Appeal of Unsatisfactory or Needs Improvement Rating Sample Clauses

Appeal of Unsatisfactory or Needs Improvement Rating. Any teacher who receives a final overall summative evaluation rating of “Unsatisfactory” or “Needs Improvement” may appeal the evaluation rating by following the procedures set forth in this section. Prior to initiating a formal appeal, within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the final evaluation rating the teacher may request an informal review of the evaluation rating by the Superintendent or his/her designee. In the event of such a request, the Superintendent or designee will meet with the teacher and his/her evaluator to discuss and review the rating. Any teacher who receives a final overall summative evaluation rating of “Unsatisfactory” or “Needs Improvement” may initiate a formal appeal of the evaluation rating by submitting written notice to the Superintendent or designee within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of the final evaluation rating. The teacher’s notice must include a specific explanation of the basis for the appeal (including the alleged errors underlying the rating). When the notice is submitted, the teacher also must provide a copy of the notice to the teacher’s evaluator. The PERA Joint Committee will determine the criteria for successful appeals. In addition, the PERA Joint Committee will create and maintain a list of qualified evaluators who may serve on the appeal panel (“the List”). The appeal panel will consist of four (4) qualified evaluators, up to two (2) of whom will be members of the bargaining unit unless EPET does not have enough members of the bargaining unit who are qualified evaluators. When an appeal is filed, the E.P.E.T. President will be given the opportunity to select two (2) qualified evaluators from the List, subject to approval by the PERA Joint Committee. The remaining members of the appeal panel will be selected from the List by the PERA Joint Committee. The appeal panel will not include the appealing teacher or the teacher’s evaluator. Within seven (7) calendar days after receiving a copy of the teacher’s notice of appeal, the teacher’s evaluator may file a written response to the appeal notice. The following materials will be provided to the appeal panel for consideration: the notice of appeal, the evaluator’s response, the final summative evaluation, all formal and informal observation reports for the evaluation, and any artifacts or other evidence referenced in the evaluation and/or used to determine the evaluation rating. Each member of the appeal panel will maintain confidentiality relating to...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Appeal of Unsatisfactory or Needs Improvement Rating

  • Excellent Above Average Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory 5 4 3 2 1 5. The instructor demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter.

  • Elements Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary IV-A-1. Reflective Practice Demonstrates limited reflection on practice and/or use of insights gained to improve practice. May reflect on the effectiveness of lessons/ units and interactions with students but not with colleagues and/or rarely uses insights to improve practice. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues, and uses insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues; and uses and shares with colleagues, insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Is able to model this element.

  • Staffing Levels to deal with Potential Violence The Employer agrees that, where there is a risk of violence, an adequate level of trained employees should be present. The Employer recognizes that workloads can lead to fatigue and a diminished ability both to identify and to subsequently deal with potentially violent situations.

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract.

  • Teaching Staff Assigned to More Than One Building Each Educator who is assigned to more than one building will be evaluated by the appropriate administrator where the individual is assigned most of the time. The principal of each building in which the Educator serves must review and sign the evaluation, and may add written comments. In cases where there is no predominate assignment, the superintendent will determine who the primary evaluator will be.

  • District’s Evaluation of Consultant and Consultant’s Employees and/or Subcontractors The District may evaluate the Consultant in any way the District is entitled pursuant to applicable law. The District’s evaluation may include, without limitation:

  • Benefit Level Two Health Care Network Determination Issues regarding the health care networks for the 2017 insurance year shall be negotiated in accordance with the following procedures:

  • Technical and Organizational Measures The following sections define SAP’s current technical and organizational measures. SAP may change these at any time without notice so long as it maintains a comparable or better level of security. Individual measures may be replaced by new measures that serve the same purpose without diminishing the security level protecting Personal Data.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Sector Sub-Sector Industry Classification Level of Government Type of Obligation Description of Measure Source of Measure All sectors : : - : Central : National Treatment Senior Management and Board of Directors : National Treatment and the Senior Management and Board of Directors obligations shall not apply to any measure relating to small and medium sized domestic market enterprise2. Foreign equity is restricted to a maximum of 40% for domestic market enterprises with paid-in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000 Note: Members of the Board of Directors or governing body of corporation or associations shall be allowed in proportion to their allowable participation or share in the capital of such enterprises. : -1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. - Foreign Investments Act of 1991 (R.A. No. 7042, as amended by R.A. No. 8179). -Presidential and Administrative Issuances. ∞ 2 The concept of a small and medium sized domestic market enterprise is an enterprise with paid in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000.00.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.