Assessment of progress. (1) The Monetary Council shall cause an independent review to be conducted annually to:
Assessment of progress. 1. By 31 October 2021 and every second year thereafter, the Commission shall assess, in particular on the basis of the integrated national energy and climate progress reports, of other information reported under this Regulation, of the indicators and of European statistics and data where available: PE625.412v01-00 68/146 AG\1158794EN.docx EN
Assessment of progress. This assessment relates only to full-time students as the proportion of part-time undergraduate HEFCE-fundable students in our 2015 HESES return is 5.0% (238 students). Key measures which are regularly monitored are set out in the table below. Key indicators of our progress across the lifecycle are described in the narrative following the table. Stage of Lifecycle Measure Outreach % participants in primary and secondary schools outreach meeting at least one WP criterion Changes in aspirations of Year 6, Year 8 and Year 10 participants to progress to HE – before and after WP interventions Perceived usefulness of residential in informing HE progression decision Qualitative feedback from school staff including general comments and their assessment of whether participants have met outcomes set out in Learner Tracking of outreach participants – comparison of HE progression rates (when age- and qualification-ready) for POLAR3 Q1 and 2 participants with average young participation rates Recruitment % first degree students from state schools % first degree students in receipt of DSA % first degree students from low participation neighbourhoods (young) % first degree students from low participation neighbourhoods (mature) Number of first degree students from UK-domicile BME groups Number of males students recruited to ITT Number of BME students recruited to ITT Number of first degree care leavers Number of first degree young adult carers Retention Retention of young first degree students from low participation neighbourhoods Retention of mature first degree students from low participation neighbourhoods % first degree students leaving with no award analysed by sex % first degree students leaving with no award analysed by disability % first degree students leaving with no award analysed by ethnicity
Assessment of progress. THIS ASSESSMENT RELATES ONLY TO FULL-TIME STUDENTS AS THE PROPORTION OF PART-TIME UNDERGRADUATE HEFCE-FUNDABLE STUDENTS IN OUR 2015 HESES RETURN IS 5.8% (280 STUDENTS). KEY MEASURES WHICH ARE REGULARLY MONITORED ARE SET OUT IN THE TABLE BELOW. KEY INDICATORS OF OUR PROGRESS ACROSS THE LIFECYCLE ARE DESCRIBED IN THE NARRATIVE FOLLOWING THE TABLE. STAGE OFLIFECYCLE MEASURE OUTREACH % PARTICIPANTS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS OUTREACH MEETING AT LEAST CHANGES IN ASPIRATIONS OF YEAR 8 AND YEAR 10 PARTICIPANTS TOPROGRESS TO HE – PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF RESIDENTIAL IN INFORMING HE PROGRESSION QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK FROM SCHOOL STAFF INCLUDING GENERAL COMMENTS AND THEIR TRACKING OF OUTREACH PARTICIPANTS – COMPARISON OF HE PROGRESSION RATES (WHEN RECRUITMENT % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM STATE SCHOOLS % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS IN RECEIPT OF DSA % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM LOW PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM LOW PARTICIPATION NEIGHBOURHOODS NUMBER OF FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM UK-DOMICILE BME GROUPS NUMBER OF MALES STUDENTS RECRUITED TO ITT NUMBER OF BME STUDENTS RECRUITED TO ITT NUMBER OF FIRST DEGREE CARE LEAVERS NUMBER OF FIRST DEGREE YOUNG ADULT CARERS RETENTION RETENTION OF YOUNG FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM LOW RETENTION OF MATURE FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS FROM LOWPARTICIPATION % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS LEAVING WITH NO AWARD ANALYSED BY SEX % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS LEAVING WITH NO AWARD ANALYSED BY % FIRST DEGREE STUDENTS LEAVING WITH NO AWARD ANALYSED BY DEGREE OUTCOMES % OF 1ST AND 2(I) DEGREES ANALYSED BY SEX
Assessment of progress. Assess the progress made overcall in the activity in achieving your project goal.
Assessment of progress. In furtherance of the goals stated above, OHSU, NMI, RCI and Block 39 will encourage their general contractors working on Contingent Projects in the Project Area to support the Workforce Diversity Strategy and will require such contractors to provide summary data reflecting minority and women workforce participation within the Project Area. The Parties also agree to annually assess the progress of the Workforce Diversity Strategy through review and analysis of workforce data collected from each Party’s respective contractors, trade unions and other sources. PDC, NMI, OHSU, RCI and Block 39 acknowledge that the Workforce Diversity Strategy may be modified over time based on this annual assessment, and the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to address changes and amend this Agreement accordingly. All Parties will be bound by any material changes to the Workforce Diversity Strategy that are set forth in writing and signed by the Parties.
