18 | 631.70 | 11,371 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 71,338 | |||||||||||||||
7
|
Disposal System | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane | ||||||||||||||||
7.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||
7.2
|
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 160.00 | 8,000 | |||||||||||
7.3
|
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard | hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||
7.4
|
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,580 | |||||||||||||||
8
|
Rehabilitation | |||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level | ||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates | ||||||||||||||||
8.1
|
Area of site = 200x20 | m2 | 4,000 | 24.00 | 96,000 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 96,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 676,308 | |||||||||||||||
Page 34 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
MAJOR BUILDINGS | ||||||||||||||||
Warehouse, Admin Office, Laboratory, Construction Warehouse, Core Shed | ||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 31,32,35,69,80 | ||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all building components | ||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings, floors etc | ||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services | ||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate | ||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Warehouse - | |||||||||||||||
2
|
Admin Office | |||||||||||||||
3
|
Laboratory | |||||||||||||||
4
|
Construction Warehouse | |||||||||||||||
5
|
Core Shed | |||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: | ||||||||||||||||
1.0
|
Warehouse - | |||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Racking &Ceilings | |||||||||||||||
1.2
|
Internal Partitions | |||||||||||||||
1.3
|
Roof | |||||||||||||||
1.4
|
Walls | |||||||||||||||
1.5
|
Structural Steel | |||||||||||||||
1.6
|
Floor Slab | |||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||
Undertake an analysis of one major building - warehouse | ||||||||||||||||
Calculate a square metre rate for the building | ||||||||||||||||
Apply the square metre rate to other buildings - adjusted where required | ||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||
Warehouse | ||||||||||||||||
Assume all internal fittings, racking etc dmolished first | ||||||||||||||||
Remove all ceilings and electrical fittings | ||||||||||||||||
Remove all plumbing fittings Remove all wall partitions |
||||||||||||||||
Remove all external additions | ||||||||||||||||
Assume the roof can be dismantled in 4 days, numbered, bundled and stacked | ||||||||||||||||
Remove all wall cladding and girts | ||||||||||||||||
Remove roof purlins | ||||||||||||||||
Remove structural steel | ||||||||||||||||
Demolish slab and U/G services | ||||||||||||||||
Tidy up and rehabilitate | ||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
Crew Required + Rates | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen - skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Labourers - Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers - unskilled - Local | hr | 8 | |||||||||||||
4
|
Transport - Labourers | hr | 10 | |||||||||||||
1.0
|
Remove Racking | |||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts | shft | 3 | |||||||||||||
1.2
|
Crew rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||
1.3
|
Assume a rate of 200m2 per shift | |||||||||||||||
1.4
|
Labour Costs | hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||
1.5
|
20 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
1.6
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 16,344 | |||||||||||||||
2.0
|
Internal Ceilings | |||||||||||||||
2.1
|
Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 4 shifts | shft | 4 | |||||||||||||
2.2
|
Crew rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||
2.3
|
Assume a rate of 200m2 per shift | |||||||||||||||
2.4
|
Labour Costs | hr | 48 | 204.00 | 9,792 | |||||||||||
2.5
|
20 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 40 | 150.00 | 6,000 | |||||||||||
2.6
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 40 | 150.00 | 6,000 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 21,792 | |||||||||||||||
3.0
|
Electrical Fittings |
Page 35 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
3.1
|
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 5 shifts | shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
3.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||||
3.3
|
Assume job done in 5 shifts | hr | 60 | 102.00 | 6,120 | |||||||||||||
3.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
3.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 21,120 | |||||||||||||||||
4.0
|
Plumbing Fittings | |||||||||||||||||
4.1
|
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 5 shifts | shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
4.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||||
4.3
|
Assume job done in 5 shifts | hr | 60 | 102.00 | 6,120 | |||||||||||||
4.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
4.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 21,120 | |||||||||||||||||
5.0
|
Roofing incl gutters, down pipes, & purlins | |||||||||||||||||
5.1
|
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 6 shifts | shft | 6 | |||||||||||||||
5.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
5.3
|
Labour Costs | hr | 72 | 204.00 | 14,688 | |||||||||||||
5.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 60 | 150.00 | 9,000 | |||||||||||||
5.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 60 | 150.00 | 9,000 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 32,688 | |||||||||||||||||
5.0
|
Wall Cladding incl girts | |||||||||||||||||
5.1
|
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 5 shifts | shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
5.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
5.3
|
Assume job done in 5 shifts | hr | 60 | 204.00 | 12,240 | |||||||||||||
5.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
5.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 27,240 | |||||||||||||||||
6.0
|
Structural Steel | |||||||||||||||||
6.1
|
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 5 shifts | shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
6.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
6.3
|
Assume job done in 5 shifts | hr | 60 | 204.00 | 12,240 | |||||||||||||
6.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
6.5
|
Crane c/w operator + dogman | hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
6.6
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 34,740 | |||||||||||||||||
7.0
|
Removal of Slab and rehabiliatation | |||||||||||||||||
7.1
|
Assume a crew of 1 L/H + 8 Labourers and 1 excavator for 5 days | shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
7.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 76.00 | |||||||||||||||
7.3
|
Assume job done in 5 shifts | hr | 60 | 76.00 | 4,560 | |||||||||||||
7.4
|
Excavator and hammer for 5 shifts | hr | 50 | 369.77 | 18,488 | |||||||||||||
7.5
|
Removal from site - assume 2 x D400 for 2 days | hr | 40 | 315.85 | 12,634 | |||||||||||||
7.6
|
Rehabilitation - Floor Area + 20% | m2 | 2,530 | 24.00 | 60,710 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 96,393 | |||||||||||||||||
Totals | 271,437 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per sq metre | Sq/m Rate | 128.76 | ||||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 31 x 68 | 2108 | |||||||||||||||||
*Rounded rate | 129.00 |
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
OTHER BUILDINGS — Apply Square Metre Rate | m2 | 129.00 | ||||||||||||||
Admin Office, Laboratory, Construction Warehouse, Core Shed | ||||||||||||||||
2
|
Admin Building | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 60x20 | m2 | 1,200 | 129.00 | 150000 | ||||||||||||
0
|
Xxxxxxxxxx | |||||||||||||||
Xxxxx Xxxx x 31.5x17 + 28.5x20 | m2 | 1,106 | 129.00 | 142610 | ||||||||||||
4
|
Construction Warehouse | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 53x31.5 | m2 | 1,670 | 129.00 | 215366 | ||||||||||||
5
|
Core Shed | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 64x30.5 | m2 | 1,952 | 129.00 | 251808 | ||||||||||||
All Major Buildings | Totals | 1,036,020 | ||||||||||||||
Page 36 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||
MINOR BUILDINGS | ||||||||||
Communications, Logistics, Customs, Emergency Services, Oil Storage, Security Office, | ||||||||||
Soil Lab, Training Centre etc. | ||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||
Items covered - 50,85,86,91,36,55,87,70,71,72,73,74,76,77,79,82,88,89 | ||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all building components | ||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings, floors etc | ||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services | ||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate | ||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||
Configuration Details: | ||||||||||
1
|
Emergency services | |||||||||
2
|
Communications = Comms + Telephone Bldgs Put Put Dwg 223 - A - 001 | |||||||||
3
|
Customs | |||||||||
4
|
Contracts Office | |||||||||
5
|
Oil Storage by MPA | |||||||||
6
|
Oil Store Dwg 213 - M - 002 | |||||||||
7
|
Security | |||||||||
8
|
Pilot Flotation Plant MCC | |||||||||
9
|
Soils Lab | |||||||||
10
|
Comms Office | |||||||||
11
|
Oxygen Clean Room | |||||||||
12
|
Mechanical Training Room | |||||||||
13
|
Training Centre | |||||||||
14
|
Eng Projects & HR Dwg 214 - A - 016 | |||||||||
15
|
Logistics | |||||||||
Material Quantities: | ||||||||||
1.0
|
Emergencies Services | |||||||||
1.1
|
Fittings | |||||||||
1.2
|
Internal Ceilings & Partitions | |||||||||
1.3
|
Roof | |||||||||
1.4
|
Walls | |||||||||
1.5
|
Structural Steel | |||||||||
1.6
|
Floor Slab | |||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||
Undertake an analysis of one building - Emergency Services | ||||||||||
Calculate a square metre rate for the building | ||||||||||
Apply the square metre rate to other buildings - adjusted where required | ||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||
Emergency Services | ||||||||||
Assume all internal fittings, racking etc dmolished first | ||||||||||
Remove all ceilings and electrical fittings | ||||||||||
Remove all plumbing fittings | ||||||||||
Remove all wall partitions | ||||||||||
Remove all external additions | ||||||||||
Assume the roof can be dismantled in 4 days, numbered, bundled and stacked | ||||||||||
Remove all wall cladding and girts | ||||||||||
Remove roof purlins | ||||||||||
Remove structural steel | ||||||||||
Demolish blockwork walls, concrete above GL and U/G services | ||||||||||
Tidy up and rehabilitate | ||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||
Crew Required + Rates |
Page 37 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen - skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Labourers - Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers - unskilled - Local | hr | 8 | |||||||||||||
4
|
Transport - Labourers | hr | 10 | |||||||||||||
1.0
|
Remove Internal Fittings | |||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 2 shifts | shift | 2 | |||||||||||||
1.2
|
Crew rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||
1.3
|
Labour Costs | hr | 24 | 204.00 | 4,896 | |||||||||||
1.4
|
20 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 20 | 150.00 | 3,000 | |||||||||||
1.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 20 | 150.00 | 3,000 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 10,896 | |||||||||||||||
2.0
|
Internal Ceilings | |||||||||||||||
2.1
|
Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts | shift | 3 | |||||||||||||
2.2
|
Crew rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||
2.3
|
Assume a rate of 200m2 per shift — 4 shifts | |||||||||||||||
2.4
|
Labour Costs | hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||
2.5
|
20 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
2.6
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 16,344 | |||||||||||||||
3.0
|
Electrical Fittings | |||||||||||||||
3.1
|
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 3 shifts | shift | 3 | |||||||||||||
3.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||
3.3
|
Assume job done in 3 shifts | hr | 36 | 102.00 | 3,672 | |||||||||||
3.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
3.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 12,672 | |||||||||||||||
4.0
|
Plumbing Fittings | |||||||||||||||
4.1
|
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 2 shifts | shift | 2 | |||||||||||||
4.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||
4.3
|
Assume job done in 2 shifts | hr | 24 | 102.00 | 2,448 | |||||||||||
4.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 20 | 150.00 | 3,000 | |||||||||||
4.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 20 | 150.00 | 3,000 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 8,448 | |||||||||||||||
5.0
|
Roofing incl gutters, down pipes, & purlins | |||||||||||||||
5.1
|
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts | shift | 3 | |||||||||||||
5.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||
5.3
|
Labour Costs | hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||
5.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
5.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 16,344 | |||||||||||||||
5.0
|
Wall Cladding incl girts | |||||||||||||||
5.1
|
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts | shift | 3 | |||||||||||||
5.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||
5.3
|
Assume job done in 3 shifts | hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||
5.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
5.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 16,344 | |||||||||||||||
6.0
|
Structural Steel | |||||||||||||||
6.1
|
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts | shift | 3 | |||||||||||||
6.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||
6.3
|
Assume job done in 3 shifts | hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||
6.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
6.5
|
Crane c/w operator + dogman | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
6.6
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 20,844 | |||||||||||||||
7.0
|
Removal of Blockwork, Slab and rehabiliatation | |||||||||||||||
7.1
|
Assume a crew of 1 L/H + 8 Labourers and 1 excavator for 4 days | shift | 4 | |||||||||||||
7.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 76.00 | |||||||||||||
7.3
|
Assume job done in 4 shifts | hr | 48 | 76.00 | 3,648 | |||||||||||
7.4
|
Excavator and hammer for 4 shifts | hr | 40 | 369.77 | 14,791 | |||||||||||
7.5
|
Removal from site - assume Cat 330 for 2 days | hr | 20 | 243.81 | 4,876 |
Page 38 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
8.5
|
Removal from site - assume 2 x D400 for 2 days | hr | 40 | 315.85 | 12,634 | |||||||||||||
7.6
|
Rehabilitation - Floor Area + 20% | m2 | 684 | 24.00 | 16,416 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 52,365 | |||||||||||||||||
Totals | 154,257 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per sq metre | Sq/m Rate | 270.63 | ||||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 20 x 28.5 | 570 | |||||||||||||||||
*Rounded rate | 271.00 |
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
OTHER BUILDINGS — Apply Square Metre Rate | m2 | 271.00 | ||||||||||||||
Admin Office, Laboratory, Construction Warehouse, Core Shed | ||||||||||||||||
2
|
Communications - item 50 - assume 200% of Rate | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 2 x (7.6x3.6) | m2 | 55 | 542.00 | 29658 | ||||||||||||
3
|
Customs Office - item 86 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 40 Ft Container | item | 1 | 1,000.00 | 1000 | ||||||||||||
4
|
