Mutual recognition definition
Mutual recognition means reciprocal recognition of the validity of trade-related data and documents in electronic form exchanged across borders between two or more countries;
Mutual recognition means that each Party, on the basis that it is accorded reciprocal treatment by the other Party:
Mutual recognition means the process of establishing the competence of an individual for independent practice in an engineering occupational role as a requirement of Professional Registration/Licensure.
Examples of Mutual recognition in a sentence
Mutual recognition arrangement between relevant institutions on credits, programs, and certifications is required.
Mutual recognition assures the applicant that no further evaluation of their technical competence will be required in the application process.
Mutual recognition of qualifications Helping the relevant professionals in Hong Kong to develop their career in the Mainland.
Mutual recognition is different from harmonization and standardization of qualifications.
Mutual recognition can be defined as the acceptance of regulatory conditions for goods and services required in one country (exporting origin/home country) as equivalent with the conditions necessary in another country (importing country/host country).3 Mutual recognition refers to the situation in which two countries accept the fulfillment of certain qualifications and standards in the other country as equivalent to its own requirements on a mutual and reciprocal basis.
More Definitions of Mutual recognition
Mutual recognition means reciprocal recognition of the validity of trade- related data and documents in electronic form exchanged across borders between two or more countries.
Mutual recognition means the acceptance of one National Medical Products Regulatory Agency’s certification of standards and procedures for medical product regulation by another National Medical Products Regulatory Agency;
Mutual recognition means that each Party, on the basis that it is accorded reciprocal treatment by the other Party:
(a) accepts the mandatory requirements of the other Party as producing outcomes equivalent to those produced by its own corresponding mandatory requirements i.e. mutual recognition of equivalence of mandatory requirements;
(b) accepts the results of conformity assessment activities of the other Party to demonstrate conformity of products and/or manufacturers with its mandatory requirements when the conformity assessment activities are undertaken by conformity assessment bodies designated by the other Party in accordance with this Part i.e. mutual recognition of conformity assessment; or
(c) accepts the standards of the other Party as equivalent to its own corresponding standards i.e. mutual recognition of equivalence of standards.
Mutual recognition has provided one means of avoiding problems that arise when regulatory orders collide. It allows countries to recognise risk assessments made elsewhere, even if they embody different assumptions and value-systems, as they inevitably do. These mechanisms of policy transfer reflect different regulatory styles and cultures that shape what types of regulation are considered necessary and appropriate. The different emphasis attributed to precaution in the U.S and the E.U. is an example of the importance of this. It draws attention to the way in which many supranational regulatory approaches reflect and internationalise the preferred policy mechanisms of influential states. In this case, ‘The result has been two management systems co-existing in GMO regulation, vying for the support and conversion of other countries’ (Dunlop 2000: 154). This has important implications for developing countries, given that what is imported through policy transfer is not just a tested set of rules and procedures, but a set of values and assumptions about biological processes and prior assessments about which risks are socially acceptable that, in turn, result from a series of context-specific compromises and trade-offs. While there is clearly scope to adapt regulatory models to national needs, however these are defined, it remains the case that certain practices, values and assumptions get internationalised by these means.
Mutual recognition means that the public body shall accept the technical standards, professional qualifications and certificates used in European Union Member States;
Mutual recognition means the reciprocal adoption or acceptance of regulatory decisions or outcomes made by other NMRAs as valid.
Mutual recognition. The TEPA provides for provisions of mutual recognition agreements (MRA) in professional services such as nursing, chartered accountants, architects, etc. • Intellectual property rights: The commitments related to intellectual property rights (IPR) in the TEPA are at the TRIPS level. India’s interests in generic medicines and concerns related to the evergreening of patents have been fully addressed. • Promotion to exporters: The TEPA will empower exporters’ access to specialised inputs and create a conducive trade and investment environment. This would boost the exports of Indian-made goods, as well as provide opportunities for the services sector to access more markets.