Agency Review - Approval Standard Sample Clauses

Agency Review - Approval Standard. All Major Phase Applications shall be reviewed and considered by the Agency Commission, and shall be Approved by the Agency Commission, in its reasonable discretion, if and to the extent the Major Phase Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the applicable Redevelopment Requirements and, if applicable, the Land Acquisition Agreements and the Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx DDA and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Agency Commission. If a Major Phase Application is disapproved by the Agency Commission, then the Agency Commissioners shall, at the public hearing during which the Major Phase Application is being considered, state the basis for the disapproval, which basis shall be summarized in writing by the Agency Director, to the best of his or her knowledge, after the hearing and delivered to Developer. Following any disapproval of a Major Phase Application, Developer may within ninety (90) days following receipt by Developer of such summary (subject to such extensions as may be Approved by the Agency Director) make changes to and resubmit the Major Phase Application. Promptly following the Agency Director’s receipt of a revised Complete Major Phase Application, the Agency Director shall submit such revised Complete Major Phase Application in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Section IV.B. The Schedule of Performance shall be automatically extended, if necessary, to allow for the foregoing procedure; provided, however, that the Schedule of Performance shall not be so extended for more than one revised Complete Major Phase Application for each Major Phase without the Approval of the Agency Director.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Agency Review - Approval Standard. DBI approval of Construction Documents Applications shall be made in accordance with Applicable City Regulations. All Construction Documents Applications shall be Approved by the Agency Director if and to the extent the Construction Documents Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the applicable Redevelopment Requirements and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Agency Director. If a Construction Documents Application is disapproved by the Agency Director, then the Agency Director shall send a notice to the applicant stating the basis for the disapproval. The applicant shall have the opportunity to make changes to and resubmit the Construction Documents Application from time to time. Promptly following the Agency Director’s receipt of a revised Construction Documents Application, the Agency Director shall review and consider such Application in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Section VII.D. The approval of the Agency shall not override the review authority of DBI under the standards and procedures of the Applicable City Regulations. Construction Documents shall not be Approved until the conditions and requirements set forth in article 4 of the DDA have been satisfied or waived by the Agency.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
Agency Review - Approval Standard. All Schematic Design Documents Applications shall be reviewed and considered by the CAC or the PAC, as applicable, and then the Agency Commission, and shall be Approved by the Agency Commission if and to the extent the Schematic Design Documents Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the applicable Redevelopment Requirements and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Agency Commission. If a Schematic Design Documents Application is disapproved by the Agency Commission, then the Agency Commissioners shall, at the public hearing during which the Schematic Design Documents Application is being considered, state the basis for the disapproval, which basis shall be summarized in writing by the Agency Director after the hearing and delivered to Vertical Developer. Following any disapproval of a Schematic Design Documents Application, Vertical Developer may make changes to and resubmit the Schematic Design Documents Application at any time; provided, for Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Replacement Projects and Stand-Alone Workforce Projects, such resubmittal shall be made within ninety (90) days. Promptly following the Agency Director’s receipt of a revised Complete Schematic Design Documents Application, the Agency Director shall submit such revised Complete Schematic Design Documents Application in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Section VII.B. For Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Replacement Projects and Stand-Alone Workforce Projects, the Schedule of Performance shall be automatically extended, if necessary, to allow for the foregoing procedure; provided, however, that the Schedule of Performance shall not be so extended for more than one revised Complete Schematic Design Documents Application for each such Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Replacement Project and Stand-Alone Workforce Project without the Approval of the Agency Director.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
Agency Review - Approval Standard. All Design Development Applications shall be reviewed and considered by the Agency Director, and shall be Approved if and to the extent the Design Development Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the applicable Redevelopment Requirements and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Agency Director. If a Design Development Application is disapproved by the Agency Director, then the Agency Director shall send a notice to the applicant stating the basis for the disapproval. The applicant shall have the opportunity to make changes to and resubmit the Design Development Application from time to time. Promptly following the Agency Director’s receipt of a revised Complete Design Development Application, the Agency Director shall review and consider such Application in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Section VII.C.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
Agency Review - Approval Standard. All Sub-Phase Applications shall be reviewed and considered by the Agency Director, and shall be Approved if and to the extent the Sub-Phase Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the Redevelopment Requirements and, if applicable, the Land Acquisition Agreements and the Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx DDA and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Agency Director. Without limiting any Approvals required (or the standards for such Approvals) under the Interagency Cooperation Agreement, the Planning Cooperation Agreement or under (i) the area of a Sub-Phase; (ii) the timing or substance of the Associated Public Benefits as shown in the Phasing Plan or other public benefits described in the Below-Market Rate Housing Plans or the Community Benefits Plan; (iii) the timing the Completion of the Agency Affordable Lots or the Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Replacement Lots; and (iv) the Infrastructure to be Completed within the Sub-Phase. Additionally, any requested variance approval must be made by the Agency Commission as required by the applicable Redevelopment Plan. If a Sub-Phase Application is disapproved by the Agency Director, then the Agency Director shall send a notice to Developer stating the basis for the disapproval. Following any disapproval of a Sub-Phase Application, Developer may within ninety (90) days following receipt by Developer of such summary (subject to such extensions as may be Approved by the Agency Director) make changes to and resubmit the Sub-Phase Application. Promptly following the Agency Director’s receipt of a revised Complete Sub-Phase Application, the Agency Director shall review and consider the Sub-Phase Application in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Section V.B.4. The Schedule of Performance shall be automatically extended, if necessary, to allow for the foregoing procedure; provided, however, that the Schedule of Performance shall not be so extended for more than one revised Complete Sub-Phase Application for each Sub-Phase without the Approval of the Agency Director.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Agency Review - Approval Standard. ‌ All Schematic Design Documents Applications shall be reviewed and considered by the CAC, and then the Agency Commission, and shall be Approved by the Agency Commission if and to the extent the Schematic Design Documents Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the applicable Redevelopment Requirements and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Agency Commission. If a Schematic Design Documents Application is disapproved by the Agency Commission, then the Agency Commissioners shall, at the public hearing during which the Schematic Design Documents Application is being considered, state the basis for the disapproval, which basis shall be summarized in writing by the Agency Director after the hearing and delivered to Developer. Following any disapproval of a Schematic Design Documents Application, Developer may make changes to and resubmit the Schematic Design Documents Application at any time. Promptly following the Agency Director’s receipt of a revised Complete Schematic Design Documents Application, the Agency Director shall submit such revised Complete Schematic Design Documents Application in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Section VIII.C.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)

