Agency review definition

Agency review means a review performed on an agency at the direction of the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Delegates, or by recommendation of the joint standing committee pursuant to the provisions of this article.
Agency review means a thorough evaluation of the entire completed investigative file by the agency head.
Agency review means a review performed on an agency at the direction of the President

Examples of Agency review in a sentence

  • Except as otherwise provided, for contracts with categorical budgets, Grantee shall submit quarterly FSRs to System Agency by the last business day of the month following the end of each quarter for System Agency review and financial assessment.

  • Maintain copies of all notices required under this section for System Agency review.

  • Except as otherwise provided in these General Provisions or in the terms of any Program Attachment(s) that is incorporated into the Contract, for contracts with categorical budgets, Grantee shall submit quarterly FSRs to Accounts Payable by the last business day of the month following the end of each quarter of the Program Attachment term for System Agency review and financial assessment.

  • Develop and Implement Policies, Procedures, and Medical Protocols to ensure client placement into the appropriate level of withdrawal management services in accordance with national guidelines, peer-reviewed literature, and best practices and have available for System Agency review.

  • All training and certification documentation must be maintained within the employees’ file for System Agency review upon request.

  • Grantee shall maintain documentation of all participation in meetings, scheduled calls, and completed trainings for System Agency review upon request in accordance with Grantee policies and procedures.

  • Providing input and review of Grantee Quarterly Data Reporting Form, which is subject to System Agency review and approval.

  • Develop and Implement Policies, Procedures, and Medical Protocols to ensure Client placement into the appropriate level of withdrawal management services in accordance with national guidelines, peer-reviewed literature, and best practices and have available for System Agency review.

  • Grantee will maintain documentation of successful completion for System Agency review upon request.

  • In addition to the Design Professional’s Basic Services fee as hereinbefore established, the Design Professional shall be reimbursed at actual cost, but not greater than the most competitive market rate, for reproductions of drawings and project manuals (specifications), for Owner and Using Agency review, reviews by authorities having jurisdiction, and for the copy to be provided to the Contractor pursuant to Paragraph 2.1.2.8.


More Definitions of Agency review

Agency review. San Francisco County Transportation Authority and San Mateo Transportation Authority. Preparation of an Archaeological Resources Preliminary Analysis Memorandum to assist in the development of a Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report. Ms. DeBaker assisted in preliminary analysis of archaeological sensitivity based on a records search, in-house literature review, and a geoarchaeological buried and submerged site sensitivity assessment. 2018-2019 Principal Investigator. Far Western. Chalk Hill Road Bridge, Sonoma County, California. Client: WRA Environmental Consultants, Inc. Agency Review: California Department of Transportation, District 4. Refit of the Chalk Hill Road Bridge over Maacama Creek as a pedestrian and bike bridge and construction of a new vehicular bridge upstream that meets modern seismic and safety standards. Ms. DeBaker will prepare an Archaeological Survey Report (ASR), Historic Properties Survey Report and Historic Resources Evaluation Report to fulfill Section 106 requirements. 2008-2018 Senior Archaeologist, Project Manager. Garcia and Associates, San Rafael, California. DeBaker was responsible for the managing cultural resources planning projects and investigations throughout California, for compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA, NEPA, and CEQA. DeBaker conducted, coordinated, and managed both small and large scale, technically complex cultural resources projects requiring regulatory expertise and the ability to collaborate with project managers, subconsultants, Native American tribal representatives, clients, agencies, and SHPO. 2017-2018 Principal Investigator. Garcia and Associates. Tubbs, Nuns, and Pocket Fire- PG&E’s Archaeological Site Impact Assessment, Emergency Fire Response, Sonoma and Napa Counties, California. DeBaker oversaw the cultural resources efforts to ensure compliance with PG&E requests to avoid and minimize impacts to cultural resources during restoration activities. DeBaker oversaw several months of monitoring and field survey that required daily communication with the client, tribal groups, and archaeological monitors. This project required the review of an intensive level records search as the Northwest Information Center, the assessment of impacts to resources within the PG&E assets corridor, the establishment of environmentally sensitive areas, and detailed site updates, including the preparation of DPR forms and maps.