Climate Change and Ocean Acidification - Sample Clauses

Climate Change and Ocean Acidification - xxx.xxx.xx.xxx/xxxxxxxxxxxxx/xxxxx.xxx Rising levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases have warmed the earth and changed the chemistry of the oceans. Washington State is already experiencing impacts that are consistent with a warming climate and changing ocean condition. Observed and projected impacts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions include:  Warmer temperatures and more severe heat waves  More severe winter flooding  Larger and more intense wildfires  Sea level rise  Drier xxxxxxx and xxxxxx autumns and xxxxxxx  More extreme weather events  Decreased snowpack and loss of natural water storage  Decreased ocean pH  More frequent and severe drought These environmental changes are impacting our forests, agriculture, water resources, coasts, infrastructure, shellfish and fisheries, and other resources that are vital for our economy, communities, and environment. The extent and duration of these impacts will largely be determined by our collective success in reducing future emissions of GHGs. In addition, we need to anticipate and address the implications of a changing climate in our programs, policies, rules, and operations. Many of the challenges created by changing climate and environmental conditions are similar to those we have been wrestling with for decades – water supply and quality, ecosystem health, air quality, and shoreline and habitat protection and restoration. But the rate and severity of the changes we are likely to witness in the coming years will be unlike anything Washingtonians have ever experienced. Washington State is addressing the challenge of climate change and ocean acidification by taking responsible and thoughtful legislative and executive actions. The state is taking a comprehensive approach in developing and implementing practical and coordinated policies and solutions to reduce energy use, meet the GHG emissions reductions adopted into law in 2008, and to unleash innovation, investment and job creation. Comprehensive and integrated strategic responses have also been developed to enable state and local agencies, public and private businesses, nongovernmental organizations, and individuals to prepare for, address, and adapt to the impacts of climate change and ocean acidification. Broad coalitions of leaders, stakeholders, and the public have offered their thoughts and ideas as the state leads the way on reducing GHG emissions, and adapt to impacts of climate change and ocean acidification. We welcome the oppor...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Climate Change and Ocean Acidification -. Climate change is an ongoing consideration in evaluating cumulative effects on environmental resources of the Arctic region (NOAA, 2011). It has been implicated in changing weather patterns, changes in the classification and seasonality of ice cover, ocean surface temperature regimes, and the timing and duration of phytoplankton blooms in the Chukchi Sea. These changes have been attributed to rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere and corresponding increases in the CO2 levels of the waters of the world’s oceans. These changes have also led to the phenomena of ocean acidification (IPCC, 2007; Royal Society, 2005). This phenomenon is often called a sister problem to climate change, because they are both attributed to human activities that are leading to increased CO2 levels in the atmosphere. The capacity of the Arctic Ocean to uptake CO2 is expected to increase in response to climate change (Bates and Mathis, 2009). Further, ocean acidification in high latitude seas is happening at a more advanced rate than other areas of the ocean. This is due to the loss of sea ice that increases the surface area of the Arctic seas. The resultant exposure of surface water lowers the solubility of calcium carbonate, resulting in lower saturation levels of calcium carbonate within the water that in turn leads to lower available levels of the minerals needed by shell-producing organisms, such as pteropods, foraminifers, sea urchins, and molluscs (Fabry et al., 2009; Mathis, Cross, and Bates, 2011). B-3. REFERENCES Bates, N.R., and Mathis, J.T., 2009, The Arctic Ocean marine carbon cycle; evaluation of air-sea CO2 exchanges, ocean acidification impacts and potential feedbacks, Biogeosciences Discussions 6. pp. 6695-6747. xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxx.xxx/0/0000/0000/xxx-0-0000-0000-xxxxx.xxx. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, 2009. xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/. Fabry, V.J.; McClintock, J.B.; Mathis, J.T.; Grebmeier, J.M., 2009, Ocean acidification at high latitudes: the bellwether. Oceanography, 22(4) 160-171. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 pp. xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xx/. Marine Exchange of Alaska, 2011. xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/. Mathis, J.T., Cross...

