CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATIONS Sample Clauses

CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATIONS. A. By March 31, 2015, in collaboration with the consultant, the District will review the results of the assessment of past enrollment in the courses and programs identified in Action Step I.1 conducted in accordance with Action Step II.A.1-7, as well as the surveys and interviews, and any consultations, conducted in accordance with Action Step II.A.7- 11. B. By March 31, 2015, the District shall obtain from the consultant a written report outlining the recommendations relating to measures the District could take to further facilitate its efforts to provide all students with equal access to and an equal opportunity to participate in the courses and programs identified in Action Step I.1. C. By April 15, 2015, the District will consider and identify what action it will take with respect to the recommendations made by the consultant, based on Action Step II.A.1-7 above, and to incorporate those recommendations into the action plan it develops. If the District rejects and/or modifies any recommendations made by the consultant(s), the District will provide to OCR a reasonably comprehensive explanation for the rejection or the modification of the recommendation. D. By August 30, 2015, and by the same date annually thereafter, the District will submit documents to OCR showing implementation of any further modifications to its programs made pursuant to Action Step II above.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATIONS. The recommendations that follow are intended to address the matters noted above and to provide other suggestions for enhancing revenues and controlling costs for both the University and RUCEC. The objective is to achieve a positive change in unrestricted nets assets from operations in Fiscal 2013 and beyond in order to achieve compliance with the Historical Debt Service Coverage Ratio. Some of the recommendations could be achieved in the months ahead; others could contribute to longer term operational improvements. Some recommendations are based on steps the University is considering taking or has begun implementing since the end of the fiscal year June 30, 2012. We were not engaged for the purpose of incorporating any estimates for any potential future changes to the University’s framework into this report and, as a result, have not incorporated such changes into this report.
Sample 1
CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATIONS. This section lists and discusses any actions recommended by Consultant based on the engagement. Recommendation type 1: Consultant may recommend a strategy and roadmap of activities and projects it believes are required to implement the strategy. i. Recommendation type 2: Consultant may recommend specific activities which it believes will achieve a mission or objective, or bring a strategic initiative or program to successful completion. ii. Recommendation type 3: Consultant may provide input on organizational structure, compensation plans, staffing and change management that it believes will increase the effectiveness of the Client. iii. Subject to the scope of the agreement, all recommendations may have a qualitative assessment of the costs, benefits, risks, timeline, and business value Deliverables will be delivered electronically to Client Authorized Representative or Project Manager for Acceptance. This form will document changes to the Agreement. Description of Change: Impact on Consultant or Client responsibilities: Impact on Deliverables: Impact on Timeline Impact on Billing Rate, estimated effort, or Project Fees Other Impacts:
Sample 1

Related to CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our country-by-country analysis, 197 of the AEWA populations are already well-monitored both for population size and trend. Our prioritisation method allowed focusing on the AEWA conservation and management priorities (Priorities 1-2) and to consider cost effectiveness and feasibility (Priorities 3-6). Theoretically, the two- third target of the AEWA Strategic Plan can be just attained by focusing on the development of monitoring activities for Priority 1-5 populations (i.e. leaving out the 168 more widespread Priority 6 populations that would require more species-specific monitoring methods. Most of the Priority 1-5 populations would require improvement of the IWC though regional schemes focusing on the West Asian / East African flyway with possibly three subregional components in the Central Asia, Arabia and Eastern and Southern Africa. In the latter region, improvements in Tanzania and Mozambique are particularly important. In the Black Sea - Mediterranean - Sahelian flyway the focus should be primarily on the Sahel countries and especially on increasing the consistency of annual counts. The quality of monitoring is already better in the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In the East Atlantic, the ongoing capacity-building activities should continue and the consistency and representativity of site coverage should be further strengthened in most countries. Angola would require a major capacity improvement but primarily for the intra-African migrants on inland wetlands. It is also clear that the targets of the AEWA Strategic Plan cannot be achieved without complementing the IWC with periodic aerial surveys both in Western Africa as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa, by setting up a periodic offshore waterbird monitoring scheme in the Caspian Sea and by focusing in each country on a relatively small number of breeding bird species strategically selected in this report.

  • Recommendations Please check off one or all of the areas below you believe should be addressed in order to prevent similar occurrences: Inservice Orientation Review nurse/resident ratio Change unit layout Float/casual pool Review policies & procedures Adjust RN staffing Adjust support staffing Replace sick calls/LOAs, etc. Input into how compliance recommendations are implemented Change Start/Stop times of shift(s). Please specify: Equipment/Supplies. Please specify: Other. Please specify:

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1. 3. Staff and the Respondent recommend settlement of the matters disclosed by the investigation in accordance with the terms and conditions set out below. The Respondent agrees to the settlement on the basis of the facts set out in Part IV herein and consents to the making of an Order in the form attached as Schedule “A”. 4. Staff and the Respondent agree that the terms of this Settlement Agreement, including the attached Schedule “A”, will be released to the public only if and when the Settlement Agreement is accepted by the Hearing Panel.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!