Competition provision Sample Clauses

Competition provision. Provisions in employment contracts that forbid employees to enter into an employment contract with the competitors of employees by competitors of the employer are non- binding if such an engagement is wider in scope than would be necessary in order to prevent competition or to limit in an unfair manner the employee’s freedom to employment. To determine wheter this is the case, each case must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all circumstances. Competition provisions may not be worded too generally. When assessing how far-reaching competition provisions in an employment contract may be, particularly as regards their scope of application and the time limits involved, the following factors must be considered: a. The type of work performed by the emplyee involved, e.g. is the employee a key employee, in direct contact with the customers or is there significant confidentiality attached to the job? In addition, what knowledge or information the employee might possess with regard to the activities of the company or its customers. b. How quickly the employee’s knowledge becomes outdated and whether a normal balance is kept among the employees. c. The type of operations involved and the identity of the competitors in the market where the company operates and which the employee’s know-how covers. d. That an employee’s freedom of employment is not restricted in an unfair manner. e. That the non-competition clause is delineated and concise with regard to the purpose of protecting certain competition interests. f. The remuneration of the employee will also have an effect, i.e. for instance, what his wages are. The competition provisions of employment contracts do not apply if the employee is dismissed from his job without sufficient cause.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Competition provision. For a period of three (3) years following the Closing Date:
Competition provision. Provisions in employment contracts that forbid employees to enter into an employment contract with competitors of the employer are non-binding if such an engagement is wider in scope than would be necessary in order to prevent competition or unfairly limit the employees freedom to employment. To determine whether this is the case, each case must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all circumstances. Competition provisions, therefore may not be worded too generally. When assessing the permissible scope of a non-competition clause in a contract of employment particularly as regards scope end time limits, the following factors must be considered: a. The type of work performed by the employee involved, e.g. is the employee a key employee, in direct contact with the customers or has high level of confidentiality. In addition, what knowledge or information the employee might possess with regard to the activities of the company or its customers. b. How quickly the employees knowledge becomes outdated and whether a normal balance is kept among the employees. c. The type of operations involved and the identity of the competitors in the market where the company operates and which the employees know-how covers. d. That an employees freedom of employment is not restricted in an unfair manner. e. The non-competition clause must be defined and concise with regard to the purpose of protecting certain competition interests. f. The remuneration of the employee will also have an effect, i.e. for instance, what his wages are. The competition provisions of employment contracts do not apply if the employee is dismissed from his job without sufficient cause.
Competition provision. Provisions in employment contracts that prohibit employees from working for their employers’ competitors are non-binding if such provisions are broader than is necessary to prevent competition or if they restrict the employeesfreedom of employment in an unfair manner. In either case, such provisions must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with consideration to all relevant factors. Competition provisions should therefore not be worded too generally. In assessing the breadth of an employment contract’s competition provision, particularly in terms of the scope of application and time limits, the following factors must be taken into consideration: a. The type of work the employee in question performed, e.g. whether he/she is a key employee, is in direct contact with customers or bears a significant confidentiality obligation. Any knowledge or information the employee may have regarding the company’s operations or its customers must also be considered. b. How fast the employee’s knowledge becomes obsolete and whether normal equality among employees is observed. c. The type of operation in question and the competitors in the market in which the company operates, and the extent of the employee’s knowledge. d. That an employee's freedom of employment is not restricted in an unfair manner. e. That the competition provision is specific and concise with a view to protecting certain competitive interests. f. The remuneration an employee receives, e.g. how high his/her wages are, also come into play. Competition provisions of an employment contract do not apply if an employee resigns without providing sufficient reason.

Related to Competition provision

  • Confidentiality and Non-Competition To the Company’s knowledge, no director, officer, key employee or consultant of the Company is subject to any confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-competition agreement or non-solicitation agreement with any employer or prior employer that could reasonably be expected to materially affect his ability to be and act in his respective capacity of the Company or be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change.

  • Confidentiality and Non-Competitions To the Company’s knowledge, no director, officer, key employee or consultant of the Company is subject to any confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-competition agreement or non-solicitation agreement with any employer or prior employer that could reasonably be expected to materially affect his ability to be and act in his respective capacity of the Company or be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change.

  • Non-Competition Because of Employer Group's legitimate business interest as described in this Agreement and the good and valuable consideration offered to the Associate, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, during the term of Associate's employment and for the one year beginning on the last day of the Associate's employment with the Employer, whether terminated for any reason or no reason, by the Associate or the Employer, (the "Restricted Period"), the Associate agrees and covenants not to engage in Prohibited Activity within the United States, or the geographical regions for which the Associate provides services during the course of employment, whichever is larger. For purposes of this non-compete clause, "Prohibited Activity" is activity in which the Associate contributes the Associate's knowledge, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, as an associate, employer, owner, operator, manager, advisor, consultant, contractor, agent, partner, director, stockholder, officer, volunteer, intern, or any other similar capacity to an entity engaged in the same or similar business as the Employer Group, including those engaged in the business of manufacturing and distribution of doors, windows, trim, and other building supplies manufactured or distributed by the Employer Group. Prohibited Activity also includes activity that may require or inevitably require disclosure of trade secrets, proprietary information, or Confidential Information. The Employer Group regards as its primary, but not exclusive, competitors the following: Masonite, Weather Shield, PlyGem, Pella, Xxxxxxxx Windows, Xxxxxx Windows, Steve’s and Sons, Fortune Brands Door Division (ThermaTru), Plastpro, Lynden Door, Xxxxx Bros., Woodgrain Millwork, PGT, Sierra Pacific, and Xxxx. Nothing herein shall prohibit Associate from purchasing or owning less than five percent (5%) of the publicly traded securities of any corporation, provided that such ownership represents a passive investment and that the Associate is not a controlling person of, or a member of a group that controls, such corporation. This Section does not, in any way, restrict or impede the Associate from exercising protected rights to the extent that such rights cannot be waived by agreement or from complying with any applicable law or regulation or a valid order of a court of competent jurisdiction or an authorized government agency, provided that such compliance does not exceed that required by the law, regulation, or order.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!