Cumulative Effects. Effects on a historic property which result from the incremental impact of an undertaking, such as the GWD Project, when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time.
Cumulative Effects. The APE for cumulative effects shall be the same as that for 24 direct and indirect effects combined.
Cumulative Effects. Cumulative effects result from incremental actions, that when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, may adversely affect a historic property. Direct Effects – Direct effects include physical destruction or damage, alteration that is not consistent with 36 CFR 68, removal of a property from a historic location, change in the character of use or physical features that contribute to the historic significance, deterioration through neglect, or introduction of visual, atmospheric, or audible elements that diminish the integrity of a property’s significant historic features. The term is consistent with the definition found at 36 CFR 800.5(a)(2).
Cumulative Effects. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ‘‘available information’’ concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ Unlike other pesticide ingredients for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to BCETMD copolymer and any other substances and BCETMD copolymer does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that BCETMD copolymer has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA’s efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see the policy statements released by EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs concerning common mechanism determinations and procedures for cumulating effects from substances found to have a common mechanism on EPA’s website at http:// xxx.xxx.xxx/xxxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxxx/.
Cumulative Effects. The SWG will work collaboratively to develop a Cumulative Effects Assessment, Monitoring, and Management Framework (the “CEA”) for the Territories that considers, and where possible, builds on B.C.’s existing and emerging CEA Management Framework initiatives.
Cumulative Effects. No plans for future State, tribal, local or private projects within or immediately adjacent to the aquatic action area are known. Within the aquatic action area, ongoing water quality issues such as siltation and chemical pollution unrelated to the US 20: Gear Street to the Galena River project will continue to affect the fish.
Cumulative Effects. Past activities in the region include exploration drilling, seismic surveys, and shipping traffic. Activities that are known to likely occur in the reasonably foreseeable future include additional seismic surveys, geological surveys, and scientific research surveys (Appendix B). Overall, the cumulative effects of the Noticed Activities on water quality from past, current and reasonably foreseeable activities would be minor and localized.
Cumulative Effects a. The identification of the APEs will consider cumulative effects to historic properties as referenced in 36 CFR 800.5. Cumulative effects may be direct and/or indirect, or reasonably foreseeable effects caused by the Undertaking that may occur over time, be farther removed in distance or be cumulative.
Cumulative Effects. A. Cumulative effects for a group of historic properties of the same architectural style(s) will be considered once the final Management Tiers have been identified. At that time, the Forest Service will consult with the Signatory and Consulting Parties to determine a cumulative effect tipping point for each of the identified architectural styles. Should the identified tipping point be reached at any time during the life of this Agreement, further consultation with Signatory and Consulting Parties must occur to determine additional mitigations or next steps.
B. Additional cumulative effects analysis will be necessary following the definitions of the final Management Tiers and at 5-year increments to ensure that the mitigations available are commensurate with the Program’s adverse effect to historic properties.
C. Should Forest Service Leadership change its direction regarding sustainable management of the Program, the Signatory and Consulting parties will be consulted to determine the effects of this decision on execution of this Agreement, next steps in light of this change in direction, and any changes that might need to be made to this Agreement as a result of this decision.
Cumulative Effects. Any additional activities occurring during the same time period and in the same general area requiring the use of marine vessels may contribute to the cumulative effects of air emissions from the Noticed Activities. A thorough description of cumulative operations on the Beaufort Sea OCS is provided in Appendix B, Section B-3, Impact Sources. The 2011 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) report, Emissions, Meteorological Data, and Air Pollutant Monitoring for Alaska's North Slope (Section 6, Ambient Monitoring on the North Slope), provides results from the most recent air quality monitoring on the North Slope using equipment installed by various sources. Monitors sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) detect and record concentrations of pollutants at Prudhoe Bay, and have been doing so since 2010. A monitor sponsored by Shell is operating at Badami oil field, 35 miles east of Prudhoe Bay; and a monitor used by BPXA and Exxon Mobile is located at Xxxxxxxx Island 2.5 miles offshore and 15 miles from Prudhoe Bay. Other monitors are located at Point Thomson, 60 miles east of Prudhoe Bay, and Nuiqsut, a city south-southeast of Xxxxxxxx Bay. The data collected from the Shell and BP/Exxon Mobile monitors, and data from Point Thomson and Nuiqsut are included in the ADEC database in the 2011 report. The monitors detect and record impacts from onshore sources of emissions, as well as impacts from vessel traffic, if present, for the pollutants and averaging periods reported by each monitor. More recent data is provided from the Badami, Edicott, and Point Thomson sites for 2009 and 2010. The monitored data reporting during the period from 2001 to 2005 at Nuiqsut showed ambient concentrations below the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The pollutant most commonly linked to vessel traffic and other combustion sources is nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The Nuiqsut monitor shows average one hour average concentrations of NO2 to be 76.0 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3), 40.0 percent of the NAAQS, which is established at188 µg/m3. The recorded data at the Badami and Endicott sites show an average concentration of 83.7 µg/m3, or 44.5 percent of the NAAQS for the one hour concentration of NO2; no data for the one-hour concentration of NO2 was recorded. The 24-hour average concentration of coarse particulate matter (PM10) is 57.0 µg/m3 at Nuiqsut, 38.0 percent of the NAAQS set at 150 µg/m3. Badami and Edicott monitors report aver...