Related to Agency Review - Approval Standard

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Regulatory Compliance Neither Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries is an “investment company” or a company “controlled” by an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Neither Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries is engaged as one of its important activities in extending credit for margin stock (under Regulations X, T and U of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors). Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries has complied in all material respects with the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. Neither Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries is a “holding company” or an “affiliate” of a “holding company” or a “subsidiary company” of a “holding company” as each term is defined and used in the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005. Neither Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries has violated any laws, ordinances or rules, the violation of which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Change. Neither Borrower’s nor any of its Subsidiaries’ properties or assets has been used by Borrower or such Subsidiary or, to Borrower’s knowledge, by previous Persons, in disposing, producing, storing, treating, or transporting any hazardous substance other than in material compliance with applicable laws. Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries has obtained all consents, approvals and authorizations of, made all declarations or filings with, and given all notices to, all Governmental Authorities that are necessary to continue their respective businesses as currently conducted. None of Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries, or any of Borrower’s or its Subsidiaries’ Affiliates or any of their respective agents acting or benefiting in any capacity in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement is (i) in violation of any Anti-Terrorism Law, (ii) engaging in or conspiring to engage in any transaction that evades or avoids, or has the purpose of evading or avoiding or attempts to violate, any of the prohibitions set forth in any Anti-Terrorism Law, or (iii) is a Blocked Person. None of Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries, or to the knowledge of Borrower and any of their Affiliates or agents, acting or benefiting in any capacity in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (x) conducts any business or engages in making or receiving any contribution of funds, goods or services to or for the benefit of any Blocked Person, or (y) deals in, or otherwise engages in any transaction relating to, any property or interest in property blocked pursuant to Executive Order No. 13224, any similar executive order or other Anti-Terrorism Law.

  • Program Compliance The School Board shall be responsible for monitoring the program to provide technical assistance and to ensure program compliance.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Program Overview Microsoft extends to eligible partners the opportunity to participate in the Program referenced above subject to these Program Terms & Conditions (“Program Terms”). Each entity participating in the Program is hereinafter referred to as a “Participant.” Participation in the Program is voluntary. The Program is governed by the Program Terms, which incorporate by reference the Microsoft Partner Network Agreement (as in effect between Microsoft and Participant, the “MPN Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in these Program Terms have the meanings assigned to them in the MPN Agreement. These Program Terms are subject to local requirements and may vary by jurisdiction, and Participant retains sole discretion to set pricing for sales of applicable products.

  • Clinical Data and Regulatory Compliance The preclinical tests and clinical trials, and other studies (collectively, “studies”) that are described in, or the results of which are referred to in, the Registration Statement or the Prospectus were and, if still pending, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with the protocols, procedures and controls designed and approved for such studies and with standard medical and scientific research procedures; each description of the results of such studies is accurate and complete in all material respects and fairly presents the data derived from such studies, and the Company and its subsidiaries have no knowledge of any other studies the results of which are inconsistent with, or otherwise call into question, the results described or referred to in the Registration Statement or the Prospectus; the Company and its subsidiaries have made all such filings and obtained all such approvals as may be required by the Food and Drug Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or any committee thereof or from any other U.S. or foreign government or drug or medical device regulatory agency, or health care facility Institutional Review Board (collectively, the “Regulatory Agencies”); neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has received any notice of, or correspondence from, any Regulatory Agency requiring the termination, suspension or modification of any clinical trials that are described or referred to in the Registration Statement or the Prospectus; and the Company and its subsidiaries have each operated and currently are in compliance in all material respects with all applicable rules, regulations and policies of the Regulatory Agencies.

  • Information for Regulatory Compliance Each of the Company and the Depositary shall provide to the other, as promptly as practicable, information from its records or otherwise available to it that is reasonably requested by the other to permit the other to comply with applicable law or requirements of governmental or regulatory authorities.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!