Contracts Office - item 91 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 40 Ft Container | item | 1 | 1,000.00 | 1000 | ||||||||||||
5
|
Oil Storage - by MPA - item 55 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 10.15x10.5 | m2 | 107 | 203.25 | 21661 | ||||||||||||
6
|
Oil Store - item 72 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 26 x 7.5 | m2 | 195 | 203.25 | 39000 | ||||||||||||
0
|
Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx | |||||||||||||||
Xxxxx Xxxx x 10X6 | m2 | 60 | 203.25 | 12195 | ||||||||||||
8
|
PFP MCC Building - item 76 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 10 x 7.5 | m2 | 75 | 203.25 | 15244 | ||||||||||||
9
|
Projects Soils Lab - item 77 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 40 Ft Container | item | 1 | 1,000.00 | 1000 | ||||||||||||
10
|
Comms Office - item 82 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 40 Ft Container | item | 1 | 1,000.00 | 1000 | ||||||||||||
11
|
Oxygen Clean Room - item 88 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 40 Ft Container | item | 1 | 1,000.00 | 1000 | ||||||||||||
12
|
Mechanical Training Room - item 89 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 12 x 6 | m2 | 72 | 203.25 | 14634 | ||||||||||||
13
|
Training Centre - item 79 | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 20 x 10 | m2 | 200 | 203.25 | 40650 | ||||||||||||
14
|
Eng Projects & HR Office | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 30.6 x 16.4 | m2 | 502 | 203.25 | 101999 | ||||||||||||
15
|
Logistics Office | |||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 20 x 3 | m2 | 60 | 203.25 | 12195 | ||||||||||||
All Minor Buildings | Totals | 451,127 |
Page 39 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Unit | Total Cost | |||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||
WORKSHOPS | ||||||||||||
Plant, Training, Mill, Oxygen Plant, Rubber, Pagini Workshops and Rigging Store | ||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||
Items covered - 33, 68, 78, 54, 81, 87, 70 | ||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all building components | ||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings, floors etc | ||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services | ||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate | ||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||
Configuration Details: | ||||||||||||
1
|
Plant W’shop | |||||||||||
2
|
Training W’shop | |||||||||||
3
|
Eng Projects W’shop | |||||||||||
4
|
Mill W’shop | |||||||||||
5
|
Rubber W’shop | |||||||||||
6
|
Pagini W’shop | |||||||||||
7
|
Rigging Store | |||||||||||
Material Quantities: | ||||||||||||
1.0
|
Plant W’shop | |||||||||||
1.1
|
Racking &Ceilings | |||||||||||
1.2
|
Internal Partitions | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Roof | |||||||||||
1.4
|
Walls | |||||||||||
1.5
|
Structural Steel | |||||||||||
1.6
|
Floor Slab | |||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||
Undertake an analysis of one major building - plant w’shop | ||||||||||||
Calculate a square metre rate for the building | ||||||||||||
Apply the square metre rate to other buildings - adjusted where required | ||||||||||||
Use minor building rate from section 14 | ||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||
Plant Workshop | ||||||||||||
Assume all internal fittings, racking etc dmolished first | ||||||||||||
Remove all ceilings and electrical fittings | ||||||||||||
Remove all plumbing fittings | ||||||||||||
Remove all wall partitions | ||||||||||||
Remove all external additions | ||||||||||||
Assume the roof can be dismantled in 4 days, numbered, bundled and stacked | ||||||||||||
Remove all wall cladding and girts | ||||||||||||
Remove roof purlins | ||||||||||||
Remove structural steel | ||||||||||||
Demolish slab and U/G services | ||||||||||||
Tidy up and rehabilitate | ||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||
Crew Required + Rates | ||||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen - skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||
2
|
Labourers - Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||
3
|
Labourers - unskilled - Local | hr | 8 |
Page 40 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Unit | Total Cost | |||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
4 | Transport — Labourers |
hr | 10 | |||||||||||||||
1.0 | Remove Internal fittings and machinery |
|||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for
3 shifts |
shft | 3 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | Crew rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Assume a rate of 200m2 per shift |
|||||||||||||||||
1.4 | Labour Costs |
hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||||
1.5 | 20 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||||
1.6 | Cartage and Packaging |
hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 16,344 | |||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Internal Ceilings, Offices & Partitions |
|||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for
4 shifts |
shft | 4 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | Crew rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Assume a rate of 200m2 per shift |
|||||||||||||||||
2.4 | Labour Costs |
hr | 48 | 204.00 | 9,792 | |||||||||||||
2.5 | 20 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 40 | 150.00 | 6,000 | |||||||||||||
2.6 | Cartage and Packaging |
hr | 40 | 150.00 | 6,000 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 21,792 | |||||||||||||||||
3.0 | Electrical Fittings |
|||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 5 shifts |
shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Assume job done in 5 shifts |
hr | 60 | 102.00 | 6,120 | |||||||||||||
3.4 | Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
3.5 | Cartage and Packaging |
hr | 50 | 400.00 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 33,620 | |||||||||||||||||
4.0 | Plumbing Fittings |
|||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 5 shifts |
shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Assume job done in 5 shifts |
hr | 60 | 102.00 | 6,120 | |||||||||||||
4.4 | Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
4.5 | Cartage and Packaging |
hr | 50 | 400.00 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 33,620 | |||||||||||||||||
5.0 | Roofing incl gutters, down pipes, & purlins |
|||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 5 shifts |
shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
5.3 | Labour Costs |
hr | 60 | 204.00 | 12,240 | |||||||||||||
5.4 | Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
5.5 | Cartage and Packaging |
hr | 50 | 400.00 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 39,740 | |||||||||||||||||
5.0 | Wall Cladding incl girts |
|||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 5 shifts |
shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
5.3 | Assume job done in 5 shifts |
hr | 60 | 204.00 | 12,240 | |||||||||||||
5.4 | Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
5.5 | Cartage and Packaging |
hr | 50 | 400.00 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 39,740 | |||||||||||||||||
6.0 | Structural Steel |
|||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 5 shifts |
shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
6.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
6.3 | Assume job done in 5 shifts |
hr | 60 | 204.00 | 12,240 | |||||||||||||
6.4 | Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
6.5 | Crane c/w operator + dogman |
hr | 50 | 150.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||
6.6 | Cartage and Packaging |
hr | 50 | 400.00 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 47,240 |
Page 41 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Unit | Total Cost | |||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
7.0 | Removal of Blockwork, Slab and rehabiliatation |
|||||||||||||||||
7.1 | Assume a crew of 1 L/H + 8 Labourers and 1 excavator for 5 days |
shft | 5 | |||||||||||||||
7.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 76.00 | |||||||||||||||
7.3 | Assume job done in 5 shifts |
hr | 60 | 76.00 | 4,560 | |||||||||||||
7.4 | Excavator and hammer for 5 shifts |
hr | 50 | 369.77 | 18,488 | |||||||||||||
7.5 | Removal from site — assume 2 x D400 for 2 days |
hr | 40 | 315.85 | 12,634 | |||||||||||||
7.6 | Rehabilitation — Floor Area + 20% |
m2 | 1,368 | 24.00 | 32,832 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 68,514 | |||||||||||||||||
Totals | 300,610 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per sq metre |
Sq/m Rate | 263.69 | ||||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 57 x 20 |
1140 | |||||||||||||||||
*Rounded rate |
264.00 |
Unit | Total Cost | |||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
OTHER BUILDINGS — Apply Square Metre Rate | m2 | 264.00 | ||||||||||||||||
Admin Office, Laboratory, Construction Warehouse, Core Shed | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | Training W’shop Floor Area = 60x20 |
m2 | 1,300 | 264.00 | 343200 | |||||||||||||
3 | Oxygen Plant W’shop Floor Area = 31.5x17 |
m2 | 536 | 264.00 | 141372 | |||||||||||||
4 | Mill W’shop Floor Area = 12x12 |
m2 | 144 | 150.00 | 21600 | |||||||||||||
5 | Rubber Shop Floor Area = 12x12 |
m2 | 180 | 150.00 | 27000 | |||||||||||||
6 | Pagini W’shop Floor Area = 13x12 |
m2 | 156 | 150.00 | 23400 | |||||||||||||
7 | Rigging Store Floor Area = 13x12 |
m2 | 156 | 150.00 | 23400 | |||||||||||||
All Workshops |
Totals | 880,582 |
Page 42 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
ELECTRICAL | ||||||||||||||||||
Primary Control Room, POX, Gold Recovery, Sea Water, Ore Reclaim, Filtered Water & Crusher Sub-Stations | ||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 61,62,63,64,65 |
||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical
equipment incl
transformers and control rooms |
||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc |
||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G cables where practical |
||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||
Allow for new power line from mine site gate to Put
Put village |
||||||||||||||||||
Allow to leave in place one switch room made up from
demolished items |
||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||
1 | Primary Control Xxxx |
|||||||||||||||||
0 | XXX Xxx 000 - X - 000 |
|||||||||||||||||
0X | POX Extension Dwg 134 - C - 040 |
|||||||||||||||||
3 | Filtered Water — Xxx 000 - X - 000 |
|||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxx Xxxxx — Dwg 183 - A - 001 |
|||||||||||||||||
5 | Gold Recovery & Carbon Regeneration — Dwg 136 - A -
001 |
|||||||||||||||||
6 | Ore Reclaim |
|||||||||||||||||
7 | Pilot Flotation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||
8 | Crusher |
|||||||||||||||||
9 | Training Centre |
|||||||||||||||||
10 | Main Cable Platform |
|||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Primary Control Room |
|||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Building is — x — O/A |
m2 | 100 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 2 Level steel portal frame |
|||||||||||||||||
1.3 | 24mm AC Floor on steel joists at 450mm crs |
|||||||||||||||||
2 | POX |
|||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Building is 35.43 x 6.4 O/A |
m2 | 227 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 2 Level steel portal frame |
|||||||||||||||||
2.3 | 24mm AC Floor on steel joists at 450mm crs |
|||||||||||||||||
2.4 | Metal Ext cladding, 6mm Versilux Int, Colourbond roof |
|||||||||||||||||
2.5 | 19.07 x 3.8 Transformer enclosure with 2.8m High
chainmesh fence |
|||||||||||||||||
2.6 | 4 x Transformers in Conc Pits + Reactor Slab |
m2 | 72 | |||||||||||||||
2.7 | Switch Gear Dwg 181 - E - 101 |
|||||||||||||||||
2A | POX Extn |
|||||||||||||||||
2A.1 | Building is 12.0 x 6.4 O/A |
m2 | 77 | |||||||||||||||
2A.2 | 2 Level steel portal frame |
|||||||||||||||||
2A.3 | 24mm AC Floor on steel joists at 450mm crs |
|||||||||||||||||
2A.4 | Metal Ext cladding, 6mm Versilux Int, Colourbond roof |
|||||||||||||||||
3 | Filtered Water |
|||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Building is 13.23 x 4.5 O/A |
m2 | 60 |
Page 43 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
3.2 | 2 Level steel portal frame |
|||||||||||||||||
3.3 | 24mm AC Floor on steel joists at 450mm crs |
|||||||||||||||||
3.4 | Metal Ext cladding, 6mm Versilux Int, Colourbond roof |
|||||||||||||||||
3.5 | 4.5 x 4.5 Transformer enclosure with 2.8m High
chainmesh fence |
m2 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
3.6 | Switch Gear Xxx 000 - X - 000 |
|||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxx Xxxxx |
|||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Building is 14.75 x 4.5 O/A |
m2 | 66 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 2 Level steel portal frame |
|||||||||||||||||
3.3 | 24mm AC Floor on steel joists at 450mm crs |
|||||||||||||||||
3.4 | Metal Ext cladding, 6mm Versilux Int, Colourbond roof |
|||||||||||||||||
3.5 | 14.75 x 6.0 Transformer enclosure with 2.8m High
chainmesh fence |
m2 | 89 | |||||||||||||||
3.6 | 3 x Transformers in Conc Pits + Reactor Slab |
|||||||||||||||||
3.7 | Switch Gear Dwg 181 - E - 101 |
|||||||||||||||||
5 | Gold Recovery & Carbon Regeneration |
|||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Building is 19.925 x 6.1 O/A |
m2 | 120 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | 2 Level steel portal frame |
|||||||||||||||||
5.3 | 24mm AC Floor on steel joists at 450mm crs |
|||||||||||||||||
5.4 | Metal Ext cladding, 6mm Versilux Int, Colourbond roof |
|||||||||||||||||
5.5 | 5.5 x 4.5 Transformer enclosure with 2.8m High
chainmesh fence |
m2 | 25 | |||||||||||||||
5.6 | Switch Gear Dwg 000 - X - 000 |
|||||||||||||||||
6.0 | Ore Reclaim |
|||||||||||||||||
7.0 | Pilot Flotation Plant |
|||||||||||||||||
8.0 | Crusher |
|||||||||||||||||
9.0 | Training centre |
|||||||||||||||||
10.0 | Main Cable Platform |
|||||||||||||||||
20.0 | Total Area |
m2 | 855 | |||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||
Calculate Rate for one and apply to others |
||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is
dismantled and load
staright onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf
for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||
Primary Control Room |
||||||||||||||||||
Allow 10 shifts to demolish |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman)
is available. |
||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
POX |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be dismantled in 7 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Others (incl POX Extn) |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be done in 5 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman)
is available. |
||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 6 |
Page 44 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||
1 | Primary |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||
1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0
X/xx) |
xx | 144 | 258.00 | 37,152 | |||||||||||||
1 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 120 | 160.00 | 19,200 | |||||||||||||
1 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 120 | 68.00 | 8,160 | |||||||||||||
2 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 93,372 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | POX |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||
2 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0
X/xx) |
xx | 96 | 258.00 | 24,768 | |||||||||||||
2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 80 | 160.00 | 12,800 | |||||||||||||
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 80 | 68.00 | 5,440 | ||||||||||||||
2 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 71,868 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Others (use POX rate above) |
|||||||||||||||||
POX Extn, Gold, Sea Water, Filter, Ore, Training,
