Method 3. The LOCAL AGENCY shall hold retainage from CONSULTANT and shall make prompt and regular incremental acceptances of portions, as determined by the LOCAL AGENCY of the contract work and pay retainage to CONSULTANT based on these acceptances. CONSULTANT or subconsultant shall return all monies withheld in retention from all subconsultants within 15 days after receiving payment for work satisfactorily completed and accepted including incremental acceptances of portions of the contract work by the LOCAL AGENCY. Any delay or postponement of payment may take place only for good cause and with the LOCAL AGENCY’s prior written approval. Any violation of these provisions shall subject the violating CONSULTANT or subconsultant to the penalties, sanctions, and other remedies specified in Section 3321 of the California Civil Code. This requirement shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative or judicial remedies otherwise available to CONSULTANT or subconsultant in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by CONSULTANT; deficient subconsultant performance and/or noncompliance by a subconsultant. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE subconsultants. Any violation of these provisions shall subject the violating CONSULTANT or subconsultant to the penalties, sanctions and other remedies specified therein. These requirements shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies otherwise available to CONSULTANT or subconsultant in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by CONSULTANT, deficient subcontract performance, or noncompliance by a subconsultant.
Method 3. With administrative approval, this is an option every other three year cycle for permanent unit members who have met Proficient or Distinguished standards in their previous overall evaluation rating and would like to work with a peer using observation in order for each peer/partner to examine practices and demonstrate proficiency related to their current practices. Evaluation Method 1: Administrative Evaluation Method Eligibility The Administrative Evaluation method for permanent unit members: • A permanent unit member rated Proficient or Distinguished in the previous overall evaluation rating may elect to be evaluated under the Administrative Evaluation option. • Permanent unit members shall be evaluated using this method every other three (3) year cycle. The Administrative Evaluation method is the only option for the following: • Temporary unit members • Probationary unit members • Unit members under an Improvement Support plan due to an overall evaluation rating of Does Not Meet or Emerging on standards in the previous year • Unit members who have failed to complete previous Peer-based or Project-based Evaluation cycle deadlines in the previous year Administrative evaluations will be conducted for two (2) consecutive years or more until the unit member has reached permanent status and has met Proficient or Distinguished standards on the overall evaluation rating. A unit member under an Improvement Support plan will remain on the Administrative Evaluation method until the unit member achieves a Proficient or Distinguished on standards on the overall evaluation rating. Evaluation Process:
Method 3 work integrated learning opportunities for University of Technology or Comprehensive University students completing their national diplomas. Method 4: structured workplace learning opportunities for candidates towards registration in a professional category by a statutory council listed in Table 1 above.
Examples of Method 3 in a sentence
Method #3: Undercontributing in a Subsequent Year - Another method of correcting an excess contribution is to treat a prior year excess as a regular contribution in a subsequent year where you have an unused contribution limit for such subsequent year.
Method #3: Under-contributing in a Subsequent Year Another method of correcting an excess contribution is to treat a prior year excess as a regular contribution in a subsequent year where you have an unused contribution limit for such subsequent year.
If the Customer wishes to use Royal Bank’s NDDS Method 3, then, subject to Royal Bank’s approval, the Customer will provide Royal Bank the Schedule applicable to NDDS Method 3.
The Agency shall include either Method 1, Method 2, or Method 3 below and delete the other two.
Before the General Contractor proceeds with any Work under Method 3, the Board must agree, in writing, to the maximum sum to be paid to the General Contractor under Method 3.
More Definitions of Method 3
Method 3 means the determination of appropriate remedial objectives based on the concentrations of Hazardous Substances developed in accordance with §§ 1.9.4 and 1.9.5 of this Part.
Method 3 means the determination of appropriate remedial objectives based on the concentrations of Hazardous Substances developed in accordance with Rule 8.04 (Method 3 Remedial Objectives) and Rule 8.05 (Ecological Protection) of the Remediation Regulations.
Method 3. The contractor shall have commercial freedom to submit such prices as it considers appropriate.
Method 3 or the "FEMA fluvial method" means the method of determining the fluvial flood hazard area design flood elevation and floodway limit from FEMA Flood Insurance Studies, as described at N.J.A.C. 7:13-3.4(e).
Method 3 each based on the unit members’ professional standards. The standards as described in the Evaluation Article for Certificated Staff act as a guide for discussion regarding professional growth and serve as a basis for unit member evaluation. Each certificated unit member is responsible for meeting the unit member’s professional standards as described in the Evaluation article for Certificated Staff to show growth in the unit member’s practice as an educator. Administrators have the right and responsibility to observe certificated unit members in their work setting at any time. Administrators always have the right and responsibility to identify any concerns related to meeting the standards. Three Evaluation Methods There are three (3) methods for certificated unit member evaluation. Each method uses self- assessment and reflection and is linked to the unit members’ professional standards.
Method 3. Financial offer and quality 1) Score for quality in the manner described below, rejecting all tender offers that fail to score the minimum number of points for quality stated in the Tender Data. 2) Score tender evaluation points for financial offer, in the manner outlined below. 3) Calculate total tender evaluation points. 4) Rank tender offers from the highest number of tender evaluation points to the lowest. 5) Recommend tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points for the award of the contract, unless there are compelling and justifiable reasons not to do so.
Method 3 a Private Line Connect Full Circuit Service. BT will provide the end to-end Service to the Customer. In case of a Private Line Connect Full Circuit Service BT will procure the other half of the Service from a Partner PTT on behalf of the Customer. The Customer will have a contract with BT for the full Service.