Design Level Sample Clauses

Design Level. On design level an overview of the overall System Design of the Comfort Range Balancer is given. For some selected subsystem the integration and internal components are also modelled in detail. As a sample below, the detailed view on the integration and internal view of the Range Problem Solver is given. The behaviour of some subsystems will be worked out on design level using ModelicaML and Modelica, in order to be able to perform simulations and verifications on design level. Besides the software systems the HW is modelled in the PrEEvision tooling.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Design Level. The design level architecture further details the analysis level design by taking the software and hardware resources into consideration. (See also D6. 1.1 for an overview the related design concept). Functional Design Architecture Figure 2-44 shows the FunctionalDesignArchitecture. This model is focusing on base braking and does not include energy regeneration functionality.
Design Level. Functional Design Architecture A step forward in the design of the case study have been done using the “Functional Design Architecture”, that in this specific case refine the preliminary design of the system adding further details in terms of functional decomposition, flow ports and provides implementation details of functional mapping on HW items through allocations. Hardware Design Architecture The following Hardware Design Architecture shown in Error! Reference source not found. 1.1. For all parts only the connectors relevant for this model are shown. The battery system, delivers the energy which is guided though the High voltage junction box to the power electronic. The power electronic transforms the DC voltage to be provided to the EV motor. The electric vehicle controller is the main controller for many powertrain functions of an electric vehicle. All functions of this model run at this controller. The sensors in this model are needed for the selection of the driving mode.
Design Level. Functional Design Architecture The following Functional Design Architecture describes one realization of the features explained in chapter 2.1.1 Both features are implemented on the EVC. Please refer to the comment fields within Figure 2-2 for further details of each function.
Design Level. Functional Design Architecture The following Functional Design Architecture describes one realization of the features explained in chapter 2.1.1 Both features are implemented on the EVC. Please refer to the comment fields within Figure 3 for further details of each function. Figure 3: Functional Design Architecture of the EV Demo‌ Hardware Design Architecture The following Hardware Design Architecture shown in Figure 4 describes the hardware realization for the features explained in chapter Error! Reference source not found.. For all parts only the connectors relevant for this model are shown. The battery system, delivers the energy which is guided though the High voltage junction box to the power electronic. The power electronic transforms the DC voltage to be provided to the EV motor. The electric vehicle controller is the main controller for many powertrain functions of an electric vehicle. All functions of this model run at this controller. The sensors in this model are needed for the selection of the driving mode. Figure 4: Hardware Design Architecture of the EV Demo‌
Design Level. The design level architecture further details the analysis level design by taking the software and hardware resources into consideration. (See also D6. 1.1 for an overview the related design concept). Currently, the documentation correspond to a single wheel brake by wire model. Work is under way to extend to a full four-wheel model. Functional Design Architecture Figure 19 shows the FunctionalDesignArchitecture. The model is preliminary, as there is only one wheel and the full details of sensors and actuators are not represented.
Design Level. The design level architecture further details the analysis level design by taking the software and hardware resources into consideration. (See also D6. 1.1 for an overview the related design concept). Functional Design Architecture Figure 2-44 shows the FunctionalDesignArchitecture. This model is focusing on base braking and does not include energy regeneration functionality. Figure 2-45 shows the period times of the included functions. Figure 2-46 (close-up) and Figure 2-47 (overall) shows timing constraints for end-to-end response requirements of the brake functionality. Figure 2-47 also show synchronization requirements and a brake-down of the end-to-end timing budget. Hardware Design Architecture Figure 2-48 shows an initial HardwareDesignArchitecture. Allocation Allocation on design level is represented in Figure 2-49, where function prototypes of the FunctionalDesignArchitecture are allocated to nodes in the HardwareDesignArchitecture.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Design Level

  • Service Level In the event that League InfoSight discovers or is notified by you of the existence of Non-Scheduled Downtime, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine the source of the problem and attempt to resolve it as quickly as possible.

  • Formal Level A. Level I: 1. Within five (5) work days of the oral response, if the grievance is not resolved, it shall be stated in writing on the "Academic Grievance" form as provided by the District (and shown as Exhibit "A" of this Agreement), signed by the grievant (or Federation Representative), and presented to his/her supervisor (or designee) at the xxxx level or above. 2. The supervisor or designee shall communicate his/her decision to the unit member in writing within five (5) days after receiving the grievance. 3. Within the above time limits, either the grievant (or Federation Representative) or the immediate supervisor (or designee) may request a personal conference with the other party. B. Level II: 1. In the event the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level I, he/she may appeal the decision on the appropriate form to the college/campus president, or his/her designee, within five (5) days. 2. This statement shall include a copy of the original grievance and a written copy of the decision rendered by the unit member's supervisor or designee. 3. The college/campus president, or his/her designee, shall communicate the decision to the grievant in writing within seven (7) days of receiving the appeal. Either the grievant (or Federation Representative) or the college/campus president (or his/her designee) may request a personal conference within the above time limits. C. Level III 1. If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level II, he/she may within five (5) days appeal the decision on the appropriate form to the Chancellor, or his/her designee. 2. This statement shall include copies of the original grievance and appeal and written copies of the decisions rendered. 3. The Chancellor, or his/her designee, shall communicate his/her decision in writing to the grievant within fifteen (15) days. D. Level IV--Advisory Arbitration 1. Within fifteen (15) work days after receipt of the decision of the Chancellor, the Federation may, upon written notice to the Associate Vice Chancellor, Human Resources, submit the grievance to arbitration under and in accordance with the prevailing rules of the California State Mediation and Conciliation Services. Only the Federation (exclusive representative) may demand arbitration.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Level II In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level I, the decision rendered may be appealed to the Superintendent of Schools, provided such an appeal is made in writing within ten (10) days after receipt of the decision in Level I. If a grievance is properly appealed to the Superintendent, the Superintendent or his/her designee shall meet regarding the grievance within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the appeal. Within ten (10) days after the meeting, the Superintendent or his/her designee shall issue a decision, in writing, to the parties involved.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!