Crusher |
||||||||||||||||||
3 | Rate per Sub-Station |
ea | 7 | 71,868.00 | 503,076 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 503,076 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Others items |
|||||||||||||||||
4 | Power Line to Put Put |
Item | 1 | 200,000.00 | 200,000 | |||||||||||||
3 | Switch Room |
Item | 1 | 20,000.00 | 20,000 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 220,000 | |||||||||||||||||
5 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Area of site — Floor Area + 50% |
m2 | 1,283 | 24.00 | 30,795 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 30,795 | |||||||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 919,111 | |||||||||||||||||
Page 45 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS | ||||||||||||||||||
Fencing & Security, Roads, Drainage, Main Wharf, Sewerage Plant, Poles, U/G cables etc | ||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - 41,42,44 + Other |
||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all
mechanical equipment and
remaining services |
||||||||||||||||||
Leave sewage system until last |
||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete
footings etc to ground level |
||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services |
||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | Sewage Plant — Xxx 000 - X - 000 |
|||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxx Xxxx Stations x 3 - Dwg 000 - XX -
000 |
|||||||||||||||||
3 | Lay Down Yards |
|||||||||||||||||
4 | Fencing |
|||||||||||||||||
5 | Security |
|||||||||||||||||
6 | Fuel Xxxxxxx Xxx 000 - X - 000 |
|||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxx Xxxxx |
|||||||||||||||||
8 | Drainage |
|||||||||||||||||
9 | Roads |
|||||||||||||||||
10 | Incinerator |
|||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Sewage Plant |
|||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Assume break up and demolish and fill hole. |
|||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Sewage Pump Stations x 3 |
|||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume break up and demolish and fill hole. |
|||||||||||||||||
3 | Lay Dow Yards |
|||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume remove to rubbish |
|||||||||||||||||
4 | Fencing |
|||||||||||||||||
4 | Rate per lin. Metre remove |
|||||||||||||||||
5 | Security |
|||||||||||||||||
5 | Remove to rubbish |
|||||||||||||||||
6 | Fuel Station |
|||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Area of Concrete Slab = 36 x 15 |
|||||||||||||||||
6.2 | Allow to Remove contaminated soil |
|||||||||||||||||
6.3 | Allow to remove underground tanks and pipes |
|||||||||||||||||
7 | Main Wharf |
|||||||||||||||||
7.1 | Assume remains as is |
|||||||||||||||||
8 | Drainage |
|||||||||||||||||
8.1 | Assume minimum work |
|||||||||||||||||
9 | Roads |
|||||||||||||||||
9.1 | Assume minimum work |
|||||||||||||||||
10 | Incinerator |
|||||||||||||||||
10.1 | Assume in last lot to be dismantled |
|||||||||||||||||
10.2 | Assume in last lot to be dismantled |
|||||||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||
Perform the work in sections so that the
one crew handles all
the conveyor sections. |
||||||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it
is dismantled and
load straight onto trailer |
||||||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent
to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | Sewage Plant |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume can be completed in 4 x 12-hour
shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 20-tonne crane (c/w operator
and dogman) is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume Cat 330 Excavator and D400 dump
truck available |
Page 46 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total
construction period |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
2 | Sewage Pump Stations — All approx 4m deep |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume each can be completed in 2 x 12-hour
shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume tops only demolished remainder
backfillled |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 20-tonne crane (c/w operator and
dogman) is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume Cat 330 Excavator and D400 dump
truck available |
||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total
construction period |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
3 | Lay Down Yards |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume the lot can be loaded and carted in
6 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 20-tonne crane (c/w operator and
dogman) is
available. |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume Cat 330 Excavator and D400 dump
truck available |
||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total
construction period |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
4 | Fencing |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume all can be done in 4 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total
construction period |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
5 | Security |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume the lot can be dismantled in 2 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total
construction period |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
6 | Fuel Station |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume the installation can be removed in 1
shift |
||||||||||||||||||
Plus allow to break up Slab - |
m2 | 468 | ||||||||||||||||
Plus allow to remove U/G pipes |
||||||||||||||||||
Plus allow to remove contaminated soil |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
7 | Main Wharf |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume Wharf will remain as is |
||||||||||||||||||
Fuel Installations removed in Tanks section |
||||||||||||||||||
No Other work |
||||||||||||||||||
8&9 | Roads + Drainage |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume Minimum Work |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume all can be done in 4 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume one Cat 330 Excavator (c/w operator)
is available. |
||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total
construction period |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
10 | Incinerator |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 5 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total
construction period |
||||||||||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Building — allow Sq.m rate |
m2 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen — skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers — Leading Hand — Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers — unskilled — Local |
hr | 8 | |||||||||||||||
4 | Transport — Labourers |
hr | 10 | |||||||||||||||
1 | Sewage Plant |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0
xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 60 | 172.00 | 10,320 | |||||||||||||
1.2 | 18 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 175.00 | 8,750 | |||||||||||||
1.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 |
Page 47 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
1.4 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 50 | 243.81 | 12,191 | |||||||||||||
1.5 | D400 |
hr | 50 | 315.85 | 15,792 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 50,453 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Sewage Pump Stations |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0
xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 84 | 172.00 | 14,448 | |||||||||||||
1.2 | 18 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 28 | 175.00 | 4,900 | |||||||||||||
1.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 28 | 68.00 | 1,904 | |||||||||||||
1.4 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 35 | 243.81 | 8,533 | |||||||||||||
1.5 | D400 |
hr | 35 | 315.85 | 11,055 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 40,840 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Lay Down Yards |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 6 Labourers and
1 crane |
||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (2 Tradesmen at K 35/hr + 6 unskilled
at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 84 | 118.00 | 9,912 | |||||||||||||
3.2 | 18 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 70 | 175.00 | 12,250 | |||||||||||||
3.3 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 70 | 243.81 | 17,067 | |||||||||||||
3.4 | D400 |
hr | 70 | 315.85 | 22,109 | |||||||||||||
3.5 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 67,110 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Fencing |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 1 L/H + 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Labour (1 X/X xx 00 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx
0 X/xx) |
xx | 60 | 83.00 | 4,980 | |||||||||||||
4.2 | Cat 330 Excavator t pull posts |
hr | 50 | 243.81 | 12,191 | |||||||||||||
4.3 | D400 |
hr | 50 | 315.85 | 15,792 | |||||||||||||
4.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 61,823 | |||||||||||||||||
5 | Security |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 1
L/H and 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Labour (1 X/X xx 00 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx
0 X/xx) |
xx | 36 | 83.00 | 2,988 | |||||||||||||
5.2 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 36 | 243.81 | 8,777 | |||||||||||||
5.3 | D400 |
hr | 30 | 315.85 | 9,475 | |||||||||||||
5.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 30 | 481.00 | 14,430 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 35,671 | |||||||||||||||||
6.0 | Fuel Station |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 1
L/H and 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Labour (1 X/X xx 00 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx
0 X/xx) |
xx | 60 | 83.00 | 4,980 | |||||||||||||
5.2 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 60 | 243.81 | 14,629 | |||||||||||||
5.3 | D400 |
hr | 50 | 315.85 | 15,792 | |||||||||||||
5.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 50 | 481.00 | 24,050 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 59,451 | |||||||||||||||||
8,9 | Roads & Drainage |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 1
L/H and 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||
5 | Labour (1 X/X xx 00 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx
0 X/xx) |
xx | 60 | 83.00 | 4,980 | |||||||||||||
5 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 50 | 243.81 | 12,191 | |||||||||||||
5 | D400 |
hr | 50 | 315.85 | 15,792 | |||||||||||||
5 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 50 | 481.00 | 24,050 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 57,013 | |||||||||||||||||
10 | Incinerator |
|||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||
10.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0
xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 72 | 172.00 | 12,384 | |||||||||||||
10.2 | 18 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 60 | 175.00 | 10,500 | |||||||||||||
10.3 | Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||||
10.4 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 60 | 243.81 | 14,629 | |||||||||||||
10.5 | D400 |
hr | 60 | 315.85 | 18,951 | |||||||||||||
10.6 | Building |
m2 | 1,000 | 203.25 | 203,250 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 263,794 | |||||||||||||||||
11 | Rehab for all sites above |
m2 | 100,000 | 24.00 | 2,400,000 | |||||||||||||
Total (Kina) | 3,036,156 | |||||||||||||||||
Page 48 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
GENERAL AND OVERHEAD COST ITEMS | ||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||
Assume a total construction duration of 365 days
(with concurrent work on different channel sections). |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume demolition project manager arrive onsite 1 month
prior to commencement and departs on completion |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume the project manager and site engineer rotate on a
FIFO basis of 3 weeks on/off |
||||||||||||||||||
Assume a full time national assistant engineer on site
4wks on 2wks off, primarily for QA/QC duties. |
||||||||||||||||||
All travel, accommodation and messing costs for
construction manager, site engineer and assistant engineer
are assumed provided by LMC. |
||||||||||||||||||
8.1 | Project Manager (AU$1,320/day) |
days | 182 | 3,300.00 | 600,600 | |||||||||||||
8.2 | Site Engineer (AU$1320/day) |
days | 182 | 3,300.00 | 600,600 | |||||||||||||
8.3 | As-Built Report at Completion of Work |
ls | 1 | 50,000.00 | 50,000 | |||||||||||||
8.4 | Local Assist Site Engineer |
days | 240 | 250.00 | 60,000 | |||||||||||||
8.5 | 4WD Light Vehicle (local hire) |
days | 365 | 200.00 | 73,000 | |||||||||||||
8.6 | Survey Crew (LMC) |
days | 90 | 1,000.00 | 90,000 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 1,474,200 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 1,474,200 | |||||||||||||||||
Page 49 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) | |||||||||||||||
COST SUMMARY — Balance Date Closure 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | PLANT WORKSHOP |
ls | 1 | 1,219,750 | 1,219,750 | |||||||||||||||
2 | MINE OFFICES |
ls | 1 | 524,914 | 524,914 | |||||||||||||||
3 | CRIB HUT |
ls | 1 | 486,676 | 486,676 | |||||||||||||||
4 | BARGE WHARF |
ls | 1 | 1,490,442 | 1,490,442 | |||||||||||||||
5 | SCREENING & DE-WATERING |
ls | 1 | 770,628 | 770,628 | |||||||||||||||
6 | HEAVY MINING EQUIPMENT |
ls | 1 | 1,021,020 | 1,021,020 | |||||||||||||||
7 | PIT SLOPES |
ls | 1 | 2,340,000 | 2,340,000 | |||||||||||||||
8 | LOW GRADE STOCKPILES |
ls | 1 | 121,725,314 | 121,725,314 | |||||||||||||||
9 | MINE ELECTRICAL |
ls | 1 | 51,727 | 51,727 | |||||||||||||||
10 | MINE MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS |
ls | 1 | 315,685 | 315,685 | |||||||||||||||
11 | MINE GENERAL AND OVERHEAD COSTS |
ls | 1 | 740,000 | 740,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 130,686,156 | |||||||||||||||||||
Contingency @ 20% (on all costs) |
ls | 1 | 26,137,231 | |||||||||||||||||
MINE SUMMARY |
Total | 156,823,388 |
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) | |||||||||||||||
COST SUMMARY — Planned Xxxxxxx Xxxxx 0- 0000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
0 | XXXXX XXXXXXXX |
ls | 1 | 509,484 | 509,484 | |||||||||||||||
2 | MINE OFFICES |
ls | 1 | 524,914 | 524,914 | |||||||||||||||
3 | CRIB HUT |
ls | 1 | 486,676 | 486,676 | |||||||||||||||
4 | BARGE WHARF |
ls | 1 | 1,490,442 | 1,490,442 | |||||||||||||||
5 | SCREENING & DE-WATERING |
ls | 1 | 770,628 | 770,628 | |||||||||||||||
6 | HEAVY MINING EQUIPMENT |
ls | 1 | 840,816 | 840,816 | |||||||||||||||
7 | PIT SLOPES |
ls | 1 | 2,340,000 | 2,340,000 | |||||||||||||||
8 | LOW GRADE STOCKPILES |
ls | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Page 50 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) | |||||||||||||||
9 | MINE ELECTRICAL |
ls | 1 | 51,727 | 51,727 | |||||||||||||||
10 | MINE MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS |
ls | 1 | 315,685 | 315,685 | |||||||||||||||
11 | MINE GENERAL AND OVERHEAD COSTS |
ls | 1 | 740,000 | 740,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 8,070,372 | |||||||||||||||||||
Contingency @ 20% (on all costs) |
ls | 1 | 1,614,074 | |||||||||||||||||
MINE SUMMARY |
Total | 9,684,447 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) | |||||||||||||||
COST SUMMARY — Planned Closure Stage 2 - 2040 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | REMOVE XXXXXX DAM |
ls | 1 | 4,785,108 | 4,785,108 | |||||||||||||||
2 | HEAVY MINING EQUIPMENT |
ls | 1 | 180,204 | 180,204 | |||||||||||||||
3 | PLANT WORKSHOP |
ls | 1 | 714,166 | 714,166 | |||||||||||||||
4 | LOW GRADE STOCKPILE AND KAPIT
VILLAGE RELOCATION |
