Action Learning Sample Clauses

Action Learning. Action learning sets (ALS) are facilitated peer support and challenge groups where participants learn both from being coached on their own leadership issues and coaching others. The intent is for action learning to help develop reflective leaders. The action learning sets will particularly focus on supporting and challenging participants as they prepare for their roles as emerging leaders in the NHS. These groups will meet both face to face and virtually in order to experience and develop increasingly important virtual engagement skills. Participants will be expected over time to participate in facilitating the sets in order to develop important peer-facilitation skills. The first meeting would be for a full day. The subsequent five meetings will be a mix of face to face and virtual, at dates to be agreed by set members. In the initial phase of the group, the set facilitator will be responsible for: Helping to establish a group climate where learning can take place Facilitating giving and receiving of support, feedback and challenge Clarifying the learning process and modelling facilitative interventions Assisting participants to take responsibility for their own learning and development Being a process consultant to the group. The following criteria must be adhered to in relation to action learning sets: Venues should be an interruption free environment; Action learning sets should take place in alternating trainees localities/host organisations; Venues themselves should be cost-neutral, that is in NHS facilities or other places that will not levy charges; Trainees will normally take the lead on venue arrangements. Area offices, LDMs and trainees should liaise together and share local knowledge to identify and secure room bookings; The lead trainee will take responsibility for all communications to the set colleagues and facilitator regarding venue arrangements. In addition there is a requirement for suppliers to demonstrate how the learning outcomes and objectives of action learning can be demonstrated to the scheme in a quantifiable way. There may also be a requirement for a multi-disciplinary approach to action learning sets through the involvement of clinicians and other NHS staff. Provision of Service and Delivery Contractors need to consider the following criteria when submitting a proposal:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Action Learning

  • Corrective Action Plan Within fifteen (15) Business Days following the establishment of the Joint Remediation Committee, the Purchasers, in consultation with the Sellers, shall prepare and submit to the Joint Remediation Committee an initial draft of the Corrective Action Plan. The parties shall work in good faith through the Joint Remediation Committee to finalize the Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days of the Purchasers’ submission of the initial draft of the Correct Action Plan. At the end of such period, if the Sellers reasonably determine that the Corrective Action Plan proposed by the Purchasers (as may be modified over the course of such period) would not reasonably be expected to satisfactorily address the Major Default, then the Sellers may escalate the issue to the Head of Commercial Capital (or equivalent leader of any successor business unit) of the Seller Group and the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank Assets Purchaser (the “Senior Executives”) and the Senior Executives shall work collaboratively (including with the Joint Remediation Committee) to develop a mutually agreeable Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days.

  • Corrective Action Plans If the OAG finds deficiencies in XXXXXXX’s performance under this Grant Contract, the OAG, at its sole discretion, may impose one or more of the following remedies as part of a corrective action plan: increase of monitoring visits; require additional or more detailed financial and/or programmatic reports be submitted; require prior approval for expenditures; require additional technical or management assistance and/or make modifications in business practices; reduce the contract amount; and/or terminate this Grant Contract. The foregoing are not exclusive remedies, and the OAG may impose other requirements that the OAG determines will be in the best interest of the State.

  • Assistance in Litigation or Administrative Proceedings Covered Entity shall provide written notice to Business Associate if litigation or administrative proceeding is commenced against Covered Entity, its directors, officers, or employees, based on a claimed violation by Business Associate of HIPAA, the HIPAA Rules or other laws relating to security and privacy or PHI. Upon receipt of such notice and to the extent requested by Covered Entity, Business Associate shall, and shall cause its employees, Subcontractors, or agents assisting Business Associate in the performance of its obligations under the Contract to, assist Covered Entity in the defense of such litigation or proceedings. Business Associate shall, and shall cause its employees, Subcontractor’s and agents to, provide assistance, to Covered Entity, which may include testifying as a witness at such proceedings. Business Associate or any of its employees, Subcontractors or agents shall not be required to provide such assistance if Business Associate is a named adverse party.

  • Procurement Related Complaints and Administrative Review 49.1 The procedures for making a Procurement-related Complaint are as specified in the TDS.

  • Name Collision Occurrence Assessment 6.2.1 Registry Operator shall not activate any names in the DNS zone for the Registry TLD except in compliance with a Name Collision Occurrence Assessment provided by ICANN regarding the Registry TLD. Registry Operator will either (A) implement the mitigation measures described in its Name Collision Occurrence Assessment before activating any second-­‐level domain name, or (B) block those second-­‐level domain names for which the mitigation measures as described in the Name Collision Occurrence Assessment have not been implemented and proceed with activating names that are not listed in the Assessment.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment and Prior Consultation Processor shall provide reasonable assistance to the Company with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with Supervising Authorities or other competent data privacy authorities, which Company reasonably considers to be required by article 35 or 36 of the GDPR or equivalent provisions of any other Data Protection Law, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Company Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, the Contracted Processors.

  • Grievance Investigation The Employer agrees to supply to the Union the names of all applicants for a vacancy, or new position in the course of a grievance investigation.

  • Action Item Task MSU Status Comments I.1 The University will employ and empower a Clery Act compliance professional (CCP). The CCP must report to a Vice President (VP) or equivalent. The CCP must not be employed in or under the sole authority of the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). Implemented The Office of Audit, Risk and Compliance (OARC) hired a qualified candidate who began work in February 2020.

  • Statement of Grievance The grievance shall contain a statement of:

  • GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE (Continued STEP No.2 If the grievance is not settled up to this point, the grievance committee shall, within ten (10) working days after the decision of the Regional Supervisor Plant Operations under Step No.1, refer the written grievance to the Executive Officer of Human Resources or designate. The Executive Officer of Human Resources or designate shall then investigate the grievance and shall meet with the Union Grievance Committee within fifteen (15) working days after receipt of the written grievance. At such meeting the Board or the Union may have such additional representation present as each party desires, and the grievor or employee(s) concerned may be required to be present at the request of either party. The Executive Officer of Human Resources shall render a decision in writing to the Secretary of the Union and Chief Xxxxxxx within ten (10) working days. STEP No.3 If the grievance is not settled up to this point, the grievance committee shall, within ten (10) working days after the decision of the Executive Officer of Human Resources under Step No.2, refer the written grievance to the Director of Education or designate. The Director of Education or designate shall then investigate the grievance and shall meet with the Union Grievance Committee as soon as possible but not later than two (2) weeks thereafter to attempt to settle the grievance. At such meeting the Board or the Union may have such additional representatives present as each party desires, and the grievor or employee(s) concerned may be required to be present at the request of either party. The Director of Education shall render a decision in writing to the Secretary of the Union and Chief Xxxxxxx within ten (10) working days of the holding of the meeting. STEP No.4 If the grievance is not settled at STEP No.3, and if mutually agreed by the Board and the Union, the grievance can proceed to a mediation process. The costs of the process will be shared equally by the parties. STEP No.5 If final settlement of the grievance is not completed at Step No.3 above, it may be referred by either party to Arbitration as hereinafter provided in Article 10 within thirty (30) days from the Director of Education's or designate's decision at Step No.3 above. The party referring the grievance to arbitration shall be restricted to the issue contained in the written grievance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.