CHANGES IN COST. It is acknowledged that there may be increases in the cost or utilization of dental care during the term of this agreement and that, in order to maintain the benefits of the Dental Program, it may be necessary for the Board of Trustees of the National IAM Benefit Trust Fund to direct one or more increases in the contribution rate. In such an event, and upon 90 days advance notice from the Trustees, the Company will increase the aforesaid contribution rate by the total amount of increases directed by the Trustees, during the term of this Agreement, shall not exceed $2.00 per employee per month.
CHANGES IN COST. The Service Provider shall be entitled to pass on to the Customer all costs and expenses incurred in complying with any relative changes in the law.
CHANGES IN COST. Any change in insurance premium, destination, or other shipping charges including fluctuations in ocean freight which may be established after the date of the Contract shall be for Buyer’s account and at Buyer’s sole cost and expense. All transportation expense, if included in the price, is as per current tariff at the date of the Contract and any changes thereafter shall be for Buyer’s account and at Buyer’s sole cost and expense, unless otherwise specified. In the case of C.I.F, C.F.R., C.P.T. or C.I.P sales, any import duty, tax, or tariff, or any revenue or other national, federal, state, or municipal tax or taxes now or subsequently imposed in the country of destination and at Buyer’s sole cost and expense, upon the Goods and/or their containers, shall be for Buyer’s account, in accordance with the International Rules for the Interpretation of Trade Terms 2020 (Incoterms) interpretation of C.I.F., C.F.R., C.P.T. and C.I.P sales, unless specifically otherwise stipulated in the Contract.
CHANGES IN COST. The following shall in no event apply to election changes with respect to the Health Care Flexible Spending Accounts (or on account of any changes in cost or coverage under the Health Care Flexible Spending Accounts).
CHANGES IN COST. At its inception, MET covered costs with property tax revenues, and this pol- icy shifted costs to low-demand, wealthier areas from high-demand, poorer areas. Xxx- xxxxx (1956a), for example, calculates that SDCWA paid 6 percent of taxes in exchange for 34 percent of MET’s water between 1948 and 1955. Los Angeles, in contrast, paid 62 percent of taxes for 9 percent of the wa- ter. On an acre-foot basis, this works out to $38/AF for SDCWA and $1,246/AF for LA. Xxxxxxx (1976) does the same calcula- tions twenty years later and finds that SD- CWA’s average cost is $69/AF and Los An- geles’ cost is $532/AF. Xxxxxx (1953) also pointed out the imbalance between cost and benefit at MET. Since Los Angeles was probably not interested in long-term charity (see Sec- tion 3.5), it fought to shift costs from taxes to water sales (via higher prices). In July 1960, the MET Board approved Resolution 5748, which mandated that MET would pay capital costs and operating expenses “from water revenues as soon as practica- ble.” In September of the same year, Reso- lution 5821 mandated that half of capital ex- penses and all operating expenses would be paid through water sales (Xxxxxxx, 1976). MET’s Board interpreted “as soon as practicable” to mean “later.” Besides the 29With caveats about sampling error, 73 percent of the 15 member agency managers who participated in the experiment in Chapter 5 were engineers but only 14 percent of the 14 MET executives were engineers; see Table 5.2.
CHANGES IN COST