ls | 1 | 39,111,600 | 39,111,600 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 44,791,078 | |||||||||||||||||||
Contingency @ 20% (on all costs) |
ls | 1 | 8,958,216 | |||||||||||||||||
MINE SUMMARY |
Total | 53,749,294 | ||||||||||||||||||
Page 51 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
These notes are applicable to all worksheets and are given here so as not to be repeated. | ||
1
|
General Demolition | |
1.1
|
The scope of work includes all identified equipment and facilities to be removed to be generally demolished down to ground level, including all plinths and up stands. Concrete slabs and services below ground will remain. | |
1.2
|
The predominant method of material disposal from demolished buildings, facilities and equipment at the mine site is via direct placement / disposal into the mine pit base. | |
1.3
|
Material which poses a risk to health or the environment e.g. – tyres, electrical transformers, fuels, chemicals, re-agents and similar hazardous materials including – but not limited to — asbestos, ceramic fibre, chlorofluorocarbons (CFC’s), Polychlorobiphenyls (PCB’s), ‘radioactive materials or mercury – to be removed from the site and to be disposed of as directed by the Project Manager | |
1.4
|
Material agreed by LMC to be of value for re-use by the local indigenous population which can be viably retained will be stockpiled in defined locations for subsequent recovery by local residents. | |
1.5
|
External vendors removing selected items of salvageable material which have been sold to outside organisations who are to remove materials from site at their cost shall be treated as an outside contractor and shall complete all site and safety inductions and shall comply with all operating and safety proceedures applicable to the site | |
1.6
|
Ground slabs may remain. All reinforcing bars and anchor bolts shall be cut or ground flush with top of slab level. | |
Top of slab shall be deemed to be top of plinth in the case of large plinths,(i.e. where the plinth is actually the predominant upper surface level) with prevailing ground contours adjusted by filling and grading to suit such a surface level. It is assumed selected filing shall be stockpiled during mining operations | ||
All areas shall be left suitable for access by vehicles or personnel without the risk of punctures or trip hazards. | ||
1.7
|
Where existing ground slabs within former building footprints fall to sumps or trench drains, such sump or trench drain inverts shall be holed or cracked to ensure water cannot collect and then backfilled and compacted with clean fill to prevailing existing surface contours. | |
1.8
|
The adjacent surrounding ground shall be locally graded away from slabs to prevent ponding and to allow runoff to flow into existing stormwater ditches or drains around the demolition site. | |
1.9
|
All works shall comply with the Demolition Plan and Demolition Methodology Statement | |
2
|
Notes pertaining to Mine Demobilisation | |
2.1
|
It is assumed the low grade stockpiles viz. Kapit North, Kapit South and Harbour base will be relocated to Minifie Pit 31/12/2004 | |
2.2
|
Allowance has been made for 25% of the Heavy Mining Equipment to remain in service until 2040 to load Low Grade ore. | |
2.3
|
It is assumed the Workshop will remain to service the equipment remaining in service until 2040 | |
2.5
|
Based on information from Xxxx Xxxxxx, Mine Manager at time of writing, it is assumed the cost of opening a channel from the foreshore to Minifie will be undertaken as a part of mining operations and the gold bearing ore recovered from the cut will cover the cost of mining operations. The cost of opening a channel into Kapit pit will be a matter of opening a channel in the xxxxxx dam and will present no problems and minor cost. | |
2.6
|
Base on item 2.5 it is assumed access from the low grade stockpile at Kapit village will be via a haul road around the western side of the open pits along a purpose left bench. |
Page 52 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
PLANT WORKSHOP | ||||||||||||||||||||
Plant Workshop, Hastings Warehouse, Tyre Shop, Wash Down bay, Zenex Offices & Workshop, Cement Store, Lakaka W’shop | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all Buildings, Mechanical Equipment,
Offices, Store Rooms etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete plinths & footings etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Plant Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Hastings Xxxxxxx W’hse |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Tyre Shop |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Wash Down Bay |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Zenex
Offices & Century W’shop |
|||||||||||||||||||
6 | Zenex Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
7 | Cement Store |
|||||||||||||||||||
8 | Lakaka Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
9 | Hydraulic Hose Shed |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Plant Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Steel Portal Frame Shed |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Mezzazine Floor Offices |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Ground Floor Storerooms |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.4 | Gantry Crane |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.5 | Crib Hut (3 x Demountables) |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.6 | Laydownyard (6 x 20 foot containers) |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.7 | Toilets |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.8 | Waste Oil Containers |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.9 | 1 x U/G power supply |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | 1 x U/G comms cable |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | 1 x U/G Waste Oil Drainage line |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | 1 x U/G Oil/Grease Cables |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.3 | HD Concrete Floor |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Hastings Xxxxxxx Warehouse |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Portal Frame Building + Racking |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | External Covered Racking |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.3 | Tiolets |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.4 | Compressor |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Tyre Shop |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Shed consisting of Truss Rafters on Shipping Containers |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.2 | 4 x Containers |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.3 | 1 x Concrete floor |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Wash Down Bay |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Steel walkway, access ladders & hand rails |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.2 | Compressed air |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.3 | Concrete silt trap |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.4 | Concrete floor |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Zenex
Building - Offices + Century W’shop |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Steel Portaf Frame Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.2 | Block Offices at Front (Zenex) |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.3 | Mezzanine Offices at Rear (Century) |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.4 | Chemical StorageArea |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.5 | Toilet |
Page 53 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
5.6 | Crib Room |
|||||||||||||||||||
6 | Zenex Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Steel Portal Frame Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.2 | Office |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.3 | Store Room |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.4 | Concrete Floor |
|||||||||||||||||||
7 | Cement & Drilling Mud Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
7.1 | Steel Portal Frame Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
7.2 | Offfice |
|||||||||||||||||||
7.3 | Store Room |
|||||||||||||||||||
7.4 | Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx |
|||||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx |
|||||||||||||||||||
8.1 | Steel Portal Frame Building |
|||||||||||||||||||
8.2 | Gantry Crane |
|||||||||||||||||||
8.3 | Office & Toilets |
|||||||||||||||||||
8.4 | Septic Tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
Concrete Floor |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.0 | Hydraulic Hose Shed |
|||||||||||||||||||
9.1 | 3 x 20 foot container |
|||||||||||||||||||
9.2 | Skillion Roof |
|||||||||||||||||||
9.3 | Concrete Floor |
|||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Plant Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the stucture can be dismantled and stacked in 30 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x60 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay
down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for
weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | Hastings Warehouse |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the stucture can be dismantled and stacked in 12 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x45 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay
down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for
weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
3 | Tyre Shop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the stucture can be dismantled and stacked in 2 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x30 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay
down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for
weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | Wash Down Bay |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the stucture can be dismantled and stacked in 2 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x16 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay
down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allow for Cat330 + Rock Breaker for 2 shifts to demolish concrete |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allow for Cat330 + D400 for 2 shifts to remove rubble |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for
weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | Zenex
Building - Offices + Century W’shop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the stucture can be dismantled and stacked in 5 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x45 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay
down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for
weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
6 | Zenex Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the stucture can be dismantled and stacked in 4 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x45 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay
down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for
weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 5 |
Page 54 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
7 | Cement & Drilling Mud Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the stucture can be dismantled and stacked in 3 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x30 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to
lay down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
8 | Lakaka Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the stucture can be dismantled and stacked in 5 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x30 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to
lay down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
9.0 | Hydraulic Hose Shed |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume the stucture can be dismantled and stacked in 3 shifts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x30 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to
lay down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - total construction period |
shift | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Plant Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 432 | 172.00 | 74,304 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 360 | 135.00 | 48,600 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 360 | 68.00 | 24,480 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | 250 Tonne Crane to remove Gantry - 2 shfts |
hr | 24 | 400.00 | 9,600 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Low Loader + Prime Mover |
hr | 12 | 80.00 | 960 | |||||||||||||||
1.6 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
1.7 | Remove Waste Oil Storage Isotainers to Incinerator - 1 shift |
hr | 12 | 203.00 | 2,436 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 189,240 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Hastings Warehouse |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 6 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 168 | 258.00 | 43,344 | |||||||||||||||
2.2 | 45 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 140 | 260.00 | 36,400 | |||||||||||||||
2.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 140 | 68.00 | 9,520 | |||||||||||||||
2.4 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 95,036 | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Tyre Shop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (2 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 36 | 102.00 | 3,672 | |||||||||||||||
3.2 | 30 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 30 | 160.00 | 4,800 | |||||||||||||||
3.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 30 | 68.00 | 2,040 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 16,284 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Wash Down Bay |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Labour (2 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 84 | 102.00 | 8,568 | |||||||||||||||
4.2 | 16 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 12 | 70.00 | 840 | |||||||||||||||
4.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 70 | 68.00 | 4,760 | |||||||||||||||
4.4 | Cat330 with Rock Breaker |
hr | 24 | 369.77 | 8,874 | |||||||||||||||
4.5 | Cat 330 + D400 |
hr | 24 | 559.66 | 13,432 | |||||||||||||||
4.6 | Cat 330 + D400 to backfill |
hr | 12 | 559.66 | 6,716 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 43,190 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Zenex Building - Offices + Century W’shop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 72 | 258.00 | 18,576 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | 45 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 60 | 260.00 | 15,600 | |||||||||||||||
5.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 |
Page 55 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
5.4 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 44,028 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | Zenex Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 60 | 258.00 | 15,480 | |||||||||||||||
6.2 | 45 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 50 | 260.00 | 13,000 | |||||||||||||||
6.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||||||||
6.4 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 37,652 | |||||||||||||||||||
7 | Cement & Drilling Mud Storage |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
7.1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 48 | 258.00 | 12,384 | |||||||||||||||
7.2 | 45 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 40 | 260.00 | 10,400 | |||||||||||||||
7.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 40 | 68.00 | 2,720 | |||||||||||||||
7.4 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 31,276 | |||||||||||||||||||
8 | Lakaka Workshop |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.1 | Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 72 | 258.00 | 18,576 | |||||||||||||||
