CFIUS Review Sample Clauses

CFIUS Review. The Company and Purchaser shall have received written notice from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) that its review of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement has concluded or, in the event of an investigation, that CFIUS has terminated such investigation, and there are no unresolved national security concerns with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CFIUS Review. Each of the Investor and the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain a written notification issued by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) that CFIUS has concluded a review of the notification voluntarily filed jointly by the Investor and the Company pursuant to the Exon-Fxxxxx Provision and determined not to conduct a full investigation or, if a full investigation is deemed to be required, notification that the United States government will not take action to prevent the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (such notification, the “CFIUS Approval”). Without limiting the foregoing, the requirement of the Investor and the Company to use their reasonable best efforts to obtain CFIUS Approval shall include promptly making any pre-notification and notification filings required in connection with CFIUS Approval, and providing any information requested by CFIUS or any other agency or branch of the United States government in connection with their review of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Such efforts also shall include, to the extent necessary to obtain CFIUS Approval, the execution of mitigation agreements containing terms customarily included in such mitigation agreements, provided however that no party shall be required to enter into any agreement that materially interferes with the Investor’s ability to exercise any and all rights accorded to them pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and the Stockholder Agreement.
Sample 1
CFIUS Review. During the term of the Loan, Borrower shall (and shall cause the holders of direct and/or indirect, legal and/or beneficial, interests in Borrower to) (i) within five (5) days of receipt of the same, notify Lender, and provide Lender with a copy, of any inquiry received from CFIUS or any other Governmental Authority related to Borrower’s acquisition of the Property, (ii) make any filing requested by CFIUS related to Borrower’s acquisition of the Property, (iii) cooperate with, and fully respond to any inquiries received from, CFIUS or any Governmental Authority related to CFIUS’s review and/or investigation (the “CFIUS Review”) related to Borrower’s acquisition of the Property, in each case within the time permitted by CFIUS or such Governmental Authority, as applicable, and (iv) subject to the terms and conditions hereof (including, without limitation, Section 4.2 hereof), take any mitigation measures requested by CFIUS and/or any Governmental Authority in connection with the CFIUS Review.
Sample 1
CFIUS Review. Review by CFIUS shall have been concluded, and the President of the United States of America shall not have taken action to block or prevent the consummation of the Transactions and other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and no requirements or conditions to mitigate any national security concerns shall have been imposed, other than requirements or conditions that would not be reasonably likely to result in a London Burdensome Condition or a New York Burdensome Condition (the “CFIUS Condition”).
Sample 1
CFIUS Review. The CFIUS Approval has been obtained.
Sample 1
CFIUS Review. Each of the Investor and the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the CFIUS Approval. Without limiting the foregoing, the requirement of the Investor and the Company to use their reasonable best efforts to obtain the CFIUS Approval shall include promptly (and in any event, the draft notification filing within 20 Business Days following (but not including) the date hereof or on such date as otherwise agreed by both parties) making any pre-notification and notification filings required in connection with obtaining the CFIUS Approval, and providing any information requested by CFIUS or any other agency or branch of the United States government in connection with their review of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Such efforts also shall include all other efforts necessary to obtain the CFIUS Approval (including entering into an agreement pursuant to the DPA intended to address any national security concerns) that are not reasonably likely to result in a Substantial Detriment.
Sample 1
CFIUS Review. (a) As soon as practicable after the date hereof, the Investor, the Guarantor and the Company shall prepare, prefile and file with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) a joint voluntary notice pursuant to Exon-Xxxxxx of the transactions contemplated hereby (the “CFIUS Filing”). The Investor, the Guarantor and the Company shall each, to their fullest ability, provide CFIUS with any additional or supplemental information requested by CFIUS or its member agencies within three (3) Business Days of receiving such request, or such longer period as permitted by CFIUS, during the Exon-Xxxxxx review process. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Investor, the Guarantor and the Company shall, on a cooperative basis, use their respective reasonable best efforts to take all steps advisable, necessary or desirable to finally and successfully complete the Exon‑Xxxxxx review process as promptly as practicable and to make any and all commercially reasonable undertakings necessary to obtain the CFIUS Approval prior to February 29, 2016; provided, however, that notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, no party shall have any obligation to offer or agree to any commitment or arrangement or any term, condition, limitation or restriction of any type or nature that would reasonably be expected to constitute or result in any Impediment with respect to such party or any of its Affiliates. (b) Without limiting the foregoing, the Investor, the Guarantor and the Company shall, on a cooperative basis and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, use their respective reasonable best efforts to take all steps advisable, necessary and desirable to obtain a written determination by CFIUS that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are not subject to Exon-Xxxxxx (the “CFIUS Determination”); provided that notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Investor nor the Guarantor shall be required to offer or agree to any changes to or limitations of the Investor’s rights under the Transaction Documents (including the Investor Rights Agreement). If, upon the conclusion of the 30-day Exon-Xxxxxx review period (including any additional 30-day Exon-Xxxxxx review period resulting from the parties’ mutual agreement, and permission from CFIUS, to withdraw and re-submit the CFIUS Filing), the parties have failed to obtain the CFIUS Determination, then each of the Investor and the Company shall have the right to terminate t...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to CFIUS Review

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Claims Review The IRO shall perform the Claims Review annually to cover each of the five Reporting Periods. The IRO shall perform all components of each Claims Review.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!