Cumulative Effects. Effects on a historic property which result from the incremental impact of an undertaking, such as the GWD Project, when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal or non- federal) or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative effects can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time.
Cumulative Effects. The APE for cumulative effects shall be the same as that for direct and indirect effects combined.
Cumulative Effects. No plans for future State, tribal, local or private projects within or immediately adjacent to the aquatic action area are known. Within the aquatic action area, ongoing water quality issues such as siltation and chemical pollution unrelated to the US 20: Gear Street to the Galena River project will continue to affect the fish.
Cumulative Effects. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ‘‘available information’’ concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ Unlike other pesticide ingredients for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to BCETMD copolymer and any other substances and BCETMD copolymer does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that BCETMD copolymer has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA’s efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see the policy statements released by EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs concerning common mechanism determinations and procedures for cumulating effects from substances found to have a common mechanism on EPA’s website at http:// xxx.xxx.xxx/xxxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxxx/.
Cumulative Effects. The SWG will work collaboratively to develop a Cumulative Effects Assessment, Monitoring, and Management Framework (the “CEA”) for the Territories that considers, and where possible, builds on B.C.’s existing and emerging CEA Management Framework initiatives.
Cumulative Effects. Cumulative effects result from incremental actions, that when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, may adversely affect a historic property. Curation – Refers to the process of selecting and caring for archaeological or cultural materials to be provided to a museum or landowner for future research, exhibit, or instruction. Curation procedures will follow University of Alaska Museum of the North’s Curation Guidelines. Direct Effects – Direct effects include physical destruction or damage, alteration that is not consistent with 36 CFR 68, removal of a property from a historic location, change in the character of use or physical features that contribute to the historic significance, deterioration through neglect, or introduction of visual, atmospheric, or audible elements that diminish the integrity of a property’s significant historic features. The term is consistent with the definition found at 36 CFR 800.5(a)(2).
Cumulative Effects a. The identification of the APEs will consider cumulative effects to historic properties as referenced in 36 CFR 800.5. Cumulative effects may be direct and/or indirect, or reasonably foreseeable effects caused by the Undertaking that may occur over time, be farther removed in distance or be cumulative.
Cumulative Effects. Past activities in the region include exploration drilling, seismic surveys, and shipping traffic. Activities that are known to likely occur in the reasonably foreseeable future include additional seismic surveys, geological surveys, and scientific research surveys (Appendix B). Overall, the cumulative effects of the Noticed Activities on water quality from past, current and reasonably foreseeable activities would be minor and localized.
Cumulative Effects. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA requires the Agency to consider the cumulative effect of exposure to Aspergillus flavus NRRL 21882 and to other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity. These considerations include the possible cumulative effects of such residues on infants and children. Based on tests in mammalian systems, Aspergillus flavus NRRL 21882 does not appear to be toxic or pathogenic to humans. Another non- aflatoxin-producing strain, Aspergillus flavus AF36, is conditionally registered for use on cotton, but not on peanuts. There are no other registered pesticide products containing Aspergillus flavus NRRL 21882, and other Aspergillus flavus strains abound naturally in the environment. Moreover, the displacement of the aflatoxin-producing strain of Aspergillus flavus by Aspergillus flavus NRRL 21882 may reduce aflatoxin contamination of peanuts. Based on the low toxicity potential of Aspergillus flavus NRRL 21882, the fact that it is non- aflatoxigenic, and the safety net already in place to monitor food/feed commodities for aflatoxins (see Unit IV.A.1.), no cumulative or incremental effect is expected from the use of Aspergillus flavus NRRL 21882 on peanuts.
Cumulative Effects. The APE for cumulative effects considers the reasonably foreseeable additive or interactive effects associated with the Undertaking. For example, use of a route can provide easier access to highly visible historic properties and may result in increased frequency of vandalism over time. The APE for cumulative effects for the Undertaking will not will not to exceed one-eighth (1/8) of a mile on either side of the center line of a route. Modifying the APE. The APE may be modified when additional research, consultation with CPU, or changes to the Undertaking indicate that historic properties located outside of boundaries of a previously defined APE will be affected by the Undertaking. The APE may be modified using the following procedures: Any CPU may propose modifications to an APE by providing the Agency Official with written notification, including justification for and illustration of, the proposed APE modification(s). The Agency Official shall communicate the modification proposal(s) to other CPU and consult in accordance with the provisions of Stipulation X. Following consultation, the Agency Official will make a decision on the proposed modification and notify the CPU within seven (7) calendar days.