8.2 | 60 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 60 | 70.00 | 4,200 | |||||||||||||||
8.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||||||
8.4 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 32,628 | |||||||||||||||||||
9.0 | Hydraulic Hose Shed |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.1 | Labour (2 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 48 | 102.00 | 4,896 | |||||||||||||||
8.2 | 16 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 40 | 70.00 | 2,800 | |||||||||||||||
8.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 40 | 68.00 | 2,720 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 10,416 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level in each item above |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.1 | Area of site |
m2 | 30,000 | 24.00 | 720,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 720,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1,219,750 | |||||||||||||||||||
2022 Closure | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assume Plant Workshop, Hastings Warehouse, Tyre Bay, Wash Down Bay
and Hyd Hose shed will remain to service plant handling low grade
ore. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Zenex Building - Offices + Century W’shop |
44,028 | ||||||||||||||||||
6 | Zenex Workshop |
37,652 | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | Cement & Drilling Mud Storage |
31,276 | ||||||||||||||||||
8 | Lakaka Workshop |
32,628 | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | Rehabilitation (50%) |
360,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 505,584 | |||||||||||||||||||
2040 Closure | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assume Plant Workshop, Hastings Warehouse, Tyre Bay, Wash Down Bay and Hyd Hose shed will be removed. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Plant Workshop |
189,240 | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | Hastings Warehouse |
95,036 | ||||||||||||||||||
3 | Tyre Shop |
16,284 | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | Wash Down Bay |
43,190 | ||||||||||||||||||
9 | Hydraulic Hose Shed |
10,416 | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | Rehabilitation (50%) |
360,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 714,166 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 56 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
MINE OFFICES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mine Offices, Environment Offices, Toilet Block, Conference Room, Containers | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||||||
Items covered - |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all Buildings, Offices, Store Rooms etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete plinths & footings etc |
||||||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Mine Offces |
|||||||||||||||||||
2 | Environment Offces |
|||||||||||||||||||
3 | Toilet block |
|||||||||||||||||||
4 | Conference Room |
|||||||||||||||||||
5 | Geotech Containers |
|||||||||||||||||||
6 | Other Containers |
|||||||||||||||||||
7 | Lay Down Yard |
|||||||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Mine Offices |
|||||||||||||||||||
1 | Office Block - 30m x 20m |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Calculate Demolition Rate for one & apply to others |
m2 | ||||||||||||||||||
1.2 | 1 x U/G Power Supply |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.3 | 1 x U/G Water Supply |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.4 | 1 x U/G Comms Network line |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.5 | 1 x U/G Comms Phone line |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.6 | 1 x Fixed Hut (Soils Lab) |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.7 | 1 x Office Furniture (Tables/Chairs/Computers) |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.8 | 1 x 5000 L xxxxxxx tank |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.9 | 1 x Phone Line (Office-Orica) |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Environment Offices |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Office Block - 33m x 20m |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.2 | External Covered Racking |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.3 | Toilets |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.4 | Compressor |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.0 | Toilet Block |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Prefab Panel Block 9m x 4m |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.2 | Fittings |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.3 | Concrete floor |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.0 | Conference Room |
|||||||||||||||||||
Timber Frame hard Plank & Versilux Block 9m x 4m |
||||||||||||||||||||
Furniture |
||||||||||||||||||||
Concrete floor |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.0 | Geotech Containers & Dewatering Office |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Containers |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.2 | Timber framed roof & Office |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.3 | Storage area |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.4 | Concrete Floor |
|||||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Mining Office |
|||||||||||||||||||
Calculate the Sq Metre rate for this building and apply to others |
||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Conveyor CV001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume 6 x 3m std modules can be dismantled and stacked in a 12-hour shift. |
||||||||||||||||||||
No of Std 3m modules |
Page 57 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
No of special modules |
||||||||||||||||||||
No of shifts required |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total construction period |
||||||||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1.0 | Remove Internal Fittings |
|||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 2 shifts |
shift | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
1.2 | Crew rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||||
1.3 | Labour Costs |
hr | 24 | 204.00 | 4,896 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | 18 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 20 | 175.00 | 3,500 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Prime mover + Trailer |
hr | 20 | 68.00 | 1,360 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 9,756 | |||||||||||||||||||
2.0 | Internal Ceilings |
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts |
shift | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
2.2 | Crew rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||||
2.4 | Labour Costs |
hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||||||
2.5 | 18 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 30 | 175.00 | 5,250 | |||||||||||||||
2.6 | Prime mover + Trailer |
hr | 30 | 68.00 | 2,040 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 14,634 | |||||||||||||||||||
3.0 | Electrical Fittings |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 3 shifts |
shift | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
3.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||||||
3.3 | Labour Costs |
hr | 36 | 102.00 | 3,672 | |||||||||||||||
3.4 | Prime mover + Trailer |
hr | 30 | 68.00 | 2,040 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 5,712 | |||||||||||||||||||
4.0 | Plumbing Fittings |
|||||||||||||||||||
4.1 | Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 2 shifts |
shift | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
4.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||||||
4.3 | Labour Costs |
hr | 24 | 102.00 | 2,448 | |||||||||||||||
4.5 | Prime mover + Trailer |
hr | 20 | 68.00 | 1,360 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 3,808 | |||||||||||||||||||
5.0 | Roofing incl gutters, down pipes, & purlins |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts |
shift | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
5.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||||
5.3 | Labour Costs |
hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||||||
5.4 | 16 tonne Crane + Operator & Dogman |
hr | 36 | 70.00 | 2,520 | |||||||||||||||
5.5 | Prime mover + Trailer |
hr | 36 | 68.00 | 2,448 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 12,312 | |||||||||||||||||||
5.0 | Wall Cladding |
|||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts |
shift | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
5.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||||
5.3 | Labour Costs |
hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||||||
5.5 | Prime mover + Trailer |
hr | 30 | 68.00 | 2,040 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 9,384 | |||||||||||||||||||
6.0 | Framing |
|||||||||||||||||||
6.1 | Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts |
shift | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
6.2 | Crew Rate |
hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||||
6.3 | Labour Costs |
hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||||||
6.5 | Crane c/w operator + dogman |
hr | 30 | 70.00 | 2,100 | |||||||||||||||
6.6 | Prime mover + Trailer |
hr | 30 | 68.00 | 2,040 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 11,484 |
Page 58 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
Total | 67,090 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Floor Area |
m2 | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rate per Square Metre (rounded) |
m2 | 112 | ||||||||||||||||||
OTHER BUILDINGS - Apply Square Metre Rate | m2 | m2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Env Office, Toilets, Conf Xxxx | ||||||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxx Xxxxxxx |
|||||||||||||||||||
Xxxxx Xxxx = 33 x 20 |
m2 | 660 | 112.00 | 00000 | ||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxx Xxxxx |
|||||||||||||||||||
Xxxxx Xxxx = 9 x 4 |
m2 | 36 | 112.00 | 4032 | ||||||||||||||||
4 | Conf Room |
|||||||||||||||||||
Floor Area =9 x 4 |
m2 | 36 | 112.00 | 4032 | ||||||||||||||||
5 | Remove Geotech Containers |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers - 2 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Labour (2 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 24 | 102.00 | 2,448 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | 30 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 24 | 160.00 | 3,840 | |||||||||||||||
5.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 24 | 68.00 | 1,632 | |||||||||||||||
6 | Remove Other Containers |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers - 2 shifts |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 | Labour (2 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 24 | 102.00 | 2,448 | |||||||||||||||
5.2 | 30 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 24 | 160.00 | 3,840 | |||||||||||||||
5.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 24 | 68.00 | 1,632 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 97,824 | |||||||||||||||||||
7 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level in each item above |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
7.1 | Area of site |
m2 | 15,000 | 24.00 | 360,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 360,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 524,914 | |||||||||||||||||||
Page 59 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||
CRIB HUT | ||||||||||||
Crib Hut, Fuel Station, Lakaka Crb Hut & Site Office | ||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||
Items covered - | ||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all Buildings associated with LMC & Lakaka Crib Huts, the Fuel Station etc | ||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc | ||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate | ||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||
Configuration Details: | ||||||||||||
1
|
LMC Crib Hut | |||||||||||
2
|
Fuel Station | lm | 78 | |||||||||
3
|
Lakaka Crib Hut | |||||||||||
Material Quantities: | ||||||||||||
1.0
|
Crib Hut — Fuel Farm | |||||||||||
1 x Building (Crib Hut) | ||||||||||||
1 x U/G Power Source | ||||||||||||
1 x U/G Water Source | ||||||||||||
1 x Dispatch Radio Cable | ||||||||||||
2 x 5000 Litre Xxxxxxx water tanks | ||||||||||||
1 x Fuel Pump | ||||||||||||
1 x Sewage Tank | ||||||||||||
4 x 40000 Litre Diesel Tanks | ||||||||||||
1 x 3 inch U/G steel pipe fuel line from fuel farm to refill point | ||||||||||||
2 x portable toilets | ||||||||||||
2 x UG Power Supply (PW19subs to Sec Gate Main sub) | ||||||||||||
2.0
|
Fuel Station | |||||||||||
2 x Fuel Pump Switches (electrical) | ||||||||||||
2 x U/G Water lines for washing | ||||||||||||
1 x UG Power Supply (cable) | ||||||||||||
4 x lighting plant to Rom (Fuel Island to Rom entrance) | ||||||||||||
1 x Concrete fueling floor | ||||||||||||
1 x 10,000 litres o/head fuel tank | ||||||||||||
1 x Fuel line (4 x containers to Refill point) | ||||||||||||
3.00
|
Lakaka Crib Hut & Site Offices | |||||||||||
1 x Building (Crib Hut) | ||||||||||||
1 x U/G Power Source | ||||||||||||
1 x U/G Water Source | ||||||||||||
1 x Dispatch Radio Cable | ||||||||||||
2 x 5000 Litre Xxxxxxx water tanks | ||||||||||||
1 x Fuel Pump | ||||||||||||
1 x Sewage Tank | ||||||||||||
4 x 40000 Litre Diesel Tanks | ||||||||||||
1 x 3 inch U/G steel pipe fuel line from fuel farm to refill point | ||||||||||||
2 x portable toilets | ||||||||||||
2 x UG Power Supply (PW19subs to Sec Gate Main sub) | ||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||
1
|
Crib Hut — Fuel farm | |||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled and stacked in 10 shifts. | ||||||||||||
Assume 1x60 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover and low loader is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total construction period | shft | 12 |
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
2
|
Fuel Station | |||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 3 x 12-hour shifts. | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. | ||||||||||||||||
Total construction period | shft | 4 | ||||||||||||||
3
|
Lakaka Crib Hut & Site Offices | |||||||||||||||
Assume all can be dismantled in 3 x 12-hour shifts. | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. | ||||||||||||||||
Total construction period | shft | 4 | ||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen — skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Labourers — Leading Hand — Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers — unskilled — Local | hr | 8 | |||||||||||||
4
|
Transport — Labourers | hr | 10 | |||||||||||||
1
|
Crib Hut — Fuel farm | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 6 tradesmen 6 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Labour (6 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 6 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 144 | 258.00 | 37,152 | |||||||||||
1.2
|
60 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman | hr | 120 | 135.00 | 16,200 | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Prime Mover + Trailer | hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||
1.4
|
Prime Mover + Low Loader | hr | 60 | 80.00 | 4,800 | |||||||||||
1.5
|
Cat 330 Excavator + D400 to remove contaminated soil | hr | 12 | 559.66 | 6,716 | |||||||||||
1.6
|
Remove Footings above GL | hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 74,720 | |||||||||||||||
2
|
Fuel Station | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 48 | 172.00 | 8,256 | |||||||||||
1.2
|
60 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman | hr | 40 | 135.00 | 5,400 | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Prime Mover + Trailer | hr | 40 | 68.00 | 2,720 | |||||||||||
1.4
|
Cat 330 Excavator + D400 to remove contaminated soil | hr | 12 | 559.66 | 6,716 | |||||||||||
1.5
|
