Conflict Facilitation Process Sample Clauses

Conflict Facilitation Process. (a) The County and the Union will identify, develop and jointly train a cadre of neutral facilitators from the ranks of the bargaining unit and management employees.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conflict Facilitation Process. (a) Facilitation will be conducted by facilitators mutually agreed upon by the parties which may include an outside facilitator. The parties (MCGEO and the County) will each designate a neutral person to assist the participants and the Facilitator with the process. Any cost for the process shall be equally shared by the parties.
Sample 1
Conflict Facilitation Process. (a) Facilitation will be conducted by facilitators mutually agreed upon by the parties which may include an outside facilitator. The parties (MCGEO and the County) will each designate a neutral person to assist the participants and the Facilitator with the process. Any cost for the process shall be equally shared by the parties. (b) An employee who believes that he/she has been treated unfairly or inappropriately by his/her supervisor may request facilitation under this process. The employee must make a written request for facilitation via MCGEO and/or the Director of Human Resources, or his/her designee. The process may also be initiated by management. OHR will notify the relevant department director of the request. (c) Within fourteen (14) days of the request for facilitation, the parties will select co-facilitators who will review the request and the issues involved and to ensure the following: (1) That the issues are appropriate for the process and have the potential to be resolved by facilitation, (2) That the issues are not matters that are currently, or were previously brought forward, utilizing the Article 57 process, or the subject or of a prior or current grievance or any other pending action/process, and (3) That the issue is not more appropriately handled in the EEO process. (d) The co-facilitators will schedule a meeting with all involved parties within five (5) days after reviewing the request. (e) The process includes the following possible outcomes: (1) The affected parties to the dispute resolve the dispute; (2) The parties do not resolve the dispute; the co-facilitators may make recommendations for further action, if any, to the Department Director, OHR Director, and Union. Possible actions include training, skill building, mentoring, referral to the EAP, etc.; (3) Request by any party for OHR intervention, including, providing training, additional facilitation, team-building, etc.; (4) The employee/Union may file a grievance in accordance with Article 10 if the dispute has not been settled to the employee’s/Union’s satisfaction. (f) The parties agree: (1) to utilize the conflict facilitation process in good faith; (2) that no employee shall be subject to retaliation for participating in the conflict facilitation process; (3) that the process shall not be used to intimidate or harass supervisors for managing responsibly; and (4) that participation in the process is not voluntary.
Sample 1

Related to Conflict Facilitation Process

  • Cooperation and Coordination The Parties acknowledge and agree that it is their mutual objective and intent to minimize, to the extent feasible and legal, taxes payable with respect to their collaborative efforts under this Agreement and that they shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate and coordinate with each other to achieve such objective.

  • Donor Coordination Throughout the multi-year development of the Compact, MCC and the Government have engaged in an inclusive process that included consultations with the United States Government, Nepali communities and key private sector actors, non-government actors, and other donors as well as multilateral organizations. In particular, MCC worked closely with the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank in reviewing and agreeing on various power sector reforms required in Nepal for future programming by the two banks. MCC also consulted frequently with the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (“DFID”) during its preparation of a political economy analysis of power sector reform.

  • SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES 4.3.1 The Contractor shall supervise and direct the Work, using his / her best skill and attention. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for all construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for coordinating all portions of the Work under the Contract. All aspects of the Project shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the State. Contractor guarantees to repair, replace, re-execute or otherwise correct any defect in workmanship, materials, or the like that fails to conform to the requirements of this Contract or that appears during the progress of the Work or within one year of final acceptance by the State.

  • General Cooperation (a) The Parties shall each cooperate fully (and each shall cause its respective Subsidiaries to cooperate fully) with all reasonable requests in writing (“Information Request”) from another Party hereto, or from an agent, representative or advisor to such Party, in connection with the preparation and filing of Tax Returns (including the preparation of Tax Packages), claims for Refunds, Tax Proceedings, and calculations of amounts required to be paid pursuant to this Agreement, in each case, related or attributable to or arising in connection with Taxes of any of the Parties or their respective Subsidiaries covered by this Agreement and the establishment of any reserve required in connection with any financial reporting (a “Tax Matter”). Such cooperation shall include the provision of any information reasonably necessary or helpful in connection with a Tax Matter (“Information”) and shall include, without limitation, at each Party’s own cost:

  • Cooperation of the Parties Each Party agrees to cooperate fully in the preparation, filing, and prosecution of any Patent Rights under this Agreement. Such cooperation includes, but is not limited to:

  • Mediation Process A. Mediation is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that may be requested by the City or the PBA. It is an alternative, not a substitute for the formal arbitration process contained in Section 19.7 above. Mediation is an informal process in which a neutral third party assists the opposing parties in reaching a voluntary, negotiated resolution of a charge of discipline. The decision to mediate is completely voluntary for the PBA and the City. Mediation gives the parties the opportunity to discuss the issues raised in the charging document, clear up misunderstandings, determine the underlying interests or concerns, find areas of agreement and, ultimately, incorporate those areas of agreement into solutions. A mediator does not resolve the charge or impose a decision on the parties. Instead, the mediator helps the parties to agree on a mutually acceptable resolution. The mediation process is strictly confidential. Information disclosed during mediation will not be revealed to anyone.

  • Project Management and Coordination The Engineer shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality of and consistency of work and administration of the invoices and monthly progress reports. The Engineer shall coordinate with necessary local entities.

  • Consultation Process (a) At the time of providing written notice of reduction to affected Employee(s), the Employer shall:

  • Order Coordination and Order Coordination-Time Specific 2.1.9.1 “Order Coordination” (OC) allows BellSouth and Global Connection to coordinate the installation of the SL2 Loops, Unbundled Digital Loops (UDL) and other Loops where OC may be purchased as an option, to Global Connection’s facilities to limit end user service outage. OC is available when the Loop is provisioned over an existing circuit that is currently providing service to the end user. OC for physical conversions will be scheduled at BellSouth’s discretion during normal working hours on the committed due date. OC shall be provided in accordance with the chart set forth below.

  • Community Involvement The Grantee will facilitate and convene a Community Task Force as one means of developing collaboration among the Grantee, affected residents, and the broader community. The Grantee also will provide information to keep the Community Task Force fully apprised of the planning and implementation of revitalization efforts. The Community Task Force shall be comprised of affected public housing residents, local government officials, service providers, community groups, and others. The Community Task Force will provide advice, counsel and recommendations to the Grantee on all aspects of the HOPE VI development process, including shaping the goals and outcome of the Community and Supportive Services Plan. Community Task Force participants also will disseminate information throughout the community about the Grantee's revitalization efforts. The Grantee's responsibilities with regard to the Community Task Force include:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.