Examples of Immigration Rights in a sentence
Michelle Amber, AFL, Day Laborers Group, Sign Pact To Advance Workers, Immigration Rights, 154 DAILY LABOR REPORT (BNA), August 10, 2006, at A-4 (noting that some worker centers may also provide legal services).
Immigration Equality, which was known as the Lesbian and Gay Immigration Rights Task Force until December 2003, was incorporated in 1994 and is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
The author would like to thank David Manne (of Melbourne’s Refugee and Immigration Legal Centre (RILC)), Margaret Piper (Executive Director of the Australian Refugee Council), Alison Ryan (Director of Sydney’s Immigration Rights and Casework Service (RACS)), and Edna Ross (Refugee Activist Extraordinaire) for their input and perspectives on Australia’s current immigration policies, particularly regarding immigration health exclusions and AIDS.
As a result, priority will be given to organizations whose work is focused in one or all of these areas: Education Reform, Immigration Rights and/or Voter Rights & Engagement.
On November 8, 2006, the day after Proposal 2 was approved, the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigration Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (“Coalition Plaintiffs”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Presented at a panel at a day long symposium hosted by the Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs (JLIA), Center for Immigration Rights, Family Law Clinic, and the Community Law Clinic.
Marouf (B.A. Yale, J.D. Harvard), Associate Professor of Law and Director of the Immigration Rights Clinic, Texas A&M University School of Law.
Scott Long, Jessica Stern & Adam Francoeur, Appendix B: Countries Protecting Same-Sex Couples’ Immigration Rights, in FAMILY, UNVALUED DISCRIMINATION, DENIAL, AND THE FATE OF BINATIONAL SAME-SEX COUPLES UNDER U.S. LAW, available at http://hrw.org/reports/2006/us0506/10.htm#_Toc132691986 (noting legalization of same-sex marriage in Belgium).
Coalition for Human Immigration Rights of Los Angeles (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 1138 (Fashion 21), and quotes an extensive discussion from that case beginning with, “It is well settled that in opposing a SLAPP motion the plaintiff’s showing of a probability of prevailing on its claim must be based on admissible evidence.” (Fashion 21, supra, 117 Cal.App.4th at pp.
I think the important message is, and what I would like to bring here, is that it is important to reach out to our organizations, who hold the trust in the community.” Michael Amezquita, Executive Director, Northern Manhattan Coalition for Immigration Rights, New York, NY • “…all the outreach doesn’t overcome those other barriers.