Remove Footings above GL | hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 28,864 | |||||||||||||||
3
|
Lakaka Crib Hut & Site Offices | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 48 | 172.00 | 8,256 | |||||||||||
1.2
|
60 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman | hr | 40 | 135.00 | 5,400 | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Prime Mover + Trailer | hr | 40 | 68.00 | 2,720 | |||||||||||
1.4
|
Cat 330 Excavator + D400 to regrade site | hr | 12 | 559.66 | 6,716 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 23,092 | |||||||||||||||
4
|
Rehabilitation | |||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level in each item above | ||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates | ||||||||||||||||
4.1
|
Area of site | m2 | 15,000 | 24.00 | 360,000 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 360,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 486,676 | |||||||||||||||
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||
BARGE WHARF | ||||||||||||
Barge Wharf, Services, Dispatch Hut, etc | ||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||
Items covered — | ||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all Buildings, Mechanical Equipment, Offices, etc | ||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete plinths & footings etc | ||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate | ||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||
Configuration Details: | ||||||||||||
1
|
Barge Wharf | |||||||||||
2
|
Barge Services | |||||||||||
3
|
Dispatch Hut | |||||||||||
Material Quantities: | ||||||||||||
1
|
Barge Wharf & Services | |||||||||||
1
|
2 x Wharves (W1 and W2) | |||||||||||
1.2
|
8 x Lighting Plants | |||||||||||
1.3
|
1 x Toilet | |||||||||||
1.4
|
1 x Water Tank (2000 litres) | |||||||||||
1.5
|
1 x U/G Power Supply to Wharf | |||||||||||
1.6
|
2 x Portable containers (Wharf Controller + Welder) | |||||||||||
1.7
|
1 x 40,000 litre barge fuel tank | |||||||||||
1.8
|
1 x mini Fuel Pump | |||||||||||
1.9
|
1 x Geotech pizo pont (Coastal Pit Road, left side) | |||||||||||
2.0
|
1 x O/H Power line from Tunnel to Inpit and 6MGW — Phase 5N | |||||||||||
2.1
|
1 x O/H Comms line from Tunnel to 6MW Phase 5N | |||||||||||
2.2
|
1 x O/H Power from Mill to town (11KV line) | |||||||||||
2.0
|
Dispatch Hut | |||||||||||
2.1
|
Dispatch Building | |||||||||||
2.2
|
Services | |||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||
1
|
Barge Wharf & Services | |||||||||||
Assume it all can be dismantled and stacked in 20 shifts. | ||||||||||||
Assume 1x45 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||
Assume 1x60 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover and low loader is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total construction period | shift | 24 | ||||||||||
2
|
Disatch | |||||||||||
Assume it all can be dismantled and stacked in 10 shifts. | ||||||||||||
Assume 1x60 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact — total construction period | shift | 24 | ||||||||||
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Labourers -
Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Labourers -
unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Barge Wharf & Services |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 8 unskilled at 8
K/hr) |
hr | 288 | 344.00 | 99,072 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne
Crane with operator + dogman |
hr | 240 | 135.00 | 32,400 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover
+ Trailer |
hr | 240 | 68.00 | 16,320 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | 250 Tonne
Crane to remove loading bays - 6 shfts |
hr | 72 | 400.00 | 28,800 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Low Loader
+ Prime Mover |
hr | 72 | 80.00 | 5,760 | |||||||||||||||
1.6 | Remove Footings above GL |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||||||||
1.7 | Remove Tanks
- 1 shift |
hr | 12 | 203.00 | 2,436 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 213,648 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Disatch |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 4 unskilled at 8
K/hr) |
hr | 288 | 64.00 | 18,432 | |||||||||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane with operator+dogman |
hr | 240 | 135.00 | 32,400 | |||||||||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover
+ Trailer |
hr | 240 | 68.00 | 16,320 | |||||||||||||||
1.4 | Cat 330
Excavator + D400 to remove contaminated soil |
hr | 12 | 559.66 | 6,716 | |||||||||||||||
1.5 | Cat 330 to
Re - grade site |
hr | 12 | 243.81 | 2,926 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 76,794 | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level in each
item above |
||||||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Area of site |
m2 | 50,000 | 24.00 | 1,200,000 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 1,200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1,490,442 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||
SCREENING & DE-WATERING | ||||||||||||
Screening Plant, De-Watering Xxxxx | ||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||
Items covered — | ||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl Screening Plant, Stockpiles, De-Watering Bores etc | ||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc | ||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate | ||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||
Configuration Details: | ||||||||||||
1
|
De—Watering Xxxxx | |||||||||||
2
|
Screening Plant | lm | 78 | |||||||||
3
|
Stockpiles | |||||||||||
Material Quantities: | ||||||||||||
1
|
Dewatering Xxxxx | |||||||||||
1.1
|
PW20,21,13 | |||||||||||
3 x 11KV Transformers | ||||||||||||
3 x xxxxx (pump unit inside) | ||||||||||||
3 x 7 inch exit hot water pipe lines | ||||||||||||
1.2
|
XX00 Xxxx | |||||||||||
0 x 11KV Transformers (1 for PW11) | ||||||||||||
1 x 11KV Substation (for 4 x PWs) | ||||||||||||
1 x well (pump inside) | ||||||||||||
1 x exit end 20m length x 500mm H/W burried | ||||||||||||
1.30
|
XX00 Xxxx | |||||||||||
0 x 11KV Transformers (for PW17) | ||||||||||||
1 x well (pump inside) | ||||||||||||
1 x Hot Water Pipe line | ||||||||||||
1.40
|
PW19 and Main Subs | |||||||||||
1 x 11KV Transformer (for PW19-pumping) | ||||||||||||
2 x 11KV Transformers (for PW3A, 4 not running) | ||||||||||||
6 x 11KV Transformers (spare) | ||||||||||||
4 x well (PW01A,PW02A,PW03A,PW04,- abandoned - water level measures only) | ||||||||||||
1 x well (PW15 - waiting parts) | ||||||||||||
1 x well (PW19 pump inside - working) | ||||||||||||
2
|
Lakaka Crushing Plant | |||||||||||
2.1
|
1 x Crusher Plant | |||||||||||
2.2
|
1 x Screen Plant | |||||||||||
2.3
|
1x Stockpile | |||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||
1
|
Dewatering Xxxxx | |||||||||||
Assume only time required is to remove transformers | ||||||||||||
No of shifts required | shift | 6 | ||||||||||
Assume 1x30 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||
2
|
Lakaka Crushing Plant | |||||||||||
Assume all can be dismantled and stacked in 3 x 12-hour shift. | ||||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard |
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations. | ||||||||||||||||
Total construction period | shift | 6 | ||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen - skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Labourers - Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx | xx | 0 | |||||||||||||
0
|
Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx | xx | 10 | |||||||||||||
1
|
Dewatering Xxxxx | |||||||||||||||
Assume xxxxx will be cut down and capped as part of mining operations. | ||||||||||||||||
Remove Transformers | ||||||||||||||||
Remove Pumps-assume done by Schlumberger | ||||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 72 | 172.00 | 12,384 | |||||||||||
1.2
|
30 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman | hr | 60 | 160.00 | 9,600 | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Prime Mover + Trailer | hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 26,064 | |||||||||||||||
2
|
Lakaka Crushing Plant | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers | ||||||||||||||||
2.1
|
Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 72 | 172.00 | 12,384 | |||||||||||
2.2
|
60 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman | hr | 60 | 135.00 | 8,100 | |||||||||||
2.3
|
Prime Mover + Trailer | hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 24,564 | |||||||||||||||
3
|
Rehabilitation | |||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level in each item above | ||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates | ||||||||||||||||
3.1
|
Area of site | m2 | 30,000 | 24.00 | 720,000 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 720,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 770,628 | |||||||||||||||
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
HEAVY MINING EQUIPMENT | ||||||||||||||||
Shovels, Trucks, Excavators etc | ||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||
Items covered - | ||||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all Heavy Mining Equipment | ||||||||||||||||
Assume delivered to lay down yard at Wharf for dismantling & removal | ||||||||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate | ||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
RH 200 Shovels | |||||||||||||||
2
|
Cat 785 Trucks | |||||||||||||||
3
|
Cat 777 Trucks | |||||||||||||||
4
|
Cat 375 Excavators | |||||||||||||||
5
|
Cat D10 Dozers | |||||||||||||||
6
|
Drills | |||||||||||||||
7
|
Graders | |||||||||||||||
8
|
Loaders | |||||||||||||||
Material Quantities: | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Heavy Equipment | |||||||||||||||
1
|
RH 200 Shovels | |||||||||||||||
1.2
|
Cat 785 Trucks | |||||||||||||||
1.3
|
Cat 777 Trucks | |||||||||||||||
1.4
|
Cat 375 Excavators | |||||||||||||||
1.5
|
Cat D10 Dozers | |||||||||||||||
1.6
|
Drills | |||||||||||||||
1.7
|
Graders | |||||||||||||||
1.8
|
Loaders | |||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Heavy Equipment | |||||||||||||||
Assumeall oils & klubricants have to be drained and removed to incinerator | ||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x45 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||||||
Assume 1x60 tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover and low loader is used to move material to lay down yard | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - total construction period | ||||||||||||||||
Total construction period | days | 30 | ||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Expat Supervisor | hr | 120 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Tradesmen-skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers-Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||
4
|
Labourers-unskilled - Xxxxx | xx | 0 | |||||||||||||
0
|
Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx | xx | 10 | |||||||||||||
1
|
Heavy Equipment | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of One Expat Supervisor + 8 tradesmen 8 Labourers per shift | ||||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Labour (1 Supervisor + 8 tradesmen at 35 Kina/hr, 8 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 720 | 464.00 | 334,080 | |||||||||||
1.2
|
60 Tonne Crane with operator + dogman | hr | 720 | 135.00 | 97,200 | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Prime Mover + Trailer | hr | 720 | 68.00 | 48,960 |
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
1.4
|
250 Tonne Xxxxx | xx | 360 | 400.00 | 144,000 | |||||||||||
1.5
|
Low Loader + Prime Mover | hr | 720 | 80.00 | 57,600 | |||||||||||
1.6
|
Remove Waste Oil Storage Isotainers to Incinerator — 1 shift | hr | 192 | 203.00 | 38,976 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 720,816 | |||||||||||||||
2
|
Rehabilitation | |||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level in each item above | m2 | 5,000 | 24.00 | 120,000 | ||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates | Subtotal | 120,000 | ||||||||||||||
Total | 840,816 | |||||||||||||||
Planned Closure Stage 2 - 2040 | ||||||||||||||||
3
|
Heavy Equipment handling Low Grade | |||||||||||||||
Assume 25% of equipment remains to do the work | ||||||||||||||||
3.1
|
Disposal Costs | 180,204.00 |
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
PIT SLOPES | ||||||||||||||||
Rehabiliatation of Pit Sopes | ||||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||||
Items covered - | ||||||||||||||||
Rehabilitate Pit Slopes & Benches above MSL | ||||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Minifie - | |||||||||||||||
1.1
|
For 2004 Costs | |||||||||||||||
1.2
|
Assume Rehab done down to 1052 Bench | |||||||||||||||
1.3
|
Area between 1052 bench and 998RL | Ha | 35 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Lienetz - | |||||||||||||||
2.1
|
For 2004 Costs | |||||||||||||||
2.2
|
Assume Nil Rehab from top of cut to 998 Bench | |||||||||||||||
2.3
|
Area between top of cut and 998RL — Phase 5 | Ha | 68 | |||||||||||||
2.4
|
For 2022 Costs | |||||||||||||||
2.5
|
Assume Rehab done during Mining Ops — Phase 9 | |||||||||||||||
2.6
|
All excavation to MSL complete by 2010 | |||||||||||||||
3
|
Kapit - | |||||||||||||||
For 2004 Costs — Nil | ||||||||||||||||
For 2022 Costs - | ||||||||||||||||
Area between top of cut and 998RL — complete by 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Therefore Assume completed during Mining Phase | ||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Hydromulch | |||||||||||||||
Assume the productivity Rate is 20,000m2 per Mth. | ||||||||||||||||
Area to Rehab in 2004 is 103 Ha | ||||||||||||||||
Assume the crew consists of one sprayer plus one supervisor and 6 labourers. | ||||||||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact - | ||||||||||||||||
Total Rehab period | Xxxx | 00 | ||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen-skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Labourers-Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers-unskilled - Xxxxx | xx | 0 | |||||||||||||
0
|
Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx | xx | 10 | |||||||||||||
1
|
Slopes | |||||||||||||||
Allow the following Costs per Mth | ||||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Labour (1 Tradesman + 1 L/H at 12 Kina/hr, 6 unskilled at 8 K/hr) | hr | 300 | 95.00 | 28,500 | |||||||||||
1.2
|
Materials | Mth | 1 | 3,000.00 | 3,000 | |||||||||||
1.3
|
Sprayer | Day | 30 | 100.00 | 3,000 | |||||||||||
1.3
|
4X4 Vehicle to carry materials | Day | 30 | 100.00 | 3,000 | |||||||||||
1.4
|
Env Dept Supervision | Day | 30 | 250.00 | 7,500 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 45,000 | |||||||||||||||
2.0
|
Number of Mths | Mth | 52 | 45,000.00 | 2,340,000 | |||||||||||
Total | 2,340,000 | |||||||||||||||
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||
LOW GRADE STOCKPILES | ||||||||||
Relocation of Stockpiles, Rehabiliatation of Pit Sopes and stockpile bases | ||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||
Items covered - |
||||||||||
Kapit Nth Low Grade Stockpile |
||||||||||
Harbour Base Stockpile |
||||||||||
Kapit Sth Low Grade Stockpile |
||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||
1 | Kapit Nth |
|||||||||
1.1 | For 2004 Costs |
|||||||||
1.2 | Cheapest alternative is to spray with tunnel guard |
|||||||||
1.3 | Area as 31st December 2004 |
m2 | 577,000 | |||||||
2 | Kapit Nth-Alternative |
|||||||||
2.1 | For 2004 Costs |
|||||||||
2.2 | The other alternative is to relocate to Minifie Pit |
|||||||||
2.3 | Volume as 31st December 2004 |
t | 29,633,940 | |||||||
3 | Harbour Base |
|||||||||
3.1 | For 2004 Costs |
|||||||||
3.2 | The cheapest alternative is spraying with Tunnel Guard |
|||||||||
3.3 | Area as 31st December 2004 |
m2 | 129,000 | |||||||
4 | Harbour Base-Alternative |
|||||||||
4.1 | For 2004 Costs |
|||||||||
