Compliance with Consent Decree. Inflow TP concentrations to the ENP through Taylor Slough and the Coastal Basins are compared to the 11 ppb limit at the end of each water year using data from both the old (S175, S332, S18C) and new (S174, S332D, S18C) combinations of structures (Figure 10). The bars in Figure 10 represent the 12-month flow-weighted mean TP concentrations from S332, S175 and S18C for water years 1989 through 2002. The diamond point values for water years 1999 through 2007 represent the new combination of structures. TP and flow data from both sets of structures presented in prior editions of this report through December 2001 (April 2002 report) showed that, beginning in October 2000, the 12-month moving total flow for S332D, S174 and S18C was consistently greater than flow at S332, S175 and S18C. There was also a shift in flow-weighted mean TP concentration data whereby S332D, S174 and S18C concentrations became equal to and then consistently lower than the concentrations at S332, S175 and S18C. These changes reflected the switch made from S332 to S332D for water delivery to Taylor Slough between July 3 and July 5, 2000. Consequently, as of the July 2002 report, only S332D, S174 and S18C data are presented for monthly tracking of data in Figure 10. However, there had been almost no flow at S174 since March 2006. The site was plugged in September 2007, preventing any flow through S174. Figure 11 presents the 12-month and individual sampling event flow- weighted mean TP concentrations at the S332D and S18C structures. All TP grab sample concentrations taken on positive flow days reported for surface water monitoring at the 3 sites were used for the compliance calculations. For the 12-month periods ending in January, February, and March 2008, the 12-month flow-weighted mean TP concentration was 4.6 ppb for the combined flow through S332D and S18C (Table 3). The Consent Decree stipulates that the percent of flow-weighted mean TP concentrations greater than 10 ppb from each sampling event in any 12-month period must not exceed a fixed guideline of 53.1 percent. The observed percentages of the sampling event flow-weighted mean TP concentrations greater than 10 ppb for the combined flow through S332D and S18C were 2.6 and 2.5 percent for the periods ending in January and February 2008, respectively. There was no sampling event flow-weighted mean TP concentration greater than 10 ppb from April 2007 to March 2008. The daily flows into the ENP through S332D, S174 and S18C are prese...
Compliance with Consent Decree. Any part or subpart of this CBA which is contrary to or inconsistent with the Consent Decree entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri on April 27, 2012, is void and of no effect.
Compliance with Consent Decree. ALBANK and the ALBANK Subsidiaries shall be in compliance in all material respects with the Consent Decree referred to in Section 6.20, and COFI shall have received a certificate, dated the Effective Date, signed on behalf of ALBANK by the Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel of ALBANK to such effect.
Compliance with Consent Decree. 27 5.16 Events Subsequent to December 31, 1997................................28 5.17 Debarment.............................................................28 5.18 DEA...................................................................28 5.19
Compliance with Consent Decree. Without admission, Seller represents and warrants that, except as identified in FDA 483 observation reports, Establishment Investigation Reports, similar reports of corresponding governmental agencies outside the United States, and all responses thereto, which may be found in public records, or as disclosed in writing to Purchaser by Seller, Seller has substantially complied with all the terms, provisions and restrictions of the Consent Decree relative to the Assets as of the date hereof.
Compliance with Consent Decree. In accordance with Section III. B. of the proposed Final Judgment filed with the court in United States of America v. Hxxxxxxxxxx Xxxpany and Dresser Industries, Inc. Civil Action Number 98CV02340 (D.C.D.C. September 29, 1998) (the "CONSENT DECREE"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit G, the Purchaser agrees that the Consent Decree shall be binding on the Purchaser.
Compliance with Consent Decree. The Buyer shall operate the Business, and GM and its Subsidiaries will operate their businesses, in material compliance with all terms of the Consent Decree (other than, in the case of the Buyer, those terms of the Consent Decree dealing with monetary penalties assessed to GM, which shall be the responsibility of GM), and the Buyer agrees to be subject to all compliance remedies established in the Consent Decree with respect to the Business, and, if requested by either the U.S. Department of State or U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Buyer shall execute a consent decree similar in all material respects to the Consent Decree (other than those terms of the Consent Decree dealing with monetary penalties assessed to GM).
Compliance with Consent Decree. Seller agrees to provide additional information to the DOJ as requested by the DOJ in connection with its approval of the transactions contemplated hereby pursuant to the Consent Decree within 15 days of any such request.
Compliance with Consent Decree. 26 3.26 Debarment.......................................................... 26 3.27 DEA................................................................ 26 3.28 Disclosure......................................................... 26 ARTICLE IV - REPRSENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PURCHASER........................ 27
Compliance with Consent Decree. Without admission and except as disclosed in public records or in Sections 3.07(a) or (e) of the Disclosure Schedule or by
