Claim Review and Processing Sample Clauses

Claim Review and Processing. The Class Action Settlement Administrator shall receive and process the Claims, whether submitted electronically via the settlement website or by U.S. Mail, and the Class Action Settlement Administrator shall administer the review and processing of Claims. The Class Action Settlement Administrator shall have the authority to determine whether In-Warranty Claim Forms or Standard Claim Forms submitted by Class Members are complete and timely. If a Claim is deficient, the Class Action Settlement Administrator shall mail a notice deficiency letter to the Class Member requesting that the Class Member complete the deficiencies and resubmit the In-Warranty Claim Form or Standard Claim Form within forty-five (45) days of the date of the letter from the Class Action Settlement Administrator. If the Class Member fails to provide the requested documentation or information, that Claim shall be denied without further processing. The Class Action Settlement Administrator shall use their best efforts to complete their review of timely and completed In-Warranty Claim Forms or Standard Claim Forms within ninety (90) days of receipt. The Class Action Settlement Administrator’s review period for submitted In-Warranty Claim Forms or Standard Claim Forms shall not be required to commence any earlier than sixty (60) days after the occurrence of the Final Effective Date. Please note that the Class Action Settlement Administrator has the right to request verification of the information provided in the Claim Forms, including, but not limited to, receipt(s) or other supporting documentation. If the Class Member does not timely comply and/or is unable to produce documents to substantiate and/or verify the information on the Claim Form and the Claim is otherwise not approved, the Claim may be reduced or denied.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Claim Review and Processing a. All claims properly submitted for reimbursement will be reviewed on a rolling basis upon receipt by the Claims Administrator, which will be responsible for conditionally approving the claim by ensuring that all information and documentation required under this Settlement Agreement has been submitted. The Claims Administrator will submit those properly supported and conditionally approved claims to BMW NA for the Claim Validation Process, pursuant to Section III.D.2., below.
Claim Review and Processing. The Claims Administrator will review all properly submitted claims on a rolling basis upon receipt. The Claims Administrator will be responsible for conditionally approving the claim by ensuring that all information and documentation required under this Settlement Agreement has been submitted. Following the Effective Date, the Claims Administrator will submit those properly supported and conditionally approved claims to All-Clad for processing and benefit, as set forth below.
Claim Review and Processing. All Claims properly submitted for reimbursement will be reviewed on a rolling basis upon receipt by the Claims Administrator, which will be responsible for conditionally approving the claim by ensuring that all information and documentation required under this Settlement Agreement has been submitted and otherwise qualifies as an Eligible Repair. Thus, as part of its Claims review responsibilities, the Claims Administrator will be responsible for making sure (1) the Claim relates to a Class Vehicle, (2) the VIN number associated with the Claim matches the Settlement Class Member vehicle’s VIN number, (3) the Claim is for an Eligible Repair; (4) the Claim is not for a vehicle excluded from the Settlement Class; and (5) the Claim has not been submitted by someone excluded from the Settlement Class under the definition of Settlement Class Member (paragraph 1(II) herein). The Claims Administrator will submit those properly supported and conditionally approved claims to BMW NA for the Claim Validation Process, pursuant to paragraph 8, below.

Related to Claim Review and Processing

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • Problem Statement School bus fleets are aging, and our communities have poor air quality. Replacing school buses with zero emission school buses will address both of these issues.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Claims Processing BCBSM will process Provider's Clean Claims submitted in accordance with this Agreement in a timely fashion.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!