4.2 | The other alternative is to relocate to Minifie Pit |
|||||||||
4.3 | Volume as 31st December 2004 |
t | 1,720,000 | |||||||
5 | Kapit South |
|||||||||
5.1 | For 2004 Costs |
|||||||||
5.2 | Assuming the HDPE liner will remain as is |
|||||||||
5.3 | Therefore Assume cost is nil |
m2 | 0 | |||||||
6 | Kapit South-Alternative |
|||||||||
6.1 | The other alternative is to relocate to Minifie Pit |
|||||||||
6.2 | Volume as 31st December 2004 |
t | 3,400,000 |
Exch | PGK | |||||||||
Rates | Rates | |||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||
1 | Comparison of Costs based on LMC rates or Contract
Rates |
|||||||||
Rate to cover with HDPE |
m2 - US$ | 12.00 | 0.26 | 46.15 | ||||||
Rate to cover with sprayed Tunnel Guard |
m2 - AU$ | 8.00 | 0.40 | 20.00 | ||||||
To Relocate to Minifie Pit — Rehandling Costs 31/12/04 |
t-US$ | 0.68 | 0.26 | 2.60 | ||||||
2 | Rehabilitation of Stockpile bases |
|||||||||
Rip Compacted Ground |
m2 | 500000 | 0.15 | 75000.00 | ||||||
Treat with Lime |
m2 | 500000 | 0.36 | 178500.00 | ||||||
Load, Haul & Spread topsoil 200mmm thick |
m2 | 500000 | 5.36 | 2680000 | ||||||
Revegetate |
m2 | 500000 | 1.08 | 540000 | ||||||
Total |
m2 | 500000 | 3473500 | |||||||
Rate per Sqare Metre |
m2 | 6.95 | ||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||
1 | Kapit Nth |
|||||||||
Comparison of costs |
||||||||||
1.1 | To Cover with HDPE |
m2 | 577,000 | 46.15 | 26,630,769 | |||||
1.2 | To Cover with sprayed Tunnel Guard |
m2 | 577,000 | 20.00 | 11,540,000 | |||||
1.3 | To relocate to Minifie |
t | 29,633,940 | 2.60 | 77,048,244 | |||||
1.4 | Rehabilitation of Stockpile base |
m2 | 500,000 | 6.95 | 3,473,500 | |||||
2 | Harbour Base |
|||||||||
Comparison of costs |
Page 69 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||
2.1 | To Cover with HDPE |
m2 | 129,000 | 46.15 | 5,953,846 | |||||
2.2 | To Cover with sprayed Tunnel Guard |
m2 | 129,000 | 20.00 | 2,580,000 | |||||
2.3 | To relocate to Minifie |
t | 4,384,000 | 2.60 | 11,398,400 | |||||
2.4 | Removal of Stockpile base to RL 998.0 |
t | 3,717,000 | 5.36 | 19,923,120 | |||||
3 | Kapit Sth |
|||||||||
Comparison of costs |
||||||||||
1.1 | Covered with HDPE already-cost is nil |
m2 | 3,400,000 | 0.00 | 0 | |||||
1.2 | To Cover with sprayed Tunnel Guard |
m2 | 172,000 | 20.00 | 3,440,000 | |||||
1.3 | To relocate to Minifie |
t | 3,400,000 | 2.60 | 8,840,000 | |||||
1.4 | Rehabilitation of Stockpile base |
m2 | 150,000 | 6.95 | 1,042,050 | |||||
4 | Summary of Alternatives allowed - 2004 Closure |
|||||||||
4.1 | Kapit Nth-Relocate to Minifie Pit |
77,048,244 | ||||||||
4.2 | Rehab stockpile base |
3,473,500 | ||||||||
4.3 | Harbour Base-Relocate to Minifie Pit |
11,398,400 | ||||||||
4.4 | Remove stockpile base to RL 998 |
19,923,120 | ||||||||
4.5 | Kapit Sth-Relocate to Minifie Pit |
8,840,000 | ||||||||
4.6 | Rehab stockpile base |
1,042,050 | ||||||||
Total | 121,725,314 | |||||||||
Planned Closure Stage 1 - 2022 - Ore to Process Plant | ||||||||||
5 | 2022 Closure will Include Wild West Stockpile |
|||||||||
5.1 | Assume stockpile will be relocated into Pits |
|||||||||
5.2 | To relocate to Minifie or Lienetz |
t | 0 | 2.60 | 0 | |||||
5.3 | Rehabilitation of Stockpile base |
m2 | 0 | 6.95 | 0 | |||||
6 | Kapit Sth Stockpile will be Mined Out |
|||||||||
6.1 | Costs for Kapit Sth Stockpile |
0.00 | ||||||||
7 | Kapit Nth Stockpile will have been relocated to
Kapit Village |
|||||||||
7.2 | Costs for Kapit Village Stockpile |
|||||||||
Relocate to Kapit Pit |
t | 0 | 2.60 | 0 | ||||||
Rehabilitation of Base |
m2 | 0 | 6.95 | 0 | ||||||
8 | Net Costs for 2022 Closure |
|||||||||
Kapit Sth will have been mined out |
||||||||||
Kapit Nth will have been relocated to Kapit Village |
||||||||||
Kapit Village Costs |
0 | |||||||||
Wild West Costs |
0 | |||||||||
Harbour Base Costs |
0 | |||||||||
Total |
0 | |||||||||
Planned Closure Stage 2 — 2040 | ||||||||||
9.0 | Remove Xxxxxx Dam |
|||||||||
9.1 | Excavate and remove to Kapit Pit |
T | 892,744 | 5.36 | 4,785,108 | |||||
10.0 | Stockpile Rehabilitation |
|||||||||
10.1 | Wild West Stockpile Rehab |
m2 | 370,000 | 6.95 | 2,570,390 | |||||
10.2 | Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx |
x0 | 670,000 | 6.95 | 4,654,490 | |||||
10.3 | Kapit Village Relocation |
11,963,600 | ||||||||
10.4 | Remove stockpile base to RL 998 |
t | 3,717,000 | 5.36 | 19,923,120 | |||||
TOTAL | 39,111,600 | |||||||||
Page 70 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||
MINE ELECTRICAL | ||||||||||
Main Mine Site Control Room | ||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||
Items covered |
||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl
transformers and control rooms |
||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc |
||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G cables where practical |
||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||
1 | Primary Control Room |
|||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||
1.0 | Primary Control Room |
|||||||||
1.1 | Building is 12.0 x 6.4 O/A |
m2 | 77 | |||||||
1.2 | 2 Level steel portal frame |
|||||||||
1.3 | 24mm AC Floor on steel joists at 450mm crs |
|||||||||
1.4 | Metal Ext cladding, 6mm Versilux Int, Colourbond roof |
|||||||||
20.0 | Total Area |
m2 | 77 | |||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||
Calculate Rate for one and apply to others |
||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and
load staright onto trailer |
||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||
Primart Control Room |
||||||||||
Assume each can be done in 5 shifts |
||||||||||
Assume one 30-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impacts on work operations |
||||||||||
Demolition Period |
shift | 6 | ||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen-skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||
2 | Labourers-Leading
Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||
3 | Labourers-unskilled
- Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||
1 | Mine MCC |
|||||||||
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers and 1 crane |
||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (2 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 72 | 102.00 | 7,344 | |||||
1.2 | 30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 60 | 160.00 | 9,600 | |||||
Trailer to remove sections to lay down yard |
hr | 60 | 68.00 | 4,080 | ||||||
1.3 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||
Subtotal | 49,884 | |||||||||
2 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||
2.1 | Area of site |
m2 | 77 | 24.00 | 1,843 | |||||
Subtotal | 1,843 | |||||||||
Total (Kina) | 51,727 | |||||||||
Page 71 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||
MINE MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS | ||||||||||
Fencing & Security, Roads, Drainage, Poles, U/G cables etc | ||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||
Items covered |
||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment and
remaining services |
||||||||||
Leave sewage system until last |
||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc to ground
level |
||||||||||
Excavate and remove U/G services |
||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate |
||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||
1 | Fencing |
|||||||||
2 | Security |
|||||||||
3 | Fuel Xxxxxxx Xxx 000-X-000 |
|||||||||
0 | Xxxx Xxxxx |
|||||||||
5 | Drainage |
|||||||||
6 | Roads |
|||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||
1 | Fencing |
|||||||||
Remove to rubbish |
||||||||||
2 | Security |
|||||||||
Remove to rubbish |
||||||||||
3 | Roads |
|||||||||
Assume minimum work |
||||||||||
4 | Drainage |
|||||||||
Assume minimum work |
||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||
Perform the work in sections so that the one crew handles all
sections. |
||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and
load staright onto trailer |
||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||
1 | Fencing |
|||||||||
Assume all can be done in 4 shifts |
||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact-total construction period |
||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 4 | ||||||||
2 | Security |
|||||||||
Assume the lot can be dismantled in 2 shifts |
||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact-total construction period |
||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 2 | ||||||||
3&4 | Roads + Drainage |
|||||||||
Assume Minimum Work |
||||||||||
Assume all can be done in 4 shifts |
||||||||||
Assume one Cat 330 Excavator (c/w operator) is available. |
||||||||||
Add 20% for weather impact-total construction period |
||||||||||
Demolition period |
shift | 4 |
Page 72 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen-skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||
2 | Labourers-Leading Hand Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||
3 | Labourers-unskilled-Local |
hr | 8 | |||||||
4 | Transport-Labourers |
hr | 10 | |||||||
1 | Fencing |
|||||||||
Assume a crew of 1 L/H + 6 Labourers |
||||||||||
1.1 | Labour ( 1 L/H at 12 Kina/hr, 6 unskilled at 8 K/hr) |
hr | 48 | 60.00 | 2,880 | |||||
1.2 | Cat 330 Excavator to pull posts |
hr | 40 | 243.81 | 9,753 | |||||
1.3 | D400 |
hr | 40 | 315.85 | 12,634 | |||||
1.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||
Subtotal | 31,038 | |||||||||
2 | Security |
|||||||||
Assume a crew of 1 L/H and 6 Labourers |
||||||||||
2.1 | Labour (1 X/X xx 00 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 24 | 60.00 | 1,440 | |||||
2.2 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 24 | 243.81 | 5,852 | |||||
2.3 | D400 |
hr | 20 | 315.85 | 6,317 | |||||
2.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 12 | 481.00 | 5,772 | |||||
Subtotal | 19,381 | |||||||||
3,4 | Roads & Drainage |
|||||||||
Assume a crew of 1 L/H and 6 Labourers |
||||||||||
3.1 | Labour (1 X/X xx 00 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 48 | 60.00 | 2,880 | |||||
3.2 | Cat 330 Excavator |
hr | 40 | 243.81 | 9,753 | |||||
3.3 | D400 |
hr | 40 | 315.85 | 12,634 | |||||
3.4 | Rehabilitation |
m2 | 10,000 | 24.00 | 240,000 | |||||
Subtotal | 265,266 | |||||||||
Total (Kina) | 315,685 | |||||||||
Page 73 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||
MINE GENERAL AND OVERHEAD COSTS | ||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||
Assume a total construction duration of
365 days (with concurrent work on
different channel sections). |
||||||||||
Assume demolition project manager arrive
onsite 1 month prior to commencement and
departs on completion |
||||||||||
Assume the project manager and site
engineer rotate on a FIFO basis of 3
weeks on/off |
||||||||||
Assume a full time national assistant
engineer on site 4wks on 2wks off,
primarily for QA/QC duties. |
||||||||||
All travel and accommodation costs for
construction manager are assumed to be
covered by the hire rate. |
||||||||||
8.1 | Project Manager (AU$1,320/day) |
days | 90 | 3,300.00 | 297,000 | |||||
8.2 | Site Engineer (AU$1320/day) |
days | 90 | 3,300.00 | 297,000 | |||||
8.3 | As-Built Report at Completion of Work |
1s | 1 | 50,000.00 | 50,000 | |||||
8.4 | Local Assist Site Engineer |
days | 120 | 250.00 | 30,000 | |||||
8.5 | 4WD Light Vehicle (local hire) |
days | 180 | 200.00 | 36,000 | |||||
8.6 | Survey Crew (LMC) |
days | 30 | 1,000.00 | 30,000 | |||||
Subtotal | 740,000 | |||||||||
Total | 740,000 | |||||||||
Page 74 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG Kina) | |||||
COST SUMMARY 2004 | ||||||||||
1 | TOWNSITE |
1s | 1 | 3,118,897 | 3,118,897 | |||||
2 | AIRPORT |
1s | 1 | 24,000 | 24,000 | |||||
3 | LONDONDOLOVIT XXXX |
1s | 1 | 126,484 | 126,484 | |||||
4 | MAIN ROADS |
1s | 1 | 258,140 | 258,140 | |||||
5 | QUARRIES |
1s | 1 | 801,468 | 801,468 | |||||
6 | TOWN ELECTRICAL |
1s | 1 | 145,700 | 145,700 | |||||
7 | TOWN MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS |
1s | 1 | 382,551 | 382,551 | |||||
8 | TOWN GENERAL AND OVERHEAD COSTS |
1s | 1 | 740,000 | 740,000 | |||||
Subtotal | 5,597,240 | |||||||||
Contingency @ 20% (on all costs) |
1s | 1 | 1,119,448 | |||||||
TOWN SUMMARY |
Total | 6,716,688 | ||||||||
- | Draft Xxxxx Xxxxxxx report “Mine Water and Sediment Management Plan — Pit Diversion Channel and Kapit Sediment Trap Design” — for format | |
- | currency conversions; Kina 1.00 = US$0.26 and 2044 Kina 1.00 = USS$0.32 |
Page 75 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
NOTES |
||
Applicable to all worksheets | ||
METHODOLOGY | ||
These notes are applicable to all worksheets and are given here so as not to be repeated. | ||
1
|
General Demolition | |
1.1
|
The scope of work includes all identified equipment and facilities to be removed to be generally demolished down to ground level, including all plinths and up stands. Concrete slabs and services below ground will remain. | |
1.2
|
The predominant method of material disposal from demolished buildings, facilities and equipment at the mine site is via direct placement / disposal into the mine pit base. | |
1.3
|
Material which poses a risk to health or the environment — e.g. tyres, electrical transformers, fuels, chemicals, re-agents and similar hazardous materials including — but not limited to — asbestos, ceramic fibre, chlorofluorocarbons (CFC’s), Polychlorobiphenyls (PCB’s), ‘radioactive materials or mercury — to be removed from the site and to be disposed of as directed by the Project Manager | |
1.4
|
Material agreed by LMC to be of value for re-use by the local indigenous population which can be viably retained will be stockpiled in defined locations for subsequent recovery by local residents. | |
1.5
|
External vendors removing selected items of salvageable material which have been sold to outside organisations who are to remove materials from site at their cost shall be treated as an outside contractor and shall complete all site and safety inductions and shall comply with all operating and safety proceedures applicable to the site | |
1.6
|
Ground slabs may remain. All reinforcing bars and anchor bolts shall be cut or ground flush with top of slab level. for the purpose. with prevailing ground contours adjusted by filling and grading to suit such a surface level. It is assumed selected filing shall be stockpiled | |
Top of slab shall be deemed to be top of plinth in the case of large plinths, (i.e. where the plinth is actually the predominant upper surface level) during mining operations | ||
All areas shall be left suitable for access by vehicles or personnel without the risk of punctures or trip hazards. | ||
1.7
|
Where existing ground slabs within former building footprints fall to sumps or trench drains, such sump or trench drain inverts shall be holed or cracked to ensure water cannot collect and then backfilled and compacted with clean fill to prevailing existing surface contours. | |
1.8
|
The adjacent surrounding ground shall be locally graded away from slabs to prevent ponding and to allow runoff to flow into existing stormwater ditches or drains around the demolition site. | |
1.9
|
All works shall comply with the Demolition Plan and Demolition Methodology Statement | |
2
|
Notes pertaining to Town site demobilisation | |
2.1
|
It is assumed 50% of Town site residences shall remain and 50% will be demolished | |
2.2
|
Allowance has been made to demolish camp one at the end of the mining phase in 2022 | |
2.3
|
Refer to the Methodology statement in Townsite demolition for particular assumptions. |
Page 76 of 89
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||
TOWNSITE | ||||||||||
Houses, Duplexes, Camp Dongas, Kitchen Mess, Warehouses, etc | ||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||
Items covered - | ||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site town site buildings except for those remaining | ||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete footings etc | ||||||||||
Make good site and rehabilitate | ||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||
1
|