Related to Climate Change and Ocean Acidification -

  • Climate Change 1. The Parties recognize that the climate change and its adverse effects are a common concern. In that sense, and under their international commitments, the Parties agree to promote joint measures to limit or reduce the adverse effects of the climate change. 2. For promoting sustainable development, each Party, within its own capacities, shall adopt policies and measures on issues such as: (a) improvement of energy efficiency; (b) research, promotion, development and use of new and renewable energy, technologies of carbon dioxide capture, and updated and innovative environmental technologies that do not affect food security or the conservation of biological diversity; and (c) measures for evaluating the vulnerability and adaptation to climate change.

  • Unbundled Loop Modifications (Line Conditioning 2.5.1 Line Conditioning is defined as routine network modification that BellSouth regularly undertakes to provide xDSL services to its own customers. This may include the removal of any device, from a copper Loop or copper Sub-loop that may diminish the capability of the Loop or Sub-loop to deliver high-speed switched wireline telecommunications capability, including xDSL service. Such devices include, but are not limited to, load coils, excessive bridged taps, low pass filters, and range extenders. Excessive bridged taps are bridged taps that serves no network design purpose and that are beyond the limits set according to industry standards and/or the XxxxXxxxx XX 00000.

  • Initial Forecasts/Trunking Requirements Because Verizon’s trunking requirements will, at least during an initial period, be dependent on the Customer segments and service segments within Customer segments to whom CSTC decides to market its services, Verizon will be largely dependent on CSTC to provide accurate trunk forecasts for both inbound (from Verizon) and outbound (to Verizon) traffic. Verizon will, as an initial matter, provide the same number of trunks to terminate Reciprocal Compensation Traffic to CSTC as CSTC provides to terminate Reciprocal Compensation Traffic to Verizon. At Verizon’s discretion, when CSTC expressly identifies particular situations that are expected to produce traffic that is substantially skewed in either the inbound or outbound direction, Verizon will provide the number of trunks CSTC suggests; provided, however, that in all cases Verizon’s provision of the forecasted number of trunks to CSTC is conditioned on the following: that such forecast is based on reasonable engineering criteria, there are no capacity constraints, and CSTC’s previous forecasts have proven to be reliable and accurate.

  • Provisioning Line Splitting and Splitter Space 3.8.1 The Data LEC, Voice CLEC or BellSouth may provide the splitter. When EZ Phone or its authorized agent owns the splitter, Line Splitting requires the following: a non-designed analog Loop from the serving wire center to the NID at the End User’s location; a collocation cross connection connecting the Loop to the collocation space; a second collocation cross connection from the collocation space connected to a voice port; the high frequency spectrum line activation, and a splitter. The Loop and port cannot be a Loop and port combination (i.e. UNE-P), but must be individual stand-alone Network Elements. When BellSouth owns the splitter, Line Splitting requires the following: a non designed analog Loop from the serving wire center to the NID at the End User’s location with CFA and splitter port assignments, and a collocation cross connection from the collocation space connected to a voice port.

  • INCLEMENT CONDITIONS Section 1.

  • MANDATORY ACTIVATION Activation associates the use of the software with a specific computer. During activation, the software will send information about the software and the computer to Microsoft. This information includes the version, language and product key of the software, the Internet protocol address of the computer, and information derived from the hardware configuration of the computer. For more information, see xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxx/?Xxxxxx=000000. By using the software, you consent to the transmission of this information. If properly licensed, you have the right to use the version of the software installed during the installation process up to the time permitted for activation. Unless the software is activated, you have no right to use the software after the time permitted for activation. This is to prevent its unlicensed use. You are not permitted to bypass or circumvent activation. If the computer is connected to the Internet, the software may automatically connect to Microsoft for activation. You can also activate the software manually by Internet or telephone. If you do so, Internet and telephone service charges may apply. Some changes to your computer components or the software may require you to reactivate the software. The software will remind you to activate it until you do.

  • CONSULTATION REGARDING MAJOR WORKPLACE CHANGE 8.1 Consultation Prior to a Definite Decision Being Made

  • Shift Change Where employees are assigned mid-week to work a non-day shift (whether due to emergencies or a shift change) and as a result lose a shift in the regular work week, such employees will be paid six (6) hours for such loss of earnings.

  • Shift Changes When an employee is assigned to a specific shift and that assignment is changed, the employee shall be given seven (7) calendar days’ notice prior to the change.

  • PROJECT CONDITIONS A. The Grantee agrees to the following Project Conditions:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.