Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. UNFPA requires that all Suppliers observe the highest standard of ethics during procurement and execution of work. Pursuant to this policy, UNFPA defines the terms set forth as follows:
(a) Corrupt practice means the offering, giving, receiving or soliciting of anything of value to influence the action of a public official in the procurement process or in the execution of a contract;
(b) Fraudulent practice means a misrepresentation of facts in order to influence a procurement process or the execution of a contract to the detriment of the client, and includes collusive practice among bidders (prior to or after bid submission) designed to establish bid prices at artificial non-competitive levels and to deprive the client of the benefits of free and open competition. UNFPA will declare a Supplier ineligible, either indefinitely or for a stated period of time, to be awarded a UNFPA-financed contract/agreement if at any time it determines that the Supplier has engaged in any corrupt or fraudulent practices in competing for, or in executing a UNFPA- financed contract/agreement.
Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. 3.1 KPLC requires compliance with the provisions of the Public Procurement and Asset Xxxxxxxx Xxx, 0000, Section 62 “Declaration not to engage in corruption”. The tender submitted by a person shall include a declaration that the person shall not engage in any corrupt or fraudulent practice and a declaration that the person or his or her sub-contractors are not debarred from participating in public procurement proceedings.
3.2 KPLC requires compliance with the provisions of the Competition Xxx 0000, regarding collusive practices in contracting. Any tenderer found to have engaged in collusive conduct shall be disqualified and criminal and/or civil sanctions may be imposed. To this effect, Tenders shall be required to complete and sign the “Certificate of Independent Tender Determination” annexed to the Form of Tender.
3.3 Unfair Competitive Advantage - Fairness and transparency in the tender process require that the firms or their Affiliates competing for a specific assignment do not derive a competitive advantage from having provided consulting services related to this tender. To that end, KPLC shall indicate in the Tender Data Sheet and make available to all the firms together with this tender document all information that would in that respect give such firm any unfair competitive advantage over competing firms
Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. 3.22.1 The employer requires that the bidders/ contractors, their designated contractors and/or their agents observe the highest standards of ethics during tendering and execution of this contract. In pursuance with this policy, the employer:
Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. The organization requires that all Suppliers observe the highest standard of ethics during procurement and execution of work. Any breach related to such practice will lead to immediate termination of this agreement.
Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. 10.1 The government requires compliance with its policy regarding corrupt and fraudulent/prohibited practices as set forth in its laws and policies.
Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. The Purchaser requires that Bidders observe the highest standard of ethics during the execution of Contract. In pursuance of this policy, the Purchaser defines, for the purposes of this provision, the terms set forth below as follows :
Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. 5.1 Consultant firms or any of its members shall not be involved in corrupt, coercive, obstructive, collusive or fraudulent practice. Consultant firms or any of its members that are proven to have been involved in any of these practices shall be automatically disqualified and would not be awarded a contract.
Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. UNICEF requires that all Contractors associated with this Contract observe the highest standard of ethics during procurement and execution of the work. In pursuance of this policy UNICEF
(a) defines for the purpose of this provision the terms set forth as follows:
(i) corrupt practice means the offering, giving, receiving or soliciting of anything of value to influence the action of a public official in the procurement process or in the execution of a contract, and
(ii) fraudulent practice means a misrepresentation of facts in order to influence a procurement process or the execution of a contract to the detriment of the client, and includes collusive practice among Contractors (prior to or after bid submission) designed to establish bid prices at artificial non-competitive levels and to deprive the client of the benefits of free and open competition;
(b) will reject a proposal for award if it determines that the selected Contractor have engaged in any corrupt or fraudulent practices in competing for the contract in question;
(c) will declare a Contractor ineligible, either indefinitely or for a stated period of time, to be awarded a UNICEF-financed contract if at any time it determines that it has engaged in any corrupt or fraudulent practices in competing for, or in executing a UNICEF-financed contract.
Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. 28.1 Bidders are required to furnish the complete and correct information/ documents required for evaluation of their bids. If the information/ documents forming basis of evaluation is found to be false/ fake/ forged, the same shall be considered adequate ground for rejection of the bids and forfeiture of xxxxxxx money deposit.
28.2 OWNER requires that the CONTRACTOR observes the highest standard of ethics during the execution of Contract. In pursuance of this policy, OWNER defines, for the purposes of this provision, the terms set forth below as follows:
Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices. 3.1 It is JICA’s policy to require that Bidders and Contractors, as well as Borrowers, under contracts funded with Japanese ODA Loans and other Japanese ODA, observe the highest standard of ethics during the procurement and execution of such contracts. In pursuance of this policy, JICA:
(a) will reject a proposal for award if it determines that the Bidder recommended for award has engaged in corrupt or fraudulent practices in competing for the contract in question;
(b) will recognize a Bidder or Contractor as ineligible, for a period determined by JICA, to be awarded a contract funded with Japanese ODA Loans if it at any time determines that the Bidder or the Contractor has engaged in corrupt or fraudulent practices in competing for, or in executing, another contract funded with Japanese ODA Loans or other Japanese ODA; and
(c) will recognize a Contractor as ineligible to be awarded a contract funded with Japanese ODA Loans if the Contractor or subcontractor, who has a direct contract with the Contractor, is debarred under the cross debarment decisions by the Multilateral Development Banks. Such period of ineligibility shall not exceed three (3) years from (and including) the date on which the cross debarment is imposed. “Cross debarment decisions by the Multilateral Development Banks” is a corporate sanction in accordance with the agreement among the African Development Bank Group, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Inter-American Development Bank Group and the World Bank Group signed on 9 April, 2010 (as amended from time to time). JICA will recognize the World Bank Group’s debarment of which period exceeds one year, imposed after 19 July, 2010, the date on which the World Bank Group started cross debarment, as “cross debarment decisions by the Multilateral Development Banks.” The list of debarred firms and individuals is available at the electronic address specified in the BDS. JICA will recognize a Bidder or Contractor as ineligible to be awarded a contract funded with Japanese ODA Loans if the Bidder or Contractor is debarred by the World Bank Group for the period starting from the date of the Invitation for Bid, if prequalification has not been conducted, or the date of the Advertisement for Prequalification, if prequalification has been conducted, up to the signing of the contract, unless (i) such debarment period does not exceed one year, or (ii) three (3) years have passed since such debarment decision. If it...