Configuration Details LMC Buildings: | |||||||||
1.01
|
50 Houses (3Br) with 2 more planned | |||||||||
1.02
|
16 Duplexes = 00 Xxxxxxxxx 0Xx. | |||||||||
1.03
|
Lihir Sporting & Social Club = Tennis Cts, Club, Swimming Pool & Squash Cts. | |||||||||
1.04
|
32 Gov’t Houses + 5/6 more planned | |||||||||
1.05
|
5 Houses = private rental XXX, NCS, NCS, Lakaka, Xxxx Soipang (Landowners Pres) | |||||||||
1.06
|
LCS 16Man Camp under construction | |||||||||
1.07
|
Proposed NCS 100-150 Man Camp = 20/25 Dongas | |||||||||
1.08
|
Sewage Treatment Plant | |||||||||
1.09
|
Water Treatment Plant | |||||||||
1.10
|
Camp 1 = 00 Xxxxxx + 1 new block building. | |||||||||
1.11
|
Security, Camp Office, Kitchen/Mess, Wet Mess, Store/Gym + Visitors block. | |||||||||
1.12
|
Comms + Telikom | |||||||||
1.13
|
9 SSQ Dongas +2 New | |||||||||
1.14
|
Twenty Man Camp + 1 New | |||||||||
1.15
|
Environment Department + Laboratory | |||||||||
1.16
|
NCS Warehouse | |||||||||
1.17
|
Camp 2 = 00 Xxxxxx + NCS Change Rooms + Basketball Court | |||||||||
1.18
|
Town Office, Camp Office, Laundry, Bakery, Function Kitchen, Store, Wet Mess | |||||||||
1.19
|
Int Primary School | |||||||||
1.20
|
40 New Senior Motel type Dongas planned | |||||||||
1.21
|
Town Site power Stn = %x Gen Sets in 40 Ftt Containers next to Mobil Depot | |||||||||
1.22
|
Town maintenance. | |||||||||
2
|
Other Buildings - Assume will remain as is | |||||||||
2.1
|
Police Stn | |||||||||
2.2
|
Market | |||||||||
2.3
|
Hospital | |||||||||
2.4
|
High School | |||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||
1
|
Assume houses will partly remain and set the number | |||||||||
2
|
Calculate cost to remove one house and apply to number to be demolished | |||||||||
3
|
Similarly with Duplexes | |||||||||
4
|
Assume the club will remain | |||||||||
5
|
Assume Gov’t houses will remain | |||||||||
6
|
Assume private rental houses will remain | |||||||||
7
|
Assume LCS 16 man camp is responsibility of LCS | |||||||||
8
|
Similarly NCS Dongas | |||||||||
9
|
Assume Sewage treatment plant will remain incl all pump stations | |||||||||
10
|
Assume water treatment plant will remain | |||||||||
11
|
Assume camp 1 will be demolished at end of mining ops in 2022 | |||||||||
12
|
Assume security, kitchen. Mess, wet mess, store gym etc will be demolished | |||||||||
13
|
Assume Telikom & Comms will remain | |||||||||
14
|
Assume SSQ Dongas as are present now will be demolished before closure 2044 | |||||||||
15
|
Assume 20 man camp will be demolished before closure in 2022 | |||||||||
16
|
Similarly Env dept and lab | |||||||||
17
|
Assume NCS warehouse will be demolished | |||||||||
18
|
Assume camp 2 will be demolished |
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||||
19
|
Similarly town office, camp office, laundry,bakery, function kitchen, store & wet mess |
|||||||||||||||||
20
|
Assume school will remain | |||||||||||||||||
21
|
Assume 40 new SSQ Donas will remain | |||||||||||||||||
22
|
Assume town site power station will be removed | |||||||||||||||||
23
|
Assume Town Maintenance will be removed | |||||||||||||||||
24
|
Assume all building in ‘Other’ classification will remain as is. | |||||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||||||
Calculate rate to demolish a single residence - apply to others | ||||||||||||||||||
Crew Required + Rates | ||||||||||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen - skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||||
2
|
Labourers - Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx | xx | 0 | |||||||||||||||
0
|
Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx | xx | 10 | |||||||||||||||
1.0
|
Remove Internal Fittings | |||||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 2 shifts | shift | 2 | |||||||||||||||
1.2
|
Crew rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
1.3
|
Labour Costs | hr | 24 | 204.00 | 4,896 | |||||||||||||
1.4
|
18 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 20 | 175.00 | 3,500 | |||||||||||||
1.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 20 | 63.00 | 1,260 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 9,656 | |||||||||||||||||
2.0
|
Internal Linings | |||||||||||||||||
2.1
|
Assume a demolition crew of 4 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 3 shifts | shift | 3 | |||||||||||||||
2.2
|
Crew rate | hr | 172.00 | |||||||||||||||
2.4
|
Labour Costs | hr | 36 | 172.00 | 6,192 | |||||||||||||
2.6
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 30 | 63.00 | 1,890 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 8,082 | |||||||||||||||||
3.0
|
Electrical Fittings | |||||||||||||||||
3.1
|
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 2 shifts | shift | 2 | |||||||||||||||
3.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||||
3.3
|
Labour Costs | hr | 24 | 102.00 | 2,448 | |||||||||||||
3.4
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 20 | 63.00 | 1,260 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 3,708 | |||||||||||||||||
4.0
|
Plumbing Fittings | |||||||||||||||||
4.1
|
Assume a crew of 2 tradesmen 4 Labourers for 2 shifts | shift | 2 | |||||||||||||||
4.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 102.00 | |||||||||||||||
4.3
|
Labour Costs | hr | 24 | 102.00 | 2,448 | |||||||||||||
4.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 12 | 63.00 | 756 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 3,204 | |||||||||||||||||
5.0
|
Roofing incl gutters, down pipes, & purlins | |||||||||||||||||
5.1
|
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts | shift | 3 | |||||||||||||||
5.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
5.3
|
Labour Costs | hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||||
5.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||||
5.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 12 | 63.00 | 756 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 12,600 | |||||||||||||||||
5.0
|
Wall Framing | |||||||||||||||||
5.1
|
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers for 3 shifts | shift | 3 | |||||||||||||||
5.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 204.00 | |||||||||||||||
5.3
|
Assume job done in 3 shifts | hr | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||||||
5.4
|
Cherry Picker c/w operator & dogman | hr | 30 | 150.00 | 4,500 | |||||||||||||
5.5
|
Cartage and Packaging | hr | 30 | 63.00 | 1,890 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 13,734 | |||||||||||||||||
7.0
|
Removal of Stumps, Blockwork, and rehabiliatation | |||||||||||||||||
7.1
|
Assume a crew of 1 L/H + 8 Labourers and 1 excavator for 3 days | shift | 2 | |||||||||||||||
7.2
|
Crew Rate | hr | 76.00 | |||||||||||||||
7.3
|
Assume job done in 2 shifts | hr | 24 | 76.00 | 1,824 | |||||||||||||
7.5
|
Removal from site - assume Cat 330 for 1 day | hr | 12 | 243.81 | 2,926 | |||||||||||||
8.5
|
Removal from site - assume 2 x D400 for 1 days | hr | 24 | 315.85 | 7,580 | |||||||||||||
7.6
|
Rehabilitation | m2 | 200 | 24.00 | 4,800 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal | 17,130 | |||||||||||||||||
Totals | 68,114 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per sq metre | Sq/m Rate | 340.57 | ||||||||||||||||
Floor Area = 20 x 28.5 | 200 | |||||||||||||||||
*Rounded rate | 341 |
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
Crew Rates | ||||||||||||||||
1
|
Tradesmen - skilled | hr | 35 | |||||||||||||
2
|
Labourers - Leading Hand - Local | hr | 12 | |||||||||||||
3
|
Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx | xx | 0 | |||||||||||||
0
|
Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx | xx | 10 | |||||||||||||
1
|
Houses x 50 (Assume 50% Remain) | |||||||||||||||
1.1
|
Apply Rate above | Ea | 25 | 68,114.14 | 1,702,853 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 1,702,853 | |||||||||||||||
2
|
Duplexes (Asssume 50% Remain) | |||||||||||||||
2.1
|
Floor Area per Duplex | m2 | 400 | 340.57 | 136,228 | |||||||||||
2.2
|
Cost for all duplexes | Ea | 5 | 136,228.28 | 681,141 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 681,141 | |||||||||||||||
3.0
|
Camp 1 | |||||||||||||||
Assume camp is demolished and dumped with no materials salvaged | ||||||||||||||||
Assume Cat 330 Excavator + D400 Dump trucks used | ||||||||||||||||
Materials dumped in land fill close to the camp | ||||||||||||||||
Assume time required is 10 shifts | shift | 10 | ||||||||||||||
Cat 330 | hr | 120 | 243.81 | 29,258 | ||||||||||||
D400 Dump Trucks x 2 | hr | 240 | 315.85 | 75,804 | ||||||||||||
Allow Cat 330 x 3 shfts to open up land fill | hr | 36 | 243.81 | 8,777 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal | 113,839 | |||||||||||||||
4.0
|
Security, Camp Office, Kitchen/Mess, Wet Mess, Store/Gym + Visitors block. | |||||||||||||||
Assume camp is demolished and dumped with no materials salvaged | ||||||||||||||||
Assume Cat 330 Excavator + D400 Dump trucks used | ||||||||||||||||
Materials dumped in land fill close to the camp | ||||||||||||||||
Assume time required is 10 shifts | shift | 10 | ||||||||||||||
Cat 330 | hr | 120 | 243.81 | 29,258 | ||||||||||||
D400 Dump Trucks x 2 | hr | 240 | 315.85 | 75,804 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal | 105,061 | |||||||||||||||
5.0
|
NCS Warehouse | |||||||||||||||
Camp 2 = 00 Xxxxxx + NCS Change Rooms + Basketball Court | ||||||||||||||||
Town Office, Camp Office, Laundry, Bakery, Function Kitchen, Store, Wet Mess | ||||||||||||||||
Assume all is demolished and dumped with no materials salvaged | ||||||||||||||||
Assume Cat 330 Excavator + D400 Dump trucks used | ||||||||||||||||
Materials dumped in land fill close to the camp | ||||||||||||||||
Assume time required is 15 shifts | shift | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Cat 330 | hr | 180 | 243.81 | 43,886 | ||||||||||||
D400 Dump Trucks x 2 | hr | 360 | 315.85 | 113,706 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal | 157,592 | |||||||||||||||
6.0
|
Town maintenance. | |||||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 8 tradesmen 12 Labourers for 7 shifts | ||||||||||||||||
Labour (8 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 00 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) | xx | 84 | 376.00 | 31,584 | ||||||||||||
30 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman | hr | 84 | 160.00 | 13,440 | ||||||||||||
Prime Mover + Trailer | hr | 84 | 68.00 | 5,712 | ||||||||||||
Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) | hr | 24 | 481.00 | 11,544 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal | 62,280 | |||||||||||||||
7
|
Rehabilitation | |||||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level and work consists of placing topsoil and grading only | ||||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates | ||||||||||||||||
7.1
|
Area of site | m2 | 10,000 | 24.00 | 240,000 | |||||||||||
Subtotal | 240,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 3,118,897 | |||||||||||||||
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Total Cost | ||||||||||
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | (PNG KINA) | |||||
AIRPORT | ||||||||||
Runway, Runway Services, Buildings, Fuel Supplies etc | ||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||
Items
covered — |
||||||||||
It is assumed the airport will be handed over to DCA and
Local Level
Government |
||||||||||
The runway will remain as is |
||||||||||
Same for buildings and services incl radio aerials and fire
training area |
||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||
1 | Runway |
|||||||||
1.1 | 1200m long runway 30m wide — coronas pavement |
|||||||||
1.2 | Runway Lights |
|||||||||
1.3 | Control Equipment |
|||||||||
2.0 | Airport Building |
|||||||||
2.1 | Main Building |
|||||||||
2.2 | Toilets |
|||||||||
3 | Fuel Supplies |
|||||||||
3.1 | Tanks |
|||||||||
3.2 | Pumps |
|||||||||
3.3 | Pipes |
|||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||
As everything will be handed over nothing to discuss |
||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||
Nil |
||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||
12 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||
Assume a minimum area for some rehabilitation of 1000m2 |
||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||
12.1 | Area of site = 1000 |
m2 | 1,000 | 24.00 | 24,000 | |||||
Subtotal | 24,000 | |||||||||
Total | 24,000 | |||||||||
(Kina) | ||||||||||
Mine Closure Plan Update 2004 — Environmental Costs
Opinion of Probable Cost for Budgeting Purposes
Item No. | Description of Work | Unit | Qty. | Unit Cost | Total
Cost (PNG KINA) |
|||||||||
LONDONDOLOVIT XXXX | ||||||||||||||
Xxxx, Pumps, Electrical control room, Pipework | ||||||||||||||
SCOPE OF WORK | ||||||||||||||
Items covered - |
||||||||||||||
Dismantle and remove from site all mechanical equipment incl
Pumps, Control Room etc |
||||||||||||||
Excavate and remove reinf. concrete foundations and footings
where practical |
||||||||||||||
Assume one pump will remain to serve the town site |
||||||||||||||
Assume switch gear will remain to service the remaining pump |
||||||||||||||
Make good ground and rehabilitate |
||||||||||||||
MATERIAL QUANTITIES | ||||||||||||||
Configuration Details: |
||||||||||||||
1 | Pumps |
|||||||||||||
2 | Control Room |
|||||||||||||
3 | Pipework |
|||||||||||||
Material Quantities: |
||||||||||||||
1 | Pumps |
|||||||||||||
2 | Control Room — allowed for in Electrical Wks |
|||||||||||||
3 | Pipework |
|||||||||||||
METHODOLOGY | ||||||||||||||
Utilise Excavator to remove concrete as required and dump as
necessary |
||||||||||||||
Utilise Crane to remove each section as it is dismantled and load
straight onto trailer |
||||||||||||||
Unload sections in laydown yard adjacent to wharf for shipping |
||||||||||||||
PRODUCTIVITY | ||||||||||||||
Pumps |
||||||||||||||
Assume work can be completed in 5 shifts |
||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is available to move other items |
||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 5 | ||||||||||||
Pipework |
||||||||||||||
Assume it can be dismantled in 3 shifts |
||||||||||||||
Assume one 45-tonne crane (c/w operator and dogman) is available. |
||||||||||||||
Assume one prime mover + trailer is available to move other items |
||||||||||||||
Demolition Period = |
shift | 3 | ||||||||||||
Rehabilitation |
||||||||||||||
Assume an area on 1500m2 |
||||||||||||||
Apply the standard rate per sq metre for the work |
||||||||||||||
CREW OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||
Crew Rates |
||||||||||||||
1 | Tradesmen - skilled |
hr | 35 | |||||||||||
2 | Labourers - Leading Hand - Local |
hr | 12 | |||||||||||
3 | Labourers - unskilled - Xxxxx |
xx | 0 | |||||||||||
0 | Xxxxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx |
xx | 10 | |||||||||||
1 | Pumps |
|||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 3 tradesmen 6 Labourers |
||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (3 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 60 | 153.00 | 9,180 | |||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 50 | 135.00 | 6,750 | |||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 50 | 68.00 | 3,400 | |||||||||
1.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||
Subtotal | 48,190 | |||||||||||||
2 | Pipework |
|||||||||||||
Assume a crew of 4 tradesmen 8 Labourers |
||||||||||||||
1.1 | Labour (4 tradesmen at 35 Xxxx/xx, 0 xxxxxxxxx xx 0 X/xx) |
xx | 36 | 204.00 | 7,344 | |||||||||
1.2 | 60 Tonne Crane c/w operator & dogman |
hr | 30 | 135.00 | 4,050 | |||||||||
1.3 | Prime Mover + Trailer |
hr | 30 | 68.00 | 2,040 | |||||||||
1.4 | Remove Footings (Excavator + Labour) |
hr | 60 | 481.00 | 28,860 | |||||||||
Subtotal | 42,294 | |||||||||||||
5 | Rehabilitation |
|||||||||||||
Assume footings demolished to ground level |
||||||||||||||
Rehab rate is taken from P&L Rates |
||||||||||||||
5 | Area of site = 1500m2 |
m2 | 1,500 | 24.00 | 36,000 | |||||||||
Subtotal | 36,000 | |||||||||||||